Skip to main content
Log in

Is g-index better than h-index? An exploratory study at the individual level

Scientometrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The ability of g-index and h-index to discriminate between different types of scientists (low producers, big producers, selective scientists and top scientists) is analysed in the area of Natural Resources at the Spanish CSIC (WoS, 1994–2004). Our results show that these indicators clearly differentiate low producers and top scientists, but do not discriminate between selective scientists and big producers. However, g-index is more sensitive than h-index in the assessment of selective scientists, since this type of scientist shows in average a higher g-index/h-index ratio and a better position in g-index rankings than in the h-index ones. Current research suggests that these indexes do not substitute each other but that they are complementary.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ball, P. (2005), Index aims for fair ranking of scientists. Nature, 436 (7053): 900.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Batista, P. D., Campiteli, M. G., Kinouchi, O., Martinez, A. S. (2006), It is possible to compare researchers with different scientific interests? Scientometrics, 68 (1): 179–189.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bordons, M., Barrigon, S. (1992), Bibliometric analysis of publication of Spanish pharmacologists in the SCI (1984–1989). 2. Contribution to subfields other than pharmacology and pharmacy (ISI). Scientometrics, 25 (3): 425–446

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bornmann, L., Daniel, H.-D., (2005), Does the h-index for ranking of scientists really work? Scientometrics, 65 (3): 391–392.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Braun, T., Glänzel, W., Schubert, A. (2006), A Hirsch-type index for journals. Scienotmetrics, 69 (1): 169–173.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cole, J., Cole, S. (1973). Social Stratification in Science. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cole, S., Cole, J. R. (1967), Scientific output and recognition: a study in the operation of the reward system in science. American Sociological Review, 32 (3): 377–390.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Costas, R., Bordons, M. (2005), Bibliometric indicators at the micro-level: some results in the area of natural resources at the Spanish CSIC. Research Evaluation, 14 (2): 110–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Costas, R., Bordons, M. (2007), The h-index: advantages, limitations and its relation with other bibliometric indicators at the micro-level. Journal of Informetrics, 1 (3): 193–203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cronin, B., Meho, L. (2006), Using the h-index to rank influential information scientists. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 57 (9): 1275–1278.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Egghe, L. (2006), Theory and practise of the g-index. Scientometrics, 69 (1): 131–152.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Glanzel, W. (2006), On the h-index — A mathematical approach to a new measure of publication activity and citation impact. Scientometrics, 67 (2): 315–321.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hirsch, J. E. (2005), An index to quantify an individual’s scientific research output. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 102 (46): 16569–16572.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jin, B., Liang, L., Rousseau, R., Egghe, L. (2007), The R-and AR-indices: Complementing the h-index. Chinese Science Bulletin, 52 (6): 855–863.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kelly, C. D., Jennions, M. D. (2006), The h-index and career assessment by numbers. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 21 (4): 167–170.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewison, G., Cottrell, R., Dixon, D. (1999), Bibliometric indicators to assist the peer review process in grant decisions. Research Evaluation, 8 (1): 47–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martin, B. R. (1996), The use of multiple indicators in the assessment of basic research. Scientometrics, 36 (3): 343–362.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moed, H. F. (2000), Bibliometric indicators reflect publication and management strategies. Scientometrics, 47 (2): 323–346.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moed, H. F. (2005), Hirsch-index is a creative and appealing construct but be cautious when using it to evaluate individual scholars. http://www.cwts.nl/moed/Comments_on_Hirsch_Index_2005_12_16.pdf. Accessed 23/6/2006.

  • Oppenheim, C. (2007), Using h-index to rank influential British researchers in information science and librarianship. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 58 (2): 297–301.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saad, G. (2006), Exploring the h-index at the author and journal levels using bibliometric data of productive consumer scholar and business-related journals respectively. Scientometrics, 69 (1): 117–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schubert, A., Braun, T. (1986), Relative indicators and relational charts for comparative assessment of publication output and citation impact. Scientometrics, 6 (5–6): 281–291.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sidiropoulos, A., Katsaros, D., Manolopoulos, Y. (2007), Generalized h-index for disclosing latent facts in citation networks. Scientometrics 72 (2): 253–280.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Leeuwen, T. N., Visser, M. S., Moed, H. F., Nederhor, T. J., van Raan, A. F. J. (2003), The Holy Grail of science policy: Exploring and combining bibliometric tools in search of scientific excellence. Scientometrics, 57 (2): 257–280.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Raan, A. F. J. (2006), Comparisons of the Hirsch-index with standard bibliometric indicators and with peer judment for 147 chemistry research groups. Scientometrics, 67 (3): 491–502.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vinkler, P. (2007), Eminence of scientists in the light of h-index and other scientometric indicators. Journal of Information Science, 33 (4): 481–491.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Weingart, P. (2005), Impact of bibliometrics upon the science system: inadverted consequences? Scientometrics, 62 (1): 117–131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rodrigo Costas.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Costas, R., Bordons, M. Is g-index better than h-index? An exploratory study at the individual level. Scientometrics 77, 267–288 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-007-1997-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-007-1997-0

Keywords

Navigation