Abstract
Energy is a central topic in physics and a key concept for understanding the physical, biological and technological worlds. It is a complex topic with multiple connections with different areas of science and with social, environmental and philosophical issues. In this paper we discuss some aspects of the teaching and learning of the energy concept, and report results of research on this issue. To immerse science teaching into the context of scientific culture and of the students’ cultural world, we propose to select specific driving issues that promote motivation for the construction of science concepts and models. We describe the design and evaluation of a teaching learning path developed around the issue of greenhouse effect and global warming. The experimentation with high school students has shown that the approach based on driving issues promotes students’ engagement toward a deeper understanding of the topic and favours further insight. The evolution of students’ answers indicates a progressively more correct and appropriate use of the concepts of heat, radiation, temperature, internal energy, a distinction between thermal equilibrium and stationary non equilibrium conditions, and a better understanding of greenhouse effect. Based on the results of the experimentation and in collaboration with the teachers involved, new materials for the students have been prepared and a new cycle of implementation, evaluation and refinement has been activated with a larger group of teachers and students. This type of systematic and long term collaboration with teachers can help to fill the gap between the science education research and the actual school practice.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
As an example: “In this process… two electrons become pure energy because they annihilate with positrons (anti-electrons)… As a spirit animating what exists around us, energy is in everything, sometimes tangible as the Sun light, sometimes hidden in remote corner of reality… All bodies producing a field are subjected to its action, thus all bodies, being no more than energy lumps, interact gravitationally the one with the other” (translated by the authors from De Felice F. (2000), pp. 13, 23, 24).
The term was coined by Z. Rant in 1956, resuming some ideas introduced by Gibbs.
We used the GLX data loggers by PASCO. We also used the metal cylinders, the metal bottles and the plastic box provided by PASCO for the experiments described in the following.
References
Andersson, B., & Kärrqvist, C. (1983). How Swedish pupils, aged 12–15 years, understand light and its properties. European Journal of Science Education, 5(4), 387–402.
Andersson, B., & Wallin, A. (2000). Students’ understanding of the greenhouse effect, the societal consequences of reducing CO2 emissions and problem of ozone layer depletion. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37(10), 1096–1111.
Arnold, M., & Millar, R. (1996). Learning the scientific story: A case study in the teaching and learning of elementary thermodynamics. Science Education, 80(3), 249–281.
Baierlein, R. (1999). Thermal physics. Cambridge: Cambridge University press.
Baracca, A., & Besson, U. (1990). Introduzione storica al concetto di energia. Firenze: Le Monnier.
Besson, U. (2003). The distinction between heat and work: An approach based on a classical mechanical model. European Journal of Physics, 24, 245–252.
Besson, U. (2009). Paradoxes of thermal radiation. European Journal of Physics, 30, 995–1007.
Besson, U. (2012). The history of cooling law: When the search for simplicity can be an obstacle. Science & Education, 21(8), 1085–1110.
Besson, U., De Ambrosis, A., & Mascheretti, P. (2010a). Studying the physical basis of global warming: Thermal effects of the interaction between radiation and matter and greenhouse effect. European Journal of Physics, 31, 375–388.
Besson, U., Borghi, L., De Ambrosis, A., & Mascheretti, P. (2010b). A three-dimensional approach and open source structure for the design and experimentation of teaching learning sequences: The case of friction. International Journal of Science Education, 32, 1289–1313.
Bevilacqua, F., & Falomo, L. (2010). Energia questa trasformista—Laboratorio storico interattivo. Pavia: La Goliardica Pavese.
Blumenfeld, P. C., Soloway, E., Marx, R. W., Krajcik, J. S., Guzdial, M., & Palincsar, A. (1991). Motivating project-based learning: Sustaining the doing, supporting the learning. Educational Psychologist, 26(3), 369–398.
Boyes, E., & Stanisstreet, M. (1993). The greenhouse effect: Children’s perception of causes, consequences and cures. International Journal of Science Education, 15, 531–552.
Chauvet, F. (1996). Teaching colour: Designing and evaluation of a sequence. European Journal of Teacher Education, 19(2), 119–134.
Coelho, L. R. (2009). On the concept of energy: How understanding its history can improve physics teaching. Science & Education, 18, 961–983.
Cordero, E., Todd, A. M., & Abellera, D. (2008). Climate change education and the ecological footprint. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, 89(6), 865–872.
Cotignola, M. I., Bordogna, C., Punte, G., & Cappannini, O. M. (2002). Difficulties in learning thermodynamic concepts: Are they linked to the historical development of this field? Science & Education, 11, 279–291.
De Ambrosis, A., & Levrini, O. (2010). An empirical study for reconstructing the appropriation path in the case of special relativity. Physical Review Special Topics-Physics Education Research, 6(020107), 1–11.
de Berg, K. C. (2008). The concepts of heat and temperature: The problem of determining the content for the construction of an historical case study which is sensitive to nature of science issues and teaching-learning issues. Science & Education, 17, 75–114.
De Felice, F. (2000). Gli incerti confini del cosmo. Milano: Bruno Mondadori Editore.
Domenech, J. L., Gil-Perez, D., Gras-Martì, A. G., Guisasola, J., Martinez-Torregrosa, J., Salinas, J., et al. (2007). Teaching of energy issues: A debate proposal for a global reorientation. Science & Education, 16, 43–64.
Duit, R. (1986). In search of an energy concept. In R. Driver & R. Millar (Eds.), Energy matters (pp. 67–101). Leeds: University of Leeds.
Edelson, D., Gordin, D., & Pea, R. (1999). Addressing the challenges of inquiry-based learning through technology and curriculum design. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 8(3), 391–450.
Erickson, G., & Tiberghien, A. (1985). Heat and temperature. In R. Driver, E. Guesne, & A. Tiberghien (Eds.), Children’s ideas in science (pp. 52–84). Philadelphia: Open University Press.
Goldring, H., & Osborne, J. (1994). Students’ difficulties with energy and related concepts. Physics Education, 29, 26–31.
Groves, F., & Pugh, A. (1999). Elementary pre-service teacher perception of the greenhouse effect. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 8, 75–81.
Guesne, E. (1985). Light. In R. Driver, E. Guesne, & A. Tiberghien (Eds.), Children’s ideas in science (pp. 10–32). Philadelphia: Open University Press.
Hecht, E. (2007). Energy and change. Physics Teacher, 45, 88–92.
Helmholtz, H. (1847). Über die Erhaltung der Kraft (On the Conservation of Force). Berlin: G. Reimer.
Hicks, N. (1983). Energy is the capacity to do work—or is it? Physics Teacher, 21, 529–530.
Hirn, C., & Viennot, L. (2000). Transformation of didactic intention by teachers: The case of geometrical optics in grade 8 in France. International Journal of Science Education, 22(4), 357–384.
IPCC Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. (2007). Fourth Assessment Report (AR4). http://www.ipcc.ch/index.htm.
Kaminski, W. (1989). Conceptions des enfants et des autres sur la lumière. Le BUP, 716, 973–996.
Kilinc, A., Stanisstreet, M., & Boyes, E. (2008). Turkish students’ ideas about global warming. International Journal of Environmental & Science Education, 3(2), 89–98.
Koulaidis, V., & Christidou, V. (1999). Models of students’ thinking concerning the greenhouse effect and teaching implications. Science Education, 83, 559–576.
Krajcik, J., Blumenfeld, P., Marx, R., Bass, K., Fredricks, J., & Soloway, E. (1998). Inquiry in project-based science classrooms: Initial attempts by middle school students. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 7(3), 313–350.
Lee, H. S., & Liu, O. L. (2010). Assessing learning progression of energy concepts across middle school grades: The knowledge integration perspective. Science Education, 94, 665–688.
Lehrman, R. L. (1973). Energy is not the ability to do work. Physics Teacher, 11, 15–18.
Lester, B. T., Li, Ma., Lee, O., & Lambert, J. (2006). Social activism in elementary science education: A science, technology and society approach to teach global warming. International Journal of Science Education, 28, 315–339.
Lijnse, P. L., Eijkelhof, H., Klaassen, C., & Scholte, R. (1990). Pupils’ and mass-media ideas about radioactivity. International Journal of Science Education, 12, 67–78.
Loverude, M. E., Kautz, C. H., & Heron, P. R. L. (2002). Student understanding of the first law of thermodynamics: Relating work to the adiabatic compression of an ideal gas. American Journal of Physics, 70, 137–148.
Maxwell J. C. (1871, 10th ed. 1891). Theory of heat. London: Longmans, Green & Co, reprint 1902.
Meadows, G., & Wiesenmayer, R. (1999). Identifying and addressing students’ alternative conceptions of the global warming: the need for cognitive conflict. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 8, 235–239.
Meltzer, E. D. (2004). Investigation of students’ reasoning regarding heat, work, and the first law of thermodynamics in an introductory calculus-based general physics course. American Journal of Physics, 72, 1432–1446.
Millar, R. (1994). School students’ understanding of key ideas about radioactivity and ionizing radiation. Public Understanding of Science, 3(1), 53–70.
Ogborn, J. (1986). Energy and fuel: The meaning of the ‘go of things’. School Science Review, 242, 30–35.
Onorato, P., Mascheretti, P., & De Ambrosis, A. (2011). ‘Home made’ model to study the greenhouse effect and global warming. European Journal of Physics, 32, 363–376.
Osterlind, K. (2005). Concept formation in environmental education: 14-year olds’ work on the intensified greenhouse effect and the depletion of the ozone layer. International Journal of Science Education, 27, 891–908.
Papadimitriou, V. (2004). Prospective primary teachers’ understanding of climate change, greenhouse effect, and ozone layer depletion. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 13, 299–307.
Papadouris, N., & Constantinou, C. P. (2011). A philosophically informed teaching proposal on the topic of energy for students aged 11–14. Science & Education, 20(10), 961–979.
Pinto, R. (2005). Introducing curriculum innovations in science: Identifying teachers’ transformations and the design of related teacher education. Science Education, 89, 1–12.
Rant, Z. (1956). Exergie, ein neues Wort für “Technische Arbeitsfähigkeit” (Exergy, a new word for “technical available work”). Forschung auf dem Gebiete des Ingenieurwesens, 22, 36–37.
Redfors, A. (2001). University physics students’ use of models in explanations of phenomena involving interaction between metals and electromagnetic radiation. International Journal of Science Education, 23, 1283–1301.
Rego, F., & Peralta, L. (2006). Portuguese students’ knowledge of radiation physics. Physics Education, 41, 259–262.
Reiser, B. J. (2004). Scaffolding complex learning: The mechanisms of structuring and problematizing student work. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 13(3), 273–304.
Reiser, B. J., Tabak, I., Sandoval, W. A., Smith, B. K., Steinmuller, F., & Leone, A. J. (2001). BGuILE: Strategic and conceptual scaffolds for scientific inquiry in biology classrooms. In S. M. Carver & D. Klahr (Eds.), Cognition and instruction: Twenty-five years of progress (pp. 263–305). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Romer, R. H. (2001). Heat is not a noun. American Journal of Physics, 69, 107–109.
Rozier, S., & Viennot, L. (1991). Students’ reasoning in thermodynamics. International Journal of Science Education, 13, 159–170.
Rye, J. A., Rubba, P. A., & Wiesenmayer, R. L. (1997). An investigation of middle school students’ alternative conception of global warming. International Journal of Science Education, 19, 527–551.
Sandoval, W., & Reiser, B. (2004). Explanation-driven inquiry: Integrating conceptual and epistemic scaffolds for scientific inquiry. Science Education, 88(3), 345–372.
Shayer, M., & Wylam, H. (1981). The development of the concepts of heat and temperature in 10–13 years-olds. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 5, 419–434.
Solbes, J., Guisasola, J., & Tarin, F. (2009). Teaching energy conservation as a unifying principle in physics. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 18(3), 265–274.
Solomon, J. (1983). Learning about energy: How pupils think in two domains. European Journal of Science Education, 5, 49–59.
Stavy, R., & Berkovitz, B. (1980). Cognitive conflict as a basis for teaching quantitative aspects of the concept of temperature. Science Education, 64(5), 679–692.
Svihla, V., & Linn, M. C. (2012). A design-based approach to fostering understanding of global climate change. International Journal of Science Education, 34(5), 651–676.
Trenberth, K. E., Fasullo, J. T., & Kiehl, J. (2009). Earth’s global energy budget. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, 90, 311–323.
Viennot, L. (2001). Reasoning in physics, the part of common sense. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Viglietta, L. (1990). Efficiency in the teaching of energy. Physics Education, 25, 317–321.
Watts, D. M. (1983). Some alternative views of energy. Physics Education, 18, 213–217.
Zemanski, M. W. (1957). Heat and thermodynamics. New York: McGraw-Hill Book Company.
Acknowledgments
We would like to thank all the students and teachers who participated in this work. Research was partly supported by the National Project Piano Lauree Scientifiche (Degrees in Science Project) funded by the Italian Ministry of Education.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Besson, U., De Ambrosis, A. Teaching Energy Concepts by Working on Themes of Cultural and Environmental Value. Sci & Educ 23, 1309–1338 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-013-9592-7
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-013-9592-7