Skip to main content
Log in

Science Curriculum Components Favored by Taiwanese Biology Teachers

  • Published:
Research in Science Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The new 1–9 curriculum framework in Taiwan provides a remarkable change from previous frameworks in terms of the coverage of content and the powers of teachers. This study employs a modified repertory grid technique to investigate biology teachers' preferences with regard to six curriculum components. One hundred and eighty-five in-service and pre-service biology teachers were asked to determine which science curriculum components they liked and disliked most of all to include in their biology classes. The data show that the rank order of these science curriculum components, from top to bottom, was as follows: application of science, manipulation skills, scientific concepts, social/ethical issues, problem-solving skills, and the history of science. They also showed that pre-service biology teachers, as compared with in-service biology teachers, favored problem-solving skills significantly more than manipulative skills, while in-service biology teachers, as compared with pre-service biology teachers, favored manipulative skills significantly more than problem-solving skills. Some recommendations for ensuring the successful implementation of the Taiwanese 1–9 curriculum framework are also proposed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abd-Ei-Khalick, F., & Lederman, N. G. (2000). The influence of history of science courses on students' views of nature of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37(10), 1057–1095.

    Google Scholar 

  • Allchin, D. (1999). Values in science: An educational perspective. Science Education, 8(1), 1–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Apple, M. (1979). Ideology and curriculum. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Black, P. (1996). Curriculum change: Dream or nightmare? Education in Science, 9 (June), 8–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cobern, W. W. (1998). Science and a social constructivist view of science education. In W. W. Cobern (Ed.), Socio-cultural perspectives on science education: An international dialogue. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cronin-Jones, (1991). Science teacher beliefs and their influence on curriculum implementation: Two case studies. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 28(3), 235–250.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cuban, L. (1995). The hidden variable: How organizations influence teacher responses to secondary science curriculum reform. Theory into Practice, 34(1), 4–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DeBoer, G. E. (1991). A history of ideas in science education: Implications for practice. New York: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duffee, L., & Aikenhead, G. (1992). Curriculum change, student evaluation, and teacher practical knowledge. Science Education, 76(5), 493–506.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duschl, R. A. (1990). Restructuring science education. New York: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisner, E. W., & Vallance, E. (Eds.). (1974). Conflicting conceptions of curriculum. Berkeley, CA: McCutchan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fensham, P. (1988). Familiar but different: Some dilemmas and new direction in science education. In P. Fensham (Ed.), Development and dilemmas in science education. London: The Falmer Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fullan, M. (1982). The meaning of educational change. Toronto, Canada: OISE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gallard, A. J., & Gallagher, J. J. (1994). A case study of a national science curriculum and teacher conflict. International Journal of Science Education, 16(6), 639–648.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hacker, R. G., & Rowe, M. R. (1997). The impact of a national curriculum development of teaching and learning behavior. International Journal of Science Education, 19(9), 997–1004.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hodson, D. (1987). Social control as a factor in science curriculum change. International Journal of Science Education, 9(5), 529–540.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hodson, D. (1988). Toward a philosophically more valid science curriculum. Science Education, 72(1), 19–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hurd, P. D. (1970). New directions in teaching secondary school science. Chicago: Rand McNally.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelly, G. A. (1955). The psychology of personal construct xxxx. New York: Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klopfer, L. E. (1969). The teaching of science and the history of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 6, 87–95.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lakin, S., & Wellington, F. (1994). Who will teach the ‘nature of science’?: Teachers' views of science and their implications for science education. International Journal of Science Education, 16(2), 175–190.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lin, C. Y. (1998). A case study of teacher's views of science. Chinese Journal of Science Education, 6(2), 113–128 (in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lin, H.-S., & Chen, C.-C. (2002). Using the history of science to promote students' problem-solving ability. International Journal of Science Education, 24(5), 453–464.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matthews, M. R. (1994). Science teaching: The role of history and philosophy of science. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of Education. (1956). Standards of secondary curriculum (for Junior High Schools) (in Chinese). Taipei, Taiwan: Cheng Chung Book Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of Education. (1972). Standards of secondary curriculum (for Junior High Schools) (in Chinese). Taipei, Taiwan: Cheng Chung Book Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of Education. (1983). Standards of secondary curriculum (for Junior High Schools) (in Chinese). Taipei, Taiwan: Cheng Chung Book Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of Education. (2001). Structure of elementary and secondary education (for Elementary and Junior High Schools) (in Chinese). Taipei, Taiwan: Ministry of Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Monk, M., & Osborne, J. (1997). Placing the history and philosophy of science on the curriculum: A model for development of the pedagogy. Science Education, 81, 405–424.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Munby, H. (1982). The place of teachers' beliefs in research on teacher thinking and decision making, and an alternative methodology. Instructional Science, 11, 201–225.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • National Research Council. (1996). National Science Education Standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olson, J. (1981). Teacher influence in the classroom: A context for understanding curriculum translation. Instructional Science, 10, 259–275.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Poole, M. (1995). Beliefs and values in science education. Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pope, M. L., & Keen, T. R. (1981). Personal construct psychology and education. London: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, D. A. (1982). Developing the concept of “curriculum emphasis” in science education. Science Education, 66(2), 243–260.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, D. A. (1988). What counts in science education? In P. Fensham (Ed.), Development and dilemmas in science education. New York: Falmer Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, D. A. (1998). Analyzing school science courses: The concept of companion meaning. In R. A. Roberts & L. Ostman (Eds.), Problems of meaning in science curriculum. New York: Teacher College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rutherford, J. F. (1964). The role of inquiry in science teaching. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 2(2), 80–84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tamir, P. (1988). The relationship between cognitive preferences, student background and achievement in science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 25(3), 201–216.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tobin, K., & McRobbie, C. (1996). Cultural myths as constraints to the enacted science curriculum. Science Education, 80(2), 223–241.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tobin, K., & McRobbie, C. (1997). Belief about nature of science and the enacted science curriculum. Science and Education, 6, 355–377.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wandersee, J. H. (1992). The historicality of cognition: Implications for science education research. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 29(4), 423–434.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, H., & Marsh, D. D. (2002). Science instruction with a humanistic twist: Teacher' perception and practice in using history of science in their classrooms. Science and Education, 11(2), 169–189.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chen-Yung Lin.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lin, CY., Hu, R. & Changlai, ML. Science Curriculum Components Favored by Taiwanese Biology Teachers. Res Sci Educ 35, 269–280 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-004-7038-6

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-004-7038-6

Keywords

Navigation