Skip to main content
Log in

A Spatial Autocorrelation Approach for Examining the Effects of Urban Greenspace on Residential Property Values

  • Published:
The Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper presents spatially explicit analyses of the greenspace contribution to residential property values in a hedonic model. The paper utilizes data from the housing market near downtown Los Angeles. We first used a standard hedonic model to estimate greenspace effects. Because the residuals were spatially autocorrelated, we implemented a spatial lag model as indicated by specification tests. Our results show that neighborhood greenspace at the immediate vicinity of houses has a significant impact on house prices even after controlling for spatial autocorrelation. The different estimation results from non-spatial and spatial models provide useful bounds for the greenspace effect. Greening of inner city areas may provide a valuable policy instrument for elevating depressed housing markets in those areas.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Delinquent tax properties could be an opportunity for open space, but municipalities such as city of Los Angeles historically have been reluctant to do so (Harnik 2000).

  2. Although studies on park impacts date back as early as 1939 (Herrick 1939 as cited in Crompton 2004), the analysis then was limited to data availability and computation capability.

  3. The vacant lot value is based on the transaction data of this neighborhood in 2000. The improvement cost is based on 2006 data for a 0.32 acre pocket park construction project in Los Angeles County.

References

  • Acharya, G., Bennett, L. L. (2001). Valuing open space and land-use patterns in urban watersheds. Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, 22, 221–237.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • AkbariH., Pomerantz, M., Taha, H. (2001). Cool surfaces and shade trees to reduce energy use and improve air quality in urban areas. Solar Energy, 70, 295–310.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, L. M., Cordell, H. K. (1985). Residential property values improved by landscaping with trees. Southern Journal of Applied Forestry, 9, 162–166.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, L. M., Cordell, H. K. (1988). Influence of trees on residential property values in Athens, Georgia (USA): a survey based on actual sales prices. Landscape and Urban Planning, 12, 153–164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, S. T., West, S. E. (2006). Open space, residential property values, and spatial context. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 36, 773–789.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anselin, L. (1988a). Spatial econometrics: Methods and models. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer Aceademic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anselin, L. (1988b). Lagrange Multiplier test diagnostics for spatial dependence and spatial heterogeneity. Geographical Analysis, 20, 1–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anselin, L. (2001). Rao’s score test in spatial econometrics. Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference, 97, 113–139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anselin L., Rey, S. J. (1991). Properties of tests for spatial dependence in linear regression models. Geographical Analysis, 23, 110–131.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anselin, L., Bera, A. K., Florax, R. J. G., Yoon, M. J. (1996). Simple diagnostic tests for spatial dependence. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 26, 77–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bailey, T. C., Gatrell, A. C. (1995). Interactive spatial data analysis. Harlow Essex, England: Pearson Education Limited.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bastian, C. T., McLeod, D. M., Germino, M. J., Reiners, W. A., Blasko, B. J. (2002). Environmental amenities and agricultural land values: a hedonic model using geographic information systems data. Ecological Economics, 40, 337–349.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Basu, S., Thibodeau, T. G. (1998). Analysis of spatial autocorrelation in house prices. Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, 17, 61–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bell, K. P., Bockstael, N. E. (2000). Applying the generalized-moments estimation approach to spatial problems involving microlevel data. Review of Economics and Statistics, 82, 72–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bera, A. K., Yoon, M. (1993). Specification testing with locally misspecified alternatives. Econometric Theory, 9, 649–658.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beron, K. J., Hanson, Y., Murdoch, J. C., Thayer, M. A. (2004). Hedonic price function and spatial dependence: Implications for the demand for urban air quality. In L. Anselin, R. J. G. M. Florax, S. J. Rey (Eds.), Advances in spatial econometrics: Methodology, tools and application (pp. 267–281). Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bin, O., & Polasky, S. (2003). Valuing inland and coastal wetlands in a rural setting using parametric and semi-parametric hedonic models. Department of Economics, East Carolina University. http://www.ecu.edu/econ/wp/03/ecu0305.pdf. Accessed March 15, 2008.

  • Blomquist, G., Worley, L. (1981). Hedonic prices, demand for urban housing amenities, and benefit estimates. Journal of Urban Economics, 9, 212–221.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bockstael, N., Bell, K. (1998). Land-use patterns and water quality: The effect of differential land management controls. In R. Just, S. Netanyahu (Eds.), Conflict and cooperation on trans-boundary water resources (pp. 169–192). Boston, MA: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Can, A. (1990). The measurement of neighborhood dynamics in urban house prices. Economic Geography, 66, 254–272.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Can, A. (1992). Specification and estimation of hedonic housing price models. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 22, 453–474.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cliff, A., Ord, J. (1973). Spatial autocorrelation. London: Pion.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crompton, J. L. (2001). The impact of parks on property values: a review of the empirical evidence. Journal of Leisure Research, 33, 1–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crompton, J. L. (2004). The proximate principle: The impact of parks and open space on property values and the property tax base. Ashburn, Virginia: National Recreation and Park Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Des Rosiers, F., Thériault, M., Kestens, Y., Villeneuve, P. (2002). Landscaping and house values: an empirical investigation. Journal of Real Estate Research, 23, 139–161.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diamond, N. K., Standiford, R. B., Passof, P. C., LeBlanc, J. (1987). Oak trees have varied effect on land values. California Agriculture, 41, 4–6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dombrow, J., Rodriguez, M., Sirmans, C. F. (2000). The market value of mature trees in single-family housing markets. The Appraisal Journal, 68, 39–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dubin, R. A., Sung, C. H. (1990). Specification of hedonic regressions: non-nested tests on measures of neighborhood quality. Journal of Urban Economics, 27, 97–110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dwyer, J. F., McPherson, E. G., Schroeder, H. W., Rowntree, R. W. (1992). Assessing benefits and costs of the urban forest. Journal of Arboriculture, 18, 227–234.

    Google Scholar 

  • Florax, R. J. G. M., de Graaff, T. (2004). The performance of diagnostic tests for spatial dependence in linear regression models: A meta-analysis of simulation studies. In L. Anselin, R. J. G. M. Florax, S. J. Rey (Eds.), Advances in spatial econometrics: Methodology, tools, and applications (pp. 29–65). Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gabriel, S., Wolch, J. (1984). Spillover effects of human service facilities in a racially segmented housing market. Journal of Urban Economics, 111, –12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gawande, K., Jenkins-Smith, H. (2001). Nuclear waste transport and residential property values: estimating the effects of perceived risks. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 42, 207–233.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gelfand, A. E., Ecker, M. D., Knight, J. R., Sirmans, C. F. (2004). The dynamics of location in home price. Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, 29, 149–166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geoghegan, J. (2002). The value of open space in residential land use. Land Use Policy, 19, 91–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geoghegan, J., Wainger, L. A., Bockstael, N. E. (1997). Spatial landscape indices in a hedonic framework: an ecological economics analysis using GIS. Ecological Economics, 232, 51–264.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geoghegan, J., Lynch, L., Bucholtz, S. (2003). Capitalization of open space into housing values and the residential property tax revenue impacts of agricultural easement programs. Agricultural and Resource Economics Review, 32, 33–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gordon-Larsen, P., McMurray, R. G., Popkin, B. M. (2000). Determinants of adolescent physical activity and inactivity patterns. Pediatrics, 105, 83–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harnik, P. (2000). Inside city parks. Washington, D. C.: Trust for Public Land and the Urban Land Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herrick, C. (1939). The effects of parks upon land real estate values. The Planning Journal, 5, 89–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Irwin, E. G., Bockstael, N. E. (2001). The problem of identifying land use spillovers: measuring the effects of open space on residential property values. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 83, 698–704.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jim, C., Chen, W. Y. (2006). Impacts of urban environmental elements on residential housing prices in Guangzhou (China). Landscape and Urban Planning, 78, 422–434.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaufman, D. A., Cloutier, N. R. (2006). The impact of small brownfields and greenspaces on residential property values. Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, 33, 19–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kestens, Y., Thériault, M., Des Rosiers, F. (2004). The impact of surrounding land use and vegetation on single-family house prices. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 31, 539–567.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, C. W., Philipps, T. T., Anselin, L. (2003). Measuring the benefits of air quality improvement: a spatial hedonic approach. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 45, 24–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leggett, C. G., Bockstael, N. E. (2000). Evidence of the effects of water quality on residential land prices. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 39, 121–144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, M. M., Brown, H. J. (1980). Micro-neighborhood externalities and hedonic housing prices. Land Economics, 56, 125–141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lindsey, G., Man, J., Payton, S., Dickson, K. (2004). Property values, recreation values and urban greenways. Journal of Parks and Recreation Administration, 22, 69–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Longcore, T., Li, C., & Wilson, J. (2003). Nature’s services in a dense urban neighborhood. Working Paper. University of Southern California, Center for Sustainable Cities.

  • Longcore, T., Li, C. Q., & Wilson, J. P. (2004). Application of CITYgreen urban ecosystem analysis software to a densely built urban neighborhood. Urban Geography, 25, 173–186.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luley, C. J. (1998). The greening of urban air. Forum for Applied Research and Public Policy, 13, 33–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luttik, J. (2000). The value of trees, water and open space as reflected by house prices in the Netherlands. Landscape and Urban Planning, 48, 161–167.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lutzenhiser, M., Netusil, N. R. (2001). The effect of open space on a home’s sale price. Contemporary Economic Policy, 19, 291–298.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mahan, B. L., Polasky, S., Adams, R. M. (2000) Valuing urban wetlands: a property pricing approach. Land Economics, 76, 100–113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McPherson, E. G. (1992). Accounting for benefits and costs of urban greenspace. Landscape and Urban Planning, 22, 41–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miron, J. (1984). Spatial autocorrelation in regression analysis: A beginner’s guide. In G. L. Gaile, C. J. Willmott (Eds.), Spatial statistics and models (pp. 201–222). Boston: D. Reidel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morales, D., Micha, F. R., Weber, R. C. (1983). Two methods of evaluating trees on residential site. Journal of Arboriculture, 9, 21–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morancho, A. B. (2003). A hedonic valuation of urban green areas. Landscape and Urban Planning, 66, 35–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nicholls, S. (2002). Does open space pay? Measuring the impacts of green spaces on property values and the property tax base Ph.D. dissertation. College Station, Texas: Department of Recreation, Park and Tourism Sciences.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nicholls, S. (2004). Measuring the impacts of parks on property values. Parks & Recreation Magazine, March.

  • Nowak, D. J., Civerolo, K. L., Rao, S. T., Sistla, G., Luley, C. J., Crane, D. E. (2000). A modeling study of the impact of urban trees on ozone. Atmospheric Environment, 34, 1601–1613.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Odland, J. (1988). Spatial autocorrelation. Newbury Park, California: SAGE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Orford, S. (2002). Valuing locational externalities: a GIS and multilevel modeling approach. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 29, 105–127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pace, R. K., Gilley, O. W. (1997). Using the spatial configuration of the data to improve estimation. Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, 14, 333–340.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pace, R. K., Barry, R. F., Clapp, J. M., Rodriquez, M. (1998). Spatiotemporal autoregressive models of neighborhood effects. Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, 17, 15–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paterson, R. W., Boyle, K. J. (2002). Out of sight, out of mind? Using GIS to incorporate visibility in hedonic property value models. Land Economics, 78, 417–425.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Patton, M., McErlean, S. (2003). Spatial effects within the agricultural land market in northern Ireland. Journal of Agricultural Economics, 54, 35–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pogodzinski, J. M., Sass, T. R. (1991). Measuring the effects of municipal zoning regulations: a survey. Urban Studies, 28, 597–621.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ready, R., & Abdalla, C. (2003). The Impact of open space and potential local disamenities on residential property values in Berks County, Pennsylvania. University Park, PA: Department of Agricultural Economics and Rural Sociology, Pennsylvania State University. http://landuse.aers.psu.edu/study/BerksLandUseShort.pdf. Accessed March 15, 2008.

  • Ridker, R. G., Henning, J. A. (1967). The determinants of residential property values with special reference to air pollution. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 49, 246–257.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosen, S. (1974). Hedonic price and implicit markets: product differentiation in pure competition. Journal of Political Economy, 82, 34–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scott, K. I., Simpson, J. R., McPherson, E. G. (1999). Effects of tree cover on parking lot microclimate and vehicle emissions. Journal of Arboriculture, 25, 129–142.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shultz, S. D., King, D. A. (2001). The use of census data for hedonic price estimates of open space amenities and land use. Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, 22, 239–252.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Standiford, R. B., Vreeland, J., & Tietje, B. (2001). California’s hardwood rangelands: Production and conservation values. Berkley, California: University of California Integrated Hardwood Range Management Program, UC Berkley. http://danr.ucop.edu/ihrmp/oak89.htm. Accessed March 15, 2008.

  • Theebe, M. A. J. (2004). Planes, trains, and automobiles: the impact of traffic noise on house prices. Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, 28, 209–234.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Troy, A., Grove, J. M. (2008). Property values, parks, and crime: a hedonic analysis in Baltimore, MD. Landscape and Urban Planning, 87, 233–245.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tyrväinen, L. (1997). The amenity value of the urban forest: an application of the hedonic price method. Landscape and Urban Planning, 37, 211–222.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tyrväinen, L., Miettinen, A. (2000). Property prices and urban forest amenities. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 39, 205–223.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Voicu, I., Been, V. (2008). The effect of community gardens on neighboring property values. Real Estate Economics, 36, 241–283.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wolch, J., Gabriel, S. (1981). Local land development policies and urban housing prices. Environment and Planning A, 13, 1253–1276.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wolch, J., Wilson, J., & Fehrenbach, J. (2002). Parks and park funding in Los Angeles: An equity mapping analysis. Los Angeles, CA: University of Southern California Center for Sustainable Cities. http://www.usc.edu/dept/geography/ESPE/documents/publications_parks.pdf#. Accessed March 15, 2008.

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank the anonymous reviewers for their comments that helped improve the paper. All omissions or errors remain our own.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Christina Q. Li.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Conway, D., Li, C.Q., Wolch, J. et al. A Spatial Autocorrelation Approach for Examining the Effects of Urban Greenspace on Residential Property Values. J Real Estate Finan Econ 41, 150–169 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11146-008-9159-6

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11146-008-9159-6

Keywords

Navigation