Skip to main content
Log in

Etiology of reading difficulties as a function of gender and severity

  • Published:
Reading and Writing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

To test the hypothesis that the etiology of reading difficulties may differ for males and females in more severely impaired samples, reading performance data from monozygotic (MZ), same-sex dizygotic (DZss), and opposite-sex dizygotic (DZos) twin pairs were analyzed using a model-fitting implementation of the DeFries-Fulker (DF) model (Purcell & Sham, 2003, Behavior genetics, 33, 271–278). Five non-independent samples were selected using cut-offs of −1 (N = 737 pairs), −1.5 (N = 654), −2 (N = 468), −2.5 (N = 335), and −3 (N = 198) standard deviations (s) below the mean composite reading score of control twins. Male/female gender ratios for children with reading difficulties were significantly higher than 1.0 for all five samples and increased as a function of severity (viz., 1.15, 1.17, 1.40, 1.61, and 1.88, respectively). When the DF model was fit to the data, estimates of heritability (h 2g ) and shared environmental influences (c 2g ) were not significantly different for males and females in any of the groups. Consequently, the most parsimonious model that provided a good fit to the data at all five levels of severity equated the heritabilities and shared environmental influences for males and females, and fixed the DZos coefficient of genetic relatedness at 0.5. Thus, these results provide no evidence for a differential etiology of reading difficulties as a function of gender in more severely impaired samples, and suggest that the same genetic and environmental influences contribute to reading difficulties in males and females, irrespective of severity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • DeFries J. C. (1985). Colorado reading project In: D. B. Gray, J. F. Kavanagh (eds) Biobehavioral measures of dyslexia Parkton, MD York Press pp. 107–122

    Google Scholar 

  • DeFries J. C., Filipek P. A., Fulker D. W., Olson R. K., Pennington B. F., Smith S. D., Wise B. W. (1997). Colorado learning disabilities research center Learning Disabilities: A Multidisciplinary Journal 8:7–19

    Google Scholar 

  • DeFries J. C., Fulker D. W. (1985). Multiple regression analysis of twin data Behavior Genetics 15:467–473

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • DeFries J. C., Fulker D. W. (1988). Multiple regression analysis of twin data: Etiology of deviant scores versus individual differences Acta Geneticae Medicae et Gemellologiae 37:205–216

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • DeFries J. C., Gillis J. J. (1993). Genetics of reading disabilities In: R. Plomin, G. E. McClearn (eds) Nature, nurture and psychology Washington, D.C. American Psychological Association pp. 121–145

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • DeFries J. C., Olson R. K., Pennington B. F., Smith S. D. (1991). Colorado Reading Project: Past, present, and future Journal of Learning Disabilities, 2:37–46

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunn M. L., Markwardt F. C. (1970). Examiner’s manual: peabody individual achievement test Circle Pines, MN American Guidance Service

    Google Scholar 

  • Finucci J. M., Childs B. (1981). Are there really more dyslexic boys than girls? In: A. Ansara, N. Geschwind, A. Galaburda, M. Albert, N. Gartrell (eds) Sex differences in dyslexia Townson, MD Orton Dyslexia pp. 1–9

    Google Scholar 

  • Geschwind N. (1981). A reaction to the conference on sex differences in dyslexia In: A. Ansara, N. Geschwind, A. Galaburda, M. Albert, N. Gartrell (eds) Sex differences in dyslexia Townson, MD Orton Dyslexia pp. xiii–xviii

    Google Scholar 

  • Harlaar N., Spinath F. M., Dale P. S., Plomin R. (2005). Genetic influences on early word recognition abilities and disabilities: A study of 7-year-old twins Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry 46:373–384

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hawke, J. L., Wadsworth, S. J., & DeFries, J. C. (2006). Genetic influences on reading difficulties in boys and girls: The Colorado Twin Study. Dyslexia, 12, 21–29

    Google Scholar 

  • Liederman J., Kantrowitz L., Flannery K. (2005). Male vulnerability to reading disability is not likely to be a myth: A call for new data Journal of Learning Disabilities 38:109–129

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nass R. (1993). Sex differences in learning abilities and disabilities Annals of Dyslexia 43:61–77

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nichols R. C., Bilbro W. C. Jr. (1966). The diagnosis of twin zygosity Acta Geneticae Medicae et Gemellologiae 16:265–275

    Google Scholar 

  • Olson R. K. (2002). Dyslexia: Nature and nurture Dyslexia 8:143–159

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Purcell S., Sham P. C. (2003). A model-fitting implementation of the DeFries-Fulker model for selected twin data Behavior Genetics 33:271–278

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rutter M., Caspi A., Fergusson D., Horwood L. J., Goodman R., Maughan B., Moffitt T. E., Meltzer H., Carroll J. (2004). Sex differences in developmental reading disability: New findings from 4 epidemiological studies JAMA 291:2007–2012

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Stevenson J. (1992). Identifying sex differences in reading disability: Lessons from a twin study Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal 4:307–326

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Symmes J. S., Rapoport J. L. (1972). Unexpected reading failure American Journal of Orthopsychiatry 42:82–91

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tallal P., Fitch R. H. (1993). Hormones and cerebral organization: Implications for the development and transmission of language and learning disabilities In: A. M. Galaburda (eds) Dyslexia and development: Neurobiological aspects of extra-ordinary brains Cambridge, MA Harvard University Press pp. 168–186

    Google Scholar 

  • Torgesen J. K., Wagner R. K., Rashotte C. A. (1999). Test of word reading efficiency (TOWRE) Austin, TX Pro-ed

    Google Scholar 

  • Vogel S. A. (1990). Gender differences in intelligence, language, visual-motor abilities, and academic achievement in students with learning disabilities: A review of the literature Journal of Learning Disabilities 23:44–52

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wadsworth, S. J., & DeFries, J. C. (2005). Genetic etiology of reading difficulties in boys and girls. Twin Research and Human Genetics, 8, 594–601

    Google Scholar 

  • Wadsworth S. J., Knopik V. S., DeFries J. C. (2000). Reading disability in boys and girls: No evidence for a differential genetic etiology Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal 13:133–145

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wechsler D. (1974). Examiner’s manual: wechsler intelligence scale for children-revised New York The Psychological Corporation

    Google Scholar 

  • Wechsler D. (1981). Examiner’s manual: wechsler adult intelligence scale-revised New York The Psychological Corporation

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jesse L. Hawke.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hawke, J.L., Wadsworth, S.J., Olson, .K. et al. Etiology of reading difficulties as a function of gender and severity. Read Writ 20, 13–25 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-006-9016-z

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-006-9016-z

Keywords

Navigation