Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Estimating Utility Values for Health States of Overweight and Obese Individuals Using the SF-36

  • Published:
Quality of Life Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective: To use health-related quality-of-life (HRQoL) data from the Australian 1995 National Health Survey to estimate the impact of obesity (as measured by body mass index or BMI) on utility and quality-adjusted life expectancy (QALE).Method: SF-36 responses from 12,661 individuals in the general population were transformed into utility values using the SF-6D algorithm developed by Brazier and colleagues. Separate regression analyses for males and females were used to examine the impact of BMI and five obesity-related medical conditions (diabetes, coronary heart disease, depression, musculoskeletal disorders, and cancer) on utility. The utility estimates were used to provide indicative estimates of the decrease in QALE associated with being overweight or obese.Results: There was a statistically significant negative relationship between BMI and utility for males and females. For males (females), the marginal effect of a one-unit increase in BMI was associated with a −0.0024 (−0.0034) decrement in utility. Based on these estimates, a non-smoking male (female) aged 40 years who is obese can expect 7.2 (8.7) years less of QALE over their remaining lifetime.Conclusions : Results suggest that BMI is negatively associated with utility. Evaluation of policies designed to prevent or treat obesity should capture HRQoL as an outcome.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. PE O’Brien JE Dixon (2002) ArticleTitleThe extent of the problem of obesity Am J Surg 184 IssueID6B 4S–8S Occurrence Handle12527343

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. ML Booth T Chey M Wake et al. (2003) ArticleTitleChange in the prevalence of overweight and obesity among young Australians, 1969–1997 Am J Clin Nutr 77 IssueID1 29–36 Occurrence Handle12499319 Occurrence Handle1:CAS:528:DC%2BD3sXhtFygsA%3D%3D

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. InstitutionalAuthorNameDHHS (2001) The Surgeon General’s call to action to prevent and decrease overweight and obesity U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS), Public Health Service Office of the Surgeon General Washington DC

    Google Scholar 

  4. JC Seidell KM Flegal (1997) ArticleTitleAssessing obesity: Classification and epidemiology Br Med Bull 53 238–252 Occurrence Handle9246834 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:ByiA1cbmvFw%3D

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. GA Bray (1992) ArticleTitlePathophysiology of obesity Am J Clin Nutr 55 488S–494S Occurrence Handle1733117 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:By2C38risFE%3D

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. GA Colditz (1992) ArticleTitleEconomic costs of obesity Am J Clin Nutr 55 IssueID2(suppl) 503S–507SS Occurrence Handle1733119 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:By2C38risFM%3D

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. FX Pi-Sunyer (1996) ArticleTitleA review of long-term studies evaluating the efficacy of weight loss in ameliorating disorders associated with obesity Clin Ther 18 1006–1035 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0149-2918(96)80057-9 Occurrence Handle9001821 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:ByiC2MrhtVM%3D

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. A Peeters JJ Barendregt F Willekens et al. (2003) ArticleTitleObesity in adulthood and its consequences for life expectancy: A life table analysis Ann Intern Med 138 24–32 Occurrence Handle12513041

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. HA Doll SEK Petersen SL Stewart-Brown (2000) ArticleTitleObesity and physical and emotional well being: Associations between body mass index, chronic illness, and the physical and mental components of the SF-36 questionnaire Obes Res 8 IssueID2 160–170 Occurrence Handle10757202 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3c3hvVWhug%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10.1038/oby.2000.17

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. KR Fontaine SJ Bartlett I Barofsky (2000) ArticleTitleHealth-related quality of life among obese persons seeking and not currently seeking treatment Int J Eat Disord 17 101–105

    Google Scholar 

  11. DA Katz CA McHorney RL Atkinson (2000) ArticleTitleImpact of obesity on health-related quality of life in patients with chronic illness J Gen Intern Med 15 789–796 Occurrence Handle10.1046/j.1525-1497.2000.90906.x Occurrence Handle11119171 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3M7gsVehtA%3D%3D

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. JC Fanuele WA Abdu B Hanscom et al. (2002) ArticleTitleAssociation between obesity and functional status in patients with spine disease Spine 27 306–312 Occurrence Handle11805697

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. U Larsson J Karlsson M Sullivan (2002) ArticleTitleImpact of overweight and obesity on health-related quality of life – a Swedish population study Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord 26 417–424 Occurrence Handle10.1038/sj.ijo.0801919 Occurrence Handle11896499 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD387mtlylsw%3D%3D

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. G Marchesini E Solaroli L Baraldi et al. (2000) ArticleTitleHealth-related quality of life in obesity: The role of eating behaviour Diab Nutr Metab 13 156–164 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3M%2FkvVKqtg%3D%3D

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. WJ Brown G Mishra J Kenardy et al. (2000) ArticleTitleRelationship between body mass index and well-being in young Australian women Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord 24 1360–1368 Occurrence Handle10.1038/sj.ijo.0801384 Occurrence Handle11093300 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3M3jtFOltA%3D%3D

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. M Finkelstein (2000) ArticleTitleBody mass index and quality of life in a survey of primary care patients J Fam Pract 49 IssueID8 734–737 Occurrence Handle10947141 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3cvhtlyrsA%3D%3D

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. JE Ware KK Snow M Kolinski et al. (1993) SF-36 Health Survey. Manual and Interpretation Guide Boston, Massachusetts The Health Institute, New England Medical Center

    Google Scholar 

  18. J Brazier J Roberts M Deverill (2002) ArticleTitleThe estimation of a preference-based measure of health from the SF-36 J Health Econ 21 271–292 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0167-6296(01)00130-8 Occurrence Handle11939242

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. W Hollingworth RA Deyo SD Sullivan et al. (2002) ArticleTitleThe practicality and validity of directly elicited SF-36 derived health state preferences in patients with low back pain Health Econ 11 71–85 Occurrence Handle10.1002/hec.650 Occurrence Handle11788983

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. L Lundberg M Johannesson DGA Isacson et al. (1999) ArticleTitleThe relationship between health-state utilities and the SF-12 in a general population Med Decis Making 19 128–140 Occurrence Handle10231075 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK1M3ks1WjtA%3D%3D

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. P Franks EL Lubetkin MR Gold et al. (2003) ArticleTitleMapping SF-12 to preference based instruments: Convergent validity in a low-income, minority population Med Care 41 IssueID11 1277–1283 Occurrence Handle14583690

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. DG Fryback EJ Dasbach R Klien et al. (1993) ArticleTitleThe Beaver Dam Health Outcomes Study: initial catalogue of health-state quality factors Med Decis Making 13 IssueID2 89–102 Occurrence Handle8483408 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:ByyB2cjkslE%3D

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. MB Nichol N Sengupta DR Globe (2001) ArticleTitleEvaluating quality adjusted life years: Estimation of the Health Utility Index (HUI) from the SF-36 Med Decis Making 21 IssueID2 105–112 Occurrence Handle10.1177/02729890122062352 Occurrence Handle11310943 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3M3hslCgtg%3D%3D

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. N Sengupta MB Nichol J Wu et al. (2004) ArticleTitleMapping the SF-12 to the HUI and VAS in managed care population Med Care 42 IssueID9 927–937 Occurrence Handle15319619

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. InstitutionalAuthorNameABS (1997) National Health Survey. Technical Paper for Sample File Australian Bureau of Statistics Canberra

    Google Scholar 

  26. ABS. National Health Survey: Users’ Guide, Australia 1995. Canberra: Australian Bureau of Statistics; 1996. Report No.: 4399.0.

  27. J Stevens J Cai ER Pamuk et al. (1998) ArticleTitleThe effect of age on the association between body-mass and mortality N Engl J Med 388 1–7

    Google Scholar 

  28. P Diehr DE Bild TB Harris et al. (1998) ArticleTitleBody mass index and mortality in non-smoking older adults: The cardiovascular health study Am J Public Health 99 623–629

    Google Scholar 

  29. M Inoue T Sobue S Tsugane (2004) ArticleTitleImpact of body mass index on the risk of total cancer incidence and mortality among middle-aged Japanese: Data from a large-scale population-based cohort study – the JPHC study Cancer Causes Control 15 IssueID17 671–680 Occurrence Handle15280625

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. EA Spencer PN Appleby GK Davey et al. (2002) ArticleTitleValidity of self-reported height and weight in 4808 EPIC - Oxford participants Public Health Nutr 5 IssueID54 561–565 Occurrence Handle12186665

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. SJ Walters JE Brazier (2003) ArticleTitleWhat is the relationship between the minimally important difference in health state utility values? The case of the SF-6D Health Qual Life Outcomes 1 IssueID1 1–8 Occurrence Handle10.1186/1477-7525-1-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. C Jenkinson S Stewart-Brown S Petersen et al. (1999) ArticleTitleAssessment of the SF-36 Version 2 in the United Kingdom J Epidemiol Community Health 53 46–50 Occurrence Handle10326053 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK1M3lsl2jsQ%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10.1136/jech.53.1.46

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. I Ohsawa T Ishida Y Oshida K Yamanouchi Y Sato (2003) ArticleTitleSubjective health values of individuals with diabetes in Japan: Comparison of utility values with the SF-36 scores Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 62 IssueID1 9–16 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0168-8227(03)00145-1 Occurrence Handle14581152

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Z Hakim A Wolf LP Garrison (2002) ArticleTitleEstimating the effect of changes in body mass index on health state preferences Pharmacoeconomics 20 IssueID6 393–404 Occurrence Handle12052098

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. CL Chaing (1984) The Life table and its Applications Robert E Krieger Publishing Company Malabar, Florida

    Google Scholar 

  36. ABS. How Australians Measure Up. Canberra: ABS; 1998. Report No.: 4359.0.

  37. Chou SY, Grossman M, Saffer H. An economic analysis of adult obesity: Results from the behavioral risk factor surveillance system: National Bureau of Economic Research; 2002. Report No.: 9247.

  38. Cawley J, Danziger S. Obesity as a Barrier to the Transition from Welfare to Work: Cornell University; 2004.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michael A. Kortt.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kortt, M.A., Clarke, P.M. Estimating Utility Values for Health States of Overweight and Obese Individuals Using the SF-36. Qual Life Res 14, 2177–2185 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-005-8027-6

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-005-8027-6

Keywords

Navigation