Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Implications of the ‘bread and peace’ model for the 2008 US presidential election

  • Editorial Commentary
  • Published:
Public Choice Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Presidential election outcomes are well explained by just two objectively measured fundamental determinants: (1) weighted-average growth of per capita real personal disposable income over the term, and (2) cumulative US military fatalities owing to unprovoked, hostile deployments of American armed forces in foreign conflicts. The US economy weakened at the beginning of 2008 and average per capita real income growth probably will be only around 0.75% at Election Day. Moreover cumulative US military fatalities in Iraq will reach 4,300 or more. Given those fundamental conditions, the Bread and Peace model predicts a Republican two-party vote share centered on 48.2%.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Bartels, L. (1997). Correspondence: econometrics and elections. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 11, 195–197.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erikson, R.S., & Wlezien, C. (2008). Are political markets really superior to polls as election predictors? Public Opinion Quarterly, online (May 2).

  • Hibbs, D. A. (1982). President Reagan’s mandate from the 1980 elections: a shift to the right? American Politics Quarterly, 10, 387–420.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hibbs, D. A. (2000). Bread and peace voting in U.S. presidential elections. Public Choice, 104(1–2), 149–180. doi:10.1023/A:1005292312412.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hibbs, D. A. (2006). Voting and the macroeconomy. In D. Wittman & B. Weingast (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of political economy (pp. 565–586). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • International Institute for Strategic Studies [IISS] (2008). Iraq after the surge. Strategic Comments, 14(2), 1–2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nordhaus, W. (2006). Electoral victory and statistical defeat? Economics, politics, and the 2004 presidential election. Quarterly Journal of Political Science, 1, 313–322. doi:10.1561/100.00000014.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Powers, T. (2008). Iraq: will we ever get out? The New York Review of Books, 55(9), 13–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wlezien, C., & Erikson, R. S. (2004). The fundamentals, the polls, and the presidential vote. PS: Political Science and Politics, 37(4), 747–751.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Douglas A. Hibbs Jr..

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hibbs, D.A. Implications of the ‘bread and peace’ model for the 2008 US presidential election. Public Choice 137, 1–10 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11127-008-9333-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11127-008-9333-7

Keywords

Navigation