Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

An analysis of conservation attitudes and awareness around Kaziranga National Park, Assam, India: implications for conservation and development

  • Research Brief
  • Published:
Population and Environment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Kaziranga National Park and World Heritage Site, Assam, India, situated in a region with a large and diverse human population, was recently expanded due to its global importance for the conservation of many endangered species. Here, we develop detailed demographic and socio-economic profiles of residents around Kaziranga to study conservation attitudes and awareness using a semi-structured survey of 590 households in 37 villages. Results show high variation in attitudes and awareness as a function of ethno-religious group, educational level, and socio-economic and immigration status, indicating more and different needs for economic interventions within some communities than others. We found a high degree of conservation awareness, but most people expressed negative conservation attitudes and almost all lost crops to wildlife. We highlight the complexity of conflict in the area and present a basis for electing a microsite planning approach for conservation and development in areas characterized by high ethnic diversity, high human population densities, and land-dependent large mammals that pose economic risks. The findings imply that highly localized development schemes and participatory approaches to resource management at the village level, coupled with greater efforts at education, are especially needed to achieve conservation and development goals in such cases.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Allendorf, T. D. (2007). Resident’s attitudes towards three protected areas in southwestern Nepal. Biodiversity and Conservation, 16, 2087–2102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baral, N., & Heinen, J. T. (2007). Resources uses, conservation attitudes, management intervention and park–people relations in the Western Terai Landscape, Nepal. Environmental Conservation, 34, 64–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baruah, S. (1994). Ethnic conflict as state-society struggle: The poetics and politics of Assamese micro-nationalism. Modern Asian Studies, 28, 649–671.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bhattacharya, A. K., & Basnyat, B. (2003). Empowering people through joint forest management: A study from Madhya Pradesh (India). International Forestry Review, 5, 370–378.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borgerhoff Mulder, M., & Coppolollo, P. (2006). Conservation: Linking ecology, economics and culture. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boserup, E. (1990). Economic and demographic relationships in development. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chaudhuri, T. K. (1982). Demographic trends in Assam 1921–71. Delhi: B.R. Publishing Corporation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chauhan, S. K. (1980). Caste status and power: Social stratification in Assam. New Delhi: Classical Publishers and Distributors.

    Google Scholar 

  • Devarapalli, J., & Kumar, R. Y. (1999). Exploitation of non-timber forest produce: Ecological concerns. Journal of Human Ecology, 10, 205–210.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fearnside, P. (1997). Transmigration in Indonesia: Lessons from its environmental and social impacts. Environmental Management, 21, 553–570.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gadgil, M., Berkes, F., & Folke, C. (1993). Indigenous knowledge for biodiversity conservation. Ambio, 22, 151–156.

    Google Scholar 

  • GOA. (1998). Status Report on Kaziranga National Park. Kaziranga National Park, Assam Forest Department (unpublished).

  • GOI. (1983). Eliciting public support for wildlife conservation. New Delhi: Indian Board for Wildlife, Ministry of Environment and Forests.

    Google Scholar 

  • GOI. (1991). Census of India 1991. Office of the Registrar General. http://www.censusindia.net/cendat/datatable2.html.

  • GOI. (2001a). Census of India 2001: Basic population data. Office of the Registrar General. http://www.censusindia.net/t_00_002.html.

  • GOI. (2001b). Census of India 2001: Density of population. Office of the Registrar General. http://www.censusindia.net/maps/popden.html.

  • GOI. (2002). National Human Development Report: India (2001). Planning Commission. New Delhi: Oxford University Press.

  • GOI. (2005). Joint Forest Management Programme. Ministry of Environment and Forests.http://www.envfor.nic.in/nfap/jfmp.html.

  • Hajra, P. K., & Jain, S. K. (1994). Botany of Kaziranga and Manas. Dehradun: Surya International Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hazarika, S. (1994). Strangers of the mist: Tales of War and Peace from India’s North East. New Delhi: Viking.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heinen, J. T. (1993). Park–people relations in Kosi Tappu Wildlife Reserve, Nepal: A socio-economic analysis. Environmental Conservation, 20, 25–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heinen, J. T. (1996). Human behavior, incentives and protected area management. Conservation Biology, 10, 681–684.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heinen, J. T., & Low, B. S. (1992). Human behavioral ecology and environmental conservation. Environmental Conservation, 19, 105–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heinen, J. T., & Mehta, J. N. (2000). Emerging issues in legal and procedural aspects of buffer zone management with case studies from Nepal. Journal of Environment and Development, 9, 45–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jagannadha, M., Janaki, A., Kerr, J., & Mercer, E. (2005). Agency perspectives on transition to participatory forest management: A case study from Tamil Nadu, India. Society and Natural Resources, 18, 859–870.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kanjilal, U. N., & Bor, N. L. (1997). Flora of Assam (Vol. I-V). New Delhi: Omsons Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leones, J., & Rozelle, S. (1991). Rural Household Data Collection in Developing Countries: Designing Instruments and Methods for Collecting Off-farm Income Data. Department of Agricultural Economics and Cornell Food and Nutrition Policy Program. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University.

  • Mehta, J. N., & Heinen, J. T. (2001). Does community-based conservation shape favorable attitudes among locals? An empirical study from Nepal. Environmental Management, 28, 165–177.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nepal, S. K., & Weber, K. E. (1995). Managing resources and resolving conflicts: National parks and local people. International Journal of Sustainable Development and World Ecology, 2, 11–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prakash, A., Bhattacharya, D. R., Mohapatra, P. K., & Mahanta, J. (1997). Mosquito abundance in peripheral foothill areas of Kaziranga National Park, Golaghat, Assam. Journal of Communicable Diseases, 29, 303–306.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rao, K. (1998). India’s protected areas ecodevelopment strategy: Working with local communities. Environments, 26, 29–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodgers, W. A., & Panwar, H. S. (1988). Planning a wildlife protected area network in India. Volume II: State summaries. Dehradun: Wildlife Institute of India.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sah, J. P. (1997). Koshi Tappu Wetlands: Nepal’s Ramsar Site. IUCN-Wetland Program, South and South-east Asian Regional Office, Bangkok, Thailand.

  • Sah, J. P., & Heinen, J. T. (2001). Wetland resource use and conservation attitudes among indigenous and migrant peoples in Ghodaghodi lake area, Nepal. Environmental Conservation, 28, 345–356.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sekhar, N. U. (2003). Local attitudes towards conservation and wildlife tourism in Sariska Tiger Reserve, India. Journal of Environmental Management, 69, 339–347.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shrivastava, R. J., & Heinen, J. T. (2005). Migration and home gardens in the Brahmaputra Valley, Assam, India. Journal of Ecological Anthropology, 9, 20–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shrivastava, R. J., & Heinen, J. T. (2007). A microsite analysis of communities around Kaziranga National Park, India: Implications for conservation and development. Journal of Environment and Development, 16, 207–216.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singh, B. P. (1987). The problem of change: A study of North-East India. New Delhi: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • UNESCO. (2002). Periodic reporting on the application of the World Heritage Convention. Section II: State of conservation of world heritage properties. http://www.whc.unesco.org/archive/periodicreporting.

  • United Nations Environment Program. (1991). Kaziranga National Park. http://www.wcmc.org/sites/wh/~main.

  • Wang, S. W., Lassoie, J. P., & Curtis, P. D. (2006). Farmers’ attitudes towards conservation in Jigme Singye Wangchuk National Park, Bhutan. Environmental Conservation, 33, 148–156.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wittemyer, G., Elsen, P., Bean, W. T., Coleman, A., Burton, O., & Brashares, J. S. (2008). Accelerated human population growth at protected area edges. Science, 321(5885), 123–126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • World Bank. (1996). Staff Appraisal Report: India Ecodevelopment Project. Report No. 14914-IN, South Asia Department II, Agriculture & Water Division. Washington, DC, USA.

  • World Bank. (2004). India: World Bank supports agricultural development in Assam. What’s New: News Release No. 2005/236/SAR. http://www.worldbank.org/in.

  • WWF. (1999). Eco-development: A Concept Paper for the Second Eco-development Project. Draft report. Forests & Wildlife Division, New Delhi, India.

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank the interviewees and the Assam State Forest Department for granting permission. D. M. Singh, U. Bora, P. S. Das, D. D. Boro, and R. Sarma from KNP provided valuable insights and P. K. Malik of the Wildlife Institute of India facilitated the fieldwork. Nasser Ahmed and family were gracious hosts during visits to Guwahati and Debajit, Jyotishmita and Ronjoy proved very able field assistants. The National Geographic Society funded the fieldwork and a WWF-US Education for Nature fellowship funded the second author. Florida International University’s Human Subjects Review Panel approved this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Joel T. Heinen.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Heinen, J.T., Shrivastava, R.J. An analysis of conservation attitudes and awareness around Kaziranga National Park, Assam, India: implications for conservation and development. Popul Environ 30, 261–274 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11111-009-0086-0

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11111-009-0086-0

Keywords

Navigation