Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

The role of the state in voluntary environmental reform: A case study of public land

  • Published:
Policy Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Conventional environmental reform is characterized by the compliance of firms with direct regulatory pressure from the state. Scholars are now turning their attention to alternative modes of reform where firms proactively improve their operations through the implementation of voluntary environmental strategies (VES). While previous research on VES has typically focused on the manufacturing sector, this study explores challenges to corporate greening in the natural resource extractive sector when strategies are undertaken on public land. Findings from two case study regions in the Canadian province of Alberta suggest that VES undertaken on public land are significantly constrained by certain features of the system of environmental governance and the regulatory regime, particularly the reluctance of the state to be involved as a co-regulator of public land. The importance of solid leadership from the state in environmental reform – including cases of voluntary corporate initiatives – is discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • AEP-NRS (Alberta Environmental Protection, Natural Resource Service) (1998). The Final Frontier: Protecting Landscape and Biological Diversity within Alberta's Boreal Forest Natural Region. Edmonton, AB: Government of Alberta.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alberta Economic Development (2005). The Alberta Economy: Abundance of Natural Resources. Edmonton, AB: Government of Alberta. http://www.alberta-canada.com/economy/energy.cfm.

  • Alberta Economic Development. (2004). Highlights of the Alberta Economy, 2004. Edmonton, AB: Alberta Economic Development, Policy and Analysis Division.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alberta Energy (2005). Home Page. Edmonton, AB: Government of Alberta. http://www.energy.gov.ab.ca/.

  • Alberta Environment (1997). The Role of Compulsory Industry Monitoring in Alberta's Environmental Regulatory Program. http://www.gov.ab.ca/env/protenf/approvals/factsheets/compuls.html.

  • Andrews, R. N. L. (1998). ‘Environmental regulation and business “self-regulation’,’ Policy Sciences 31: 177–197.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arora, S. and T. N. Cason (1996). ‘Why do firms volunteer to exceed environmental regulations? Understanding participation in the EPA's 33/50 program,’ Land Economics 72: 413–432.

    Google Scholar 

  • Athanasiou, T. (1996). ‘The age of greenwashing.,’ Capitalism, Nature, Socialism 7(1):1–36.

  • Banerjee, S. B. (2001a). ‘Corporate environmental strategies and actions,’ Management Decisions 39(1): 36–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Banerjee, S. B. (2001b). ‘Managerial perceptions of corporate environmentalism: Interpretations from industry and strategic implications for organizations,’ Journal of Management Studies 38: 489–513.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buysse, K. and A. Verbeke (2003). ‘Proactive environmental strategies: A stakeholder management perspective,’ Strategic Management Journal 24: 453–470.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carney, D. and J. Farrington (1998). Natural Resource Management and Institutional Change. London: Routledge Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cashore, B. (2002). ‘Legitimacy and the privatization of environmental governance: How non-state market-driven (NSMD) governance systems gain rule-making authority,’ Governance: An International Journal of Policy, Administration and Institutions 15: 503–529.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cashore, B., G. Auld and D. Newsom (2003). ‘Forest certification (eco-labeling) programs and their policymaking authority: Explaining divergence among North American and European case studies,’ Forest Policy and Economics 5: 225–247.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cashore, B. and I. Vertinsky (2000). ‘Policy networks and firm behaviors: Governance systems and firm responses to external demands for sustainable forest management,’ Policy Sciences 33: 1–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christmann, P. (2004). ‘Multinational companies and the natural environment: Determinants of global environmental policy standardization,’ Academy of Management Journal 47: 747–760.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clarkson, M. B. E. (1995). ‘A stakeholder framework for analyzing and evaluating corporate social performance,’ Academy of Management Review 20: 92–117.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davidson, D. J. and S. Frickel (2004). ‘Understanding environmental governance: A critical review,’ Organization and Environment 17: 471–492.

    Google Scholar 

  • Delmas, M. A. and A. Terlaak (2001). ‘A framework for analyzing environmental voluntary agreements,’ California Management Review 43(3): 44–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Delmas, M. A. (2002). ‘The diffusion of environmental management standards in Europe and in the United States: An institutional perspective.,’ Policy Sciences 35: 91–119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DiMaggio, P. J. and W. W. Powell. (1983). ‘The iron cage re-visited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields.,’ American Sociological Review 48: 147–160.

    Google Scholar 

  • DiMaggio, P. J. and W. W. Powell, eds. (1991). The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisner, M. A. (2004). ‘Corporate environmentalism, regulatory reform, and industry self-regulation: Toward genuine regulatory reinvention in the United States,’ Governance: An International Journal of Policy, Administration and Institutions 17: 145–167.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, D., and W. Freudenburg (2001). ‘Ecological modernization and its critics: Assessing the past and looking toward the future,’ Society and Natural Resources 14: 701–709.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gibson, R. B. (1999). ‘Questions about a gift horse,’ in R. B. Gibson, ed., Voluntary Initiatives: The New Politics of Corporate Greening. Peterborough, ON: Broadview Press, pp. 3–14.

  • Henriques, I. and P. Sadorsky (1996). ‘Determinants of an environmentally responsive firm,’ Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 30: 381–395.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoberg, G. (1999). ‘The coming revolution in regulating our forests,’ Policy Options December: 53–56.

  • Hoffman, A. J. (1996). Trends in corporate environmentalism: The chemical and petroleum industries, 1996–1993. Society and Natural Resources 9: 47–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoffman, A. J. (1999). ‘Institutional evolution and change: Environmentalism and the U.S. chemical industry.,’ Academy of Management Journal 42: 351–371.

  • Hoffman, A. J., H. C. Riley, J. G. Troast Jr. and M. H. Bazerman (2002). ‘Cognitive and institutional barriers to new forms of cooperation on environmental protection,’ American Behavioral Scientist 45: 820–845.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jessop, B. (2002). The Future of the Capitalist State. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Khanna, A. and W. R. Q. Anton (2002). ‘Corporate environmental management: Regulatory and market incentives,’ Land Economics 78: 539–558.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kennett, S. A. and M. M. Ross (1998). In Search of Public Land Law in Alberta. CIRL Occasional Paper 5. Calgary, AB: Canadian Institute of Resources Law.

  • King, A. and M. Lenox (2002). ‘Exploring the locus of profitable pollution reduction,’ Management Science 48: 289–299.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knill, C. and D. Lehmkuhl (2002). ‘Private actors and the state: Internationalization of changing patterns of governance,’ Governance: An International Journal of Policy, Administration and Institutions 15: 41–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koontz, T. M., T. A. Steelman, J. Carmin, K. S. Korfmacher, C. Moseley and C. W. Thomas (2004). Collaborative Environmental Management: What Roles for Government? Washington DC: Resources for the Future.

  • Leroy, P. and J. van Tatenhove (2000). ‘Political modernization theory and environmental politics,’ in G. Spaargaren, A. P. J. Mol and F. H. Buttel, eds., Environment and Global Modernity. London: Sage Studies in International Sociology, pp. 187–208.

  • Levy, D. L. and P. J. Newell (2002). ‘Business strategy and international environmental governance: Toward a neo-Gramscian synthesis,’ Global Environmental Politics 2(4): 84–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lyon, T. P. and J. W. Maxwell (2003). ‘Self-regulation, taxation and public voluntary environmental agreements,’ Journal of Public Economics 87: 1453–1486.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacCrimmon, G. and T. Marr-Laing (2000). Patchwork Policy, Fragmented Forests: In-Situ Oil Sands, Industrial Development, and the Ecological Integrity of Alberta's Boreal Forest. Drayton Valley. Calgary, AB: Pembina Institute for Appropriate Development.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maxwell, J. W., T. P. Lyon and S. C. Hackett (2000). ‘Self-regulation and social welfare: The political economy of corporate environmentalism,’ Journal of Law and Economics 43: 583–618.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miles, M. B. and A. M. Huberman (1994). Qualitative Data Analysis. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moffet, J. and F. Bregha (1999). ‘Non-regulatory environmental measures. What are they and what makes them work?,’ in R. B. Gibson, ed., Voluntary Initiatives: The New Politics of Corporate Greening. Peterborough, ON: Broadview Press, pp. 15–31.

  • Mol, A. P. J. (2000). ‘Globalization and environment: Between apocalypse-blindness and ecological modernization,’ in G. Spaargaren, A. P. J. Mol and F. H. Buttel, eds., Environment and Global Modernity. London: Sage Studies in International Sociology, pp. 121–150.

  • Neuman, L. (2000). Social Research Methods: Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oliver, C. (1991). ‘Strategic responses to institutional processes,’ Academy of Management Review 16:145–179.

    Google Scholar 

  • Papadakis, E. and R. Grant (2003). ‘The politics of “light handed regulation”: “New” environmental policy instruments in Australia. Environmental Politics 12(1): 27–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Porter, M. E. and C. van der Linde (1995). ‘Toward a new conception of the environment-competitiveness relationship,’ Journal of Economic Perspectives 9(4): 97–118.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prakash, A. (2000). Greening the Firm: The Politics of Corporate Environmentalism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rivera, J. and P. de Leon (2004). ‘Is greener whiter? Voluntary environmental performance of western ski areas,’ Policy Studies Journal 32: 417–437.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roper, J. M. and J. Shapira (2000). Ethnography in Nursing Research. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ross, M. M. (2002). Legal and Institutional Responses to Conflicts Involving the Oil and Gas and Forestry Sectors. CIRL Occasional Paper 10. Calgary, AB: Canadian Institute of Resources Law.

  • Sawyer, M., D. Mayhood, P. Paquet, C. Wallis, R. Thomas, and W. Haskins (1998). Southern East Slopes Cumulative Effects Assessment. Calgary, AB: Hayduke and Associates Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, R. (2002). Alternative Futures: Alberta's Boreal Forest at the Crossroads. Edmonton, AB: The Federation of Alberta Naturalists and the Alberta Centre for Boreal Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Segerson, K. and T. Miceli (1998). ‘Voluntary environmental agreements: Good or bad news for the environment?,’ Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 36: 109–130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sharma, S. (2000). ‘Managerial interpretations and organizational context as predictors of corporate choice of environmental strategy,’ Academy of Management Journal 43: 681–697.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shrivastava, P. (1995). ‘The role of corporations in achieving ecological sustainability,’ Academy of Management Review 20: 936–960.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sonnenfeld, D. A. and A. P. Mol. (2002). ‘Globalization and the transformation of environmental governance,’ American Behavioral Scientist 45: 1318–1339.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spaargaren, G. and A. P. Mol (1992). ‘Sociology, the environment and modernity: ecological modernization as a theory of social change,’ Society and Natural Resources 5: 323–344.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vertinsky, I. B. and. C. Zietsma (1998). Shades of Green: Cognitive Framing and the Dynamics of Corporate Response. Sustainable Forest Management Network Working Paper 1998-13. Edmonton, AB: Sustainable Forest Management Network.

  • Walton, J. (2000). ‘Should monitoring be compulsory within voluntary environmental agreements?,’ Sustainable Development 8: 146–154.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Welch, E. and A. Hibiki (2002). ‘Japanese voluntary environmental agreements: Bargaining power and reciprocity as contributors to effectiveness,’ Policy Sciences 35: 401–424.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Winn, M. and L. Angell (2000). ‘Towards a process model of corporate greening,’ Organization Studies 21: 1119–1147.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winter, S. C. and P. J. May (2001). ‘Motivation for compliance with environmental regulations,’ Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 20: 675–698.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Rural Economy, University of Alberta, Canada

    Norah A. Mackendrick

  2. Department of Sociology, University of Toronto, 725 Spadina Avenue, Toronto, ON M5S 2J4

    Norah A. Mackendrick

Authors
  1. Norah A. Mackendrick
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Norah A. Mackendrick.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mackendrick, N.A. The role of the state in voluntary environmental reform: A case study of public land. Policy Sci 38, 21–44 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11077-005-1722-x

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11077-005-1722-x

Keywords

Search

Navigation