Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The economics of open source software for a competitive firm

Why give it away for free?

  • Published:
NETNOMICS: Economic Research and Electronic Networking Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Large quantities of software, ranging from operating systems to web servers to games, are now available as “open source software” or “free software”. In many cases, this software is backed by large profit seeking corporations such as IBM. Traditional economic analysis is used to identify the costs and benefits to firms of using open source rather than proprietary solutions, particularly in the case of the firm releasing code to the world when not obliged to do so. Examples of large companies backing open source are examined in light of the profit motive. Additionally, open source is also analyzed as a quasi-public good.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. R. Buckman, Microsoft net rose 12% in quarter-profit, revenue forecasts are reduced amid weakness in PC, software markets, Wall Street Journal (19 April 2002) A3.

  2. Corel’s contributions to the Wine project, Linux Today (23 June 1999).

  3. Debian open source definition, http://www.debian.org.

  4. Debian social contract, http://www.debian.org.

  5. N. Franke and E. von Hippel, Satisfying heterogeneous user needs via innovation toolkits: The case of Apache security software, MIT Sloan School of Management, Working Paper #4341-02.

  6. General Public License, http://www.fsf.org/gpl.

  7. L. Gomes, More big technology firms embrace broad use of Linux operating system, Wall Street Journal (13 May 1999) B4.

  8. D. Harhoff, J. Henkel and E. von Hippel, Profiting from voluntary information spillovers: How users benefit by freely revealing their innovations?, Research Policy 32 (December 2003) 1753–1769.

    Google Scholar 

  9. http://developer.apple.com/darwin.

  10. http://developer.apple.com/darwin.projects/darwin/faq.html.

  11. http://www.mozilla.org.

  12. http://www.netcraft.com/survey (September 2002).

  13. http://www.winehq.org.

  14. J.P. Johnson, Open source software: Private provision of a public good, J. Economics Managm. Strategy 11(4) 637–662.

  15. A. Khalak, Economic model for impact of open source software, Department of Mech. Engineering, MIT, akhalak@alum.mit.edu.

  16. X. Lecocq and B. Demil, Open standard: Role of externalities and impact on the industry structure, Working paper.

  17. J. Lerner and J. Tirole, Some simple economics of open source, J. Industr. Economics 50 (2002) 197–234.

    Google Scholar 

  18. A. Mockus, R.T. Fielding and J. Herbsleb, A case study of open source software development: The Apache server, in: Proc. of the 22nd Internat. Conf. on Software Engineering (2000) pp. 263–272.

  19. M. Mustonen, Copyleft – the economics of Linux and other open source software, Discussion paper No. 493, Department of Economics, University of Helinski.

  20. P. Nilendu and T.R. Madanmohan, Competing on open source: Strategies and practice.

  21. J. Sandberg, IBM will distribute Apache software for free, but charge for maintenance, Wall Street Journal (22 June 1998) B5.

  22. E. von Hippel and G. von Krogh, Open source software and the private-collective innovation model: Issues for organization science.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Pennsylvania State University, Dubois, PA, 15801, USA

    Richard E. Hawkins

Authors
  1. Richard E. Hawkins
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Richard E. Hawkins.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hawkins, R.E. The economics of open source software for a competitive firm. Netnomics 6, 103–117 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11066-004-2717-z

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11066-004-2717-z

Keywords

Search

Navigation