Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Integrative connectionist learning systems inspired by nature: current models, future trends and challenges

  • Published:
Natural Computing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The so far developed and widely utilized connectionist systems (artificial neural networks) are mainly based on a single brain-like connectionist principle of information processing, where learning and information exchange occur in the connections. This paper extends this paradigm of connectionist systems to a new trend—integrative connectionist learning systems (ICOS) that integrate in their structure and learning algorithms principles from different hierarchical levels of information processing in the brain, including neuronal-, genetic-, quantum. Spiking neural networks (SNN) are used as a basic connectionist learning model which is further extended with other information learning principles to create different ICOS. For example, evolving SNN for multitask learning are presented and illustrated on a case study of person authentification based on multimodal auditory and visual information. Integrative gene-SNN are presented, where gene interactions are included in the functioning of a spiking neuron. They are applied on a case study of computational neurogenetic modeling. Integrative quantum-SNN are introduced with a quantum Hebbian learning, where input features as well as information spikes are represented by quantum bits that result in exponentially faster feature selection and model learning. ICOS can be used to solve more efficiently challenging biological and engineering problems when fast adaptive learning systems are needed to incrementally learn in a large dimensional space. They can also help to better understand complex information processes in the brain especially how information processes at different information levels interact. Open questions, challenges and directions for further research are presented.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Arbib M (ed) (2003) The handbook of brain theory and neural networks. MIT Press, Cambridge

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Ashburner M, Ball CA et al (2000) Gene ontology: tool for the unification of biology. The gene ontology consortium. Nat Genet 25:25–29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benuskova L, Kasabov N (2007a) Computational neurogenetic modeling. Springer, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Benuskova L, Kasabov N (2007b) Modeling L-LTP based on changes in concentration of pCREB transcription factor. Neurocomputing 70(10–12):2035–2040

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benuskova L, Jain V et al (2006) Computational neurogenetic modelling: a pathway to new discoveries in genetic neuroscience. Int J Neural Syst 16(3):215–227

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carpenter G, Grossberg S (1990) ART3: hierarchical search using chemical transmitters in self-organising pattern-recognition architectures. Neural Netw 3(2):129–152

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carpenter GA, Grossberg S (1992) Neural networks for vision and image processing. MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Carpenter G, Grossberg S et al (1991) Fuzzy ARTMAP: a neural network architecture for incremental supervised learning of analogue multi-dimensional maps. IEEE Trans Neural Netw 3(5):698–713

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chalmers DJ (1996) The conscious mind: in search of a fundamental theory. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Collado-Vides J, Hofestadt R (eds) (2002) Gene regulation and metabolism. Post-genomic computational approaches. MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper LN, Intrator N et al (2004) Theory of cortical plasticity. World Scientific Publishing, Singapore

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Crick F (1970) Central dogma of molecular biology. Nature 227:561–563

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Darwin C (1859) The origin of species by means of natural selection. John Murray, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Defoin-Platel M, Schliebs S et al (2007a) Quantum inspired feature selection and neural network models for time series prediction. IJCNN

  • Defoin-Platel M, Schliebs S et al (2007b) A versatile quantum inspired evolutionary algorithm. In: IEEE Congress on evolutionary computation. IEEE Press, Singapore

  • Dow J, Lindsay G et al (1995) Biochemistry molecules, cells and the body. Addison-Wesley, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Ezhov A, Ventura D (2000) Quantum neural networks. In: Kasabov N (ed) Future directions for intelligent systems and information sciences. Springer Verlag

  • Feynman RP, Leighton RB et al (1965) The feynman lectures on physics. Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, Massachusetts

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Fogel G, Corne D (2003) Evolutionary computation for bioinformatics. Morgan Kaufmann Publ

  • Fogel D, Fogel L et al (1990) Evolving neural networks. Biol Cybern 63:487–493

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freeman WJ (2000) Neurodynamics. An exploration in mesoscopic brain dynamics. Springer-Verlag, London

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Gerstner W, Kistler WM (2002) Spiking neuron models. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Goldberg DE (1989) Genetic algorithms in search, optimization and machine learning. Addison-Wesley, Reading

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Gottgtroy P, Kasabov N et al (2006) Evolving ontologies for intelligent decision support. In: Sanches E (ed) Fuzzy logic and the semantic web. Elsevier, pp 415–439

  • Grossberg S (1982) Studies of mind and brain. Reidel, Boston

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Grover LK (1996) A fast quantum mechanical algorithm for database search. In: Proceedings of the twenty-eighth annual ACM symposium on theory of computing, ACM Press, New York

  • Han K-H, Kim J-H (2002) Quantum-inspired evolutionary algorithm for a class of combinatorial optimization. IEEE Trans Evol Comput 6:580–593

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hey T (1999) Quantum computing: an introduction. Comput Control Eng J 10(6):105–112

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holland JH (1975) Adaptation in natural and artificial systems. The University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor

    Google Scholar 

  • Izhikevich EM (2003) Simple model of spiking neurons. IEEE Trans Neural Netw 14(6):1569–1572

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Izhikevich EM, Desai NS (2003) Relating STDP to BCM. Neural Comput 15:1511–1523

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Johnston S, Prasad G et al (2005) Comparative investigation into classical and spiking neuron implementations on FPGAs. Springer LNCS 3696:269–274

    Google Scholar 

  • Kasabov N (1996) Foundations of neural networks, fuzzy systems and knowledge engineering. MIT Press

  • Kasabov N (2001) Evolving fuzzy neural networks for supervised/unsupervised online knowledge-based learning. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern B Cybern 31(6):902–918

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kasabov NK (2002) Evolving connectionist systems. Methods and applications in bioinformatics, brain study and intelligent machines. Springer-Verlag, London

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Kasabov N (2006) Brain-, gene-, and quantum inspired computational intelligence: challenges and opportunities. In: Reusch B (ed) Computational intelligence: theory and practice. Springer, Heiderlberg, pp 521–544

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Kasabov N (2007) Evolving connectionist systems: the knowledge engineering approach. Springer, London

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Kasabov N, Benuskova L (2004) Computational neurogenetics. J Comput Theor Nanosci 1(1):47–61

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kasabov N, Song Q (2002) DENFIS: dynamic, evolving neural-fuzzy inference systems and its application for time-series prediction. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 10(2):144–154

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kasabov N, Jain V et al (2007) Evolving brain-gene ontology system (EBGOS): towards integrating bioinformatics and neuroinformatics data to facilitate discoveries. In: International joint conference on neural networks, IEEE Press, Orlando

  • Kohonen T (1997) Self-organizing maps. Springer Verlag

  • Narayanan A, Meneer T (2000) Quantum artificial neural network architectures and components. Inf Sci Appl 128:3–4

    Google Scholar 

  • Penrose R (1994) Shadows of the mind: a search for the missing science of consciousness. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Sanderson C, Paliwal KK (2004) Identity verification using speech and face information. Digit Signal Process 14:449–480

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shor PW (1997) Polynomial-time algorithms for prime factorization and discrete logarithms on a quantum computer. SIAM J Comput 26:1484–1509

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor JG (1999) The race for consciousness. MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Venayagamoorthy GK, Gaurav S (2005) Quantum-inspired evolutionary algorithms and binary particle swarm optimization for training MLP and SRN neural networks. J Theor Comput Nanosci 2(4):561–568

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wysoski S, Benuskova L et al (2006) On-line learning with structural adaptation in a network of spiking neurons for visual pattern recognition. In: ICANN 2006. Springer-LNCS, Athens, Greece

  • Wysoski S, Benuskova L et al (2007a) Brain-like evolving spiking neural networks for multimodal information processing. In: ICONIP 2007, Kitakyushu, Japan, LNCS, Springer

  • Wysoski S, Benuskova L et al (2007b) Text-independent speaker authentication with spiking neural networks. In: Proc ICANN ’07, vol 4668, pp 758–767

  • Wysoski S, Benuskova L et al (2008) Fast and adaptive network of spiking for multi-view visual pattern recognition. Neurocomputing (in print)

  • Yao X (1993) Evolutionary artificial neural networks. Int J Neural Syst 4(3):203–222

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The paper is supported partially by a grant AUTX0201 funded by the Foundation of Research Science and Technology of New Zealand and also by the Auckland University of Technology grant to the Knowledge Engineering and Discovery Research Institute KEDRI (http://www.kedri.info). I acknowledge the contribution to different experiments by Simei Wysoski, Stefan Shliebs, Michael Defoin-Platel, Lubica Benuskova from KEDRI and the inspirational discussions I had with Dr Liam McDaid from the University of Ulster during my visits.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nikola Kasabov.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kasabov, N. Integrative connectionist learning systems inspired by nature: current models, future trends and challenges. Nat Comput 8, 199–218 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11047-008-9066-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11047-008-9066-z

Keywords

Navigation