Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Assessing vulnerabilities to the effects of global change: an eight step approach

  • Published:
Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In the recent years, global environmental change research has seen increased attention to the concept of vulnerability. There have been a growing number of vulnerability assessments, but relatively little discussion on appropriate and common methods. Here we propose a method to guide vulnerability assessments of coupled human–environment systems toward a common objective: informing the decision-making of specific stakeholders about options for adapting to the effects of global change. We suggest five criteria vulnerability assessments must at least possess to achieve this objective. They should have a knowledge base from various disciplines and stakeholder participation, be place based, consider multiple interacting stresses, examine differential adaptive capacity, and be prospective as well as historical. On the basis of these criteria, we present a general methodological guideline of eight steps. To examine whether these eight steps, if attentively coordinated, do in fact achieve the criteria, and in turn satisfy the objective of the assessment, we discuss two case studies. We expect most readers to identify some of the steps as part of their well-established disciplinary practices. However, they should also identify one or more steps as uncommon to their research traditions. Thus taken together the eight steps constitute a novel methodological framework. We hypothesize that if researchers employ this framework, then the products of the research will (1) achieve the objective of preparing stakeholders for the effects of global change on a site-specific basis, and (2) further the “public good” of additional insights through cross-study comparisons of research projects designed according to common principles.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ahmad, Q.K. and Warrick, R.A.: 2001, ‘,Methods and tools’, in J.J. McCarthy, O.F. Canziani, N.A. Leary, D.J. Dokken and K.S. White (eds.), Climate Change 2001—Impacts, Adaptation, and Vulnerability, Contribution of Working Group II to the Third Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, pp. 107–143.

  • Alcamo, J., Ash, N.J., Butler, C.D., Callicott, J.B., Capistrano, D., Carpenter, S.R., Castilla, J.C., Chambers, R., Chopra, K., Cropper, A., Daily, G.C., Dasgupta, P., Groot, R.D., Dietz, T., Duraiappah, A.K., Gadgil, M., Hamilton, K., Hassan, R., Lambin, E.F., Lebel, L., Leemans, R., Jiyuan, L., Malingreau, J.P., May, R.M., McCalla, A.F., McMichael, T.A.J., Moldan, B., Mooney, H., Naeem, S., Nelson, G.C., Wen-Yuan, N., Noble, I., Zhiyun, B., Pagiola, S., Pauly, D., Percy, S., Pingali, P., Prescott-Allen, R., Reid, W.V., Ricketts, T.H., Samper, C., Scholes, R.B., Simons, H., Toth, F.L., Turpie, J.K., Watson, R.T., Wilbanks, T.J., Williams, M., Wood, S., Shidong, Z., and Zurek, M.B.: 2003, Ecosystems and Human Well-being: A Framework for Assessment—Millennium Ecosystem Assessment, Washington, Island Press.

  • Böhle, H.G., Downing, T.E. and Watts, M.: 1994, ‘,Climate change and social vulnerability: toward a sociology and geography of food insecurity’, Global Environmental Change 4(1), 37–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, P.: 2003, ‘,Who'd want to work in a team?’, Nature 424, 1 (Editorial).

  • Carter, T.R., Parry, M.L., Harasawa, H. and Nishioka, S.: 1994, ‘,IPCC Technical Guidelines for Assessing Climate Change Impacts and Adaptations’, Climate Change Impacts and Adaptations, London, UK and Tsukuba, Japan, Department of Geography, University College London and Center for Global Environmental Research, National Institute for Environmental Studies, pp. 59.

  • Cash, D.W., Clark, W.C., Alcock, F., Dickson, N.M., Eckley, N., Guston, D.H., Jäger, J. and Mitchell, R.B.: 2003, ‘,Knowledge systems for sustainable development’, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences United States of America 100(14), 8086–8091.

  • Clark, W.C.: 2002, ‘,Social Learning’, in Encyclopedia of Global Change. Oxford, Oxford University Press, pp. 382–384.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, W.C. and Dickson, N.M.: 2003, ‘,Sustainability science: The emerging research program’, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences United States of America 100(14), 8059–8061.

  • Cutter, S.: 1996, ‘,Vulnerability to environmental hazards’, Progress in Human Geography 20(4): 529–539.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dow, K.: 1992, ‘,Exploring differences in our common future(s): The meaning of vulnerability to global environmental change’, Geoforum 23, 417–436.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Downing, T.E.: 1991, ‘,Vulnerability to hunger in Africa: A climate change perspective’, Global Environmental Change 1, 365–380.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Downing, T.E.: 2000, ‘,Human dimensions research: Toward a vulnerability science?’, International Human Dimensions Program Update 31(3), 16–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Downing, T.E., Butterfield, R., Cohen, S., Huq, S., Moss, R., Rahman, A., Sokona, Y. and Stephen, L.: 2001, ‘,Vulnerability Indices: Climate Change Impacts and Adaptation’, United Nations Environment Programme Policy Series 3.

  • Easterling, W.E. and Polsky, C.: 2004, ‘,Crossing the complex divide: Linking scales for understanding coupled human-environment systems’, in R. McMaster and E. Sheppard (eds.), Scale and Geographic Inquiry, Oxford, Blackwell, pp. 55–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farrell, A., VanDeveer, S. and Jäger, J.: 2001, ‘,Environmental assessments: Four under-appreciated design elements’, Global Environmental Change 11(4), 311–333.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fischhoff, B.: 1995, ‘,Risk communication and perception unplugged: Twenty years of process’, Risk Analysis 15, 137–145.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fotheringham, S., Brunsdon, C. and Charlton, M.: 1998, ‘,Geographically weighted regression: A natural evolution of the expansion method for spatial data analysis’, Environment and Planning, A 30, 905–927.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fox, S.: 2002, When the Weather is Uggianaqtuq: Inuit Observations of Environmental Change, Multi-media, Interactive CD-ROM. Boulder, Colorado, USA, Cartography Lab, Department of Geography, University of Colorado at Boulder.

  • Garcia, R. (ed.): 1981, Drought and Man: The 1972 Case History, Volume 1: Nature Pleads Not Guilty, Oxford, Pergamon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Golding, D.: 2001, ‘,Vulnerability’, in A.S. Goudie and D.J. Cuff (eds.), Encyclopedia of Global Change: Environmental Change and Human Society, Oxford, Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoozemans, F.M.J., Marchand, M. and Pennekamp, H.A.: 1993, A Global Vulnerability Analysis: Vulnerability Assessment for Population, Coastal Wetlands and Rice Production on a Global Scale, 2nd rev. edn, The Netherlands, Delft Hydraulics, pp. 184.

  • Houghton, J.T., Ding, Y., Griggs, D.J., Noguer, M., van der Linden, P.J., Dai, X., Maskell, K. and Johnson, C.A.: 2001, Climate Change 2001: The Scientific Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Third Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), Cambridge, Cambridge, University Press, 881 pp.

  • IMAGE team: 2001, The IMAGE 2.2 Implementation of the SRES Scenarios: A Comprehensive Analysis of Emissions, Climate Change and Impacts in the 21st Century, RIVM CD-ROM Bilthoven, The Netherlands, National Institute of Public Health and the Environment, Publication 481508018.

  • IPCC CZMS: 1992, ‘,A common methodology for assessing vulnerability to sea-level rise—second revision' in Global Climate Change and the Rising Challenge of the Sea, Report of the Coastal Zone Management Subgroup, Response Strategies Working Group of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Ministry of Transport, Public Works and Water Management, The Hague, The Netherlands, Appendix C, pp. 27.

  • Jaeger, C.C., Renn, O., Rosa, E.A. and Webler, T.: 2001, ‘,Risk, Uncertainty, and Rational Action', London, UK, Earthscan Publication Ltd., pp. 320.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, R.N.: 2001, ‘,An environmental risk assessment/management framework for climate change impact assessments’, Natural Hazards 23, 197–230.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman, D. and Tversky, A.: 1979, ‘,Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk’, Econometrica 47, 263–291.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaly, U.L., Pratt, C.R., Mitchell, J. and Howorth, R.: 2003, The Demonstration Environmental Vulnerability Index (EVI), SOPAC Technical Report 356, 133 pp.

  • Kandlikar, M. and Risbey, J.: 2000, ‘,Agricultural impacts of climate change: If adaptation is the answer, what is the question?: An editorial comment’, Climatic Change 45, 529–539.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kasemir, B., Jäger, J., Jaeger, C.C. and Gardner, M.T. (eds.): 2003, Public Participation in Sustainability Science, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, pp. 311.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kasperson, J.X. and Kasperson, R.E. (eds.): 2001, Global Environmental Risk, Tokyo, United Nations University Press, pp. 574.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kasperson, J.X., Kasperson, R.E., Turner, B.L., Hsieh W. and Schiller, A.: 2003, ‘,Vulnerability to global environmental change’, in A. Diekman, T. Dietz, C.C. Jaeger and E.A. Rosa (eds.), The Human Dimensions of Global Environmental Change, Cambridge, MA, USA, MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kasperson, R.: 2001, ‘,Vulnerability and global environmental change’, International Human Dimensions Program Update 01(2), 2–3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kasperson, R.E., Renn, O., Slovic, P., Brown, H., Emel, J., Goble, R., Kasperson, J.X. and Ratick, S.: 1988, ‘,The social amplification of risk: A conceptual framework’, Risk Analysis 8(2), 177–187.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kates, R.W.: 1985, ‘,The Interaction of Climate and Society’, In R.W. Kates, J.H. Ausubel and M. Berberian (eds.), Climate Impact Assessment: Studies of the Interaction of Climate and Society, Wiley, Chichister.

  • Kates, R.W., Clark, W.C., Corell, R., Hall, J.M., Jaeger, C.C., Lowe, I., McCarthy, J.J., Schellnhuber, H.-J., Bolin, B., Dickson, N.M., Faucheux, S., Gallopin, G.C., Gruebler, A., Huntley, B., Jäger, J., Jodha, N.S., Kasperson, R.E., Mabogunje, A., Matson, P., Mooney, H., Moore III, B., O'Riordan, T. and Svedin, U.: 2001, ‘,Sustainability science’, Science 292, 641–642.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kelly, P.M. and Adger, W.N.: 2000, ‘,Theory and practice in assessing vulnerability to climate change and facilitating adaptation’, Climatic Change 47, 325–352.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klein, R.J.T. and Maciver, D.C.: 1999, ‘,Adaptation to climate variability and change: methodological issues’, Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change 4, 189–198.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klein, R.J.T., Nicholls, R.J. and Mimura, N.: 1999, ‘,Coastal adaptation to climate change: Can the IPCC technical guidelines be applied?’, Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change 4, 239–252.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liverman, D.: 2001, ‘,Vulnerability to global environmental change’, in J.X. Kasperson and R.E. Kasperson (eds.), Global Environmental Risk, Tokyo, United Nations University Press, pp. 201–216.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loewenstein, G. and Elster, J.: 1992, Choice Over Time, New York, USA, Russell Sage Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luers, A.L., Lobell, D.B., Sklar, L.S., Addams, C.L. and Matson, P.A.: 2003, ‘,A method for quantifying vulnerability, applied to the agricultural system of the Yaqui Valley, Mexico,’ Global Environmental Change 13, 255–267.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCarthy, J.J., Canziani, O.F., Leary, N.A., Dokken, D.J. and White, K.S. (eds.): 2001, Climate Change 2001: Impacts, Adaptation, and Vulnerability, Published for the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1032 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCarthy, J.J., Martello, M.L., Corell, R.W., Eckley, N., Hovelsrud-Broda, G., Mathiesen, S., Polsky, C., Selin, H. and Tyler, N.: 2003, Assessing Vulnerabilities: A Strategy for the Arctic. An Interdisciplinary and Intercultural Study to Assess the vulnerabilities of Coupled Human-Environment Systems in the Arctic, Submitted to The Arctic Climate Impact Assessment of the Arctic Council.

  • Moss, R., Brenkert, A. and Malone, E.L.: 2000, Measuring vulnerability: A trial indicator set. in Pacific Northwest Laboratories. Available online: http://www.pnl.gov/globalchange/projects/vul/indicators.pdf.

  • Nakicenovic, N. and Swart, R. (eds.): 2000, IPCC Special Report on Emissions Scenarios (SRES), Cambridge, UK, Cambridge University Press, pp. 570.

  • Nicholls, R.J.: 2002, ‘,Rising sea levels: Potential impacts an responses,’ in R.E. Hester and R.M. Harrison (eds.). Global Environmental Change, Issues in Envionmental Science and Technology, Royal Society of Chemistry, Cambridge, pp. 83–107.

    Google Scholar 

  • NRC: 1999, Our Common Journey: A Transition Toward Sustainability, Board on Sustainable Development, National Research Council, Washington, DC, USA, National Academy Press.

  • NRC: 2001, The Science of Regional and Global Change: Putting Knowledge to Work, Committee on Global Change Research, National Research Council, Washington, DC, USA, National Academy Press.

  • O'Brien, K., Sygna, L. and Haugen, J.E.: 2003, ‘,Vulnerable or resilient? A multi-scale assessment of climate impacts and vulnerability in Norway’, Climatic Change 464, 193–225.

    Google Scholar 

  • O'Brien, K. and Leichenko, R.: 2004, ‘,Double exposure: Assessing the impacts of climate change within the context of economic globalization’, Global Environmental Change 10, 221–232.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parry, M.L.: 2001, ‘,Viewpoint—climate change: Where should our research priorities be?’ Global Environmental Change 11, 257–260.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parry, M. and Carter, T.: 1998, Climate Impact and Adaptation Assessment—A Guide to the IPCC Approach, London, UK, Earthscan, pp. 166.

    Google Scholar 

  • Patt, A.G.: 2001, ‘,Understanding uncertainty: forecasting seasonal climate for farmers in Zimbabwe’, Risk Decision and Policy 6, 105–119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Patt, A.G. and Gwata, C.: 2002, ‘,Effective seasonal climate forecast applications: Examining constraints for subsistence farmers in Zimbabwe’, Global Environmental Change 12, 185–195.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Petschel-Held, G., Block, A., Cassel-Gintz, M., Kropp, J., Lüdecke, M.K.B., Moldenhauer, O., Reusswig, F. and Schellnhuber, H.-J.: 1999, ‘,Syndromes of global change—a qualitative modelling approach to assist global environmental management’, Environmental Modeling and Assessment 4(4), 295–314.

    Google Scholar 

  • Polsky, C.: 2004, ‘,Putting space and time in Ricardian climate change impact studies: The case of agriculture in the U.S. great plains’, Annals of the Association of American Geographers 94(3), 549–564.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Polsky, C. and Munroe, D.: 2004, in press, ‘,Studying scale and scalar dynamics in integrated regional assessments’, in C.G. Knight and J. Jäger (eds.), Integrated Regional Assessments.

  • Polsky, C., Schröter, D., Patt, A., Gaffin, S., Martello, M.L., Neff, R., Pulsipher, A. and Selin, H.: 2003, Assessing Vulnerabilities to the Effects of Global Change: An Eight-Step Approach. Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs Working Paper, Environment and Natural Resources Program, John F. Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts.

  • Raskin, P., Banuri, T., Gallopin, G., Gutman, P., Hammond, A., Kates, R. and Swart, R.: 2002, Great Transition: The Promise and Lure of the Times Ahead, Boston, MA, USA, Global Scenario Group, Stockholm Environment Institute. http://www.tellus.org/seib/publications/Great_Transitions.pdf.

  • Ribot, J.C., Magalhaes, A. and Panagides, S. (eds.): 1996, Climate Variability, Climate Change, and Social Vulnerability in the Semi-Arid Tropics, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ribot, J.C.: 1996, Climate variability, Climate Change and Vulnerability: Moving forward by looking back, in J. C. Ribot, A. R. Magalhaes, and S. Panagides (eds.), Climate Variability, Climate Change and Social Vulnerability in the Semi-Arid Tropics, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, pp. 1–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Riebsame, W.E.: 1989, Assessing the Social Implications of Climate Fluctuations: A Guide to Climate Impact Studies, World Climate Impacts Programme, Nairobi, United Nations Environment Programme.

  • Sabatier, P. and Jenkins-Smith, H.: 1999, ‘,The advocacy coalition framework: An assessment’, in P. Sabatier (ed.), Theories of the Policy Process, Boulder, Colorado, USA, Westview Press, pp. 117–166.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, S.H., Easterling, W.E. and Mearns, L.O.: 2000, ‘,Adaptation: Sensitivity to natural variability, agent assumptions and dynamic climate changes’, Climatic Change 45, 203–221.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smit, B., Burton, I., Klein, R.J.T. and Street, R.: 1999, ‘,The science of adaptation: A framework for assessment’, Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change 4(3,4), 199–213.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smit, B. and Pilifosova, O.: 2001, ‘,Adaptation to climate change in the context of sustainable development and equity’, in J.J. McCarthy, O.F. Canziani, N.A. Leary, D.J. Dokken and K.S. White (eds.), Climate Change 2001—Impacts, Adaptation, and Vulnerability, Contribution of Working Group II to the Third Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, pp. 877–912.

  • Smith, J. B., Schellnhuber, H.-J. and Qader Mirza, M.M.: 2001, ‘,Vulnerability to climate change and reasons for concern: A synthesis’, in J.J. McCarthy, O.F. Canziani, N.A. Leary, D.J. Dokken and K.S. White (eds.), Climate Change 2001—Impacts, Adaptation, and Vulnerability, Contribution of Working Group II to the Third Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, pp. 915–967.

  • Smithers, J. and Smit, B.: 1997, ‘,Human Adaptation to Climatic Variability and Change’, Global Environmental Change 7(2), 129–146.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stephen, L. and Downing, T.E.: 2001, ‘,Getting the scale rights: A comparison of analytical methods for vulnerability assessment and household-level targeting’. Disasters 25(2), 113–135.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turner, B.L., Kasperson, R.E., Matson, P., McCarthy, J.J., Corell, R.W., Christensen, L., Eckley, N., Kasperson, J.X., Luers, A., Martello, M.L., Polsky, C., Pulsipher, A. and Schiller, A.: 2003a, ‘,A framework for vulnerability analysis in sustainability science’, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, United States of America 100, 8074–8079.

  • Turner, B.L., Kasperson, R.E., Meyer, W.B., Dow, K.M., Golding, D., Kasperson, J.X., Mitchell, R.C. and Ratick, S.J.: 1990, ‘,Two Types of Environmental Change: Definitional and Spatial-Scale Issues in their Human Dimensions’, Global Environmental Change, 1(1), 14–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turner, B.L., Matson, P., McCarthy, J.J., Corell, R.W., Christensen, L., Eckley, N., Hovelsrud-Broda, G., Kasperson, J.X., Kasperson, R.E., Luers, A., Martello, M.L., Mathiesen, S., Polsky, C., Pulsipher, A., Schiller, A. and Tyler, N.: 2003b, ‘,Illustrating the coupled human-environment system for vulnerability analysis: Three case studies’, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, United States of America 100, 8080–8085.

  • Turner, B.L. and Meyer, W.B.: 1991, ‘,Land use and land cover in global environmental change: Considerations for study’, International Social Science Journal 130, 669–679.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker, B., Carpenter, S., Anderies, J., Abel, N., Cummings, G., Janssen, M., Lebel, L., Norberg, J., Peterson, G.D. and Pritchard, R.: 2002, ‘,Resilience management in social-ecological systems: A working hypothesis for a participatory approach’, Conservation Ecology 6(1), 14 (online). http://www.consecol.org/vol6/iss1/art14/main.html.

  • Waltner-Toews, D., Kay, J.J., Neudoerffer, C. and Gitau, T.: 2003, ‘,Perspective changes everything: managing ecosystems from the inside out’, Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 1(1), 23–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watts, M.: 1983, ‘,On the poverty of theory: Natural hazards research in context’, in K. Hewitt (ed.), Interpretations of Calamity from the Viewpoint of Human Ecology, Boston, Massachusetts, Allen & Unwin, pp. 231–262.

    Google Scholar 

  • Warwick, C., Bakker, K., Downing, T.E. and Lonsdale, K.: 2003, ‘,Scenarios as a tool in water management: Considerations of scale and application’, in A.S. Alsharhan and W.W. Wood (eds.), Water Resources Perspectives: Evaluation, Management and Policy, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, Elsevier Science, pp. 1–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, G.F., Kates, R.W. and Burton, I.: 2001, ‘,Knowing better and losing even more: The use of knowledge in hazards management’, Environmental Hazards 3(3,4), 81–92.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dagmar Schröter.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Schröter, D., Polsky, C. & Patt, A.G. Assessing vulnerabilities to the effects of global change: an eight step approach. Mitig Adapt Strat Glob Change 10, 573–595 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11027-005-6135-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11027-005-6135-9

Keywords

Navigation