Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Decision neuroscience and consumer decision making

  • Published:
Marketing Letters Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This article proposes that neuroscience can shape future theory and models in consumer decision making and suggests ways that neuroscience methods can be used in decision-making research. The article argues that neuroscience facilitates better theory development and empirical testing by considering the physiological context and the role of constructs such as hunger, stress, and social influence on consumer choice and preferences. Neuroscience can also provide new explanations for different sources of heterogeneity within and across populations, suggest novel hypotheses with respect to choices and underlying mechanisms that accord with an understanding of biology, and allow for the use of neural data to make better predictions about consumer behavior. The article suggests that despite some challenges associated with incorporating neuroscience into research on consumer decision processes, the use of neuroscience paradigms will produce a deeper understanding of decision making that can lead to the development of more effective decision aids and interventions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Behrens, T. E. J., Hunt, L. T., Woolrich, M. W., & Rushworth, M. F. S. (2008). Associative learning of social value. Nature, 456, 245–U245.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berns, G. S., & Moore, S. (2012). A neural predictor of cultural popularity. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 22, 154–160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berns, G. S., Capra, C. M., Moore, S., & Noussair, C. (2010). Neural mechanisms of the influence of popularity on adolescent ratings of music. NeuroImage, 49, 2687–2696.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chib, V. S., Rangel, A., Shimojo, S., & O’Doherty, J. (2009). Evidence for a common representation of decision values for dissimilar goods in human ventromedial prefrontal cortex. Journal of Neuroscience, 29(39), 12315–12320.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doll, B., Hutchison, K., & Frank, M. (2011). Dopaminergic genes predict individual differences in susceptibility to confirmation bias. Journal of Neuroscience, 31, 6188–6198.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fellows, L. K., & Farah, M. J. (2007). The role of ventromedial prefrontal cortex in decision making: judgment under uncertainty or judgment per se? Cerebral Cortex, 17(11), 2669–2674.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glimcher, P., Camerer, C., Fehr, E., & Poldrack, R. (2009). Neuroeconomics: decision making and the brain. Amsterdam: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gul, F., & Pesendorfer, W. (2008). The case for mindless economics. In A. Caplin & A. Shotter (Eds.), The foundations of positive and normative economics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ho, C., & Spence, C. (2009). Using peripersonal warning signals to orient a driver’s gaze. Human Factors, 51, 539–556.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kable, J., & Glimcher, P. (2007). The neural correlates of subjective value during intertemporal choice. Nature Neuroscience, 10, 1625–1633.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kable, J., & Glimcher, P. (2009). The neurobiology of decision: consensus and controversy. Neuron, 63, 733–745.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kable, J., & Glimcher, P. (2010). An “as soon as possible” effect in human intertemporal decision making: behavioral evidence and neural mechanisms. Journal of Neurophysiology, 103, 2513–2531.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klucharev, V., Hytonen, K., Rijpkema, M., Smidts, A., & Fernandez, G. (2009). Reinforcement learning signal predicts social conformity. Neuron, 61, 140–151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knutson, B., Rick, S., Wimmer, G. E., Prelec, D., & Loewenstein, G. (2007). Neural predictors of purchases. Neuron, 53, 147–156.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kringelbach, M. L. (2005). The human orbitofrontal cortex: Linking reward to hedonic experience. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 6, 691–702.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krugel, L., Biele, G., Mohr, P., Li, S.-C., & Heekeren, H. (2009). Genetic variation in dopaminergic neuromodulation influences the ability to rapidly and flexibly adapt decisions. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science, 106, 17951–17956.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Litt, A., Plassmann, H., Shiv, B., & Rangel, A. (2011). Dissociating valuation and saliency signals during decision-making. Cerebral Cortex, 21, 95–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mehta, P.H., Yap, A., & Mor, S. (2010). The biology of bargaining: dynamic hormone changes during negotiation predict economic profit. Talk presented at the conference for the Social and Affective Neuroscience Society, Chicago, IL.

  • Plassmann, H., O’Doherty, J., & Rangel, A. (2007). Orbitofrontal cortex encodes willingness to pay in everyday economic transaction. Journal of Neuroscience, 27(37), 9984–9988.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Plassmann, H., O’Doherty, J., & Rangel, A. (2010). Aversive goal values are negatively encoded in the medial orbitofrontal cortex at the time of decision-making. Journal of Neuroscience, 30(32), 10799–10808.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Poldrack, R. (2006). Can cognitive processes be inferred from neuroimaging data? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 10, 59–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Poldrack, R., Halchenko, Y., & Hanson, S. (2009). Decoding the large-scale structure of brain function by classifying mental states across individuals. Psychological Science, 20, 1364–1372.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raafat, R. M., Chater, N., & Frith, C. (2009). Herding in humans. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 13, 420–428.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schultz, W., Dayan, P., & Montague, P. R. (1997). A neural substrate of prediction and reward. Science, 275, 1593–1599.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sheese, B. E., Voelker, P. M., Rothbart, M. K., & Posner, M. I. (2007). Parenting quality interacts with genetic variation in dopamine receptor D4 to influence temperament in early childhood. Development and Psychopathology, 19, 1039–1046.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, D., Hayden, B., Truong, T.-K., Song, A., Platt, M., & Huettel, S. (2010). Distinct value signals in anterior and posterior ventromedial prefrontal cortex. Journal of Neuroscience, 30(7), 2490–2495.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tusche, A., Bode, S., & Haynes, J.-D. (2010). Neural responses to unattended products predict later consumer choices. Journal of Neuroscience, 30(23), 8024–8031.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vartanian, O., & Mandel, D. (2011). Neuroscience of decision making. New York: Psychology Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Venkatraman, V., Payne, J., Bettman, J., Luce, M., & Huettel, S. (2009). Separate neural mechanisms underlie choices and strategic preferences in risky decision making. Neuron, 62, 593–602.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Venkatraman, V., Clithoro, J. A., Fitzsimons, G. A., & Huettel, S. A. (2012). New scanner data for brand marketers: how neuroscience can help better understand differences in brand preferences. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 22, 143–153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wadhwa, M., Shiv, B., & Nowlis, S. M. (2008). A bite to whet the reward appetite: the influence of sampling on reward-seeking behaviors. Journal of Marketing Research, 45, 403–413.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weisberg, D., Keil, F., Goodstein, J., Rawson, E., & Gray, J. (2008). The seductive allure of neuroscience explanations. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 20, 470–477.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yoon, C., Gutchess, A. H., Feinberg, F., & Polk, T. A. (2006). A functional magnetic resonance imaging study of neural dissociations between brand and person judgments. Journal of Consumer Research, 33, 31–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Carolyn Yoon.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Yoon, C., Gonzalez, R., Bechara, A. et al. Decision neuroscience and consumer decision making. Mark Lett 23, 473–485 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11002-012-9188-z

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11002-012-9188-z

Keywords

Navigation