Skip to main content
Log in

Choice Based on Goals

  • Published:
Marketing Letters Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This article introduces a goal-based view of consumer choice in which (1) choice is influenced by three classes of goals (consumption goals, criterion goals, and process goals), (2) goals are cognitively represented, and (3) the impact of a goal on choice depends on its activation. For each class of goals, we discuss how goal activation is influenced by direct (subconscious) goal priming, by spreading activation from choice options, from other goals, and from the context, and by goal (non-)achievement. Opportunities for modeling goal-based choice, the integration of emotions in a theory of goal-based choice, and relationships with dual-process theories of decision making are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anderson, John R., Daniel Bothell, Michael D. Byrne, Scott Douglass, Christian Lebiere, and Yulin Qin. (2004). “An Integrated Theory of the Mind,” Psychological Review 111, 1036–1060.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ariely, Dan and Jonathan Levav. (2000). “Sequential Choice in Group Settings: Taking the Road Less Traveled and Less Enjoyed,” Journal of Consumer Research 27, 279–290.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bagozzi, Richard P., Hans Baumgartner, Rik Pieters, and Marcel Zeelenberg. (2000). “The Role of Emotions in Goal-Directed Behavior.” In S. Ratneshwar, David Glen Mick, and Cynthia Huffman (eds.), The Why of Consumption: Contemporary Perspectives on Consumer Motives, Goals, and Desires. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bargh, John A., Mark Chen, and Laura Burrows. (1996). “Automaticity of Social Behavior: Direct Effects of Trait Construct and Stereotype Activation on Action,” Journal of Personality & Social Psychology 71, 230–244.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bargh, John A., Peter M. Gollwitzer, Annette Lee-Chai, Kimberly Barndollar, and Roman Troetschel. (2001). “The Automated Will: Nonconscious Activation and Pursuit of Behavioral Goals,” Journal of Personality & Social Psychology 81, 1014–1027.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bargh, John A., Paula Raymond, John B. Pryor, and Fritz Strack. (1995). “Attractiveness of the Underling: An Automatic Power $ Sex Association and its Consequences for Sexual Harassment and Aggression,” Journal of Personality & Social Psychology 68, 768–781.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bettman, James R., Mary Frances Luce, and John W. Payne. (1998). “Constructive Consumer Choice Processes,” Journal of Consumer Research 25, 187–217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brendl, C. Miguel, Arthur B. Markman, and Claude Messner. (2003). “The Devaluation Effect: Activating a Need Devalues Unrelated Objects,” Journal of Consumer Research 29, 463–473.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chaiken, Shelly and Yaacov Trope (eds.), (1999). Dual-Process Theories in Social Psychology. New York: Guilford.

  • Chartrand, Tanya L. (2000). Consequences of Success and Failure at Automatic Goal Pursuit for Mood, Self-efficacy, and Subsequent Performance. Ph.D. Dissertation. New York University.

  • Cziksentmihalyi, Mihaly and Jeanne Nakamura. (1999). “Emerging Goals and the Self-Regulation of Behavior,” In Robert S. Wyer, Jr. (ed.), Advances in Social Cognition Vol. 12: Perspectives on Behavioral Self-Regulation. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fishbach, Ayelet and Ravi Dhar. (2004). “Goals as Excuses versus Guides: The Liberating Effect of Perceived Goal Progress,” paper presented at Association for Consumer Research North-American Conference, Portland, OR.

  • Fishbach, Ayelet, Ronald S. Friedman, and Arie W. Kruglanski. (2003). “Leading Us Not into Temptation: Momentary Allurements Elicit Overriding Goal Activation,” Journal of Personality & Social Psychology 84, 296–309.

    Google Scholar 

  • Isen, Alice M. (1997). “Positive Affect and Decision Making,” In William Mark Goldstein and Robin M. Hogarth (eds.), Research on Judgment and Decision Making: Currents, Connections, and Controversies. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kruglanski, Arie W., James Y. Shah, Ayelet Fishbach, Ron Friedman, Woo Young Chun, and David Sleeth-Keppler. (2002). “A Theory of Goal Systems”. In Mark P. Zanna (ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, Angela Y. and Brian Sternthal. (1999). “The Effects of Positive Mood on Memory,” Journal of Consumer Research 26, 115–127.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luce, Mary Frances, James R. Bettman, and John W. Payne. (2001). Emotional Decisions: Tradeoff Difficulty and Coping in Consumer Choice. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pham, Michel Tuan, Joel B. Cohen, John W. Pracejus, and G. David Hughes. (2001). “Affect Monitoring and the Primacy of Feelings in Judgment,” Journal of Consumer Research 28, 167–188.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Puntoni, Stefano and Nader T. Tavassoli. (2004). “Social Context and Message Reception”. Working paper. London Business School.

  • Ramanathan, Suresh and Geeta Menon. (2004). “Dynamic Effects of Chronic Hedonic Goals on Spontaneous Affect and Impulsive Behavior,” Working paper. University of Chicago.

  • Read, Stephen J. (1987). “Constructing Causal Scenarios: A Knowledge Structure Approach to Causal Reasoning,” Journal of Personality & Social Psychology 52, 288–302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Read, Stephen J. and Jorge A. Montoya. (1999). “An Autoassociative Model of Causal Reasoning and Causal Learning: A Reply to Van Overwalle's. (1998). Critique of Read and Marcus-Newhall (1993),” Journal of Personality & Social Psychology 76, 728–742.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Russo, J. Edward, Margaret G. Meloy, and Victoria Husted Medvec. (1998). “Predecisional Distortion of Product Information,” Journal of Marketing Research 35, 438–452.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sanbonmatsu, David M., Steven S. Posavac, Frank R. Kardes, and Susan P. Mantel. (1998). “Selective Hypothesis Testing,” Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 5, 197–220.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schank, Roger C. and Robert P. Abelson. (1977). Scripts, Plans, Goals, and Understanding: An Inquiry into Human Knowledge Structures. Oxford: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shah, James. (2003). “Automatic for the People: How Representations of Significant Others Implicitly Affect Goal Pursuit,” Journal of Personality & Social Psychology 84, 661–681.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shah, James Y. and Arie W. Kruglanski. (2002). “Priming Against Your Will: How Accessible Alternatives Affect Goal Pursuit,” Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 38, 368–383.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shah, James Y. and Arie W. Kruglanski. (2003). “When Opportunity Knocks: Bottom-up Priming of Goals by Means and its Effects on Self-regulation,” Journal of Personality & Social Psychology 84, 1109–1122.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shiv, Baba and Joel Huber. (2000). “The Impact of Anticipating Satisfaction on Consumer Choice,” Journal of Consumer Research 27, 202–216.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simon, Dan, Chadwick J. Snow, and Stephen J. Read. (2004). “The Redux of Cognitive Consistency Theories: Evidence Judgments by Constraint Satisfaction,” Journal of Personality & Social Psychology 86, 814–837.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simon, Herbert A. (1955). “A Behavioral Model of Rational Choice,” Quarterly Journal of Economics 69, 99–118.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simonson, Itamar. (1989). “Choice Based on Reasons,” Journal of Consumer Research 16, 158–174

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tversky, Amos, and Daniel Kahneman. (1981). “The Framing of Decisions and the Psychology of Choice,” Science 211, 453–458.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Osselaer, Stijn M. J. and Chris Janiszewski. (2001). “Two Ways of Learning Brand Associations,” Journal of Consumer Research 28, 202–223.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Osselaer, Stijn M. J., Chris Janiszewski, and Marcus Cunha Jr. (2004). “Stimulus Generalization in Two Associative Learning Processes,” Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition 30, 626–638.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Stijn M. J. Van Osselaer.

Additional information

An expanded version of this paper is available from the first author.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Van Osselaer, S.M.J., Ramanathan, S., Campbell, M.C. et al. Choice Based on Goals. Market Lett 16, 335–346 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11002-005-5896-y

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11002-005-5896-y

Keywords

Navigation