Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Editorial 7.3: Introduction to the thematic issue

  • Editorial
  • Published:
Language Policy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

    We’re sorry, something doesn't seem to be working properly.

    Please try refreshing the page. If that doesn't work, please contact support so we can address the problem.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Abedi, J. (2004). The no child left behind act and English language learners: Assessment and accountability issues. Educational Researcher, 33(1), 4–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Abedi, J. & Dietal, R. (2004, Winter). Challenges in the no child left behind act for English language learners. CRESST Policy Brief 7. Los Angeles: National Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, and Student Testing.

  • Cheng, L., Watanabe, Y., & Curtis, A. (Eds.). (2004). Washback in language testing: Research contexts and methods. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, R. L. (1989). Language planning and social change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Corson, D. (1999). Language policy in schools: A resource for teachers and administrators. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crawford, J. (1999). Bilingual education: History, politics, theory and practice. Los Angeles: Bilingual Education Services Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crawford, J. (2000). At war with diversity: U.S. language policy in an age of anxiety. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crawford, J. (2002, Summer). Obituary: The bilingual ed act, 1968–2002. Rethinking schools online, 16(4): 1–4. Retrieved July 13, 2008 from, http://www.rethinkingschools.org/archive/16_04/Bil164.shtml.

  • Crawford, J. (2004). No child left behind: Misguided approach to school accountability for English language learners. Paper for the Forum on ideas to improve the NCLB accountability provisions for students with disabilities and English language learners. Washington, DC: Center on Education Policy & National Association for Bilingual Education.

  • Evans, B., & Hornberger, N. (2005). No child left behind: Repealing and unpeeling federal language education policy in the United States. Language Policy, 4, 87–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Government Accountability Office. (2006). No child left behind act: Assistance from education could help states better measure progress of students with limited English proficiency. Washington, DC: Author.

  • Hill, P. (2000). The federal role in education. In D. Ravitch (Ed.), Brookings papers on education policy 2000 (pp. 11–40). Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hornberger, N. (2006). Frameworks and models in language policy and planning. In T. Ricento (Ed.), An introduction to language policy: Theory and method (pp. 24–41). Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manna, P. (2006). School’s in: Federalism and the national education agenda. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Menken, K. (2008). English learners left behind: Standardized testing as language policy. Clevedon, Avon: Multilingual Matters.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Clearinghouse for English Language Acquisition. (2006). How has the English language learner population changed in recent years? Washington, DC: Author. Retrieved June 12, 2008 http://www.ncela.gwu.edu/expert/faq/08leps.html.

  • National Clearinghouse for English Language Acquisition. (2007). The growing number of limited English proficient students 1995/96–2005/06. Poster. Washington, DC: Author. Retrieved June 12, 2008 from http://www.ncela.gwu.edu/policy/states/reports/statedata/2005LEP/GrowingLEP_0506.pd.

  • New York City Department of Education, Office of English Language Learners. (2008). New York City’s English language learners: Demographics and performance. Draft Report. New York: Author.

  • Shohamy, E. (2001). The power of tests: A critical perspective on the uses of language tests. London: Longman/Pearson Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shohamy, E. (2006). Language policy: Hidden agendas and new approaches. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spolsky, B. (2004). Language policy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Census Bureau. (2000). QT-P16 Language spoken at home: 2000. Census 2000 Summary File 3. Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Department of Education. (2001). The No Child Left Behind Act of 2001. P.L. 107–110. Washington, DC.

  • U.S. Department of Education, Office of the Education Secretary. (2006). Secretary spellings announces partnership with states to improve accountability for limited English proficient students. Press Release, July 27, 2006.

  • Wall, D. (1997). Impact and washback in language testing. In C. Clapham & D. Corson (Eds.), Language testing and assessment, Encyclopedia of language and education, Volume 7. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiley, T., & Wright, W. (2004). Against the undertow: Language-minority education policy and politics in the “age of accountability”. Educational Policy, 18(1), 142–168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. City University of New York—Queens College & Graduate Center, New York, NY, USA

    Kate Menken

Authors
  1. Kate Menken
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kate Menken.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Menken, K. Editorial 7.3: Introduction to the thematic issue. Lang Policy 7, 191–199 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10993-008-9104-9

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10993-008-9104-9

Search

Navigation