Abstract
An important debate in the current literature is whether “all truth-conditional effects of extra-linguistic context can be traced to [a variable at; LM] logical form” (Stanley, ‘Context and Logical Form’, Linguistics and Philosophy, 23 (2000) 391). That is, according to Stanley, the only truth-conditional effects that extra-linguistic context has are localizable in (potentially silent) variable-denoting pronouns or pronoun-like items, which are represented in the syntax/at logical form (pure indexicals like I or today are put aside in this discussion). According to Recanati (‘Unarticulated Constituents’, Linguistics and Philosophy, 25 (2002) 299), extra-linguistic context can have additional truth-conditional effects, in the form of optional pragmatic processes like ‘free enrichment’. This paper shows that Recanati’s position is not warranted, since there is an alternative line of analysis that obviates the need to assume free enrichment. In the alternative analysis, we need Stanley’s variables, but we need to give them the freedom to be or not to be generated in the syntax/present at logical form, a kind of optionality that has nothing to do with the pragmatics-related optionality of free enrichment.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Breheny R.: 2003a, ‘On Bindability’, Proceedings of the Fourteenth Amsterdam Colloquium, ILLC, University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Breheny R.: 2003b, ‘A Lexical Account of Implicit (Bound) Contextual Dependence’, Proceedings of Semantics and Linguistic Theory 13, University of Washington, CLC Publications, Ithaca, NY.
H. Cappelen E. Lepore (2002) ArticleTitle‘Indexicality, Binding, Anaphora and a priori Truth’ Analysis 62 271–81 Occurrence Handle10.1093/analys/62.4.271
R. Carston (2002) Thoughts and Utterances. The Pragmatics of Explicit Communication Blackwell Oxford, UK Occurrence Handle10.1002/9780470754603
G. Chierchia (1993) ArticleTitle‘Questions with Quantifiers’ Natural Language Semantics 1 181–234 Occurrence Handle10.1007/BF00372562
Dayal V. (1997) ‘Free Relatives and Ever: Identity and Free Choice Readings’,Proceedings of Semantics and Linguistic Theory 7, Stanford University, CLC Publications, Ithaca, NY.
D. Dowty (1978) ArticleTitle‘Lexically-Governed Transformations as Lexical Rules in a Montague Grammar’ Linguistic Inquiry 9 393–426
D. Dowty (1982a) ‘Grammatical Relations and Montague Grammar’ P. Jacobson G. Pullum (Eds) The Nature of Syntactic Representation Reidel New York 79–130 Occurrence Handle10.1007/978-94-009-7707-5_4
Dowty D.: 1982b, ‘Quantification and the Lexicon: A Reply to Fodor and Fodor’, in T. Hoekstra H. van der Hulst and M. Moortgat (eds.), The Scope of Lexical Rules, pp. 79–106, Foris Publications, Dordrecht.
E. Engdahl (1986) Constituent Questions Reidel New York
von Fintel K. (2000) ‘Whatever’, Proceedings of Semantics and Linguistic Theory 10, Cornell University, CLC Publications, Ithaca, NY.
Groenendijk, J. and M. Stokhof: (1983) ‘Interrogative Quantifiers and Skolem Functions’, in K. Ehlich and H. van Riemsdijk (eds.), Connectedness in Sentence, Discourse and Text, Tilburg Studies in Language and Literature 4, pp. 71–110, Tilburg University, Tilburg, The Netherlands
Jacobson, P. (1995) ‘On the Quantificational Force of Free Relatives’, in E. Bach, E. Jelinek, A. Kratzer and B. Partee (eds.), Quantification in Natural Languages, pp. 451–86, Kluwer, Dordrecht.
Martí, L. (2003) Contextual Variables, PhD dissertation, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT.
S. McConnell-Ginet (1982) ArticleTitle‘Adverbs and Logical Form’ Language 58 144–84 Occurrence Handle10.2307/413534
J. Mitchell (1986) The Formal Semantics of Point of View University of Massachusetts Amherst, MA
T. Parsons (1990) Events in the Semantics of English MIT Press Cambridge, MA
Partee, B.: (1989) ‘Binding Implicit Variables in Quantified Contexts’, Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Chicago Linguistics Society 25 (Part One: The General Session), pp. 342–365, University of Chicago, The Chicago Linguistics Society, Chicago, IL.
J. Perry (1993) The Problem of the Essential Indexical and Other Essays Oxford University Press New York, NY
Perry, J. (1998) ‘Indexicals, Contexts, and Unarticulated Constituents’, in D. Westerståhl et al. (eds.), Computing Natural Language, pp. 1–11, CSLI Publications, Stanford, CA.
F. Recanati (2002) ArticleTitle‘Unarticulated Constituents’ Linguistics and Philosophy 25 299–345 Occurrence Handle10.1023/A:1015267930510
F. Recanati (2003) Literal Meaning Cambridge University Press Cambridge, UK Occurrence Handle10.1017/CBO9780511615382
J. Stanley (2000) ArticleTitle‘Context and Logical Form’ Linguistics and Philosophy 23 391–434 Occurrence Handle10.1023/A:1005599312747
J. Stanley Z. Szabó (2000) ArticleTitle‘On Quantifier Domain Restriction’ Mind and Language 15 219–61 Occurrence Handle10.1111/1468-0017.00130
K. Taylor (2001) ArticleTitle‘Sex, Breakfast, and Descriptus Interruptus’ Synthese 128 45–61 Occurrence Handle10.1023/A:1010349621943
D. Wilson D. Sperber (2000) ArticleTitle‘Truthfulness and Relevance’ UCL Working Papers in Linguistics 12 215–54
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Martí, L. Unarticulated Constituents Revisited. Linguistics & Philosophy 29, 135–166 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10988-005-4740-4
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10988-005-4740-4