Skip to main content
Log in

Unarticulated Constituents Revisited

  • Published:
Linguistics and Philosophy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

An important debate in the current literature is whether “all truth-conditional effects of extra-linguistic context can be traced to [a variable at; LM] logical form” (Stanley, ‘Context and Logical Form’, Linguistics and Philosophy, 23 (2000) 391). That is, according to Stanley, the only truth-conditional effects that extra-linguistic context has are localizable in (potentially silent) variable-denoting pronouns or pronoun-like items, which are represented in the syntax/at logical form (pure indexicals like I or today are put aside in this discussion). According to Recanati (‘Unarticulated Constituents’, Linguistics and Philosophy, 25 (2002) 299), extra-linguistic context can have additional truth-conditional effects, in the form of optional pragmatic processes like ‘free enrichment’. This paper shows that Recanati’s position is not warranted, since there is an alternative line of analysis that obviates the need to assume free enrichment. In the alternative analysis, we need Stanley’s variables, but we need to give them the freedom to be or not to be generated in the syntax/present at logical form, a kind of optionality that has nothing to do with the pragmatics-related optionality of free enrichment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Breheny R.: 2003a, ‘On Bindability’, Proceedings of the Fourteenth Amsterdam Colloquium, ILLC, University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

  • Breheny R.: 2003b, ‘A Lexical Account of Implicit (Bound) Contextual Dependence’, Proceedings of Semantics and Linguistic Theory 13, University of Washington, CLC Publications, Ithaca, NY.

  • H. Cappelen E. Lepore (2002) ArticleTitle‘Indexicality, Binding, Anaphora and a priori Truth’ Analysis 62 271–81 Occurrence Handle10.1093/analys/62.4.271

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • R. Carston (2002) Thoughts and Utterances. The Pragmatics of Explicit Communication Blackwell Oxford, UK Occurrence Handle10.1002/9780470754603

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • G. Chierchia (1993) ArticleTitle‘Questions with Quantifiers’ Natural Language Semantics 1 181–234 Occurrence Handle10.1007/BF00372562

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dayal V. (1997) ‘Free Relatives and Ever: Identity and Free Choice Readings’,Proceedings of Semantics and Linguistic Theory 7, Stanford University, CLC Publications, Ithaca, NY.

  • D. Dowty (1978) ArticleTitle‘Lexically-Governed Transformations as Lexical Rules in a Montague Grammar’ Linguistic Inquiry 9 393–426

    Google Scholar 

  • D. Dowty (1982a) ‘Grammatical Relations and Montague Grammar’ P. Jacobson G. Pullum (Eds) The Nature of Syntactic Representation Reidel New York 79–130 Occurrence Handle10.1007/978-94-009-7707-5_4

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Dowty D.: 1982b, ‘Quantification and the Lexicon: A Reply to Fodor and Fodor’, in T. Hoekstra H. van der Hulst and M. Moortgat (eds.), The Scope of Lexical Rules, pp. 79–106, Foris Publications, Dordrecht.

  • E. Engdahl (1986) Constituent Questions Reidel New York

    Google Scholar 

  • von Fintel K. (2000) ‘Whatever’, Proceedings of Semantics and Linguistic Theory 10, Cornell University, CLC Publications, Ithaca, NY.

  • Groenendijk, J. and M. Stokhof: (1983) ‘Interrogative Quantifiers and Skolem Functions’, in K. Ehlich and H. van Riemsdijk (eds.), Connectedness in Sentence, Discourse and Text, Tilburg Studies in Language and Literature 4, pp. 71–110, Tilburg University, Tilburg, The Netherlands

  • Jacobson, P. (1995) ‘On the Quantificational Force of Free Relatives’, in E. Bach, E. Jelinek, A. Kratzer and B. Partee (eds.), Quantification in Natural Languages, pp. 451–86, Kluwer, Dordrecht.

  • Martí, L. (2003) Contextual Variables, PhD dissertation, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT.

  • S. McConnell-Ginet (1982) ArticleTitle‘Adverbs and Logical Form’ Language 58 144–84 Occurrence Handle10.2307/413534

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • J. Mitchell (1986) The Formal Semantics of Point of View University of Massachusetts Amherst, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • T. Parsons (1990) Events in the Semantics of English MIT Press Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Partee, B.: (1989) ‘Binding Implicit Variables in Quantified Contexts’, Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Chicago Linguistics Society 25 (Part One: The General Session), pp. 342–365, University of Chicago, The Chicago Linguistics Society, Chicago, IL.

  • J. Perry (1993) The Problem of the Essential Indexical and Other Essays Oxford University Press New York, NY

    Google Scholar 

  • Perry, J. (1998) ‘Indexicals, Contexts, and Unarticulated Constituents’, in D. Westerståhl et al. (eds.), Computing Natural Language, pp. 1–11, CSLI Publications, Stanford, CA.

  • F. Recanati (2002) ArticleTitle‘Unarticulated Constituents’ Linguistics and Philosophy 25 299–345 Occurrence Handle10.1023/A:1015267930510

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • F. Recanati (2003) Literal Meaning Cambridge University Press Cambridge, UK Occurrence Handle10.1017/CBO9780511615382

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • J. Stanley (2000) ArticleTitle‘Context and Logical Form’ Linguistics and Philosophy 23 391–434 Occurrence Handle10.1023/A:1005599312747

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • J. Stanley Z. Szabó (2000) ArticleTitle‘On Quantifier Domain Restriction’ Mind and Language 15 219–61 Occurrence Handle10.1111/1468-0017.00130

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • K. Taylor (2001) ArticleTitle‘Sex, Breakfast, and Descriptus Interruptus’ Synthese 128 45–61 Occurrence Handle10.1023/A:1010349621943

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • D. Wilson D. Sperber (2000) ArticleTitle‘Truthfulness and Relevance’ UCL Working Papers in Linguistics 12 215–54

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Luisa Martí.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Martí, L. Unarticulated Constituents Revisited. Linguistics & Philosophy 29, 135–166 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10988-005-4740-4

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10988-005-4740-4

Keywords

Navigation