Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Can a problem-solving approach strengthen landscape ecology’s contribution to sustainable landscape planning?

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Landscape Ecology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The need to avert unacceptable and irreversible environmental change is the most urgent challenge facing society. Landscape ecology has the capacity to help address these challenges by providing spatially-explicit solutions to landscape sustainability problems. However, despite a large body of research, the real impact of landscape ecology on sustainable landscape management and planning is still limited. In this paper, we first outline a typology of landscape sustainability problems which serves to guide landscape ecologists in the problem-solving process. We then outline a formal problem-solving approach, whereby landscape ecologists can better bring about disciplinary integration, a consideration of multiple landscape functions over long time scales, and a focus on decision making. This framework explicitly considers multiple ecological objectives and socio-economic constraints, the spatial allocation of scarce resources to address these objectives, and the timing of the implementation of management actions. It aims to make explicit the problem-solving objectives, management options and the system understanding required to make sustainable landscape planning decisions. We propose that by adopting a more problem-solving approach, landscape ecologists can make a significant contribution towards realising sustainable future landscapes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ahern J (1999a) Integration of landscape ecology and landscape design: an evolutionary process. In: Wiens JA, Moss MR (eds) Issues in landscape ecology. International Association for Landscape Ecology (IALE), Faculty of Environmental Sciences, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON, Canada, pp 119–133

  • Ahern J (1999b) Spatial concepts, planning strategies, and future scenarios: a framework method for integrating landscape ecology and landscape planning. In: Klopatek JM, Gardner RH (eds) Landscape ecological analysis: issues and applications. Springer, New York, pp 175–201

    Google Scholar 

  • Bartuska AM (1999) Cross-boundary issues to manage for healthy forest ecosystems. In: Klopatek JM, Gardner RH (eds) Landscape ecological analysis: issues and applications. Springer, New York, pp 24–34

    Google Scholar 

  • Bastian O (2001) Landscape ecology—towards a unified discipline? Landscape Ecol 16:757–766

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ben-Haim Y (2006) Estimating an uncertain probability density. In: Lawry J, Miranda E, Bugarin A, Li S, Gil MA, Grzegorzewski P, Hyrniewicz O (eds) Soft methods for integrated uncertainty modelling. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 261–265

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Botequilha Leitão A, Ahern J (2002) Applying landscape ecological concepts and metrics in sustainable landscape planning. Landsc Urban Plan 59:65–93

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Botequilha Leitão A, Miller J, Ahern J, McGarigal K (2006) Measuring landscapes. A planners book. Island Press, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowman DMJS (2001) Future eating and country keeping: what role has environmental history in the management of biodiversity? J Biogeogr 28:549–564

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown VA, Harris JA, Russell JY (2010) Tackling wicked problems through the transdisciplinary imagination. Earthscan, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Burgman MA, Ferson S, Akcakaya HR (1993) Risk assessment in conservation biology. Chapman & Hall, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Christensen NL, Bartuska AM, Brown JH, Carpenter S, D’Antonio C, Francis R, Franklin JF, MacMahon JA, Noss RF, Parsons DJ, Peterson CH, Turner MG, Woodmansee RG (1996) The report of the Ecological Society of America Committee on the scientific basis for ecosystem management. Ecol Appl 6:665–691

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clemen RT (1996) Making hard decisions: an introduction to decision analysis. Duxbury Press, Pacific Grove, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Cowling RM, Pressey RL (2003) Introduction to systematic conservation planning in the Cape Floristic Region. Biol Conserv 112:1–3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crosby MP, Abu-Hilal A, Al-Homoud A, Erez J, Ortal R (2000) Interactions among scientists, managers and the public in defining research priorities and management strategies for marine and coastal resources: is the Red Sea Marine Peace Park a new paradigm? Water Air Soil Pollut 123:581–594

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Daily GC (ed) (1997) Nature’s services: societal dependence on natural ecosystems. Island Press, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Drechsler M, Johst K, Wätzold F, Westphal MI (2006) Integrating economic costs into the analysis of flexible conservation management strategies. Ecol Appl 16:1959–1966

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Elmqvist T, Folke C, Nystrom M, Peterson G, Bengtsson J, Walker B, Norberg J (2003) Response diversity, ecosystem change, and resilience. Front Ecol Environ 1:488–494

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Evans KE, Klinger T (2008) Obstacles to bottom-up implementation of marine ecosystem management. Conserv Biol 22:1135–1143

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fargione J, Hill J, Tilman D, Polasky S, Hawthorne P (2008) Land clearing and the biofuel carbon debt. Science 319:1235–1238

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fearnside PM (2005) Deforestation in Brazilian Amazonia: history, rates, and consequences. Conserv Biol 19:680–688

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fearnside PM, Laurance WF (2004) Tropical deforestation and greenhouse-gas emissions. Ecol Appl 14:982–986

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fischer J, Manning AD, Steffen W, Rose DB, Daniell K, Felton A, Garnett S, Gilna B, Heinsohn R, Lindenmayer DB, MacDonald B, Mills F, Newell B, Reid J, Robin L, Sherren K, Wade A (2007) Mind the sustainability gap. Trends Ecol Evol 22:621–624

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Foley JA, Asner GP, Costa MH, Coe MT, DeFries R, Gibbs HK, Howard EA, Olson S, Patz J, Ramankutty N, Snyder P (2007) Amazonia revealed: forest degradation and loss of ecosystem goods and services in the Amazon Basin. Front Ecol Environ 5:25–32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ford HA, Barrett GW, Saunders DA, Recher HF (2001) Why have birds of in the woodlands of Southern Australia declined? Biol Conserv 97:71–88

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frazee S, Cowling RM, Pressey RL, Turpie JK, Lindenberg N (2003) Estimating the costs of conserving a biodiversity hotspot: a case study of the Cape Floristic Region, South Africa. Conserv Biol 112:275–290

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freemark K, Hummon C, White D, Hulse D (1996) Modeling risks to biodiversity in past, present and future landscapes. Technical Report No. 268, Canadian Wildlife Service Headquarters, Ottawa, Canada

  • Fry G, Tress B, Tress G (2007) Integrative landscape research: facts and challenges. In: Wu J, Hobbs RJ (eds) Key topics and landscape ecology. Cambridge University Press, New York, pp 246–268

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Gelderblom CM, van Wilgen BW, Nel J, Sandwith T, Botha M, Hauck M (2003) Turning strategy into action: implementing a conservation action plan in the Cape Floristic Region. Biol Conserv 112:291–297

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Golley FB, Bellot J (eds) (1999) Rural planning from an environmental systems perspective. Springer Verlag, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Hobbs RJ, Lambeck RJ (2002) An integrated approach to landscape science and management. In: Liu J, Taylor WW (eds) Integrating landscape ecology into natural resource management. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 412–430

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Hobbs RJ, Wu J (2007) Perspectives and prospects of landscape ecology. In: Wu J, Hobbs RJ (eds) Key topics in landscape ecology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, pp 634–671

    Google Scholar 

  • Holling CS (1978) Adaptive environmental assessment and management. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Hughes TP, Gunderson LH, Folke C, Baird AH, Bellwood D, Berkes F, Crona B, Helfgott A, Leslie H, Norberg J, Nyström M, Olsson P, Österblom H, Scheffer M, Schuttenberg H, Steneck RS, Tengö M, Troell M, Walker B, Wilson J, Worm B (2007) Adaptive management of the Great Barrier Reef and the Grand Canyon world heritage areas. Ambio 36:586–592

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jentoft S, Chuenpagdee R (2009) Fisheries and coastal governance as a wicked problem. Marine Policy 33:553–560

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knight AT, Driver A, Cowling RM, Maze K, Desmet PG, Lowbard AT, Rouget M, Botha MA, Boshoff AF (2006) Designing systematic conservation assessments that promote effective implementation: best practice from South Africa. Conserv Biol 20:739–750

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Knight AT, Cowling RM, Rouget M, Balmford A, Lombard AT, Campbell BM (2008) Knowing but not doing: selecting priority conservation areas and the research-implementation gap. Conserv Biol 22:610–617

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Levin SA (1998) Ecosystems and the biosphere as complex adaptive systems. Ecosystems 1:431–436

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lindenmayer DB, Hobbs RJ (eds) (2007) Managing and designing landscapes for conservation: moving from perspectives to principles. Blackwell, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindenmayer DB, Likens GE (2009) Adaptive monitoring: a new paradigm for long-term research and monitoring. Trends Ecol Evol 24:482–486

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lindenmayer D, Hobbs RJ, Montague-Drake R, Alexandra J, Bennett A, Burgman M, Cale P, Calhoun A, Cramer V, Cullen P, Driscoll D, Fahrig L, Fischer J, Franklin J, Haila Y, Hunter M, Gibbons P, Lake S, Luck G, MacGregor C, McIntyre S, Mac Nally R, Manning A, Miller J, Mooney H, Noss R, Possingham H, Saunders D, Schmiegelow F, Scott M, Simberloff D, Sisk T, Tabor G, Walker B, Wiens J, Woinarski J, Zavaleta E (2008) A checklist for ecological management of landscapes for conservation. Ecol Lett 11:78–91

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lovell ST, Johnston DM (2009) Creating multifunctional landscapes: how can the field of ecology inform the design of the landscape? Front Ecol Environ 7:212–220

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Margules CR, Pressey RL (2000) Systematic conservation planning. Nature 405:243–253

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Marucci DJ (2000) Landscape history as a planning tool. Landsc Urban Plan 49:67–81

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McAlpine CA, Spies TA, Norman P, Peterson A (2007) Conserving forest biodiversity across multiple land ownerships: lessons from the Northwest Forest Plan and the Southeast Queensland regional forests agreement (Australia). Biol Conserv 134:580–592

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Metzger JP (2008) Landscape ecology: perspectives based on the 2007 IALE world congress. Landscape Ecol 23:501–504

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mooij WM, DeAngelis DL (2003) Uncertainty in spatially explicit animal dispersal models. Ecol Appl 13:794–805

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morgan RK (1998) Environmental impact assessment. A methodological perspective. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgan JW (1999) Effects of population size on seed production and germinability in an endangered, fragmented grassland plant. Conserv Biol 13:266–273

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nassauer JI, Opdam P (2008) Design in science: extending the landscape ecology paradigm. Landscape Ecol 23:633–644

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Naveh Z (2007) Landscape ecology and sustainability. Landscape Ecol 22:1437–1440

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Farrell PJ, Reyers B, Le Maitre DC, Milton SJ, Egoh B, Maherry A, Colvin C, Atkinson D, De Lange W, Blignaut JN, Cowling RM (2010) Multi-finctional landscapes in semi arid environments: implications for biodiversity and ecosystem services. Landscape Ecol. Published online: 15 June 2010

  • Opdam P, Wascher D (2004) Climate change meets habitat fragmentation: linking landscape and biogeographical scale levels in research and conservation. Biol Conserv 117:285–297

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peterson MN, Chen X, Liu J (2008) Household location choices: implications for biodiversity conservation. Conserv Biol 22:912–921

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Phillipson J, Lowe P, Bullock JM (2009) Navigating the social sciences: interdisciplinarity and ecology. J Appl Ecol 46:261–264

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pickett STA, Burch WR, Dalton SE, Foresman TW, Grove JM, Rowntree R (1997) A conceptual framework for the study of human ecosystems in urban areas. Urban Ecosyst 1:185–199

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pierce SM, Cowling RM, Knight AT, Lombard AT, Rouget M, Wolf T (2005) Systematic conservation planning products from land-use planning: interpretation for implementation. Biol Conserv 125:441–458

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Polasky S, Nelson E, Camm J, Csuti B, Fackler P, Lonsdorf E, Montgomery C, White D, Arthur J, Garber-Yonts B, Haight R, Kagan J, Starfield A, Tobalske C (2008) Where to put things? Spatial land management to sustain biodiversity and economic returns. Biol Conserv 141:1505–1524

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Possingham HP (2001) The business of biodiversity: applying decision theory principles to nature conservation. Australian Conservation Foundation, Fitzroy, VIC

    Google Scholar 

  • Possingham HP, Nicholson E (2007) Principles of landscape design that emerge from a formal problem-solving approach. In: Hobbs RJ, Lindenmayer DB (eds) Managing and designing landscapes for conservation: moving from perspectives to principles. Blackwell Publishing, Oxford, pp 546–560

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Possingham H, Shea K (1999) The business of biodiversity. Aust Zool 31:3–5

    Google Scholar 

  • Possingham HP, Andelman SJ, Noon BR, Trombulak S, Pulliam HR (2001) Making smart conservation decisions. In: Soule ME, Orians GH (eds) Conservation biology: research priorities for the next decade. Island Press, Washington, pp 225–244

    Google Scholar 

  • Pressey RL, Humphries CJ, Margules CR, Vanewright RI, Williams PH (1993) Beyond opportunism—key principles for systematic reserve selection. Trends Ecol Evol 8:124–128

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pressey RL, Cowling RM, Rouget M (2003) Formulating conservation targets for biodiversity pattern and process in the Cape Floristic Region, South Africa. Biol Conserv 112:99–127

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pressey RL, Cabeza M, Watts ME, Cowling RM, Wilson KA (2007) Conservation planning in a changing world. Trends Ecol Evol 22:583–592

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Redman CL, Grove JM, Kuby LH (2004) Integrating social science into the Long-Term Ecological Research (LTER) network: social dimensions of ecological change and ecological dimensions of social change. Ecosystems 7:161–171

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Regan HM, Colyvan M, Burgman MA (2002) A taxonomy and treatment of uncertainty for ecology and conservation biology. Ecol Appl 12:618–628

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reyers B, O’Farrell PJ, Cowling RM, Egoh BN, Le Maitre DC, Vlok JHJ (2009) Ecosystem services, land-cover change, and stakeholders: finding a sustainable foothold for a semiarid biodiversity hotspot. Ecol Soc 14:38–60

    Google Scholar 

  • Risser PG (1999) Landscape ecology: does the science only need to change at the margin? In: Klopatek JM, Gardner RH (eds) Landscape ecological analysis: issues and applications. Springer-Verlag, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Risser PG, Karr JR, Forman RTT (1984) Landscape ecology: directions and approaches. Illinois Natural History Survey, Champaign, IL, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Rockström J, Steffen W, Noone K, Persson A, Chapin FS III, Lambin EF, Lenton TM, Scheffer M, Folke C, Schellnhuber HJ, Nykvist B, de Wit CA, Hughes T, van der Leeuw S, Rodhe H, Sörlin S, Snyder PK, Costanza R, Svedin U, Falkenmark M, Karlberg L, Corell RW, Fabry VJ, Hansen J, Walker B, Liverman D, Richardson K, Crutzen P, Foley JA (2009) A safe operating space for humanity. Nature 461:472–475

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ryan JG, Ludwig JA, McAlpine CA (2007) Complex adaptive landscapes (CAL): a conceptual framework of multi-functional, non-linear ecohydrological feedback systems. Ecol Complex 4:113–127

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ryan JG, McAlpine CA, Ludwig JA (2010) Integrated vegetation designs for enhancing water retention and recycling in agroecosystems. Landscape Ecol. doi:10.1007/s10980-010-9509-7

    Google Scholar 

  • Shao G, Wu J (2008) On the accuracy of landscape pattern analysis using remote sensing data. Landscape Ecol 23:1572–9761

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sherren K, Fischer J, Clayton H, Schirmer J, Dovers S (2010) Integration by case, place and process: transdisciplinary research for sustainable grazing in the Lachlan River catchment, Australia. Landscape Ecol. Published online: 11 June 2010

  • Slocombe DS (1993) Environmental-planning, ecosystem science, and ecosystem approaches for integrating environment and development. Environ Manage 17:289–303

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Snowden DJ, Boone ME (2007) A leader’s framework for decision making. A leader’s framework for decision making. Harv Bus Rev 85:68–76

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Spies TA, Reeves GH, Burnett KM, McComb WC, Johnson KN, Grant G, Ohmann JL, Garman SL, Bettinger P (2002) Assessing the ecological consequences of forest policies in a multi-ownership province in Oregon. In: Liu J, Taylor WW (eds) Integrating landscape ecology into natural resource management. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 179–207

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Spies TA, Giesen TW, Swanson FJ, Franklin JF, Lach D, Johnson KN (2010) Climate change adaptation strategies for federal forests of the Pacific Northwest, USA: ecological policy, and socio-economic perspectives. Landscape Ecol. Published online: 06 May 2010

  • Steinitz C, Rojo HMA, Bassett S, Flaxman M, Goode T, Maddock T III, Mouat D, Peiser R, Shearer A (2003) Alternative futures for changing landscapes: The Upper San Pedro River Basin in Arizona and Sonora. Island Press, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  • Stewart TJ (2005) Goal programming and cognitive biases in decision making. J Oper Res Soc 56:1166–1175

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Termorshuizen J, Opdam P (2009) Landscape services as a bridge between landscape ecology and sustainable development. Landscape Ecol 24:1037–1052

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Termorshuizen JW, Opdam P, Van Den Brink A (2007) Incorporating ecological sustainability in landscape planning. Landsc Urban Plan 79:374–384

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomson JR, Moilanen AJ, Vesk PA, Bennett AF, Mac Nally R (2009) Where and when to revegetate: a quantitative method for scheduling landscape reconstruction. Ecol Appl 19:817–828

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tress B, Tress G, Fry G (2005a) Defining concepts and process of knowledge production in integrative research. In: Tress B, Tress G, Fry G, Opdam P (eds) From landscape research to landscape planning: aspects of integration, education and application. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 13–26

    Google Scholar 

  • Tress G, Tress B, Fry G (2005b) Clarifying integrative research concepts in landscape ecology. Landscape Ecol 20:479–493

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tress G, Tress B, Fry G (2007) Analysis of the barriers to integration in landscape research projects. Land Use Policy 24:374–385

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Treweek J (1999) Ecological impact assessment. Blackwell Science, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner MG, Crow TR, Lui J, Rabe D, Rabeni CF, Soranno PA, Taylor WW, Vogt KA, Wiens JA (2002) Bridging the gap between landscape ecology and natural resource management. In: Lui J, Taylor WW (eds) Integrating landscape ecology into natural resource management. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, pp 433–460

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Vos C, Opdam P, Steingröver E, Reijnen R (2007) Transferring ecological knowledge to landscape planning: a design method for robust corridors. In: Wu J, Hobbs R (eds) Key topics in landscape ecology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, pp 227–245

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Vos CC, Berry P, Opdam P, Baveco H, Nijhof B, O’Hanley J, Bell C, Kuipers H (2008) Adapting landscapes to climate change: examples of climate-proof ecosystem networks and priority adaptation zones. J Appl Ecol 45:1722–1731

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walters C (1986) Adaptive management of renewable resources. Blackburn Press, Caldwell

    Google Scholar 

  • Walters CJ, Holling CS (1990) Large-scale management experiments and learning by doing. Ecology 71:2060–2068

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Westphal MI, Field SA, Possingham HP (2007) Optimizing landscape configuration: a case study of woodland birds in the Mount Lofty Ranges, South Australia. Landsc Urban Plan 81:56–66

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiens JA (1999) The science and practice of landscape ecology. In: Klopatek JM, Gardner RH (eds) Landscape ecological analysis: issues and applications. Springer, New York, pp 371–383

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson KA, Carwardine J, Possingham HP (2009) Setting conservation priorities. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1162:237–364

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wu JG (2006) Landscape ecology, cross-disciplinarity, and sustainability science. Landscape Ecol 21:1–4

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wu JG, Hobbs R (2002) Key issues and research priorities in landscape ecology: an idiosyncratic synthesis. Landscape Ecol 17:355–365

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu JG, Hobbs R (eds) (2007) Key topics in landscape ecology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Zonneveld IS (1995) Land ecology: an introduction to landscape ecology as a base for land evaluation, land management and conservation. SPB Publishing, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This paper contains ideas arising from group discussions in the Landscape Ecology and Conservation Group of The University of Queensland, Australia, and experience drawn from multiple research projects funded by the Australian Research Council, Land & Water Australia, local government, non-government organisations and regional natural resource management bodies. We thank three anonymous reviewers for their valuable comments which greatly improved the quality of this paper.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Clive A. McAlpine.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

McAlpine, C.A., Seabrook, L.M., Rhodes, J.R. et al. Can a problem-solving approach strengthen landscape ecology’s contribution to sustainable landscape planning?. Landscape Ecol 25, 1155–1168 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-010-9514-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-010-9514-x

Keywords

Navigation