Skip to main content
Log in

Peer Influences on Moral Disengagement in Late Childhood and Early Adolescence

  • Empirical Research
  • Published:
Journal of Youth and Adolescence Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Moral disengagement processes are cognitive self-justification processes of transgressive actions that have been hypothesized to be learned and socialized within social contexts. The current study aimed at investigating socialization of moral disengagement by friends in two developmentally different age groups, namely late childhood (age: 9–10 years; n = 133, 42.9 % girls) and early adolescence (age: 11–14 years; n = 236, 40.6 % girls) over a 1-year period. Specifically, the current study examined whether similarity in moral disengagement between friends was the result of friends’ influence or friend selection. Moreover, gender (42 % girls), individual bullying behavior, and perceived popularity status were examined as potential moderators of socialization for moral disengagement within friendship networks. Self-report measures were used to assess moral disengagement, sociometric questions and a peer-nomination scale for friendship networks and bullying behavior, respectively. Longitudinal social network analysis (RSiena) was used to study change of moral disengagement in friendship networks during a 1-year interval. In early adolescence, friends were more likely to be similar to each other over time and this was explained only by influence processes and not by selection processes. Gender, bullying, and perceived popularity did not moderate the friends’ influence on moral disengagement over time. Results indicate that self-justification processes change over time already in late childhood, but only in early adolescence this change is likely to be dependent upon peers’ moral disengagement.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Agnew, R. (2003). An integrated theory of the adolescent peak in offending. Youth & Society, 34(3), 263–299. doi:10.1177/0044118X02250094.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A. (1990). Selective activation and disengagement of moral control. Journal of Social Issues, 46, 27–46. doi:10.1111/j.1540-4560.1990.tb00270.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A. (1991). Social cognitive theory of moral thought and action. In W. M. Kurtines & G. L. Gewirtz (Eds.), Handbook of moral behavior and development: Theory, research and applications (Vol. 1, pp. 71–129). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A. (2002). Selective moral disengagement in the exercise of moral agency. Journal of Moral Education, 312, 101–119. doi:10.1080/0305724022014322.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Camodeca, M., & Goossens, F. A. (2005). Aggression, social cognitions, anger and sadness in bullies and victims. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 46(2), 186–197. doi:10.1111/j.1469-7610.2004.00347.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Caprara, G. V., Pastorelli, C., & Bandura, A. (1995). La misura del disimpegno morale in età evolutiva [Measuring age differences in moral disengagement]. Età Evolutiva, 51, 18–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caravita, S. C. S., & Cillessen, A. H. N. (2012). Agentic or communal? Developmental differences in the associations among interpersonal goals, popularity, and bullying. Social Development, 2, 376–395. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9507.2011.00632.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caravita, S. C. S., Gini, G., & Pozzoli, T. (2011). Moral disengagement for victimization in bullying: Individual or contextual processes? Oral communication at SRCD 2011 Biennal Meeting, Montréal (Quebec, Canada), March 31–April 2, 2011.

  • Caravita, S. C. S., Gini, G., & Pozzoli, T. (2012). Main and moderated effects of moral cognition and status on bullying and defending. Aggressive Behavior, 38, 456–468. doi:10.1002/ab.21447.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Caravita, S. C. S., Miragoli, S., & Di Blasio, P. (2009). Why should I behave in this way? Rule discrimination within the school context related to bullying. In L. R. Elling (Ed.), Social development (pp. 269–290). New York: Nova Science Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cillessen, A. H. N. (2009). Sociometric methods. In K. H. Rubin, W. M. Bukowski, & B. Laursen (Eds.), Handbook of peer interactions, relationships and groups (pp. 82–99). New York, NY: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cillessen, A. H. N., & Mayeux, L. (2004). From censure to reinforcement: Developmental changes in the association between aggression and social status. Child Development, 75, 147–163. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.2004.00660.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, J. M. (1977). Sources of peer group homogeneity. Sociology of Education, 50, 227–241.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dijkstra, J. K., Cillessen, A. H. N., & Borch, C. (2012). Popularity and adolescent friendship networks: Selection and influence dynamics. Developmental Psychology. Advance online publication,. doi:10.1037/a0030098.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dijkstra, J. K., Cillessen, A. H. N., Lindenberg, S., & Veenstra, R. (2010). Basking in reflected glory and its limits. Why adolescents hang out with popular peers. Journal of Research in Adolescence, 20, 942–958. doi:10.1111/j.1532-7795.2010.00671.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dornbusch, S. M. (1987). Individual moral choices and social evaluations: A research odyssey. In E. J. Lawler & B. Markovsky (Eds.), Advances in group processes: Theory and research (Vol. 4, pp. 271–307). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Espelage, D., Holt, M., & Henkel, R. (2003). Examination of peer-group contextual effects on aggression during early adolescence. Child Development, 74, 205–220. doi:10.1111/1467-8624.00531.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Garandeau, C. F., & Cillessen, A. H. N. (2006). From indirect aggression to invisible aggression: A conceptual view on bullying and peer group manipulation. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 11, 612–625. doi:10.1016/j.avb.2005.08.005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gasser, L., & Keller, M. (2009). Are the competent the morally good? Perspective taking and moral motivation of children involved in bullying. Social Development, 18, 798–816. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9507.2008.00516.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gini, G. (2006). Social cognition and moral cognition in bullying: What’s wrong? Aggressive Behavior, 32, 528–539. doi:10.1002/ab.20153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huisman, M., & Steglich, C. E. G. (2008). Treatment of non-response in longitudinal network studies. Social Networks, 30, 297–308.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hyde, L. W., Shaw, D. S., & Moilanen, K. L. (2010). Developmental precursors of moral disengagement and the role of moral disengagement in the development of antisocial behavior. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 38, 197–209. doi:10.1007/s10802-009-9358-5.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hymel, S., Rocke Henderson, N., & Bonanno, R. A. (2005). Moral disengagement: A framework for understanding bullying among adolescents. Journal of Social Sciences, 8, 1–11. Retrieved from: http://www.krepublishers.com/06-Special%20Volume-Journal/JSS-00-Special%20Volumes/JSS-SI-08-Peer-Vicit-Schools-Web/JSS-SI-08-01-001-011-Hymel-S/JSS-SI-08-01-001-011-Hymel-S-Text.pdf.

  • Hymel, S., Schonert-Reichl, K. A., Bonanno, R. A., Vaillancourt, T., & Rocke Henderson, N. (2010a). Bullying and morality. Understanding how good kids can behave badly. In S. R. Jimerson, S. M. Swearer, & D. L. Espelage (Eds.), Handbook of bullying in schools. An international perspective (pp. 101–118). New York: Routledge.

  • Juvonen, J., & Galvan, A. (2008). Peer influence in involuntary social groups: Lessons from research on bullying. In M. Prinstein & K. Dodge (Eds.), Peer influence processes among youth (pp. 225–244). New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kandel, D. B. (1978). Homophily, selection, and socialization in adolescent friendship pairs. American Journal of Sociology, 48, 427–436.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kohlberg, L. (1984). Essays on moral development: Vol. 2. The psychology of moral development. San Francisco: Harper & Row.

  • Marsh, P., Allen, J. P., Ho, M., Porter, M., & McFarland, F. C. (2006). The changing nature of adolescent friendships—Longitudinal links with early adolescent ego development. Journal of Early Adolescence, 26(4), 414–431. doi:10.1177/0272431606291942.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Menesini, E., & Gini, G. (2000). Il bullismo come processo di gruppo: Adattamento e validazione del questionario “Ruoli dei partecipanti” alla popolazione italiana [Bullying as a group process: adaptation and validation of the Participant Role Questionnaire to the Italian population]. Età Evolutiva, 66, 18–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Menesini, E., Sanchez, V., Fonzi, A., Ortega, R., Costabile, A., & Lo Feudo, G. (2003). Moral emotions and bullying: A cross-national comparison of differences between bullies, victims and outsiders. Aggressive Behavior, 29, 515–530. doi:10.1111/1467-9507.00121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moffitt, T. E. (1993). Adolescence-limited and life-course-persistent antisocial behavior: A developmental taxonomy. Psychological Review, 100, 674–701.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ojanen, T., Sijtsema, J. J., Hawley, P. H., & Little, T. D. (2010). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation in early adolescents' friendship development: Friendship selection, influence, and prospective friendship quality. Journal of Adolescence, 33, 837–851. doi:10.1016/j.adolescence.2010.08.004.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ojanen, T., Sijtsema, J. J., & Rambaran, J. A. (2013). Social goals and adolescent friendships: Social selection, deselection, and influence. Journal of Research on Adolescence. doi:10.1111/jora.12043.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paciello, M., Fida, R., Tramontano, C., Lupinet, C., & Caprara, G. V. (2008). Stability and change of moral disengagement and its impact on aggression and violence in late adolescence. Child Development, 79, 1288–1309. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.2008.01189.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Parkhurst, J. T., & Hopmeyer, A. (1998). Sociometric popularity and peer-perceived popularity: Two distinct dimensions of peer status. Journal of Early Adolescence, 18, 125–144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Piaget, J. (1932). The moral judgement of the child. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pozzoli, T., & Gini, G. (2012). Friend similarity in attitudes toward bullying and sense of responsibility to intervene. Social Influence. Early view online. doi:10.1080/15534510.2012.716372.

  • Pozzoli, T., Gini, G., & Vieno, A. (2012a). Individual and class moral disengagement in bullying among elementary school children. Aggressive Behavior, 38, 378–388. doi:10.1002/ab.21442.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pozzoli, T., Gini, G., & Vieno, A. (2012b). The role of individual correlates and class norms in defending and passive bystanding behavior in bullying: A multilevel analysis. Child Development, 83, 1917–1931. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.2012.01831.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Prinstein, M. J., & Dodge, K. A. (2008). Understanding peer influence in children and adolescents. New York: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salmivalli, C. (2009). Bullying and the peer group: A review. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 15, 112–120. doi:10.1016/j.avb.2009.08.007.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salmivalli, C., Lagerspetz, K., Björkqvist, K., Österman, K., & Kaukiainen, A. (1996). Bullying as a group process: Participant roles and their relations to social status within the group. Aggressive Behavior, 22, 1–15. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1098-2337(1996)22:1<1:AID-AB1>3.0.CO;2-T.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, D., & Gorman, A. H. (2011). The high price of high status: Popularity as a mechanism of risk. In A. H. N. Cillessen, D. Schwartz, & L. Mayeux (Eds.), Popularity in the peer system (pp. 245–270). New York: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shulman, E. P., Cauffmann, E., Piquero, A. R., & Fagan, J. (2011). Moral disengagement among serious juvenile offenders: A longitudinal study of the relations between morally disengaged attitudes and offending. Developmental Psychology, 47, 1619–1632. doi:10.1037/a0025404.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sijtsema, J. J., Veenstra, R., Lindenberg, S., & Salmivalli, C. (2009). Empirical test of bullies’ status goals: Assessing direct goals, aggression, and prestige. Aggressive Behavior, 35, 57–67. doi:10.1002/ab.20282.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Snijders, T. A. B., van de Bunt, G. G., & Steglich, C. E. G. (2010). Introduction to stochastic actor-based models for network dynamics. Social Networks, 32, 44–60. doi:10.1016/j.socnet.2009.02.004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Veenstra, R., Dijkstra, J. K., Steglich, C., & Van Zalk, M. (2013). Network-behavior dynamics. Journal of Research on Adolescence (in press).

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful to the students, teachers, and school administrators participating in this study, and to Mrs. Silvia Capraro for her help in collecting the data. Part of this study was presented at the 2012 Biennal Meeting of the Society for Research on Adolescence, Vancouver, Canada, March, 2012 and at the European Association for Research on Adolescence, Spetses, Greece, August 2012. This work was partially supported by grant D1-2006 from the Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore to the first author.

Author Contributions

SC conceived of the study, participated in its design and coordination, collected the data, and drafted the manuscript; JS participated in the design, performed the statistical analysis, and drafted the manuscript; AR participated in the design of the study, performed the statistical analysis, and drafted the manuscript; GG participated in design of the study and data collection, and drafted the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Simona C. S. Caravita.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Caravita, S.C.S., Sijtsema, J.J., Rambaran, J.A. et al. Peer Influences on Moral Disengagement in Late Childhood and Early Adolescence. J Youth Adolescence 43, 193–207 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-013-9953-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-013-9953-1

Keywords

Navigation