The present study explored the heterogeneous nature of popularity by investigating subgroups of popular girls (N = 365) in their first year of secondary school (mean age = 13.05). Cluster analysis revealed the presence of five subgroups based upon sociometric popularity (i.e., those considered likeable by peers) and consensual popularity (i.e., those considered popular by peers), and academic behavioral indices. Two of these groups contained girls who were all nominated as “popular” by classmates, yet the girls in one group displayed very positive academic behaviors (Popular Studious); girls in the other popular group displayed extreme antiacademic behaviors (Popular Disengaged). The remaining groups were Average Popular, Unpopular Disengaged, and Unpopular Studious. External validating measures confirmed the existence of the subgroups, that is, Popular Studious girls were judged by classmates to behave in a prosocial fashion, whereas Popular Disengaged girls exhibited many antisocial behaviors, and were often nominated as bullies. Unpopular Studious girls were often nominated as victims. These findings confirmed the hypothesis that consensual popularity is a heterogeneous concept, and that antiacademic and antisocial girls may still be among the most consensually popular students in secondary schools.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Adler, P. A., and Adler, P. (1998). Peer power: Preadolescent culture and identity. Rutgers University Press, New Brunswick, NJ.
Adler, P. A., Kless, S. J., and Adler, P. (1992). Socialization to gender roles: Popularity among elementary school boys and girls. Soc. Educ. 65: 169–187.
Aldenderfer, M. S., and Blashfield, R. K. (1984). Cluster Analysis. Sage, London.
Andreou, E. (2004). Bully/victim problems and their association with Machiavellianism and self-efficacy in Greek primary school children. Br. Educ. Psychol. 74: 297–309.
Arowosafe, D. S., and Irvin, J. L. (1992). Transition to a middle level school: What kids say. Middle Sch. J. 24: 15–20.
Babad, E. (2001). On the conception and measurement of popularity: More facts and some straight conclusions. Soc. Psychol. Educ. 5: 3–30.
Bronfenbrenner, U. (1979). The Ecology of Human Development. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
Brown, B. B., Mory, M. S., and Kinney, D. (1994). Casting adolescent crowds in a relational perspective: Caricature, channel, and context. In Montemayer, R., Adams, G. R., and Gulotta, T. P. (eds.), Advances in Adolescent Development: Vol. 5, Personal Relationships During Adolescence. Sage, Newbury Park, CA, pp. 123–167.
Buss, D. M. (1995). Evolutionary psychology: A new paradigm for psychological science. Psychol. Inq. 6: 1–30.
Chiu, L.-H. (1997). Development and validation of the School Achievement Motivation Rating Scale. Educ. Psychol. Meas. 57: 292–305.
Cillessen, A. H. N., and Borch, C. A. (2005, April). The role of aggression and social network position in developmental trajectories of sociometric and peer-perceived popularity from Grade 4 to Grade 12. Paper presented at the biennial meeting of the Society for Research in Child Development, Atlanta, GA.
Cillessen, A. H. N., and Mayeux, L. (2004). From censure to reinforcement: Developmental changes in the association between aggression and social status. Child Dev. 75: 147–163.
Cillessen, A. H. N., and Rose, A. J. (2005). Understanding popularity in the peer system. Curr. Dir. Psychol. Sci. 14: 102–105.
Coie, J. D., Dodge, K. A., and Coppotelli, H. (1982). Dimensions and types of social status: A cross-age perspective. Dev. Psychol. 18: 557–570.
Coie, J. D., Lochman, J. E., Terry, R., and Hyman, C. (1992). Predicting early adolescent disorder from childhood aggression and peer rejection. J. Consult. Clin. Psychol. 60: 783–792.
Corsaro, W. A., and Eder, D. (1990). Children's peer cultures. Annu. Rev. Soc. 16: 197–220.
De Bruyn, E. H. (2005). Role strain, engagement and academic achievement in early adolescence. Educ. Stud. 31: 15–27.
De Bruyn, E. H., Deković, M., and Meijnen, G. W. (2003). Parenting, academic motivation, classroom behavior, and school success in early adolescence. J. Appl. Dev. Psychol. 24: 393–412.
De Bruyn, E. H., and Van den Boom, D. C. (2005). Interpersonal behavior, peer popularity, and self-esteem in early adolescence. Soc. Dev. 14: 555–573.
Duncan, N. (2004). It's important to be nice, but it's nicer to be important: Girls, popularity and sexual competition. Sex Educ. 4: 137–152.
Eccles, J., and Midgley, C. (1989). Stage/environment fit: Developmentally appropriate classrooms for young adolescents. In Ames, R. E., and Ames, C. (eds.), Research on Motivation and Education, Vol. 3. Academic Press, New York, NY, pp. 139–186.
Eccles, J. S., Lord, S., and Midgley, C. (1991). What are we doing to early adolescents? The impact of educational contexts on early adolescents. Am. J. Educ. 99: 521–543.
Eder, D. (1985). The cycle of popularity: Interpersonal relations among female adolescents. Soc. Educ. 58: 154–165.
Elias, M. J., Gara, M., and Ubriaco, M. (1985). Sources of stress and support in children's transition to middle school: An empirical analysis. J. Clin. Child Psychol. 14: 112–118.
Elias, M. J., Ubriaco, M., Reese, A., Gara, M., Rothbaum, P., and Haviland, M. (1992). A measure of adaptation to problematic academic and interpersonal tasks of middle school. J. Sch. Psychol. 30: 41–57.
Farmer, T. W., Estell, D. B., Bishop, J. L., O’Neal, K. K., and Cairns, B. D. (2003). Rejected bullies or popular leaders? The social relations of aggressive subtypes of rural African American early adolescents. Dev. Psychol. 39: 992–1004.
Friedman, I. A. (1994). Conceptualizing and measuring teacher-perceived student behaviors: Disrespect, sociability, and attentiveness. Educ. Psychol. Meas. 54: 949–958.
Gilbert, P., Price, J. S., and Allan, S. (1995). Social comparison, social attractiveness and evolution: How might they be related? New Ideas Psychol. 13: 149–165.
Harter, S. (1990). Causes, correlates, and the functional role of global self-worth: A life-span perspective. In Sternberg, R. J., and Kolligian Jr., J. (eds.), Competence Considered. Yale University Press, New Haven, CT, pp. 67–97.
Hatzichristou, C., and Hopf, D. (1996). A multiperspective comparison of peer sociometric status groups in childhood and adolescence. Child Dev. 67: 1085–1102.
Havighurst, R. (1948). Developmental Tasks and Education. McKay, New York.
Hawley, P. (2003). Prosocial and coercive configurations of resource control in early adolescence: A case for the well-adapted Machiavellian. Merrill-Palmer Q. 49: 279–309.
Hopmeyer Gorman, A., Kim, J., and Schimmelbusch, A. (2002). The attributes adolescents associate with peer popularity and teacher preference. J. Sch. Psychol. 40: 143–165.
Jarvinen, D. W., and Nicholls, J. G. (1996). Adolescents’ social goals, beliefs about the causes of social success, and satisfaction in peer relations. Dev. Psychol. 32: 435–441.
Juvonen, J., and Graham, S. (eds.) (2001). Peer Harassment in School: The Plight of the Vulnerable and Victimized. Guilford, New York.
LaFontana, K. M., and Cillessen, A. H. N. (2002). Children's perceptions of popular and unpopular peers: A multimethod assessment. Dev. Psychol. 38: 635–647.
Lease, A. M., Kennedy, C. A., and Axelrod, J. L. (2002a). Children's social constructions of popularity. Soc. Dev. 11: 87–109.
Lease, A. M., Musgrove, K. T., and Axelrod, J. L. (2002b). Dimensions of social status in preadolescent peer groups: Likability, perceived popularity, and social dominance. Soc. Dev. 11: 508–533.
Luthar, S. S., and McMahon, T. J. (1996). Peer reputation among inner-city adolescents: Structure and correlates. J. Res. Adolesc. 6: 581–603.
Merten, D. E. (1996). Visibility and vulnerability: Responses to rejection by nonaggressive junior high school boys. J. Early Adolesc. 16: 5–26.
Merten, D. E. (1997). The meaning of meanness: Popularity, competition, and conflict among junior high school girls. Soc. Educ. 70: 175–191.
Noom, M. J. (1999). Adolescent Autonomy: Characteristics and Correlates. Eburon, Delft, The Netherlands.
Ollendick, T. H., Weist, M. D., Borden, C., and Greene, R. W. (1992). Sociometric status and academic, behavioral, and psychological adjustment: A five-year longitudinal study. J. Consult. Clin. Psychol. 60: 80–87.
Parkhurst, J. T., and Hopmeyer, A. (1998). Sociometric popularity and peer-perceived popularity: Two distinct dimensions of peer status. J. Early Adolesc. 18: 125–144.
Pellegrini, A. D. (2002). Affiliative and aggressive dimensions of dominance and possible functions during early adolescence. Aggr. Violent Behav. 7: 21–31.
Pellegrini, A. D., and Bartini, M. (2001). Dominance in early adolescent boys: Affiliative and aggressive dimensions and possible functions. Merrill-Palmer Q.: 47: 142–163.
Prinstein, M. J., and Cillessen, A. H. N. (2003). Forms and functions of adolescent peer aggression associated with high levels of peer status. Merrill-Palmer Q. 49: 310–342.
Rodkin, P. C., Farmer, T. W., Pearl, R., and Van Acker, R. (2000). Heterogeneity of popular boys: Antisocial and prosocial configurations. Dev. Psychol. 36: 14–24.
Rose, A. J., Swenson, L. P., and Waller, E. M. (2004). Overt and relational aggression and perceived popularity: Developmental differences in concurrent and prospective relations. Dev. Psychol. 40: 378–387.
Rubin, K. H., Bukowski, W. M., and Parker, J. G. (1998). Peer interactions, relationships, and groups. In Damon, W. (Series Ed.) and Eisenberg, N. (Vol. Ed.), Handbook of Child Psychology: Vol. 3. Social, Emotional, and Personality Development 5th ed. Wiley, New York, pp. 619–700.
Rugkasa, J., Knox, B., Sittlington, J., Kennedy, O., Treacy, M. P., and Abaunza, P. S. (2001). Anxious adults vs. cool children: Children's views on smoking and addiction. Soc. Sci. Med. 53: 593–602.
Vaillancourt, T., Hymel, S., and McDougall, P. (2003). Bullying is power: Implications for school-based intervention strategies. J. Appl. Sch. Psychol. 19: 157–176.
Weisfeld, G. E., Bloch, S. A., and Ivers, J. W. (1984). Possible determinants of social dominance among adolescent girls. J. Genet. Psychol. 144: 115–129.
Wentzel, K. R., and Asher, S. R. (1995). The academic lives of neglected, rejected, popular, and controversial children. Child Dev. 66: 754–763.
Wentzel, K. R., McNamara Barry, C., and Caldwell, K. A. (2004). Friendships in middle school: Influences on motivation and school adjustment. J. Educ. Psychol. 96: 195–203.
Zettergren, P. (2003). School adjustment in adolescence for previously rejected, average and popular children. Br. J. Dev.Psychol. 73: 207–221.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
This research was supported by grant 2004/1800 from the Dutch Ministry of Education, Culture and Sciences awarded to the first author. We are grateful to the students and staff of the following schools who participated in this research: Pieter Nieuwland College, Stanislas College, and the Scholengemeenschappen Amersfoortse Berg, Gerrit van der Veen, and Reigersbos. Thanks to Logic8 for the Internet logistics.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Lecturer at the Department of Educational Sciences, University of Amsterdam, Wibautstraat 4, 1091 GM Amsterdam, The Netherlands. His interests include the academic and social behavioral correlates of consensual popularity in adolescence.
Associate Professor and Head of Developmental Division, Department of Psychology, University of Connecticut. His interests include peer relations, social behavior, and social cognition in middle childhood and early adolescence.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
de Bruyn, E.H., Cillessen, A.H.N. Heterogeneity of Girls’ Consensual Popularity: Academic and Interpersonal Behavioral Profiles. J Youth Adolescence 35, 412–422 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-005-9023-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-005-9023-4