Skip to main content
Log in

A solution-focused approach to rational-emotive behavior therapy: toward a theoretical integration

  • Published:
Journal of Rational-Emotive and Cognitive-Behavior Therapy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A theoretical integration of rational emotive behavior therapy (REBT) and solution-focused therapy is described. It is suggested that the integrative conceptualization underscores these models’ complementary aspects by addressing the limitations of each and enhancing their respective strengths. The clinical theory and process of the integrative model is explicated along with a case example. Directions for future theory building, research, and practice are considered.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anderson H., Goolishian H. A., (1988). Human systems as linguistic systems: Preliminary and evolving ideas about the implications for clinical theoryFamily Process 27: 371–393

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Beck A. T., (1976). Cognitive therapy and the emotional disorders International Universities Press New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Colaptino J., (1979). The relative value of empirical evidenceFamily Process 18: 427–441

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Shazer S., (1978). Brief hypnotherapy of two sexual dysfunctions: The Crystal Ball TechniqueAmerican Journal of Clinical Hypnosis 20: 203–208

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • de Shazer S., (1982). Patterns of brief family therapy: An ecosystemic approach. Guilford New York

    Google Scholar 

  • de Shazer S., (1984). The death of resistanceFamily Process 23: 11–17

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • de Shazer S., (1985). Keys to solution in brief therapy Norton New York

    Google Scholar 

  • de Shazer S., (1988). Investigating solutions in brief therapy Norton New York

    Google Scholar 

  • de Shazer S., (1991). Putting difference to work Norton New York

    Google Scholar 

  • de Shazer S., Berg I. K., Lipchik E., Nunnally E., Molnar E., Gingerich K., Weiner-Davis M., (1986). Brief therapy: Focused solution developmentFamily Process 25: 207–222

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ellis A., (1962). Reason and emotion in psychotherapy Lyle Stuart Secaucus, NJ

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellis A., (1977). Rejoinder: Elegant and inelegant RET Counseling Psychologist 7: 73–82

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ellis A., (1980). Rational-emotive therapy and cognitive-behavior therapy: Similarities and differencesCognitive Therapy and Research 4: 325–340

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ellis A., (1985). Overcoming resistance: Rational-emotive therapy with difficult clients Springer New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellis A., (1987). The evolution of rational-emotive therapy (RET) and cognitive behavior therapy (CBT) In Zeig J. K., (Ed.), The evolution of psychotherapy Brunner/Mazel New York (pp. 107–125)

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellis A., (1988). How to stubbornly refuse to make yourself miserable about anything—yes anything! Lyle Stuart Secaucus, NJ

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellis A., (1996). Better, deeper, and more enduring brief therapy: The rational emotive behavior therapy approach Taylor and Francis New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellis A., (1997). Response to Jeffrey T. Guterman’s response to my critique of social constructivism in mental health counseling Journal of Mental Health Counseling 19: 57–63

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellis A., (1999). Why rational-emotive therapy to rational emotive behavior therapy?Psychotherapy 36: 154–159

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellis A., (2001). Overcoming destructive beliefs, feelings, and behaviors: New directions for rational emotive behavior therapy Prometheus Books Buffalo, NY

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellis A., Dryden W., (1990). The basic practice of RET In Dryden W., (Ed.), The essential Albert Ellis Springer New York (pp. 3–30)

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellis A. Sichel J., Yeager R., DiMattia D., DiGiuseppe R., (1989). Rational-emotive couples therapy Pergamon New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellis A., Yeager R. J., (1989). Why some therapies don’t work: the dangers of transpersonal psychology Prometheus Books Buffalo, NY

    Google Scholar 

  • Erickson M. H. (1980). Further clinical techniques of hypnosis: Utilization techniques. In Rossi E. L. (Ed.), The collected papers of Milton H. Erickson (Vol. 1, pp. 177–205). New York : Irvington

  • Held B. S., (1986). The relationship between individual psychologies and strategic/systemic therapies reconsidered In Efron D. E., (Ed.), Journeys: Expansion of the strategic-systemic therapies Brunner/Mazel New York (pp. 222–260)

    Google Scholar 

  • Held B. S., (1992). The problem of strategy within the systemic therapiesJournal of Marital and Family Therapy 18: 25–35

    Google Scholar 

  • Liddle H. A., (1982). On the problem of eclecticism: A call for epistemological clarification and human-scale theories Family Process 21: 243–250

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Meichenbaum D., (1977). Cognitive-behavior modification: An integrative approach Plenum New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Molnar A., de Shazer S., (1987). Solution-focused therapy: Toward the identification of therapeutic tasksJournal of Marital and Family Therapy 13: 349–358

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Norcross J. C., (1990). Commentary: Eclecticism misrepresented and integration misunderstoodPsychotherapy 27: 297–300

    Google Scholar 

  • Norcross J. C., Goldfried M., (1992). Handbook of psychotherapy integration Basic Books New York

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Hanlon W. H., Weiner-Davis M., (1989). In search of solutions: A new direction in psychotherapy Norton New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Paul G. L., (1967). Strategy of outcome research in psychotherapyJournal of Consulting Psychology 31: 109–119

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Petzold C., (1981). Erickson and Ellis: An elegant integration based on the innovative techniques of both Corrective and Social Psychiatry and Journal of Behavior Technology Methods and Therapy 27(1): 27–34

    Google Scholar 

  • Safran J. D., Messer S. B., (1997). Psychotherapy integration: A postmodern critique Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice 4: 140–152

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walen S. R., DiGiuseppe R., Dryden W., (1992). A practitioner’s guide to rational-emotive therapy Oxford University Press New York

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jeffrey T. Guterman.

Additional information

Address correspondence to Jeffrey T. Guterman, Barry University, 11300 NE 2 Avenue, Adrian Dominican School of Education, Counseling Program, Powers Building, Miami Shores, FL 33161–6695, USA; e-mail: jguterman@mail.barry.edu

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Guterman, J.T., Rudes, J. A solution-focused approach to rational-emotive behavior therapy: toward a theoretical integration. J Rat-Emo Cognitive-Behav Ther 23, 223–244 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10942-005-0012-z

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10942-005-0012-z

Keywords:

Navigation