Skip to main content
Log in

Development and Validation of a Short-Form Functional Capacity Evaluation for Use in Claimants with Low Back Disorders

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Objectives: Functional Capacity Evaluations (FCE) are used for making return-to-work decisions, yet FCE's modest predictive ability is currently outweighed by the administrative burden of testing. We attempted to develop a short-form FCE while maintaining comparable predictive ability. Methods: Three databases previously created for evaluating FCE predictive validity were used. Subjects were compensation claimants with low back disorders. FCE measures included items in the Isernhagen Work Systems’ FCE. Days until benefit suspension served as an indicator of return-to-work. Analysis included Cox regression. Results: Three items, floor-to-waist lift, crouching, and standing, were maintained in the short-form FCE. The short-form FCE was found to predict comparably to the entire FCE protocol in two validation cohorts (R 2 difference<3%). Subjects meeting job demands on all three items consistently experienced faster benefit suspension. Conclusion: A short-form FCE for determining future work status in claimants with low back disorders was developed. A substantially abbreviated FCE may offer an efficient alternative.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 3.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. King PM, Tuckwell N, Barrett TE. A critical review of functional capacity evaluations. Phys Ther 1998; 78(8): 852–866.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Hazard RG. Spine update. Functional restoration. Spine 1995; 20(21): 2345–2348.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Innes E, Straker L. A clinician's guide to work-related assessments: 1-purposes and problems. Work 1998; 11: 183–189.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Finch E, Brooks D, Stratford P, Mayo N. Physical rehabilitation outcome measures: A guide to enhanced clinical decision making, 2nd edn. Toronto: Canadian Physiotherapy Association, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Gross DP. Measurement properties of performance-based assessment of functional capacity. J of Occup Rehab 2004; 14(3): 166–174.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Gross DP, Battié MC. Reliability of safe maximum lifting determinations of a functional capacity evaluation. Phys Ther 2002; 82(4): 364–371.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Gross DP, Battie MC. Construct validity of a kinesiophysical functional capacity evaluation administered within a worker's compensation environment. J Occup Rehabil 2003; 13(4): 287–295.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Gross DP, Battie MC, Cassidy JD. The prognostic value of functional capacity evaluation in patients with chronic low back pain: part 1: Timely return to work. Spine 2004; 29(8): 914–919.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Gross DP, Battie MC. The prognostic value of functional capacity evaluation in patients with chronic low back pain: part 2: Sustained recovery. Spine 2004; 29(8): 920–924.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Gross DP, Battie MC. Predicting timely recovery and recurrence following multidisciplinary rehabilitation in patients with compensated low back pain. Spine 2005; 30(2): 235–240.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Matheson LN, Isernhagen SJ, Hart DL. Relationships among lifting ability, grip force, and return to work. Phys Ther 2002; 82(3): 249–256.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Fishbain DA, Cutler RB, Rosomoff H, Khalil T, Abdel-Moty E, Steele-Rosomoff R. Validity of the dictionary of occupational titles residual functional capacity battery. Clin J Pain 1999; 15(2): 102–110.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Cutler RB, Fishbain DA, Steele-Rosomoff R, Rosomoff HL. Relationships between functional capacity measures and baseline psychological measures in chronic pain patients. J Occup Rehabil 2003; 13(4): 249–258.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Gross DP, Battié MC. Functional Capacity Evaluation performance does not predict sustained return to work in claimants with chronic back pain. J Occup Rehabil 2005; 15: 285–294.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Gross DP, Battié MC, Cassidy JD. The prognostic value of functional capacity evaluation in patients with chronic low back pain: Part 1. Timely return to work. Spine 2004; 29(8): 914–919.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Reneman MF, Dijkstra PU, Westmaas M, Goeken LN. Test-retest reliability of lifting and carrying in a 2-day functional capacity evaluation. J Occup Rehabil 2002; 12(4): 269–275.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Brouwer S, Reneman MF, Dijkstra PU, Groothoff JW, Schellekens JMH, Goeken LNH. Test-retest reliability of the Isernhagen Work Systems Functional Capacity Evaluation in patients with chronic low back pain. J Occup Rehabil 2003; 13: 207–218.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Krause N, Dasinger LK, Deegan LJ, Brand RJ, Rudolph L. Alternative approaches for measuring duration of work disability after low back injury based on administrative workers’ compensation data. Am J Ind Med 1999; 35(6): 604–618.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Amick BC 3rd, Habeck RV, Hunt A, et al. Measuring the impact of organizational behaviours on work disability prevention and management. J Occup Rehabil 2000; 10(1): 21–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Hosmer DW, Lemeshow S. Applied survival analysis: Regression modeling of time to event data, 1st, edn. New York: Wiley, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Ruan CM, Haig AJ, Geisser ME, Yamakawa K, Buchholz RL. Functional capacity evaluations in persons with spinal disorders: predicting poor outcomes on the Functional Assessment Screening Test (FAST). J Occup Rehabil 2001; 11(2): 119–132.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

Data collection was facilitated by the Alberta Workers’ Compensation Board/Millard Health.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Douglas P. Gross.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gross, D.P., Battié, M.C. & Asante, A. Development and Validation of a Short-Form Functional Capacity Evaluation for Use in Claimants with Low Back Disorders. J Occup Rehabil 16, 50–59 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10926-005-9008-x

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10926-005-9008-x

KEY WORDS:

Navigation