Abstract
Primary care practitioners need to be supported by specialist genetics services to enable them to cope effectively with the expanding relevance of genetics to their patients. Genetic counselors could be effective in such a role. This exploratory project set out to improve the Primary–Tertiary interface through piloting such a service to general practice for 1 year. Tailored genetic educational outreach was delivered by a genetic counselor to ten randomly selected general practices in central England for 12 months. A range of services were provided to the practices these included facilitated genetic update sessions, a responsive advice service and referral guidelines. The service was evaluated through pre and post intervention questionnaires and via seven semi-structured interviews. This article presents a description of the development and delivery of this service and also reports on the experiences of a sample of the participants. Participants reported positive attitudes to the service and said that they had gained knowledge and confidence, as well as recognized limitations and gaps in their current knowledge. The consistent link with a specialist genetics service provided by a genetic counselor had a positive impact during the project and participants have continued to utilize the genetic counselor for advice and support with genetic patient issues since the project was completed. This is the first example of this model of service provision. Further research, utilizing a larger sample and other measures of behavioral change needs to be carried out to assess whether this model should be adopted on a wider basis.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bankhead, C., Emery, J., Qureshi, N., Campbell, H., Austoker, J., & Watson, E. (2001). New developments in genetics—Knowledge attitudes and information needs of practice nurses. Family Practice, 18, 475–482.
Buntinx, F., Winkens, R., Grol, R., & Knoltnerus, J. (1993). Influencing diagnostic and preventive performance in ambulatory care by feedback and reminders: A review. Family Practice, 10, 219–228.
Campbell, H., Holloway, S., Cetnarskyj, R., Anderson, E., Fry, A., Gorman, D., et al. (2003). Referrals of women with a family history of breast cancer from primary care to cancer genetics services in South East Scotland. British Journal of Cancer, 89(9), 1650–1656.
Davis, D., Thomson, A., Oxman, A., & Haynes, R. (1995). Changing physician performance. A systematic review of the effects of continuing medical educational strategies. JAMA, 274, 700–705.
Department of Health (2003). Our inheritance our future. Realising the potential of genetics in the NHS. CM, 5791. London: HMSO.
Dietrich, A., O’Connor, G., Keller, A., Carney, P., Levy, D., & Whaley, F. (1992). Cancer, improving early detection and prevention. A community practice randomised trail. British Medical Journal, 304, 687–691.
Goodson, P., Gottlieb, N., & Smith, M. (1999). Put prevention into practice: Evaluation of program initiation in nine Texas clinical sites. American Journal of Preventative Medicine, 17, 73–78.
Hogg, W., Baskerville, N., Nykiforuk, C., & Mallen, D. (2002). Improved preventative care in family practices with outreach facilitation: Understanding success and failure. Journal of Health Services Research and Policy, 7, 195–201.
Hulscher, M., Van Drenth, B., Mokkink, H., Van deLisdonk, E., Van der Wouden, J., Van Weel, C., et al. (1998). Tailored outreach visits as a method for implementing guidelines and improving preventive care. International Journal for Quality in Health Care, 10, 105–112.
King, N. (1998). Template analysis. In G. Symon & C. Cassell (Eds.), Qualitative methods and analysis in organisational research (pp. 118–134). London: Sage Publications.
Kinmonth, A. L., Reinhard, J., Babrow, M., & Pauker, S. (1998). Implications for clinical services in Britain and the United States. British Medical Journal, 316, 767–770.
McVea, K., Crabtree, B., Medder, J., Susman, J., Lukas, L., McIlvain, H., et al. (1996). An ounce of prevention? Evaluation of the ‘Put Prevention into Practice’ program. Journal of Family Practice, 43, 361–369.
Modell, M., Wonke, B., & Anionwu, E. (1998). A multidisciplinary approach for improving service in primary care: Randomised controlled trial of screening for haemoglobin disorders. British Medical Journal, 317, 788–791.
NICE (2004). Familial breast cancer. The classification and care of women at risk of familial breast cancer in primary, secondary and tertiary care. Clinical Guidance. Ref CG014.
Qureshi, N., Allen, J., & Hapgood, R. (2002b). A systematic review of educational outreach visits for non-prescribing interventions in general practice. European Journal of General Practice, 8, 31–36.
Qureshi, N., Hapgood, R., & Armstrong, S. (2002a). Continuous medical education approaches for clinical genetics: A postal survey of general practitioners. Journal of Medical Genetics, 39: e69 (http://www.jmedgenet.com/cgi/content/full/39/11/e69).
Qureshi, N., Modell, B., & Modell, M. (2004). Timeline: Raising the profile of genetics in primary care. Nature Reviews Genetics, 5, 783–790.
Rogers, S., Humphrey, C., Nazareth, I., Lister, S., Zelda, T., & Haines, A. (2000). Designing trials of interventions to change professional practice in primary care: Lessons from an exploratory study of two change strategies. BMJ, 320, 1580–1583.
Shickle, S., Hapgood, R., & Qureshi, N. (2002). The genetics liaison nurse role as a means of educating and supporting primary care professionals. Family Practice, 19, 193–196.
Thomson, M., Oxman, A., Davis, D., Haynes, R., Freemantle, N., & Harvey, E. (2001). Educational outreach visits: Effects on professional practice and health care outcomes (Cochrane Review). In The Cochrane Library, Issue 4. Oxford: Update Software 2001.
Walter, F., Kinmouth, A., Hyland, F., Murrell, P., Marteau, T., & Todd, C. (2001). Experiences and expectations of the new genetics in relation to familial risk of breast cancer: A comparison of the views of GPs and practice nurses. Family Practice, 18, 491–494.
Watson, E. K., Shickle, D., Qureshi, N., Emery, J., & Austoker, J. (1999). The ‘new genetics’ and primary care: GPs’ views on their role and their educational needs. Family Practice, 16, 420–525.
Westwood, G., Pickering, R., Latter, S., Lucassen, A., Little, P., & Temple, I. K. (2006). Feasibility and acceptability of providing nurse counsellor genetics clinics in primary care. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 53(5), 591–604.
Acknowledgements
The project team would like to thank all of the practices that took part in this project, and also those staff who kindly agreed to take part in an interview. Also Clara Gaff who kindly commented on the manuscript. This study was funded by the UK Department of Health as part of the first wave of genetics service development projects 2002-3 and NHS R&D task linked funding.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Drury, N., Bethea, J., Guilbert, P. et al. Genetics Support to Primary Care Practitioners—A Demonstration Project. J Genet Counsel 16, 583–591 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10897-007-9096-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10897-007-9096-1