Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Proactive and Reactive Violence among Intimate Partner Violent Men Diagnosed with Antisocial and Borderline Personality Disorder

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Family Violence Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Personality disorder features have been an important basis of many batterer typologies (Babcock et al. J Fam Violence 15:391–409, 2000; Holtzworth-Munroe and Stuart Psychol Bull 116:476–497, 1994), most notably Antisocial and Borderline Personality Disorders. Aggression that partner violent men commit has also been found to be heterogeneous, motivated by the need to control (proactive) or enacted out of emotion (reactive). In the present study, men who were physically abusive towards their female partner (N = 124 couples) were administered the SCID-II diagnostic interview for Antisocial (ASPD) and Borderline Personality Disorder (BPD). It was hypothesized that partner violent men diagnosed with ASPD would show highest levels of proactive violence whereas men diagnosed with BPD (alone or comorbidly with ASPD) were expected to be reactively violent. Results suggest that violence perpetrated by men with different personality disorders differs in its function. Within the context of intimate relationships, BPD/comorbid men appear to use violence more reactively, while ASPD men tend to use violence both proactively and reactively. Implications for treatment are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. (Women’s) defensive and retaliatory violence are considered “other” here, as these acts, by definition, cannot precede men’s initial use of violence

References

  • American Psychiatric Association. (2000). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders, 4th edition text revised. Washington, DC: APA.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Babcock, J. C., Jacobson, N. S., Gottman, J. M., & Yerington, T. P. (2000). Attachment, emotional regulation, and the function of marital violence: differences between secure, preoccupied and dismissing violent and nonviolent husbands. Journal of Family Violence, 15, 391–409.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Babcock, J. C., Green, C. E., & Robie, C. (2004). Does batterers’ treatment work? A meta-analytic review of domestic violence treatment outcome research. Clinical Psychology Review, 23, 1023–1053.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Babcock, J. C., Green, C. E., Webb, S. A., & Yerington, T. P. (2005). Psychophysiological profiles of batterers: autonomic emotional reactivity as it predicts the antisocial spectrum of behavior among intimate partner abusers. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 114, 445–455.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Babcock, J. C., Canady, B., Graham, K. H., & Schart, L. (2007). The evolution of battering interventions: From the dark ages into the scientific age. In J. Hamel & T. Nicholls (Eds.), Family therapy for domestic violence: A practitioner’s guide to gender-inclusive research and treatment (pp. 215–244). NY: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bakeman, R. (1983). Computing lag sequential statistics: the ELAG program. Behavior Research Methods & Instrumentation, 15(5), 530–535.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bakeman, R., & Quera, V. (1995). Analyzing interaction: Sequential analysis with SDIS and GSEQ. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bakeman, R., & Gottman, J. M. (1997). Observing interaction: An introduction to sequential analysis. New York: Cambridge University Press. Original work published 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bakeman, R., Adamson, L. B., & Strisik, P. (1995). Lags and logs: Statistical approaches to interaction. In J. M. Gottman (Ed.), The analysis of change (pp. 279–308). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brewin, C. R., Andrews, B., & Gotlib, I. H. (1993). Psychopathology and early experience: a reappraisal of retrospective reports. Psychological Bulletin, 113(1), 82–98.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, K. S., & Parsons, R. D. (1998). Accurate identification of childhood aggression: a key to successful intervention. Professional School Counseling, 2(2), 135–140.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bushman, B. J., & Anderson, C. A. (2001). Is it time to pull the plug on the hostile versus instrumental aggression dichotomy? Psychological Review, 108(1), 273–279.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chase, K. A., O’Leary, K. D., & Heyman, R. E. (2001). Categorizing partner-violent men within the reactive-proactive typology model. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 69(3), 567–572.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cornell, D. G., Warren, J., Hawk, G., Stafford, E., Oram, G., & Pine, D. (1996). Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 64(4), 783–790.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dodge, K. A., & Coie, J. D. (1987). Social-information-processing factors in reactive and proactive aggression in children’s peer groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53(6), 1146–1158.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dutton, D. G. (2006). Rethinking domestic violence. Vancouver: UBC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ehrensaft, M. K., Cohen, P., & Johnson, J. G. (2006). Development of personality disorder symptoms and the risk for partner violence. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 115(3), 474–483.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • First, M. B., Spitzer, R. L., Gibbon, M., & Williams, J. B. W. (1997). Structured clinical interview for DSM-IV personality disorders, (SCID-II). Washington, D.C.: American Psychiatric.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gottman, J. M., Jacobson, N. S., Rushe, R. H., Shortt, J. W., Babcock, J. C., La Taillade, J. J., et al. (1995). The relationship between heart rate reactivity, emotionally aggressive behavior, and general violence in batterers. Journal of Family Psychology, 9, 227–248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hamberger, L. K., & Hastings, J. E. (1986). Personality correlates of men who abuse their partners: a cross-validation study. Journal of Family Violence, 1(4), 323–341.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hamberger, L. K., Lohr, J. M., Bonge, D., & Tolin, D. F. (1996). A large sample empirical typology of male spouse abusers and its relationship to dimensions of abuse. Violence & Victims, 11, 277–292.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Heyman, R. E., & Schlee, K. (2003). Stopping wife abuse via physical aggression couples treatment. Journal of Aggression, Maltreatment & Trauma, 7(1–2), 135–157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holtzworth-Munroe, A., & Stuart, G. L. (1994). Typologies of male batterers: three subtypes and differences among them. Psychological Bulletin, 116(3), 476–497.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jacobson, N. S., Gottman, J. M., Waltz, J., Rushe, R., Babcock, J., & Holtzworth-Munroe, A. (1994). Affect, verbal content, and psychophysiology in the arguments of couples with a violent husband. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 62(5), 982–988.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Keltner, D., & Kring, A. M. (1998). Emotion, social function, and psychopathology. Review of General Psychology, 2(3), 320–342.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kingsbury, S. J., Lambert, M. T., & Hendrickse, W. (1997). A two-factor model of aggression. Psychiatry, 60(3), 224–232.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Little, T. D., Jones, S. M., Henrich, C. C., & Hawley, P. H. (2003). Disentagling the “whys” from the “whats” of aggressive behaviour. International Journal of Behavior Development, 27(2), 122–133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lohr, J. M., Bonge, D., Witte, T. H., Hamberger, L. K., & Langhinrichsen-Rohling, J. (2005). Consistency and accuracy of batterer typology identification. Journal of Family Violence, 20(4), 253–258.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Merk, W., deCastro, B. O., & Koops, W. (2005). The distinction between reactive and proactive aggression: utility for theory, diagnosis, and treatment. European Journal of Developmental Psychology, 2(2), 197–220.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Poulin, F., & Boivin, M. (2000). Reactive and proactive aggression: evidence of a two-factor model. Psychological Assessment, 12(2), 115–122.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Quera, V., & Bakeman, R. (2001). GSEQ for windows: new software for the analysis of interaction sequences. DiPAV Quaderni, 2, 9–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raine, A., Dodge, K., Loeber, R., Gatzke-Kopp, L., Lynam, D., Reynolds, C., et al. (2006). The reactive-proactive aggression questionnaire: differential correlates of reactive and proactive aggression in adolescent boys. Aggressive Behavior, 32, 159–171.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ramirez, J. M., & Andreu, J. M. (2006). Aggression, and some related psychological constructs (anger, hostility, and impulsivity): some comments from a research project. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 30, 276–291.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Stith, S. M., Rosen, K. H., & McCollum, E. E. (2003). Effectiveness of couples treatment for spouse abuse. Journal of Marital & Family Therapy, 29(3), 407–426.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Straus, M. A. (1979). Measuring intrafamily conflict and violence: the Conflict Tactics (CT) scales. Journal of marriage and the family, 41, 75–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Straus, M. A., Hamby, S. L., Boney-McCoy, S., & Sugarman, D. B. (1996). The revised Conflict Tactics Scales (CTS2): development and preliminary psychometric data. Journal of Family Issues, 17(3), 283–316.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tweed, R. G., & Dutton, D. G. (1998). A comparison of impulsive and instrumental subgroups of batterers. Violence and Victims, 13(3), 217–230.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Vitaro, F., & Brendgen, M. (2005). Proactive and reactive aggression: A developmental perspective. In R. E. Tremblay, W. W. Hartup & J. Archer (Eds.), Developmental origins of aggression (pp. 178–201). New York: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walters, G. D. (2005). Proactive and reactive aggression: A lifestyle view. In J. P. Morgan (Ed.), Psychology of aggression (pp. 29–43). Hauppauge: Nova Science.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waltz, J., Babcock, J. C., Jacobson, N. S., & Gottman, J. M. (2000). Testing a typology of batterers. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 68, 658–669.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • White, R. J., & Gondolf, E. W. (2000). Implications of personality profiles for batterer treatment. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 15(5), 467–486.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jody M. Ross.

Appendix

Appendix

Violent Incident Description Codes—Modified 9-Code System

Prosocial: Request or Apology or Problem solve or Positive

Withdrawal: Ignore or Leave

Complaint: Criticize or Blame or Complain

Distress: Pleading or Distress or Cry

Dominance/Belligerence: Sarcasm or Rejection or Demand or Pursue or Scream/yell

Offensive Violence: Offensive violence, moderate or Offensive violence, potentially life-threatening

Threat: Verbal threat or Physical threat or Property damage

Verbal Defense: Verbal defense (stand-alone, high frequency code)

Footnote 1Contextual/Other: Substance use or Defensive violence, moderate or Defensive violence, potentially life-threatening or Retaliatory violence, moderate or Retaliatory violence, potentially life-threatening, or other, non-related behaviors (e.g., 3rd party behavior).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ross, J.M., Babcock, J.C. Proactive and Reactive Violence among Intimate Partner Violent Men Diagnosed with Antisocial and Borderline Personality Disorder. J Fam Viol 24, 607–617 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10896-009-9259-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10896-009-9259-y

Keywords

Navigation