Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

New tools to boost butterfly habitat quality in existing grass buffer strips

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Insect Conservation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

There are approximately 29,000 ha of grass buffer strips in the UK under Agri-Environment Schemes; however, typically they are floristically poor and as such are of limited biodiversity value. Introducing a sown wildflower component has the potential to increase dramatically the value of these buffer strips for a suite of native species, including butterflies. This study investigates management practices aiming to promote the establishment and maintenance of wildflowers in existing buffer strips. The effectiveness of two methods used to increase the establishment of wildflowers for the benefit of native butterfly species were tested, both individually and in combination. The management practices were: (1) the application of a selective graminicide (fluazifop-P-butyl) which reduces the dominance of competitive grasses; and (2) scarification of the soil which creates germination niches for sown wildflower seeds. A wildflower seed mix consisting of nine species was sown in conjunction with the scarification treatment. Responses of wildflowers and butterflies were monitored for two years after establishment. Results indicate that the combined scarification and graminicide treatment produced the greatest cover and species richness of sown wildflowers. Butterfly abundance, species richness and diversity were positively correlated with sown wildflower species richness, with the highest values in the combined scarification and graminicide treatment. These findings have confirmed the importance of both scarification as a means of introducing wildflower seed into existing buffer strips, and subsequent management using graminicides, for the benefit of butterflies. Application of this approach could provide tools to help butterfly conservation on farmland in the future.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Asher J, Warren M, Fox R, Harding P, Jeffcoate G, Jeffcoate S (2001) The millenium atlas of butterflies in Britain and Ireland. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Boatman ND (1992) Improvement of field margin habitat by selective control of annual weeds. Asp Appl Biol 29:431–436

    Google Scholar 

  • Butterfly Conservation, CEH, DEFRA, Joint Nature Conservation Committee (2009) Populations of butterflies on farmland in England. http://www.defra.gov.uk/environment/biodiversity/documents/indicator/200904a1b.pdf. Accessed 26 May 2010

  • Cheffings CM, Farrell L (2005) Species status report no. 7: the vascular plant red data list for Great Britain. Joint Nature Conservation Committee, Peterborough

    Google Scholar 

  • Corbet S (1987) More bees make better crops. New Sci 115:40–43

    Google Scholar 

  • Critchley CNR, Fowbert JA, Sherwood AJ, Pywell RF (2006) Vegetation development of sown grass margins in arable fields under a countrywide agri-environment scheme. Biol Conserv 132:1–11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Defra (2008) Entry level stewardship handbook, 2nd edn. Natural England, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Dennis RLH (1992) Appendix 1. A check list of British butterflies and their hostplants. In: Dennis RLH (ed) The ecology of butterflies in Britain. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Dover JW (1996) Factors affecting the distribution of satyrid butterflies on arable farmland. J Appl Ecol 33:723–734

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edwards GR, Crawley MJ (1999) Herbivores, seed banks and seedling recruitment in mesic grassland. J Ecol 87:423–435

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edwards M, Jenner M (2005) Field guide to the bumblebees of Great Britain and Ireland. Ocelli, Eastbourne

    Google Scholar 

  • Edwards AR, Mortimer SR, Lawson CS, Westbury DB, Harris SJ, Woodcock BA, Brown VK (2007) Hay strewing, brush harvesting of seed and soil disturbance as tools for the enhancement of botanical diversity in grasslands. Biol Conserv 134:372–382

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feber RE, Smith H, Macdonald DW (1996) The effects on butterfly abundance of the management of uncropped edges of arable fields. J Appl Ecol 33:1191–1205

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Field RG, Gardiner T, Mason CF, Hill J (2006) Countryside stewardship scheme and butterflies: a study of plant and butterfly species richness. Biodivers Conserv 15:443–452

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fox R, Warren MS, Asher J, Brereton TM, Roy DB (2007) The state of Britain’s butterflies 2007. Butterfly Conservation and the Centre for Ecology and Hydrology, Wareham

    Google Scholar 

  • Goulson D, Lye GC, Darvill B (2008) Decline and conservation of bumble bees. Annu Rev Ent 53:191–208

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Grubb PJ (1977) Maintenance of species-richness in plant communities—importance of regeneration niche. Biol Rev Camb Phil Soc 52:107–145

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haaland C, Gyllin M (2010) Butterflies and bumblebees in greenways and sown wildflower strips in southern Sweden. J Insect Cons 14:125–132

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hammond PC, Miller JC (1998) Comparison of the biodiversity of Lepidoptera within three forested ecosystems. Ann Ent Soc Am 91:323–328

    Google Scholar 

  • Herbert D, Walker KA, Price LJ, Cole DJ, Pallett KE, Ridley SM, Harwood JL (1997) Acetyl-CoA carboxylase—a graminicide target site. Pestic Sci 50:67–71

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hofmann M, Isselstein J (2004) Seedling recruitment on agriculturally improved mesic grassland: the influence of disturbance and management schemes. Appl Veg Sci 7:193–200

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hopkins A, Pywell RF, Peel S, Johnson RH, Bowling PJ (1999) Enhancement of botanical diversity of permanent grassland and impact on hay production in environmentally sensitive areas in the UK. Grass For Sci 54:163–173

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Losey JE, Vaughan M (2006) The economic value of ecological services provided by insects. Bioscience 56:311–323

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marshall EJP (2003) Methods to diversify field margin plant communities, BD1607. Marshall Agroecology Ltd., UK. http://www.agroecol.co.uk/marshallagro1BD1607.htm. Accessed 25 January 2009

  • Marshall EJR, Moonen AC (2002) Field margins in northern Europe: their functions and interactions with agriculture. Agric Ecosyst Environ 89:5–21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marshall EJP, Nowakowski M (1991) The use of herbicides in the creation of a herb-rich field margin. Brighton Crop Protection Conference—Weeds

  • Marshall EJP, Nowakowski M (1994) The effects of Fluazifop-P-Butyl and cutting treatments on the establishment of sown field margin strips. Field margins: integrating agriculture and conservation, British Crop Protection Council, Surrey, UK, Brighton 58, pp 307–312

  • Marshall EJP, Nowakowski M (1996) Interactions between cutting and graminicide on a newly-sown grass and wild flower field margin strip. Asp Appl Biol 44:307–312

    Google Scholar 

  • Marshall EJP, Brown VK, Boatman ND, Lutman PJW, Squire GR, Ward LK (2003) The role of weeds in supporting biological diversity within crop fields. Weed Res 43:77–89

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meek B, Loxton D, Sparks T, Pywell R, Pickett H, Nowakowski M (2002) The effect of arable field margin composition on invertebrate biodiversity. Biol Conserv 106:259–271

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MVSP (1999) Multivariate statistical package version 3.1. Kovach Computing Services, Anglesey

    Google Scholar 

  • Natural England (2009) Agri-environment schemes in England 2009: a review of results and effectiveness

  • O’Connor RJ, Shrubb M (1986) Farming and birds. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Ovenden GN, Swash ARH, Smallshire D (1998) Agri-environment schemes and their contribution to the conservation of biodiversity in England. J Appl Ecol 35:955–960

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peel S, Christian M (2009) Sward enhancement: selection of suitable sites. Natural England Technical Information Note TIN061

  • Pollard E, Yates TJ (1993) Monitoring butterflies for ecology and conservation. Chapman and Hall, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Pollard E, Elias DO, Skelton MJ, Thomas JA (1975) A method of assessing the abundance of butterflies in Monks Wood National Nature Reserve in 1973. Ent Gaz 26:77–88

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter K, Steel CA, Thomas JA (1992) Butterflies and communities. In: Dennis RLH (ed) The ecology of butterflies in Britain. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Potts GR (1986) The partridge: pesticides, predation and conservation. Collins, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Potts SG, Westbury DB, Woodcock BA, Ramsay AJ, Harris SJ, Springate S, Pywell R, Meek B, Carvell C, Hulmes L, Warman L, Sparks T, Cook SK, Henderson IG (2007) Experiment 2—management of the non-cropped margin structure to maximise biodiversity

  • Pywell RF, Warman EA, Sparks TH, Greatorex-Davies JN, Walker KJ, Meek WR, Carvell C, Petit S, Firbank LG (2004) Assessing habitat quality for butterflies on intensively managed arable farmland. Biol Conserv 118:313–325

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pywell RF, Warman EA, Carvell C, Sparks TH, Dicks LV, Bennett D, Wright A, Critchley CNR, Sherwood A (2005) Providing foraging resources for bumblebees in intensively farmed landscapes. Biol Conserv 121:479–494

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pywell RF, Bullock JM, Tallowin JB, Walker KJ, Warman EA, Masters G (2007) Enhancing diversity of species-poor grasslands: an experimental assessment of multiple constraints. J Appl Ecol 44:81–94

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Robinson RA, Sutherland WJ (2002) Post-war changes in arable farming and biodiversity in Great Britain. J Appl Ecol 39:157–176

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • SAS (2008) Statistical analysis system: version 9.2. SAS Institute, Cary

    Google Scholar 

  • Schabenberger O, Pierce FJ (eds) (2002) Contemporary statistical models for the plant and soil sciences. CRC Press, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Stace C (1997) New flora of the British Isles. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Syngenta Crop Protection Ltd (2003) Fusilade Max Product Label. http://www.syngenta-crop.co.uk/pdfs/products/FusiladeMax_uk_product_label.pdf. Accessed 13 February 2009

  • Thomas SR, Noordhuis R, Holland JM, Goulson D (2002) Botanical diversity of beetle banks effects of age and comparison with conventional arable field margins in southern UK. Agric Ecosyst Environ 93:403–412

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Swaay C, Warren M, Lois G (2006) Biotope use and trends of European butterflies. J Insect Cons 10:189–209

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Westbury DB, Dunnett NP (2008) The promotion of grassland forb abundance: a chemical or biological solution? Basic Appl Ecol 9:653–662

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Westphal C, Bommarco RGC, Lamborn E, Morison N, Petanidou T, Potts SG, Roberts SPM, Szentgyörgyi H, Tscheulin T, Vaissière BE, Woyciechowski M, Biesmeijer JC, Kunin WE, Settele J, Steffan-Dewenter I (2008) Measuring bee diversity in different European habitats and biogeographical regions. Ecol Monogr 78:653–671

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams PH (1982) The distribution and decline of British bumble-bees. J Apic Res 21:236–245

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson PJ (1992) Britain’s Arable weeds. Br Wildl 3:149–161

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson JD, Morris AJ, Arroyo BE, Clark SC, Bradbury RB (1999) A review of the abundance and diversity of invertebrate and plant foods of granivorous birds in northern Europe in relation to agricultural change. Agric Ecosyst Environ 75:13–30

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Woodcock BA, Westbury DB, Tscheulin T, Harrison-Cripps J, Harris SJ, Ramsey AJ, Brown VK, Potts SG (2008) Effects of seed mixture and management on beetle assemblages of arable field margins. Agric Ecosyst Environ 125:246–254

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This project was funded by the Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council and Syngenta. We would like to thank the farmers Mark Robins (Farley Estates, Reading) and Peter Clarke (Adbury Park Farm, Newbury) for allowing access to their land for data collection.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Robin J. Blake.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Blake, R.J., Woodcock, B.A., Westbury, D.B. et al. New tools to boost butterfly habitat quality in existing grass buffer strips. J Insect Conserv 15, 221–232 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10841-010-9339-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10841-010-9339-6

Keywords

Navigation