Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

The development of butterfly indicators in the United Kingdom and assessments in 2010

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Insect Conservation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The United Kingdom (UK) Government has national and international commitments to tackle the rate of biodiversity loss by 2010. Biodiversity indicators are used to measure and communicate progress in meeting these commitments. From 2005 onwards, butterflies have been adopted as Governmental biodiversity indicators in England, Scotland and for the UK as a whole. The indicators are compiled using butterfly abundance data collected through the UK Butterfly Monitoring Scheme, at a network of site established from 1976 onwards. The indicators show that butterfly numbers have fluctuated considerably from year-to-year, though analysis of the underlying smoothed multi-species trends for (habitat) ‘specialist’ species show significant long-term declines in each country since the 1970s. Trends in wider countryside ‘generalist’ species vary at the country-level from little or no overall change in Scotland and across the UK, to declines over selected years in England. Comparisons of changes in butterfly abundance before and after the 2010 target was set in 2002 suggest that the rate of decline at the UK-level is increasing for specialist species. In spite of large amounts of investment since 2000 to improve the habitat condition of protected areas, the trend for butterfly populations is no different in protected areas compared to elsewhere. Analysis by policy sector in England, shows that butterflies are declining rapidly in both forestry land and farmland, although in the latter habitat type, improvements are being seen on land entered into agri-environment schemes. We conclude by assessing the extent to which butterflies may represent broader biodiversity and help inform and evaluate conservation policy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anon (1994) Biodiversity: the UK action plan. HMSO, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Asher J, Warren MS, Fox R, Harding P, Jeffcoate G, Jeffcoate S (2001) The millennium atlas of butterflies in Britain and Ireland. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Balmford A, Green RE, Jenkins M (2003) Measuring the changing state of nature. Trends Ecol Evol 18(7):326–330

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Balmford A, Bennun L, Ten Brink B, Cooper D, Côté IM, Crane P, Dobson AP, Dudley N, Dutton I, Green RE, Gregory RD, Harrison J, Kennedy ET, Kremen C, Leader Williams N, Lovejoy TE, Mace P, May RM, Mayaux P, Morling P, Phillips J, Redford K, Ricketts TH, Rodriguez JP, Sanjayan MA, Schei PJ, Van Jaarsveld AS, Walther BA (2005) The convention on biological diversity’s 2010 target. Science 307:212–213

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Beccaloni GW, Gaston KJ (1995) Predicting species richness of neotropical forest butterflies: Ithominae (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae) as indicators. Biol Indic 71:77–86

    Google Scholar 

  • Berry PM, Dawson TP, Harrison PA, Pearson RG (2002) Modelling potential impacts of climate change on the bioclimatic envelope of species in Britain and Ireland. Glob Ecol Biogeogr 11:453–462

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blair RB (1999) Birds and butterflies along an urban gradient: surrogate taxa for assessing biodiversity? Ecol Appl 9:164–170

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Botham MS, Brereton TM, Middlebrook I, Cruickshank KL, Harrower C, Beckmann B, Roy DB (2008). United Kingdom Butterfly Monitoring Scheme report for 2008. CEH Wallingford

  • Brereton T (2004) Farming and butterflies. The Biologist 51:32–36

    Google Scholar 

  • Brereton T, Warren M, Stewart K (2002) BD1427: developing a system for assessing the effect of agri-environmentschemes on butterfly populations. Butterfly Conservation, Wareham

    Google Scholar 

  • Brereton T, Wigglesworth T, Warren MS, Stewart K (2005) BD1446: Agri-environment schemes and butterflies: re-assessing the impacts and improving delivery of BAP targets. Butterfly Conservation, Wareham

    Google Scholar 

  • Brereton T, Roy D, Greatorex-Davies N (2006) 30 years and counting. The contribution to conservation and ecology of butterfly monitoring in the UK. Br Widl 17:162–170

    Google Scholar 

  • Brereton TM, Warren MS, Roy DB, Stewart K (2007) The changing status of the Chalkhill Blue butterfly Polyommatus coridon in the UK: the impacts of conservation policies and environmental factors. J Insect Conserv 12:629–638

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brereton TM, van Swaay C, van Strien A (in press) Developing a butterfly indicator to assess changes in Europe’s biodiversity. Proceedings of the 17th International Conference of the European Bird Census Council, Bird Numbers 2007. Chiavenna, Italy

  • Brown KS (1991) Conservation of neotropical environments: insects as indicators. In: Collins NM, Thomas JA (eds) The conservation of insects and their habitats. Academic Press, London, pp 350–404

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown KS, Freitas AVL (2000) Atlantic forest butterflies: indicators for landscape conservation. Biotropica 32:934–956

    Google Scholar 

  • Buckland ST, Magurran AE, Green RE, Fewster RM (2005) Monitoring change in biodiversity through composite indices. Philos Trans R Soc B 360:243–254

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Caro TM, O’Doherty G (1999) On the use of surrogate species in conservation biology. Conserv Biol 13:805–814

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • CBD (2004) Decision VII/30 of the Seventh Conference of the Parties to the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD/COP7) “Strategic Plan: future evaluation of progress”. http://www.biodiv.org/decisions/default.aspx?dec=VII/30

  • CBD (2006) Global Biodiversity Outlook 2. Secretariat of the. convention on biological diversity, Montreal, Canada

  • Conrad KF, Woiwod IP, Parsons M, Fox R, Warren MS (2004) Long-term population trends in widespread British moths. J Insect Conserv 8:119–136

    Google Scholar 

  • Conrad KF, Warren MS, Fox R, Parsons MS, Woiwod IP (2006) Rapid declines of common, widespread British moths provide evidence of an insect biodiversity crisis. Biol Conserv 132:279–291

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davies ZG, Wilson RJ, Brereton TM, Thomas CD (2005) The re-expansion and improving status of the silver-spotted skipper butterfly (Hesperia comma) in Britain: a metapopulation success story. Biol Conserv 124:189–198

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davies H, Brereton T, Roy DBR, Fox R (2007) Government targets for protected area management: will threatened butterflies benefit? Biodivers Conserv 16(13):3719–3736

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Heer M, Kapos V, Ten Brink BJE (2005) Biodiversity trends in Europe: development and testing of a species trend indicator for evaluating progress towards the 2010 target. Philos Trans R Soc B 360:297–308

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Defra (2002) Working with the grain of nature: a biodiversity strategy for England. Defra, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Defra (2006) Working with the grain of nature–taking it forward: Volume II. Measuring progress on the England Biodiversity Strategy: 2006 assessment. Defra, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Defra (2007) UK biodiversity indicators in your pocket 2007. Published by Defra on behalf of the UK Biodiversity Partnership. Defra, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Defra (2009) UK biodiversity indicators in your pocket 2009. Published by Defra on behalf of the UK Biodiversity Partnership. Defra, London

    Google Scholar 

  • DoE(NI) (2002). Northern Ireland Biodiversity Strategy. Department of the environment Northern Ireland (environment and heritage service)

  • Ehrlich PR (1994) Energy use and biodiversity loss. Philos Trans R Soc B 344:99–104

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ehrlich PR (2001) Tropical butterflies: a key model group that can be “completed”. Lepid News 2(1):10–12

    Google Scholar 

  • Ehrlich PR (2003) Introduction: butterflies, test systems, and biodiversity. In: Boggs L, Watt WB, Ehrlich PR (eds) Butterflies: ecology and evolution taking flight. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp 1–6

    Google Scholar 

  • Erhardt A, Thomas JA (1991) Lepidoptera as indicators of change in the semi-natural grasslands of lowland and upland Europe. In: Collins NM, Thomas JA (eds) The conservation of insects and their habitats. Academic Press, London, pp 213–236

    Google Scholar 

  • Failing L, Gregory R (2003) Ten common mistakes in designing biodiversity indicators for forest policy. J Environ Manage 68:121–132

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Feest A, Aldreda TD, Jedamzika K (2010) Biodiversity quality: a paradigm for biodiversity. Ecological Indicators. Ecol Indic 10(6):1077–1082

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fleishman E, Fay JP, Murphy DD (2000) Upsides and downsides: contrasting topographic gradients in species richness and associated scenarios for climate change. J Biogeogr 27:1209–1219

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fleishman E, Thomson JR, MacNally R, Murphy DD, Fay JP (2005) Using indicator species to predict richness of multiple taxonomic groups. Conserv Biol 19:1125–1137

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fox R, Asher J, Brereton T, Roy D, Warren M (2006) The state of butterflies in Britain and Ireland. Pisces Publications, Newbury

    Google Scholar 

  • Fry R, Lonsdale D (1991) Habitat conservation for Insects—a neglected green Issue. Amateur Entomological Society, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Gregory RD, Noble D, Field R, Marchant JH, Raven M, Gibbons DW (2003) Using birds as indicators of biodiversity. Ornis Hung 12–13:11–24

    Google Scholar 

  • Gregory RD, Van Strien AJ, Vorisek P, Gmelig Meyling AW, Noble DG, Foppen RPB, Gibbons DW (2005) Developing indicators for European birds. Philos Trans R Soc B 360:269–288

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grill A, Knoflach B, Cleary DFR, Kati V (2005) Butterfly, spider, and plant communities in different land-use types in Sardinia, Italy. Biodivers Conserv 14:1281–1300

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Groombridge B (1992) Global biodiversity: status of the Earth’s living resources. Chapman & Hall, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Harvey AC (1989) Forecasting structural time series models and the kalman filter. Cambridge University Press, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Heath J, Pollard E, Thomas JA (1984) Atlas of butterflies in Britain and Ireland. Harmondsworth, Viking

    Google Scholar 

  • Hickling R, Roy DB, Hill JK, Fox R, Thomas CD (2006) The distributions of a wide range of taxonomic groups are expanding polewards. Glob Chang Biol 12:450–455

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hill JK, Thomas CD, Fox R, Telfer MG, Willis SG, Asher J, Huntley B (2002) Responses of butterflies to 20th century climate warming: implications for future ranges. Proceedings of the Royal Society B 269: 2163–2171

  • Hockley N, Farrar J, Gibbons JM, Hearn SM, Jones JPG, Kaiser M (2010) Biodiversity indicators for Wales—a report to the Welsh Assembly Government. University of Bangor, Bangor

    Google Scholar 

  • Kerr JT, Sugar A, Packer L (2000) Indicator taxa, rapid biodiversity assessment, and nestedness in an endangered ecosystem. Conserv Biol 14:1726–1734

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kremen C (1992) Assessing the indicator properties of species assemblages for natural areas monitoring. Ecol Appl 2:203–217

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kűhn E, Feldmann R, Harpke A, Hirneisen N, Musche M, Leopold P, Settele J (2008) Getting the public involved into butterfly conservation—lessons learned from a new monitoring scheme in Germany. Isr J Ecol Evol 54:89–103

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewis OT, Hurford C (1997) Assessing the status of the marsh fritillary butterfly (Eurodryas aurinia): an example from Glamorgan, UK. J Insect Conserv 1(3):159–166

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mace GM, Baillie JEM (2007) The 2010 biodiversity indicators: challenges for science and policy. Conserv Biol 21(6):1406–1413

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Maes D, Van Dyck H (2001) Butterfly diversity loss in Flanders (north Belgium): Europe’s worst case scenario? Biol Conserv 99:263–276

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maes D, Bauwens D, de Bruyn L, Anselin A, Vermeersch G, van Landuyt W, de Knijf G, Gilbert M (2005) Species richness coincidence: conservation strategies based on predictive modelling. Biodivers Conserv 14:1345–1364

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • National Audit Office (2008) Natural England’s role in improving sites of special scientific interest. The Stationery Office, London

    Google Scholar 

  • New TR (1997) Are Lepidoptera an effective ‘umbrella group’ for biodiversity conservation? J Insect Conserv 1:5–12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • OECD (1994) Environmental indicators. OECD core sets, OECD, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Oostermeijer JGB, van Swaay CAM (1998) The relationship between butterflies and environmental indicator values: a tool for conservation in a changing landscape. Biol Conserv 86:271–280

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pannekoek J, Van Strien AJ (2005) TRIM 3 manual. Trends and indices for monitoring data. CBS. Statistics Netherlands, Voorburg, Netherlands

    Google Scholar 

  • Parmesan C (2003) Butterflies as bioindicators for climate change effects. In: Boggs CL, Watt WB, Ehrlich PR (eds) Butterflies—ecology and evolution taking flight. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp 541–560

    Google Scholar 

  • Parmesan C, Yohe G (2003) A globally coherent fingerprint of climate change impacts across natural systems. Nature 421:37–42

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Parmesan C, Ryrholm N, Stefanescu C, Hill JK, Thomas CD, Descimon H, Huntley B, Laila L, Kullberg J, Tammaru T, Tennent WJ, Thomas JA, Warren MS (1999) Poleward shifts in geographical ranges of butterfly species associated with regional warming. Nature 399:579–583

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pollard E (1977) A method of assessing changes in the abundance of butterflies. Biol Conserv 12:115–134

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pollard E (1988) Temperature, rainfall and butterfly numbers. J Appl Ecol 25:819–828

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pollard E, Yates TJ (1993) Monitoring butterflies for ecology and conservation. Chapman and Hall, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Pollard E, Woiwod IP, Greatorex-Davies JN, Yates TJ, Welch RC (1998) The spread of coarse grasses and changes in numbers of Lepidoptera in a woodland nature reserve. Biol Conserv 84:17–24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pullin AS (1996) Restoration of butterfly populations in Britain. Restor Ecol 4:71–81

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pywell RF, Warman EA, Sparks TH, Greatorex-Davis JN, Walker KJ, Meek WR, Carvell C, Petit S, Firbank LG (2004) Assessing habitat quality for butterflies on intensively managed arable farmland. Biol Conserv 118:313–325

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rees HL, Hyland JL, Hylland K, Mercer Clarke CSL, Roff JC, Ware S (2008) Environmental indicators: utility in meeting regulatory needs an Overview. ICES J Mar Sci 65:1381–1386

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ricketts TH, Daily GD, Ehrlich PR (2002) Does butterfly diversity predict moth diversity? testing a popular indicator taxon at local scales. Biol Conserv 103:361–370

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Root TL, Price JT, Hall KR, Schneider SH, Rosenzweig C, Pounds JA (2003) Fingerprints of global warming on wild animals and plants. Nature 421:57–60

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenberg DM, Danks HV, Lehmkuhl DM (1986) Importance of insects in environmental impact assessment. Environ Manage 10:773–783

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rothery P, Roy DB (2001) Application of generalized additive models to butterfly transect count data. J Appl Stat 28:897–909

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roy DB, Rothery P, Moss D, Pollard E, Thomas JA (2001) Butterfly numbers and weather: predicting historical trends in abundance and the future effects of climate change. J Anim Ecol 70:201–217

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roy DB, Rothery P, Brereton T (2007) Reduced-effort schemes for monitoring butterfly populations. J Appl Ecol 44:993–1000

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scholes RJ, Biggs R (2005) A biodiversity intactness index. Nature 434:45–49

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schultz CB (1998) Dispersal behaviour and its implications for reserve design in a rare Oregan butterfly. Conserv Biol 12:248–292

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scottish Executive (2004) Scotland ‘s Biodiversity—It’s in Your Hands. A strategy for the conservation and enhancement of biodiversity in Scotland. Scottish Executive Environment and Rural Affairs Department, Edinburgh

  • Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity (2006) Global biodiversity outlook 2. CBD, Montreal

    Google Scholar 

  • Simonson SE, Opler PA, Stohlgren TJ, Chong GW (2001) Rapid assessment of butterfly diversity in a montane landscape. Biodivers Conserv 10:1369–1386

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Soldaat L, Visser H, Van Roomen M, Van Strien AJ (2007) Smoothing and trend detection in waterbird monitoring data using structural time-series analysis and the Kalman filter. J Ornithol 148(suppl 2):351–357

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sparks TH, Greatorex-Davies JN, Mountford JO, Hall ML, Marrs RH (1996) The effects of shade on the plant communities of rides in plantation woodland and implications for butterfly conservation. For Ecol Manage 80:197–207

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stork N (1997) How many species are there? Biodivers Conserv 2:215–232

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swengel AB (1998) Effects of management on butterfly abundance in tallgrass prairie and pine barrens. Biol Conserv 83:77–89

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ten Brink BJE (2000) Biodiversity indicators for the OECD environmental outlook and strategy; a feasibility study. RIVM report 402001014, Bilthoven

  • Ten Brink BJE, Hosper SH, Colijn F (1991) A quantitative methods for description and assessment of ecosystems: the AMEOBA approach. Mar Poll Bull 23:265–270

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ter Braak CJF, van Strien AJ, Meijer R, Verstrael TJ (1994) Analysis of monitoring data with many missing values: which method? In: W. Hagemeijer & T. Verstrael, Eds. Bird Numbers 1992. Distribution, Monitoring and Ecological Aspects. Proceedings of the 12 th International Conference of the International Bird Census Committee and European Ornithological Atlas Committee. SOVON, Beek-Ubbergen, The Netherlands

  • Thackeray SJ, Sparks TH, Frederiksen M, Burthe S, Bacon, PJ Bell, JR Botham MS, Brereton TM, Bright PW, Carvalho L, Clutton-Brock T, Dawson A, Edwards M, Elliott JM, Harrington R, Johns D, Jones ID, Jones JT, Leech DI, Roy DB, Scott WA, Smith M, Smithers RJ, Winfield IJ, Wanless S (2010) Trophic level asynchrony in rates of phenological change for marine, freshwater and terrestrial environments. Glob Chang Biol. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2486.2010.02165.x

  • Thomas JA (1991) Rare species conservation: case studies of European butterflies. In: Spellerberg IF, Goldsmith FB, Morris MG (eds) The scientific management of temperate communities for conservation. Blackwell’s Scientific, Oxford, pp 149–197

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas JA (1993) Holocene climate changes and warm man-made refugia may explain why a sixth of British butterflies possess unnatural early successional habitats. Ecography 16:278–284

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas JA (2005) Monitoring change in the abundance and distribution of insects using butterflies and other indicator groups. Philos Trans R Soc B 360:339–357

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas JA, Clarke RT (2004) Extinction rates and butterflies–response. Science 305:1563–1564

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas CD, Harrison S (1992) Spatial dynamics of a patchily distributed butterfly species. J Anim Ecol 61:437–446

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas JA, Rose RJ, Clarke RT, Thomas CD, Webb NR (1999) Intraspecific variation in habitat availability among ectothermic animals near their climatic limits and their centres of range. Funct Ecol 13:55–64

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas JA, Telfer MG, Roy DB, Preston C, Greenwood JJD, Willis SG, Asher J, Fox R, Clarke RT, Lawton JH (2004) Comparative losses of British butterflies, birds, and plants and the global extinction crisis. Science 303:1879–1881

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • UK BAP (2007) UK List of Priority Species and Habitats. Available at http://www.ukbap.org.uk/newprioritylist.aspx

  • UK Biodiversity Partnership (2007) Conserving biodiversity–the UK approach. Defra, London

    Google Scholar 

  • UNEP (2003) Report of expert meeting on indicators of biological diversity including indicators for rapid assessment of Inland water ecosystems. 10–14 November 2003, Montreal

  • Van Swaay CAM, Van Strien AJ (2005) Using butterfly monitoring data to develop a European grassland butterfly indicator. In: Kuehn E, Thomas J, Feldmann R, Settele J (eds.) 2005. Studies on the Ecology and Conservation of Butterflies in Europe. Proceedings of the Conference held in UFZ Leipzig, 5–9th of December, 2005

  • Van Swaay CAM, Van Strien AJ (2008) The European butterfly indicator for grassland species 1990–2007. Report VS2008.022, De Vlinderstichting, Wageningen

  • Van Swaay C, Warren MS (1999) Red data book of European butterflies (Rhopalocera). Council of Europe, Strasbourg (Nature and Environment Series No. 99)

  • Van Swaay CAM, Nowicki P, Settele J, van Strien AJ (2008) Butterfly monitoring in Europe: methods, applications and perspectives. Biodiver Conserv 17:3455–3469

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Swaay C, Cuttelod A, Collins S, Maes D, López Munguira M, Šašić M, Settele J, Verovnik R, Verstrael T, Warren M, Wiemers M, Wynhof I (2010) European red list of butterflies. IUCN and butterfly conservation Europe. Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg

    Google Scholar 

  • Visser H (2004) Estimation and detection of flexible trends. Atmos Environ 38:4135–4145

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Warren MS (1992) The conservation of British butterflies. In: Dennis RLH (ed) The ecology of butterflies inBritain. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 246–274

    Google Scholar 

  • Warren MS, Thomas CD, Thomas JA (1984) The status of the heath fritillary butterfly Mellicta athalia Rott. in Britain. Biol Conserv 29:287–305

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Warren MS, Hill JK, Thomas JA, Asher J, Fox R, Huntley B, Roy DB, Telfer MG, Jeffcoate S, Harding P, Jeffcoate G, Willis SG, Greatorex-Davies JN, Moss D, Thomas CD (2001) Rapid responses of British butterflies to opposing forces of climate and habitat change. Nature 414:65–69

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Welsh Assembly Government (2006a) Environment strategy for wales. Welsh Assembly Government, Cardiff

    Google Scholar 

  • Welsh Assembly Government (2006b) Environment strategy for wales: report on progress—September 2007. Welsh Assembly Government, Cardiff

    Google Scholar 

  • Woiwod IP, Harrington R (1994) Flying in the face of change: the Rothamsted Insect Survey. In: Leigh RA, Johnson AE (eds) Long-term experiments in agricultural and ecological sciences. CAB International, Wallingford, pp 321–342

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We are indebted to all the volunteer recorders and local co-ordinators who have contributed to butterfly monitoring in general and the UKBMS specifically since 1976. The UKBMS is a partnership between Butterfly Conservation and the Natural Environment Research Council, Centre for Ecology & Hydrology. The UKBMS is funded by a multi-agency consortium led by Defra, and including the Countryside Council for Wales, the Joint Nature Conservation Committee, Forestry Commission, Natural England, the Natural Environment Research Council, the Northern Ireland Environment Agency and Scottish Natural Heritage.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Butterfly Conservation, Manor Yard, East Lulworth, Wareham, Dorset, BH20 5QP, UK

    T. Brereton, I. Middlebrook & M. Warren

  2. Centre for Ecology & Hydrology, Maclean Building, Benson Lane, Crowmarsh Gifford, Wallingford, Oxfordshire, OX10 8BB, UK

    D. B. Roy & M. Botham

Authors
  1. T. Brereton
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. D. B. Roy
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. I. Middlebrook
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. M. Botham
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. M. Warren
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to T. Brereton.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Brereton, T., Roy, D.B., Middlebrook, I. et al. The development of butterfly indicators in the United Kingdom and assessments in 2010. J Insect Conserv 15, 139–151 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10841-010-9333-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10841-010-9333-z

Keywords

Search

Navigation