Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Does forest loss affect the communities of trap-nesting wasps (Hymenoptera: Aculeata) in forests? Landscape vs. local habitat conditions

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Insect Conservation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We investigated changes in the communities of trap-nesting Hymenoptera in forests in relation to forest loss on a landscape scale and understory conditions on a local habitat scale. Two specific questions were addressed. (1) Do the communities change with degrees of forest loss? (2) Do the communities change with varying local environmental conditions of understory habitats? The study was made in a landscape characterized by distributed forest patches within intensively managed agricultural surroundings. We deployed trap-nests at eight randomly selected sites in forests in summer. To quantify forest loss, the amount of forest coverage was calculated using GIS. To indicate local habitat conditions, the species richness of understory flowering plants was used. All together, 12 species of wasps and no bees were captured. Regression analyses showed that both abundance and species richness of the wasps were not significantly related to forest coverage. However, abundance of trap-nesting wasps was significantly related to species richness of understory plants, but species richness of the wasps was not significantly related to the plants. These results suggest that communities of trap-nesting wasps in forests are influenced more by the local habitat conditions than by forest loss.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Allen GM, Eagles PFJ, Price SD (eds) (1990) Conserving Carolinian Canada. University of Waterloo Press, Waterloo

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson MC (1964) Studies of the woodland light climate II. Seasonal variation in the light climate. J Ecol 52:643–663

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Argus GW (1992) The phytogeography of rare vascular plants in Ontario and its bearing on plant conservation. Can J Bot 70:469–490

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bach CE, Kelly D, Hazlett BA (2005) Forest edges benefit adults, but not seedlings, of the mistletoe Alepis flavida (Loranthaceae). J Ecol 93:79–86

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barnes BV, Zak DR, Denton SR, Spurr SH (1998) Forest ecology, 4th edn. John Wiley & Sons Inc., New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowley SR (1999) A hitchhiker’s guide to statistics in plant biology. Any old subject books. A division of plant et al. Inc., Guelph

    Google Scholar 

  • Burgess VJ, Kelly D, Robertson AW, Ladley JJ (2006) Positive effects of forest edges on plant reproduction: literature review and a case study of bee visitation to flowers of Peraxilla tetrapetala (Loranthaceae). New Zealand J Ecol 30:179–190

    Google Scholar 

  • Buschini MLT (2006) Species diversity and community structure in trap-nesting bees in Southern Brazil. Apidologie 37:58–66

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Camillo E, Brescovit AD (1999) Spiders (Araneae) captured by Trypoxylon (Trypargilum) lactitarse (Hymenoptera: Sphecidae) in Southeastern Brazil. Rev Biol Trop 47:151–162

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen JQ, Franklin JF, Spies TA (1992) Vegetation responses to edge environments in old-growth Douglas-fir forests. Ecol Appl 2:387–396

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Collinge SK, Prudic KL, Oliver JC (2003) Effects of local habitat characteristics and landscape context on grassland butterfly diversity. Conserv Biol 17:178–187

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Collins JA, Jennings DT (1987) Spruce budwormand other lepidopterous prey of Eumenid wasps (Hymenoptera: Eumenidae) in spruce-fir forests of Maine. Great Lakes Entomol 20:127–133

    Google Scholar 

  • Culin JD, Robertson MW (2003) Spider prey of Trypoxylon lactitarse Saussure (Hymenoptera: Sphecidae). J Entomol Sci 38:321–333

    Google Scholar 

  • Debinski DM, Holt RD (2000) A survey and overview of habitat fragmentation experiments. Conserv Biol 14:342–355

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Donovan TM, Jones PW, Annand EM, Thompson FR (1997) Variation in local-scale edge effects: mechanisms and landscape context. Ecology 78:2064–2075

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Driscoll MJL, Donovan TM (2004) Landscape context moderates edge effects: nesting success of wood thrushes in central New York. Conserv Biol 18:1330–1338

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ewers RM, Didham RK (2006) Confounding factors in the detection of species responses to habitat fragmentation. Biol Rev 81:117–142

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fahrig L (2003) Effects of habitat fragmentation on biodiversity. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 34:487–515

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Findlay CS, Houlahan J (1997) Anthropogenic correlates of species richness in southeastern Ontario wetlands. Conserv Biol 11:1000–1009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frankie GW, Thorp RW, Newstrom-Lloyd LE et al (1998) Monitoring solitary bees in modified wildland habitats: implications for bee ecology and conservation. Environ Entomol 27:1137–1148

    Google Scholar 

  • Fye RE (1972) The effect of forest disturbances on populations of wasps and bees in northwestern Ontario (Hymenoptera: Aculeata). Can Entomol 104:1623–1633

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gathmann A, Greiler HJ, Tscharntke T (1994) Trap-nesting bees and wasps colonizing set-aside fields: succession and body size, management by cutting and sowing. Oecologia 98:8–14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gathmann A, Tscharntke T (2002) Foraging ranges of solitary bees. J Anim Ecol 71:757–764

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gorham LE, King SL, Keeland BD et al (2002) Effects of canopy gaps and flooding on homopterans in a bottomland hardwood forest. Wetlands 22:541–549

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gurd DB, Nudds TD, Rivard DH (2001) Conservation of mammals in eastern North American wildlife reserves: how small is too small?. Conserv Biol 15:1355–1363

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hardtle W, von Oheimb G, Westphal C (2003) The effects of light and soil conditions on the species richness of the ground vegetation of deciduous forests in northern Germany (Schleswig-Holstein). For Ecol Manage 182:327–338

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Horn S, Hanula JL, Ulyshen MD (2005) Abundance of green tree frogs and insects in artificial canopy gaps in a bottomland hardwood forest. Am Midland Nat 153:321–326

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jeanneret P, Schupbach B, Luka H (2003) Quantifying the impact of landscape and habitat features on biodiversity in cultivated landscapes. Agric Ecosyst Environ 98:311–320

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jennings DT, Parker FD (1987) Habitats and spider prey of Dipogon sayi sayi (Hymenoptera: Pompilidae) in Washington County, Maine. Great Lakes Entomol 20:135–140

    Google Scholar 

  • Jules ES, Rathcke BJ (1999) Mechanisms of reduced Trillium recruitment along edges of old-growth forest fragments. Conserv Biol 13:784–793

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kevan PG, Baker HG (1983) Insects as flower visitors and pollinators. Annu Rev Entomol 28:407–453

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kevan PG, Baker HG (1999) Insects on flowers: pollination and floral visitations. In: Huffaker CB, Rabb RC (eds) Insect ecology, 2nd edn. John Wiley and Sons, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Klein AM, Steffan-Dewenter I, Buchori D et al (2002) Effects of land-use intensity in tropical agroforestry systems on coffee flower-visiting and trap-nesting bees and wasps. Conserv Biol 16:1003–1014

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kruess A (2003) Effects of landscape structure and habitat type on a plant-herbivore-parasitoid community. Ecography 26:283–290

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kruess A, Tscharntke T (2002) Grazing intensity and the diversity of grasshoppers, butterflies, and trap-nesting bees and wasps. Conserv Biol 16:1570–1580

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krombein KV (1967) Trap-nesting wasps and bees: life histories, nests and associates. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Krombein KV, Hurd PD, Smith DR, Birks BD (1979) Catalog of Hymenoptera in America north of Mexico. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Kurczewski F (1989) Observations on the nesting behavior of Auplopus caerulescens subcorticalis and other Auplopodini (Hymenoptera: Pompilidae). Great Lakes Entomol 22:71–74

    Google Scholar 

  • Kurczewski FE, Spofford MG (1986). Observations of the behaviors of some Scoliidae and Pompilidae (Hymenoptera) in Florida. Florida Entomol 69:636–644

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lund RE (1975) Tables for an approximate test for outliers in linear models. Technometrics 17:473–476

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McKenna DD, Zangerl AR, Berenbaum MR (2001) A native hymenopteran predator of Agonopterix alstroemeriana (Lepidoptera: Oecophoridae) in east-central Illinois. Great Lakes Entomol 34:71–75

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Neill KM, O’Neill RP (2003) Sex allocation, nests, and prey in the grass-carrying wasp Isodontia mexicana (Saussure) (Hymenoptera: Sphecidae). J Kansas Entomol Soc 76:447–454

    Google Scholar 

  • Paton PWC (1994) The effect of edge on avian nest success – how strong is the evidence. Conserv Biol 8:17–26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perfecto I, Vandermeer J (2002) Quality of agroecological matrix in a tropical montane landscape. Ants in coffee plantations in Southern Mexico. Conserv Biol 16:174–182

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Potts SG, Kevan PG, Boone JW (2005) Conservation in pollination: collecting, surveying and monitoring. In: Dafni A, Kevan PG, Husband BC (eds) Practical pollination biology. Enviroquest, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Ricketts TH (2001) The matrix matters: effective isolation in fragmented landscapes. Am Nat 158:87–99

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ricketts TH, Daily GC, Ehrlich PR et al (2001) Countryside biogeography of moths in a fragmented landscape: biodiversity in native and agricultural habitats. Conserv Biol 15:378–388

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sears ALW, Smiley JT, Hilker M, Muller F, Rank NE (2001) Nesting behavior and prey use in two geographically separated populations of the specialist wasp Symmorphus cristatus (Vespidae:Eumeninae). Am Midland Nat 145:233–246

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Soderstrom B, Svensson B, Vessby K et al (2001) Plants, insects and birds in semi-natural pastures in relation to local habitat and landscape factors. Biodiver Conserv 10:1839–1863

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steffan-Dewenter I (2002) Landscape context affects trap-nesting bees, wasps, and their natural enemies. Ecol Entomol 27:631–637

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steffan-Dewenter I (2003) Importance of habitat area and landscape context for species richness of bees and wasps in fragmented orchard meadows. Conserv Biol 17:1036–1044

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steffan-Dewenter I, Münzenberg U, Tscharntke T (2001) Pollination, seed set and seed predation on a landscape scale. Proc R Soc Lond B 268:1685–1690

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Steffan-Dewenter I, Münzenberg U, Bürger C et al (2002) Scale-dependent effects of landscape context on three pollinator guilds. Ecology 83:1421–1432

    Google Scholar 

  • Stoner KJL, Joern A (2004) Landscape vs. local habitat scale influences to insect communities from tallgrass prairie remnants. Ecol Appl 14:1306–1320

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Summerville KS, Crist TO (2004) Contrasting effects of habitat quantity and quality on moth communities in fragmented landscapes. Ecography 27:3–12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taki H, Boone JW, Viana BF et al (2004) Effect of shading on trap nest utilization by hole-nesting aculeate Hymenoptera. Can Entomol 136:889–891

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tomimatsu H, Ohara M (2004) Edge effects on recruitment of Trillium camschatcense in small forest fragments. Biol Conserv 117:509–519

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tscharntke T, Gathmann A, Steffan-Dewenter I (1998) Bioindication using trap-nesting wasps and their natural enemies: community structure and interactions. J Appl Ecol 35:708–719

    Google Scholar 

  • Tscharntke T, Klein AM, Kruess A et al (2005) Landscape perspectives on agricultural intensification and biodiversity – ecosystem service management. Ecol Lett 8:857–874

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tylianakis JM, Klein AM, Tscharntke T (2005) Spatiotemporal variation in the diversity of hymenoptera across a tropical habitat gradient. Ecology 86:3296–3302

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waldron G (2003) Trees of the Carolinian forest: a guide to species, their ecology and uses. Boston Mills Press, Toronto

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilcove DS, McLellan CH, Dobson AP (1986) Habitat fragmentation in the temperate zone. Habitat fragmentation in the temperate zone. In: Soulé ME (ed) Conservation biology: the science of scarcity and diversity. Sunderland, Massachusetts

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Long Point Conservation Authority, F. Saul, J. DeCloet and V. Sinnave for access to the study sites, C. Connell and Q. Shirk-Luckett for GIS support, G. Huber, E. Tanaka and J. Boone for their assistance with field sampling, C. Sheffield and S. Rigby for providing trap-nests, A. Pawlowski, M. Horn and J. Trevors for discussion and G. Umphrey for statistical consultant. This research was supported by a scholarship from the Rotary Foundation to H. Taki and a grant from the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada to P. G. Kevan.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hisatomo Taki.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Taki, H., Viana, B.F., Kevan, P.G. et al. Does forest loss affect the communities of trap-nesting wasps (Hymenoptera: Aculeata) in forests? Landscape vs. local habitat conditions. J Insect Conserv 12, 15–21 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10841-006-9058-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10841-006-9058-1

Keywords

Navigation