Skip to main content
Log in

Middle High German [rs] > [r] as height dissimilation

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
The Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The contrast between Middle High German (MHG) [s] and [] was consistently neutralized to the latter sound after [r] in many modern German dialects, e.g., MHG kirse > New High German Kirsche ‘cherry’. It will be argued that this sound change was a dissimilation of the distinctive feature [high] and that this dissimilation was triggered by an independently motivated OCP constraint banning adjacent consonants with the same value of [high]. Alternative analyses in which the shift from [rs] to [r] is analyzed as a dissimilation of some other feature or as the assimilation of some property will be refuted. The present study also addressed the actuation problem: Why did [rs] shift to [r] in this particular language at this particular time? It will be argued that the structural questions that arise in explaining the [rs] > [r] shift (e.g., Why did [s] shift after [r] but not after other sounds?) as well as specific questions pertaining to the actuation problem derive straightforward answers by considering the phonological system of Middle High German. In particular, one needs to consider the features of Middle High German that were distinctive and which of those distinctive features were active phonologically.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alber, B. (2001). Regional variation and edges: glottal stop epenthesis and dissimilation in standard and Southern varieties of German. Zeitschrift für Sprachwissenschaft, 20, 3–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Albrecht, K. (1881). Leipziger Mundart. Grammatik und Wörterbuch der Leipziger Volkssprache. Leipzig: Arnoldische Buchhandlung.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alderete, J.D., & Frisch, S.A. (2007). Dissimilation in grammar and the lexicon. In P. de Lacy (Ed.), Cambridge handbook of phonology (pp. 379–398). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barba, K. (1982). Deutsche Dialekte in Rumänien. Die südfränkischen Mundarten der Banater deutschen Sprachinsel. Wiesbaden: Franz Steiner Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benware, W. (1996). Processual change and phonetic analogy: Early New High German <s> > <sch>. American Journal of Germanic Linguistics and Literatures, 8.2, 265–288.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beranek, F.J. (1936). Die Mundart von Südmähren (Lautlehre). Reichenberg: Verlag der Anstalt für Sudetendeutsche Heimatforschung in Reichenberg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bertrang, A. (1921). Grammatik der Areler Mundart. Bruxelles: M. Lamertin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Braune, W. (1987). Althochdeutsche Grammatik (14th ed.). Tübingen: Niemeyer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, L. (1998). Historical linguistics. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cercignani, F. (1979). The consonants of German: synchrony and diachrony. Milan: Cisalpino.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky, N., & Halle, M. (1968). The sound pattern of English. New York: Harper and Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clements, G.N. (1999). Affricates as noncontoured stops. In O. Fujimura, et al. (Ed.), Item, order in language and speech (pp. 271–299). Prague: Charles University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clements, G.N. (2001). Representational economy in constraint-based phonology. In T. A. Hall (Ed.), Distinctive feature theory (pp. 71–146). Berlin: Mouton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clements, G.N., & Hume, E.V. (1995). The internal organization of speech sounds. In J. Goldsmith (Ed.), The handbook of phonological theory (pp. 245–306). Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohn, A. (1992). The consequences of dissimilation in Sundanese. Phonology, 9, 199–220.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dellit, O. (1913). Die Mundart von Kleinschmalkalden. Marburg: N. G. Elschwert’sche Verlags-buchhandlung.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dittmar, E. (1891). Die Blankenheimer Mundart. Eine lautliche Untersuchung. Darmstadt: G. Otto’s Hof-Buchdruckerei.

    Google Scholar 

  • Esau, H. (1976). The medieval German sibilants /s/ and /z/. Journal of English and Germanic Philology, 57, 188–197.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gabriel, E. (1978). Die Sibilanten in den oberddeutschen Mundarten. In R. Müller, E. Gabriel, & W. Kraemer (Eds.), Laut und Schrift in Dialekt und Standardsprache (pp. 55–91). Wiesbaden: Franz Steiner Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greferath, T. (1922). Studien zu den Mundarten zwischen Köln, Jülich, M.-Gladbach u. Neuss. Marburg: N. G. Elwert’sche Verlagsbuchhandlung.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, T.A. (1992). Syllable structure and syllable related processes in German. Tübingen: Niemeyer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Halle, M., & Clements, G.N. (1983). Problem book in phonology. Cambridge, Mass.: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamann, S. 2003. The phonetics and phonology of retroflexes. Doctoral Dissertation. University of Utrecht.

  • Hartweg, F., & Wegera, K.-P. (2005). Frühneuhochdeutsch. Eine Einführung in die deutsche Sprache des Spätmittelalters und der frühen Neuzeit (2nd ed.). Tübingen: Niemeyer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hock, H.H., & Joseph, B.D. (1996). Language history, language change and language relationship. An introduction to historical and comparative linguistics. Berlin: Mouton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holthausen, F. (1886). Die Soester Mundart. Laut- und Formenlehre. Norden and Leipzig: Dietrich Soltau.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howell, R. (1991). Old English breaking and its Germanic analogues. Tübingen: Niemeyer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hume, E. 1992. Front vowels, coronal consonants and their interaction in non-linear phonology. Ph.D. dissertation, Cornell University. [Published 1994. New York: Garland].

  • Hyman, L. (1988). Underspecification and vowel height transfer in Esimbi. Phonology, 5, 255–273.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jakobson, R. 1929. Remarques sur l’evolution phonologique du russe comparée à celle des autres langues slaves. Travaux du Cercle linguistique de Prag 2.

  • Jakobson, R., G. Fant and M. Halle 1952. Preliminaries to Speech Analysis. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press (sixth printing, 1965).

  • Joos, M. (1952). The medieval sibilants. Language, 28, 222–231.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jutz, L. (1931). Die alemannischen Mundarten. Halle (Saale): Niemeyer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kehrein, W. (2002). Phonological representation and phonetic phrasing: affricates and laryngeals. Tübingen: Niemeyer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kiparsky, P. (1995). The phonological basis of sound change. In J. Goldsmith (Ed.), The handbook of phonological theory (pp. 640–670). Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kristoffersen, G. (2000). The phonology of Norwegian. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kürsten, O., & Bremer, O. (1910). Lautlehre der Mundart von Buttelstedt bei Weimar. Leipzig: Breitkopf and Härtel.

    Google Scholar 

  • LaCharité, D. 1993. The internal structure of affricates. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Ottawa.

  • Lahiri, A., & Evers, V. (1991). Palatalization and coronality. In C. Paradis, & J.-F. Prunet (Eds.), The special status of coronals. Internal and external evidence (pp. 79–100). San Diego: Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lasch, A. (1914). Mittelniederdeutsche Grammatik. Halle an der Saale: Niemeyer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leidolf, J. (1891). Die Naunheimer Mundart. Eine lautliche Untersuchung. Darmstadt: G. Otto’s Hof-Buchdruckerei.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lessiak, P. (1933). Beträge zur Geschichte des deutschen Konsonantismus. Brünn: Rudolf M. Rohrer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lexer, M. (1983). Mittelhochdeutsches Taschenwörterbuch. Stuttgart: S. Hirzel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lieber, R. (1987). An integrated theory of autosegmental processes. Albany: State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, R. (1922). Untersuchungen zur rhein-moselfränkischen Dialektgrenze. Marburg: N. G. Elwert’sche Verlagsbuchhandlung.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCarthy, J. (1988). Feature geometry and dependency: a review. Phonetica, 43, 84–108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meinhold, G., & Stock, E. (1982). Phonologie der deutschen Gegenwartssprache. Leipzig: VEB Bibliographisches Institut.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mielke, J. (2005). Ambivalence and ambiguity in laterals and nasals. Phonology, 22, 169–203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moser, V. (1951). Frühneuhochdeutsche Grammatik. Band III: Lautlehre. Heidelberg: Carl Winter Universitätsverlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Münch, F. 1970. Grammatik der ripuarisch-fränkischen Mundart. Wiesbaden: Dr. Martin Ständig oHG. [Reprint of 2004 edition. Bonn: H. Bouvier.]

  • Odden, D. (1991). Vowel geometry. Phonology, 8, 261–289.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ohala, J. (1993). The phonetics of sound change. In C. Jones (Ed.), Historical linguistics. Problems and perspectives (pp. 237–278). London: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Palgen, H. (1931). Kurze Lautlehre der Mundart von Echternach. Luxemburg: Linden and Hansen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Penzl, H. (1968). Die mittelhochdeutschen Sibilanten und ihre Weiterentwicklung. Word, 24, 340–349.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, O. (2001). Whose German? The ach/ich alternation and related phenomena in ‘standard’ and ‘colloquial’. Amsterdam: Benjamins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roloff, E. (1902). Der Konsonantismus des Niederdeutschen in der Magdeburger Börde. Halle an der Saale: C. A. Kaemmerer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rubach, J. (1994). Affricates as strident stops in Polish. Linguistic Inquiry, 25, 119–143.

    Google Scholar 

  • Russ, C.V.J. (1978). Historical German phonology and morphology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Russ, C.V.J. (1982). Studies in historical German phonology. A phonological comparison of MHG and NHG with reference to modern dialects. Bern: Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sagey, E. 1986. The representations of features and relations in nonlinear phonology. Ph.D. dissertation, MIT.

  • Salzmann, J. (1888). Die Hersfelder Mundart. Marburg: Buchdruckerei Fr. Sömmering.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schachtschabel, O. (1910). Die Mundart von Kranichfeld in Thüringen. Strassburg: M. DuMont Schauberg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schirmunski, V.M. (1962). Deutsche Mundartkunde. Vergleichende Laut- und Formenlehre der deutschen Mundarten. Berlin: Akademie-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, W. (2000). Geschichte der deutschen Sprache (8th ed.). Stuttgart: S. Hirzel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schöller, G. (1939). Laute und Flexion der Mundart von Bavendorf (Kreis Ravensburg) und Umgebung. Tübingen: H. Laupp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seelmann, E. (1908). Die Mundart von Prenden (Kreis Nieder-Barnim). Jahrbuch des Vereins für Niederdeutsche Sprachforschung, 34, 1–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaw, P. (1991). Consonant harmony systems: the special status of coronal harmony. In C. Paradis, & J.-F. Prunet (Eds.), The special status of coronals: internal and external evidence (pp. 125–157). San Diego: Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Siewert, M. (1912). Die Mundart von Neu-Golm. Jahrbuch des Vereins für Niederdeutsche Sprachforschung, 38, 105–147.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stucki, K. 1917. Die Mundart von Jaun im Kanton Freiburg. Lautlehre und Flexion. Frauenfeld: Huber and Co. [Beträge zur Schweizerdeutschen Grammatik 10].

  • Sütterlin, L. (1924). Neuhochdeutsche Grammatik. München: Oskar Beck.

    Google Scholar 

  • Szulc, A. (1969). Abriss der diachronischen Deutschen Grammatik. Teil 1. Das Lautsystem. Halle (Saale): Niemeyer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Szulc, A. (2002). Geschichte des standarddeutschen Lautsystems. Wien: Praesens.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tarral, N. (1903). Laut- und Formenlehre der Mundart des Kantons Falkenberg in Lothr. Strassburg: Heitz and Mündel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vennemann, T. (1972). Sound change and markedness theory: On the history of the German consonant system. In R. Stockwell, & R. K. S. Kacaulay (Eds.), Linguistic change and generative theory (pp. 230–274). Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vetsch, J. 1910. Die Laute der Appenzeller Mundarten. Frauenfeld: Huber and Co. [Beträge zur Schweizerdeutschen Grammatik 1]

  • von Kienle, R. (1960). Historische Laut- und Formenlehre des Deutschen. Tübingen: Niemeyer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Voyles, J. (1972). The phonetic quality of OHG z. Journal of English and Germanic Philology, 71, 47–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weinreich, U., Labov, W., & Herzog, M.I. (1968). Empirical foundations for a theory of language change. In W. P. Lehmann, & Y. Malkiel (Eds.), Directions for historical linguistics. A symposium (pp. 95–188). Austin: University of Texas Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Werner, O. (1961). Die Mundarten des Frankenwaldes (Eine Lautgeographische Untersuchung). Regensburg: Michael Lassleben.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiese, R. (1991). Was ist extrasilbisch im Deutschen und warum? Zeitschrift für Sprachwissenschaft, 10.1, 112–133.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiese, R. (1996). The phonology of German. Oxford: Clarendon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilmanns, W. 1893. Deutsche Grammatik. Erste Abteilung: Lautlehre. Strassburg: Trübner.

  • Wipf, E. 1910. Die Mundart von Visperterminen im Wallis. Frauenfelder: Huber and Co [Beiträge zur Schweizerdeutschen Grammatik 2].

  • Yip, M. (1988). The obligatory contour principle and phonological rules: a loss of identity. Linguistic Inquiry, 19.1, 65–100.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to T. A. Hall.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hall, T.A. Middle High German [rs] > [r] as height dissimilation. J Comp German Linguistics 11, 213–248 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10828-008-9021-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10828-008-9021-5

Keywords

Navigation