Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Peer Bystanders to Bullying: Who Wants to Play with the Victim?

  • Published:
Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Given widespread concern associated with school-based bullying, researchers have looked beyond a dyadic perspective (i.e., bullies and victims only), and now consider the broader social ecology of the peer group. In this research, we examined how the behaviors of peer bystanders influence subsequent reactions to bullies and their victims. Two hundred and six 10- to 15-year-old boys (Mage = 12.46) were invited to play a computer game with three other boys allegedly located at another school. Before the start of the game, participants “met the other players” apparently sitting in a waiting room. These child actors depicted an escalating bullying episode in which the behavior of the bystander was manipulated: aide to the bully, defender of the victim, or passive outsider. Immediately after exposure to the bullying, each participant played a ball toss game (Cyberball) with the three other boys in the video. Individual differences among participants were examined as moderators of the effect of bystander behavior on participants’ willingness to include the “victim” in the game. Results indicated that, when exposed to a passive bystander, boys’ normative beliefs about aggression, as well as their tendency to morally disengage from observed egregious acts, decreased their willingness to include the victim in the game.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bandura, A. (1990). Mechanisms of moral disengagement. In W. Reich (Ed.), Origins of terrorism: Psychologies, ideologies, theologies, states of mind (pp. 161–191). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A. (1999). Moral disengagement in the perpetration of inhumanities. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 3, 193–209.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A., Bararanelli, C., Caprara, G. V., & Pastorelli, C. (1996). Mechanisms of moral disengagement in the exercise of moral agency. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 364–374.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical consideration. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173–1182.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caplan, M. Z., & Hay, D. F. (1989). Preschoolers’ responses to peers’ distress and beliefs about bystander intervention. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 30, 231–242.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Charach, A., Pepler, D., & Ziegler, S. (1995). Bullying at school - a Canadian perspective: a survey of problems and suggestions for intervention. Education Canada, 35, 12–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chekroun, P., & Brauer, M. (2002). The bystander effect and social control behavior: the effect of the presence of others on people’s reactions to norm violations. European Journal of Social Psychology, 32, 853–867.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.

  • Cook, C. R., Williams, K. R., Guerra, N. G., Kim, T. E., & Sadek, S. (2010). Predictors of bullying and victimization in childhood and adolescence: a meta-analytic investigation. School Psychology Quarterly, 25, 65–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cowie, H., Naylor, P., Rivers, I., Smith, P. K., & Pereira, B. (2001). Measuring workplace bullying. Aggressive and Violent Behavior, 7, 33–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crick, N. C., & Dodge, K. A. (1994). A review and reformulation of social information processing mechanisms in children’s social adjustment. Psychological Bulletin, 115, 74–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crick, N. R., & Grotpeter, J. K. (1995). Relational aggression, gender, and social psychological adjustment. Child Development, 66, 710–722.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Darley, J., & Latané, B. (1968). Bystander intervention in emergencies: diffusion of responsibility. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 8, 377–383.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Davis, M. H. (1980). A multidimensional approach to individual differences in empathy. JSAS Catalog of Selected Documents in Psychology, 10, 85.

    Google Scholar 

  • Endersen, I. M., & Olweus, D. (2001). Self-reported empathy in Norwegian adolescents: Sex differences, age trends, and relationship to bullying. In A. C. Bohart & D. J. Stipek (Eds.), Constructive and destructive behavior: Implications for family, school, and society (pp. 147–165). Washington: American Psychological Association.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Frey, K. S., Hirschstein, M. K., Snell, J. L., Van Schoiack Edstrom, L., MacKenzie, E. P., & Broderick, C. J. (2005). Reducing playground bullying and supporting beliefs: An experimental trial of the Steps to Respect Program. Developmental Psychology, 41, 479–491.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gini, G., Albiero, P., Benelli, B., & Altoe, G. (2007). Does empathy predict adolescents’ bullying and defending behavior? Aggressive Behavior, 33, 467–476.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gini, G., Pozzoli, T., Borghi, F., & Franzoni, L. (2008). The role of bystanders in students’ perception of bullying and sense of safety. Journal of School Psychology, 46, 617–638.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hawkins, D. L., Pepler, D. J., & Craig, W. M. (2001). Naturalistic observations of peer interventions in bullying. Social Development, 10, 512–527.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Howard, A. M., & Landau, S. (2005). Psychopathy and bullying: Effect of aggressors’ characteristics on peer bystander devaluation of the victim. Poster presented at the National Association of School Psychologists Annual Convention, Atlanta, GA.

  • Huesmann, L. R., & Guerra, N. G. (1997). Children’s normative beliefs about aggression and aggressive behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 408–419.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kärnä, A., Voeten, M., Poskiparta, E., & Salmivalli, C. (2010). Vulnerable children in varying classroom contexts. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 56, 261–282.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Langdon, S., & Preble, W. (2008). The relationship between levels of perceived respect and bullying in 5th through 12th graders. Adolescence, 43, 485–503.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Latané, B., & Darley, J. M. (1970). The unresponsive bystander: Why doesn’t he help? New York: Appleton-Century Crofts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Latané, B., & Nida, S. (1981). Ten years of research on group size and helping. Psychological Bulleting, 89, 308–324.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Litvack-Miller, W., McDougall, D., & Romney, D. M. (1997). The structure of empathy during middle childhood and its relationship to prosocial behavior. Genetic, Social, and General Psychology Monographs, 123, 303–324.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nansel, T. R., Overpeck, M., Pilla, R. S., Ruan, W. J., Simon-Morton, B., & Scheidt, P. (2001). Bullying behaviors among U.S. youth: prevalence and association with psychosocial adjustment. Journal of the American Medical Association, 285, 2094–2100.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Oh, I., & Hazler, R. J. (2009). Contributions of personal and situational factors to bystanders’ reactions to school bullying. School Psychology International, 30, 291–310.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Connell, P., Pepler, D., & Craig, W. (1999). Peer involvement in bullying: insights and challenges for intervention. Journal of Adolescence, 22, 437–452.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pellegrini, A. D., & Bartini, M. (2000). A longitudinal study of bullying, victimization, and peer affiliation during the transition from primary school to middle school. American Education Research Journal, 37, 699–725.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Polanin, J. R., Espelage, D. L., & Pigott, T. D. (2012). A meta-analysis of school-based bullying prevention programs’ effects on bystander intervention behavior. School Psychology Review, 41, 47–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pozzoli, T., & Gini, G. (2010). Active defending and passive bystanding behavior in bullying: the role of personal characteristics and perceived peer pressure. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 38, 815–827.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rigby, K., & Johnson, B. (2006). Expressed readiness of Australian schoolchildren to act as bystanders in support of children who are being bullied. Educational Psychology, 26, 425–440.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salmivalli, C. (2010). Bullying and the peer group: a review. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 15, 112–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salmivalli, C., Huttunen, A., & Lagerspetz, K. M. (1997). Peer networks and bullying schools. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 38, 305–312.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salmivalli, C., Voeten, M., & Poskiparta, E. (2011). Bystanders matter: associations between reinforcing, defending, and the frequency of bullying behavior in classrooms. Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, 40, 668–676.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Staub, E., Fellner, D., Jr., Berry, J., & Morange, K. (2003). Passive and active bystandership across grades in response to students bullying other students. In E. Staub (Ed.), The psychology of good and evil. Why children, adults, and groups help and harm others (pp. 240–243). New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Thornberg, R. (2007). A classmate in distress: schoolchildren as bystanders and their reasons for how they act. Social Psychology of Education, 10, 5–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thornberg, R. (2010). A student in distress: moral frames and bystander behavior in school. The Elementary School Journal, 110, 585–608.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ttofi, M. M. & Farrington, D. P. (2011). Effectiveness of school-based programs to reduce bullying: a systematic and meta-analytic review. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 7, 27–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • van den Berg, Y. H. M., Segers, E., & Cillessen, A. H. N. (2012). Changing peer perceptions and victimization through classroom arrangements: a field experiment. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 40, 403–412.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wesselmann, E. D., Wirth, J. H., Pryor, J. B., Reeder, G. D. & William, K. D. (2012). When do we ostracize? Social Psychological and Personality Science. Online first version of record. Apr 12, 2012.

Download references

Author Note

Anne M. Howard is now at Department of Behavioral Sciences, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Steven Landau.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Howard, A.M., Landau, S. & Pryor, J.B. Peer Bystanders to Bullying: Who Wants to Play with the Victim?. J Abnorm Child Psychol 42, 265–276 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10802-013-9770-8

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10802-013-9770-8

Keywords

Navigation