Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Traditionalism and Innovation: Philosophy, Exegesis, and Intellectual History in Jñānaśrīmitra’s Apohaprakaraṇa

  • Published:
Journal of Indian Philosophy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Abbreviations

AP:

Apohaprakaraṇa (Jñānaśrīmitra) in JNĀ.

BKNCT:

Bulletin of Kochi National College of Technology

DhPr:

Dharmottarapradīpa(Durvekamiśra) in Malvania (1971)

HB:

Hetubindu (Dharmakīrti) in Steinkellner (1967)

HBṬ:

Hetubinduṭīkā (Arcaṭa) in Sanghavi and Jinavijayji (1949)

HBṬĀ:

Hetubinduṭīkāloka(Durvekamiśra) in Sanghavi (and Jinavijayji) (1949)

ĪPPV:

Īśvarapratyabhijñāvivṛtivimarśini (Abhinavagupta) in Shastri (1938–1943).

JNĀ:

Jñānaśrīmitranibandhāvali (Jñānaśrīmitra) in Thakur (1987).

LPrP:

Laghuprāmāṇyaparīkṣā (Dharmottara) in Krasser (1991).

N1:

Apohasiddhi (Ratnakīrti), Manuscript # 5–256 from the National Archives of Nepal

N2:

Apohasiddhi (Ratnakīrti), Manuscript # 3–696 from the National Archives of Nepal

N3:

Apohasiddhi (Ratnakīrti), Manuscript # 764d (running number) from the National Archives of Nepal

NBṬ:

Nyāyabinduṭīkā (Dharmottara) in DhPr.

NBṬṬ:

Nyāyabinduṭīkāṭippaṇa in Shastri (1984).

NBṬ (Vi):

Nyāyabinduṭīkā (Vinītadeva) in Shastri (1984).

NBhū:

Nyāyabhūṣaṇa (Bhāsarvajña) in Yogindrananda (1968)

NKaṇ:

Nyāyakaṇikā (Vācaspatimiśra) in Stern (1988). NKaṇ (1907) Nyāyakaṇikā;, in Śāstrī (1907)

NSū:

Nyāyasūtra (Gautama) in Thakur (1997)

NVTṬ:

Nyāyavārttikatātparyaṭīkā (Vācaspatimiśra) in Thakur (1996)

PV 1:

Pramāṇavārttika, Svārthānumāna (Dharmakīrti) in Gnoli (1960)

PV 2:

Pramāṇavārttika, Prāmāṇ asiddhi (Dharmakīrti) in Miyaksaka (1971/2)

PV 3:

Pramāṇavārttika, Pratyakṣa (Dharmakīrti) in Miyasaka (1971/2), Tosaki (1995)

PV 4:

Pramāṇavārttika, Parārthānumāna (Dharmakīrti) in Miyasaka (1971/2), Tillemans (2004)

PVA:

Pramāṇavārttikālaṅkāra (Prajñākaragupta) in Sāṃkrtyāyana (1953)

PVin 1:

Pramāṇaviniścaya 1 (Dharmakīrti) in Vetter (1966)

PVin 2:

Pramāṇaviniścaya 2 (Dharmakīrti) in Steinkellner (1973)

PVinṬ:

Pramāṇaviniścayaṭīkā (Dharmottara) in Steinkellner and Krasser (1989)

PVV:

Pramāṇavārttikavṇtti(Manorathanandin) in Sāṃkrtyāyana (1938–1940)

PVSV:

Pramāṇavārttikasvavṇtti (Dharmakīrti) in Gnoli (1960).

SSS:

Sākārasiddhiśāstra (Jñānaśrīmitra) in JNĀ

SVR:

Syādvādaratnākara (Vādidevasūri) in Motilal (1926–1930).

VC:

Vyāpticarcā (Jñānaśrīmitra) in JNĀ

WSTB:

Wiener Studien zur Tibetologie und Buddhismuskunde

WZKS:

Wiener Zeitschrift für die Kunde Südasiens.

WZKSO:

Wiener Zeitschrift für die Kunde Süd- und Ostasiens.

References

  • Balcerowicz, P. (1999). How Could a Cow be both Synchronically and Diachronically Homogenous, or On the Jaina Notions of tiryak-sāmānya and ūrdhva-sāmānya. Approaches to Jaina Studies: Philosophy, Logic, Rituals, and Symbols, Toronto, University of Toronto: Center for South Asian Studies.

  • P. Balcerowicz (2001) Jaina Epistemology in Historical and Comparative Perspective: Critical Edition and English Translation of Logical-epistemological Treatises: Nyayâvatara, Nyayâvatara-vivrti and Nyayâvatâra-tippana with Introduction and Notes Franz Steiner Verlag Stuttgart

    Google Scholar 

  • Bronkhorst J. (1999). ‘Nagārjuna and Apoha.’ In: Katsura S. (ed)., Dharmakīrti’s Thought and its Impact on Indian and Tibetan Philosophy: Proceedings of the Third International Dharmakīrti Conference. (pp. 17–24) Wien: Verlag der Österreichischen Akademie der Wissenschaften: Beiträge zur Kultur- und Geistesgeschichte Asiens.

  • R.R. Dravid (1972) The Problem of Universals in Indian Philosophy Motilal Banarsidass Delhi

    Google Scholar 

  • G. Dreyfus (1996) ArticleTitle‘Can the Fool Lead the Blind? Perception and the Given in Dharmakīrti’s Thought.’ Journal of Indian Philosophy 24 209 Occurrence Handle10.1007/BF01792024

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • G. Dreyfus (1997) Recognizing Reality: Dharmakīrti’s Philosophy and its Tibetan Interpretations SUNY Press Albany

    Google Scholar 

  • J.D. Dunne (1998) Nominalism, Buddhist Doctrine of, Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy NumberInSeriesVol. 7 Routledge Press New York 23–27

    Google Scholar 

  • J.D. Dunne (2004) Foundations of Dharmakīrti’s Philosophy Wisdom Publications Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Durvekamiśra (1971). Dharmottara-pradīpa. Paṇ ṇḍita Durveka Miśra’s Dharmottara-pradīpa [Being a sub-commentary on Dharmottara’s Nyāya-bindu-ṭīkā, a commentary on Dharmakīrti’s Nyāya-bindu. P.D. Malvania. Patna, Kashi Prasad Jayaswal.

  • M.D. Eckel (1987) Jñānagarbha’s Commentary on the Distinction between the Two Truths: An Eighth Century Handbook of Madhyamaka Philosophy State University of New York Press Albany NY

    Google Scholar 

  • Eltschinger, V. (1999). ‘Śubhagupta’s Śrutiparīk ṣākārikā (vv. 10cd-19) and its Dharmakīrtian Background.’ In S. Katsura (ed.), Dharmakīrti’s Thought and its Impact on Indian and Tibetan Philosophy: Proceedings of the Third International Dharmakīrti Conference.(pp. 47–62). Wien: Verlag der Österreichischen Akademie der Wissenschaften: Beiträge zur Kultur- und Geistesgeschichte Asiens.

  • E. Franco (1987) Perception, Knowledge and Disbelief: A Study of Jayarāśi’s scepticism Steiner Stuttgart

    Google Scholar 

  • E. Franco (1997) Dharmakīrti on Compassion and Rebirth Arbeitskreis für Tibetische und Buddhistische Studien Universität Wien Wien

    Google Scholar 

  • Frauwallner, E. (1935). ‘Dharmottaras Kṣaṇabhaṅgasiddhih Text and Übersetzung.’WZKM 42, 217–258.

    Google Scholar 

  • E. Frauwallner (1937) ArticleTitle‘Beitrage zur Apohalehre II Dharmottaras.’ WZKM 44 233–287

    Google Scholar 

  • E. Frauwallner (1959) ArticleTitle‘Dignāga, sein werk und seine Entwicklung.’ WZKSO 3 83–164

    Google Scholar 

  • E. Frauwallner (1961) ArticleTitle‘Landmarks in the History of Indian Logic.’ WZKSO 5 125–148

    Google Scholar 

  • Funayama T. (1992). ‘Study of Kalpanāpoḍha: A Translation of the Tattvasaṃgraha vv. 1212–1263 by Sāntarakṣita and the Tattvasaṃgrahapañjikā by Kamalaśīla on the Definition of Direct Perception.’ Zinbun. 27: 33–128

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Ganeri (2001) Philosophy in Classical India: An Introduction and Analysis Routledge New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Gillon, B.S. (1991). ‘Dharmakīrti and the Problem of Induction.’ Second International Dharmakīrti Conference, Vienna, Österreichischen Akademie der Wissenschaften: philosophisch-historischen Klasse, Denkschriften, 222. Band; Verlag der Österreichischen Akademie der Wissenschaften, Wien 1991.

  • Gnoli, R. (1960). The Pramāṇavārttikam of Dharmakīrti; the first chapter with the autocommentary. Roma: Instituto italiano per il medio ed estremo oriente.

  • Hahn, M. (1971). Jñânashrîmitras Vrttamâlâ stuti. Ein Beispielsammlung zur altindischen Metrik. Nach dem tibetischen Tanjur zusammen mit der mongolischen Version herausgegeben, übersetzt und erläutert. Wiesbaden.

  • Hahn M. (1989). ‘Sanskrit Metrics—As Studied At Buddhist Universities in the Eleventh and Twelfth Century A.D.’ Adyar Library Bulletin 1989, pp. 30–60.

  • Hattori, M. (1968). Dignāga, on Perception; Being the Pratyakṣapariccheda of Dignāga’s Pramāṇasamuccaya from the Sanskrit Fragments and the Tibetan Versions. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press.

  • Hattori M. (1977). ‘The Sautrāntrika Background of the Apoha Theory.’ In: Guenther H.V., Kawamura L.S., Scott K. (eds)., Buddhist Thought and Asian Civilization: Essays in Honor of Herbert V. Guenther on his Sixtieth Birthday. Emeryville Calif, Dharma Publications, pp. 535–548

  • Hattori M. (1980). ‘Apoha and Pratibhā.’ In Nagatomi M. (eds)., Sanskrit and Indian Studies: Essays in Honour of Daniel H. H. Ingalls. Dordrecht, Holland; Boston Hingham, MA: D. Reidel.

  • Hattori, M. (2000). ‘Dignāga’s Theory of Meaning: An Annotated Translation of the Pramāṇasamuccayavṛtti: Chapter V: Anyāpoha-parīkṣa (I).’ In J.A. Silk (ed.), Wisdom, compassion, and the Search for Understanding: The Buddhist Studies Legacy of Gadjin M. Nagao. Vol. 1x (p. 420). Honolulu, University of Hawaii Press.

  • R. Hayes (1980) ArticleTitle‘Dignāga’s Views on Reasoning.’ Journal of Indian Philosophy 8 219–277 Occurrence Handle10.1007/BF00166296

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hayes R. (1986). ‘An Interpretation of Anyāpoha in Diṅ nāga ’s General Theory of Inference.’ In: Matilal B.K. (eds)., Buddhist Logic and Epistemology: Studies in the Buddhist Analysis of Inference and Language. D. Reidel Pub. Co., Dordrecht, Holland; Boston, Hingham, MA., U.S.A.

  • R.P. Hayes (1987) ArticleTitle‘On the Reinterpretation of Dharmakīrti’s svabhāvahetu.’ Journal of Indian Philosophy 15 317–332 Occurrence Handle10.1007/BF00178811

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • R.P. Hayes (1988) Dignāga on the Interpretation of Signs Kluwer Academic Dordrecht; Boston Occurrence Handle10.1007/978-94-009-2899-2

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hayes R. (1997). ‘Whose Experience Validates What for Dharmakīrti.’ In: Bilimoria P., Mohanty J., Matilal B.K. (eds.), Relativism, Suffering and Beyond: Essays in Memory of Bimal K. Matilal. Delhi; New York: Oxford University Press.

  • T. Iwata (2003) ArticleTitle‘An introduction of Dharmakīrti’s Svabhāva-hetu.’ Journal of Indian Philosophy 31 IssueID1–3 61–87 Occurrence Handle10.1023/A:1024662721319

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kajiyama Y. (1966). An Introduction to Buddhist Philosophy: An Annotated Translation of the Tarkabhāṣā of Mokṣākaragupta. Kyoto.

  • Y. Kajiyama (1989) Studies in Buddhist Philosophy Rinsen Book Co., LTD Kyoto

    Google Scholar 

  • Kajiyama, Y. (1998). An Introduction to Buddhist Philosophy: An Annotated Translation of the Tarkabhāṣāof Mokṣākaragupta: Reprint with Corrections in the Author’s Hand. Wien: Arbeitskreis für Tibetische und Buddhistische Studien Universität Wien.

  • Katsura, S. (1979). ‘The Apoha Theory of Dignāga.’ Indogaku Bukkyōgaku Kenkyū28, 16–20.

  • S. Katsura (1984) ArticleTitle‘Dharmakīrti’s Theory of Truth.’ Journal of Indian Philosophy 12 215–235 Occurrence Handle10.1007/BF00186682

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Katsura S. (1986). ‘Jñānaśrīmitra on Apoha.’ In: Matilal B.K., Evans R.D. (eds.), Buddhist Logic and Epistemology: Studies in the Buddhist Analysis of Inference and Language. D. Reidel Pub. Co., Dordrecht, Holland; Boston/Hingham, MA, U.S.A.

  • Katsura, S. (1991). ‘Dignāga and Dharmakīrti on Apoha.’ In E. Steinkellner (ed.), Studies in the Buddhist Epistemological Tradition. Vienna: Österreeichischen Akademie der Wissenschaften: philosophisch-historischen Klasse, Denkschriften, 222. Band; Verlag der Österreichischen Akademie der Wissenschaften, Wien 1991.: 129–144.

  • S. Katsura (1992) ArticleTitle‘Dignāga and Dharmakīrti on Adarśanamātra and Anupalabdhi’ Asiatische Studien/Etudes Asiatiques XLVI IssueID1 222–231

    Google Scholar 

  • Katsura, S. (1993). ‘On Perceptual Judgment.’ In N.K. Wagle, F. Watanabe (eds.), Studies on Buddhism in honour of Professor A.K. Warder. University of Toronto. Centre for South Asian Studies. Toronto, Ont., University of Toronto Centre for South Asian Studies: 205.

  • Kellner, B. (1997a). Nichts bleibt nichts: die buddhistische Zurückweisung von Kumārilas Abhāvapramāṇa: Übersetzung und Interpretation von Śāntarakṣitas Tattvasaṅ graha vv. 1647–1690, mit Kamalaśīlas Tattvasaṅ grahapañjikā, sowie Ansätze und Arbeitshypothesen zur Geschichte negativer Erkenntnis in der indischen Philosophie. Wien: Arbeitskreis für Tibetische und Buddhistische Studien Universität Wien.

  • B. Kellner (1997) ArticleTitle‘Non-cognition (anupalabdhi)—Perception or Inference? The View of Dharmottara and Jñānaśrīmitra.’ Tetsugaku 49 121–134

    Google Scholar 

  • Kellner, B. (1999). ‘Levels of (im)perceptibility.’ Dharmottara on the dṛśya in dśyānupalabdhi. In S. Katsura (ed.), Dharmakīrti’s Thought and its Impact on Indian and Tibetan Philosophy: Proceedings of the Thirds International Dharmakīrti Conference: Third International Dharmakīrti Conference. Vol. 32 (pp. 193–208). Wien: Verlag der Österreichischen Akademie der Wissenschaften: Beiträge zur Kultur- und Geistesgeschichte Asiens.

  • B. Kellner (2001) ArticleTitle‘Negation—Failure or Success? Remarks on an Allegedly Characteristic Trait of Dharmakīrti’s Anupalabdhi-Theory.’ Journal of Indian Philosophy 29 IssueID5–6 495–517 Occurrence Handle10.1023/A:1013876909972

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kellner, B. (2003). ‘Integrating Negative Knowledge into Pramāṇa Theory: The Development of the drśyānupalabdhi in Dharmakīrti’s Earlier Works.’ Journal of Indian Philosophy 31(1–3), 121.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kellner, B. (2004). ‘Why Infer and Not Just Look?’ In S. Katsura (ed.), The role of the example (dṛṣ ṭāna) in classical Indian logic. (pp. 1–51). Wien: Arbeitskreis für tibetische und buddhistische Studien, Universität Wien.

  • Keyt, C.M. (1980). Dharmakīrti’s Concept of the Svalakṣaṇ a, Unpublished PhD Dissertation, University of Washington.

  • Krasser, H. (1991). Dharmottara’s kurze untersuchung der Gültigkeit einer Erkenntnis (Laghuprāmāṇ yaparīkṣā): Materialen zur Definition gültiger Erkenntnis in der Tradition Dharmakīrtis 2. Wien: Österreichische Akademie der Wissenschaften.

  • Krasser, H. (1995). ‘Dharmottara’s Theory of Knowledge in his Laghuprāmāṇyaparīkṣā.’ Journal of Indian Philosophy 23, 247–271.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krasser, H. (1997). ‘Zur Buddhistischen Definition von gültiger Erkenntnis (Pramāṇa) in Jayantabhaṭṭas Nyāyamañjarī.’ Studien zur Indologie und Iranistik 21, 105–132.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lasic, H. (1999). ‘Dharmakīrti and his Successors on the Determination of Causality.’ In S. Katsura (ed.), Dharmakīrti’s Thought and its Impact on Indian and Tibetan Philosophy: Proceedings of the Thirds International Dharmakīrti Conference: Third International Dharmakīrti Conference. (pp. 233–242). Wien: Verlag der Österreichische Akademie der Wissenschaften. Beiträge zur Kultur- und Geistesgeschichte Asiens.

  • H. Lasic (2000) JñānaśrīmitrasVyāpticarcā: Sanskrittext, Übersetzung, Analyse Arbeitskreis für Tibetische und Buddhistische Studien Wien

    Google Scholar 

  • H. Lasic (2003) ArticleTitle‘On the Utilisation of Causality as a Basis of Inference: Dharmakīrti’s Statements and Their Interpretation.’ Journal of Indian Philosophy 31 185–197 Occurrence Handle10.1023/A:1024679124045

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malvania, D. (1971). Dharmottara-pradīpa. Paṇ ṇḍita Durveka Miśra’s Dharmottara-pradīpa [Being a sub-commentary on Dharmottara’s Nyāya-bindu-ṭīkā, a commentary on Dharmakīrti’s Nyāya-bindu. P.D. Malvania. Patna, Kashi Prasad Jayaswal.

  • Matsumoto, S. (1981). ‘On the Philosophical Positions of Dharmottara and Jitāri.’ Indogaku Bukkyōgaku Kenkyū58, 969–966.

    Google Scholar 

  • E. Mikogami (1979) ArticleTitle‘Some Remarks on the Concept of arthakriyā.’ Journal of Indian Philosophy 7 79–94 Occurrence Handle10.1007/BF02561253

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mimaki, K. (1976). La Refutation Bouddhique de la Permanence des Choses [Sthirasiddhidūṣaṇa] et la Prevue de la Momenraneite des Choses [K ṣaṇabhaṅ gasiddhi]. Paris: Insititut de Civilization Indienne.

  • Miyasaka, Y.E. (1971/72). Pramāṇa-vārttika-kārikā(Sanskrit and Tibetan), Chapters 2,3,4. Acta Indologica 2, 1–206.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mookerjee, S. (1935). The Buddhist Philosophy of Universal Flux: An Exposition of the Philosophy of Critical Realism as Expounded by the School of Dignāga. [Calcutta], University of Calcutta [Reprinted: Motilal Banarsidass, Delhi, 1993].

  • Motilal, L. (1926–1930). Śrimad-Vādidevasūri-viracitaḥPramāṇanayatattvālokālaṅ kāraḥ Sa-syādvādaratnākara, Poona 1926–1930.

  • Nagatomi, M. (1967). A Study of Dharmakīrti’s Prāmāṇ avārttika: An English Translation and Annotation of the Pramāṇ avārttika, Book 1. Unpublished PhD Dissertation, Harvard University.

  • G. Newland (1999) Appearance and Reality: The Two Truths in Four Buddhist Systems Snow Lion Publications Ithaca

    Google Scholar 

  • Oetke, C. (1991). ‘Svabhāvapratibandha and the Types of Reasons in Dharmakīrti’s Theory of Inference.’ In E. Steinkellner (ed.), Studies in the Buddhist Epistemological Tradition: Second International Dharmakīrti Conference. (pp. 243–268). Vienna: Österreichischen Akademie der Wissenschaften: Philosophisch-historischen Klasse, Denkschriften, 222. Band; Verlag der Österreeichischen Akademie der Wissenschaften, Wien 1991.

  • Oetke C. (1993). Bemerkungen zur Buddhitischen Doktrin der Momentanheit des Seienden: Dharmakīrtis Sattvānumāna. WSTB 29.

  • Owaga, H. (1999). ‘Bharṭhari on Representations (Buddhyākāra).’ In S. Katsura (ed.), Dharmakīrti’s Thought and its Impact on Indian and Tibetan Philosophy: Proceedings of the Third International Dharmakīrti Conference. Vol. 32 (pp. 267–286). Wien Verlag der Österreichischen Akademie der Wissenschaften: Beiträge zur Kultur- und Geistesgeschichte Asiens.

  • Pandeya, R.C. (1989). Ācāryadharmakīrteḥpramāṇ avārttikam: granthakartr˳viracitayā Svopajñavr˳ ttyā Ācāryamanorathanandikr˳ tayā Pramāṇ avārttikav r˳ ttyāca samupetam. Dillī, Motīlāla Banārasīdāsa.

  • P.G. Patil (2003) ArticleTitle‘On What It is That Buddhists Think About—Apoha in the Ratnakīrti-nibabdhāvali.’ Journal of Indian Philosophy 31 229–256 Occurrence Handle10.1023/A:1024683224953

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pind, O. (1991). ‘Dignāga on śabdasāmānya and śabdaviśeṣa.’ In E. Steinkellner (ed.), Studies in the Buddhist Epistemological Tradition. Vienna: Österreeichischen Akademie der Wissenschaften: philosophisch-historischen Klasse, Denkschriften, 222. Band; Verlag der Österreeichischen Akademie der Wissenschaften. Wien 1991.

  • Pind, O. (1999). ‘Dharmakīrti’s Interpretation of Pramāṇ asamuccayavṛtti V 36: śabdo ‘rthāntaranivṛttiviśiṣṭān eva bhāvānāha.’ In S. Katsura (ed.), Dharmakīrti’s Thought and its Impact on Indian and Tibetan Philosophy: Proceedings of the Third International Dharmakīrti Conference. (pp. 317–324). Wien: Verlag der Österreeichischen Akademie der Wissenschaften: Beiträge zur Kultur- und Geistesgeschichte Asiens.

  • Raja, K.K. (1986). ‘ApohaTheory and Pre-Diṅ nāga Views on Sentence Meaning.’ In B.K. Matilal and R.D. Evans (eds.), Buddhist Logic and Epistemology: Studies in the Buddhist Analysis of Inference and Language (pp. 185–192). Dordrecht, Holland; Boston/Hingham, MA., U.S.A.: D. Reidel Pub. Co.

  • Sanghavi, S. (1949). Hetubinduṭīkā of Bhaṭṭa Arcaṭa: with the Sub-commentary Entitled Āloka of Durveka Miśra. Baroda: Oriental Institute.

  • Scharf, P.M. (1996). The Denotation of Generic Terms in Ancient Indian Philosophy: Grammar, Nyāya and Mīmāṃ sā. Philadelphia: American Philosophical Society.

  • Schmithausen, L. (1965). Maṇ ṇḍanamiśra’s Vibhramavivekaḥ. Wien.

  • H.P. Shastri (1910) Six Buddhist Nyāya Tracts in Sanskrit Asiatic Society Calcutta

    Google Scholar 

  • Shastri, D. (1984). Nyāyabindu of ācārya Dharmakīrti with the Commentaries by ārya Vinitadeva and Dharmottara and Dharmottara-ṭīkā−ṭippaṇ a. Bauddha Bharati, Varanasi 1994.

  • Shastri, Madhusudan Kaul (1938–1943). īśvarapratyabhijñāvivṛ tivimarś inī, Śrīmadabhinavaguptaviracitā, Srinagar: Jammu and Kashmir Government Research Department.

  • M. Siderits (1986) ArticleTitle‘Word Meaning, Sentence Meaning, and Apoha.’ Journal of Indian Philosophy. 13 133–151 Occurrence Handle10.1007/BF00200262

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • M. Siderits (1991) Indian Philosophy of Language: Studies in Selected Issues Kluwer Academic Publishers Dordrecht; Boston Occurrence Handle10.1007/978-94-011-3234-3

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • T. Stcherbatsky (1984) Buddhist Logic Munshiram Manoharlal New Delhi

    Google Scholar 

  • Steinkellner E. (1967). Dharmakīrti’s Hetubinduh. Graz, Wien, Köln: Böhlau in Kommission.

  • Steinkellner, E. (1969). ‘Die Entwicklung des Kṣaṇikatvānumānam bei Dharmakīrti.’. WZKSO 13, 361–377.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steinkellner, E. (1973). Dharmakīrti’s Pramāṇ aviniścaya 2, Kapitel: Svārthānumāna. Wien: Verlag der Österreichischen Akademie der Wissenschaften.

  • Steinkellner, E. (1973). ‘Buddhaparinirvāṇastotram.’ Wiener Zeitschrift für die Kunde Südasiens und Archiv für indische Philosophie. 17, 43.

  • E. Steinkellner (1974) ArticleTitle‘On Interpretation of the Svabhāvahetu.’ WZKS 18 117–129

    Google Scholar 

  • E. Steinkellner (1976) ArticleTitle‘Der Einleitungsvers von Dharmottara’s Apohaprakaranam.’ Wiener Zeitschrift für die Kunde Südasiens und Archiv für indische Philosophie. 20 123–124

    Google Scholar 

  • E. Steinkellner (1979) ArticleTitle‘Miszellen zur Erkenntnistheoretisch-logischen Schule des Buddhismus.’ Wiener Zeitschrift für die Kunde Südasiens und Archiv für indische Philosophie. 23 141–154

    Google Scholar 

  • Steinkellner, E. and Krasser, H. (1989). Dharmottaras Exkurs zur Definition gültiger Erkenntnis im Pramāṇ aviniścaya: (Materialien zur Definition gültiger Erkenntnis in der Tradition Dharmakīrtis 1): tibetischer Text, Sanskritmaterialien und Übersetzung. Wien: Verlag der Österreichischen Akademie der Wissenschaften.

  • Steinkellner, E. (1991). ‘On the Logic of Svabhāvahetu In Dharmakīrti’s Vādanyāya.’ In E. Steinkellner (ed.), Studies in the Buddhist Epistemological Tradition: Second International Dharmakīrti Conference. (pp. 311–324). Vienna: Österreichischen Akademie der Wissenschaften: philosophisch-historischen Klasse, Denkschriften, 222. Band; Verlag der Österreichischen Akademie der Wissenschaften, Wien 1991.

  • Steinkellner E., Much M.T. (1995). Texte der erkenntnistheoretischen Schule des Buddhismus. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.

  • Steinkellner, E. (1996). ‘An Explanation of Dharmakīrti’s Svabhāvahetu Definitions.’ In F. Wilhelm (ed.), Festschrift Dieter Schlingloff. (pp. 257–268). Reinbek, Dr. Inge Wezler Verlag fur Orientalistische Fachpublikationen.

  • Stern, Elliot (1988). “Vidhiviveka” of Maṇṇḍaṇ amiśra, with Commentary “Nyāyakaṇ ikā” of Vācaspatimiśra, and Supercommentaries, “Juṣadhvaṇ ikaraṇ ī,” and “Svaditaṅ karaṇ ī” of Parameśvara, Critical and Annotated Edition. Unpublished Ph.D Dissertation, University of Pennsylvania.

  • Sāṃ kṛtyāyana, R. (1953). Pramāṇavārttikabhāṣya of Prajñākaragupta. Patna: Kashi Prasad Jayaswal Research Institute.

  • Śāstrī, Tailaṇgarāma (1907). Vidhiviveka (with Nyāyakaṇikā of Vācaspatimiśra). Kāśī: Medical Hall Press.

  • Tani, T. (1984). ‘A Conflict between Logical Indicators in the Negative Inference (Svabhāvānupalabdhivādin versus Vyāapakāanupalabdhivāadin).’ Indogaku Bukkyāogaku Kenkyūū 32(2), 1100–1106.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tani, T. (1997). ‘Problems of Interpretation on Dharmottara’s Kṣaṇabhaṅ gasiddhi (1), (2) and (3) BKNCT 41, 19–77.

  • Tani, T. (1999). ‘Reinstatement of the Theory of External Determination of Pervasion (Bahirvyāptivāda) Jñānaśrīmitra’s Proof of Momentary Existence.’ In S. Katsura (ed.), Third International Dharmakīrti Conference, Dharmakīrti’s Thought and its Impact on Indian and Tibetan Philosophy: Proceedings of the Third International Dharmakīrti Conference. Wien: Verlag der Österreeichischen Akademie der Wissenschaften: Beiträge zur Kultur- und Geistesgeschichte Asiens. 32.

  • A. Thakur (1975) Ratnakīrti-nibandhāvali Kashiprasad Jayaswal Research Institute Patna

    Google Scholar 

  • A. Thakur (1987) Jñānaśrīmitranibandhāvali Kashi Prasad Jayaswal Research Institute Patna

    Google Scholar 

  • A. Thakur (1996) Nyāyavārttikatātparya-ṭīkā Munshiram Manoharlal Publishers New Delhi

    Google Scholar 

  • Thakur, A. (1997). Savātsyāyanabhāṛyam Gautamīyam Nyāyadarśanam. New Delhi: Munshiram Manoharlal Publishers.

  • T.J.F. Tillemans (1999) Scripture, Logic, Language: Essays on Dharmakīrti and his Tibetan Successors Wisdom Publications Boston, Mass

    Google Scholar 

  • Tillemans, T.J.F. (2004). Dharmakīrti’s Pramāṇ avārttika: An Annotated Translation of the Fourth Chapter (parārthānumāna) Vol. 1 (k. 1–148). Österreichischen Akademie Der Wissenschaften, Wien.

  • Tucci, G. (1929). Pre-Diṅ nāga Buddhist Texts on Logic from Chinese Sources. Baroda: Oriental Institute.

  • Van Bijlert, V.A. (1989). Epistemology and Spiritual Authority: The Development of Epistemology and Logic in the Old Nyaya and the Buddhist School of Epistemology with an Annotated Translation of Dharmakīrti’s Pramāṇ avārttika (Pramāṇ asiddhi) VV. 1–7. Wien: Arbeitskreis für Tibetische und Buddhistische Studien Universität Wien.

  • Vetter, T. (1964). Erkenntnisprobleme bei Dharmakīrti. Wien: H. Böhlaus. Nachf., Kommissionsverlag der Öseterreichischen Akademie der Wissenschaften, Wien.

  • Vetter, T. (1966). Dharmakīrti’s Pramāṇ aviniścaya, 1. Kapitel: Pratyakṣam. Einleitung, Text der Tibetishcen Übersetzung, Sanskritfragmente, deutsche Übersetzung. Wien: H. Böhlaus Nachf., Kommissionsverlag der Öseterreichischen Akademie der Wissenschaften, Wien.

  • S.C. Vidyabhusana (1921) A History of Indian Logic (Ancient, Medieval and Modern Schools) Calcutta University Calcutta

    Google Scholar 

  • A. Von Rospatt (1995) The Buddhist Doctrine of Momentariness: A Survey of the Origins and Early Phase of this Doctrine up to Vasubandhu Steiner Stuttgart

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Woo (2001) ArticleTitle‘Incompatibility and the Proof of the Buddhist Theory of Momentariness.’ Journal of Indian Philosophy. 29 IssueID4 423–434 Occurrence Handle10.1023/A:1013181318494

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Woo, J. (1999). The Kṣaṇ abhaṅ gasiddhi-Anvayātmika: An Eleventh-Century Buddhist Work on Existence and Causal Theory, Unpublished PhD Dissertation, University of Pennsylvania.

  • Yaita, H. (1985a). ‘On Anupalabdhi, Annotated Translation of Dharmakīrti’s Pramāṇavārttikasvavṛtti (I).’ Taishō daigaku daigakuin kenkyū ronshū [Journal of the Graduate School of Taisho University] 9, 199–216.

  • Yaita, H. (1985b). ‘On Anupalabdhi, Annotated Translation of Dharmakīrti’s Pramāṇavārttikasvav ṛtti (II).’ Chizan Gakuhō (Journal of Chizan Studies) 34,1–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • C. Yoshimizu (1999) ArticleTitle‘The Development of Sattvānumāna from the Refutation of a Permanent Existent in the Sautrāntika Tradition.’ WZKS 43 231–254

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. FAS Department of Sanskrit, Harvard University, Room # 313, 1 Bow Street, Cambridge, MA, 02138, USA

    Lawrence J. Mccrea & Parimal G. Patil

Authors
  1. Lawrence J. Mccrea
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Parimal G. Patil
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lawrence J. Mccrea.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mccrea, L.J., Patil, P.G. Traditionalism and Innovation: Philosophy, Exegesis, and Intellectual History in Jñānaśrīmitra’s Apohaprakaraṇa . J Indian Philos 34, 303–366 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10781-005-5739-4

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10781-005-5739-4

Keywords

Search

Navigation