Abstract
Researchers have suggested that several types of agonistic and affiliative behavior covary as a set of species-specific traits, and have used the term dominance style to describe the covariation. We compared measures of dominance style between a group of Assamese macaques (Macaca assamensis) and a group of rhesus macaques (M. mulatta), though kinship information was unknown. Assamese and rhesus female-female dyads each showed a low proportion of counter aggression and a low conciliatory tendency, suggesting that they have despotic social relationships. They also showed a despotic pattern on several other types of agonistic and affiliative behavior, such as approach outcomes and grooming distributions, which is consistent with the covariation of dominance style traits. Assamese male-male dyads showed relatively high levels of reconciliation and counter aggression versus other macaque males portrayed in the literature, suggesting that Assamese males have a tolerant dominance style. Insofar as macaque dominance style depends on the behavior of females, we suggest that Assamese macaques, like rhesus macaques, have despotic social relationships, which contrasts with evidence of a strong correlation between phylogeny and dominance style in macaques. Further, our results indicate that strong male bonding and tolerant dominance relationships among males are independent of female dominance style. Lastly, some measures of agonistic behavior, such as rate of aggression or proportion of bites, are likely altered in competitive environments and thus are not useful indicators of dominance style.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abegg, C., Thierry, B., & Kaumanns, W. (1996). Reconciliation in three groups of lion-tailed macaques. International Journal of Primatology, 17, 803–816.
Aureli, F. (1992). Post-conflict behavior among wild long-tailed macaques (Macaca fascicularis). Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 31, 329–337.
Aureli, F., Das, M., & Veenema, H. C. (1997). Differential kinship effect on reconciliation in three species of macaques (Macaca fascicularis, M. fuscata, and M. sylvanus). Journal of Comparative Psychology, 111, 91–99.
Berman, C. M., Ionica, C. S., Dorner, M., & Li, J. (2006). Postconflict affiliation between former opponents in Macaca thibetana on Mt. Huangshan, China. International Journal of Primatology, 27, 827–854.
Berman, C. M., Ionica, C. S., & Li, J. H. (2004). Dominance style among Macaca thibetana on Mt. Huangshan, China. International Journal of Primatology, 25, 1283–1312.
Bernstein, I. S., & Cooper, M. A. (1999). Dominance in Assamese macaques (Macaca assamensis). American Journal of Primatology, 48, 283–289.
Bernstein, I. S., & Ehardt, C. L. (1985). Age-sex differences in the expression of agonistic behavior in rhesus monkey (Macaca mulatta) groups. Journal of Comparative Psychology, 99, 115–132.
Bernstein, I. S., Williams, L., & Ramsey, M. (1983). The expression of aggression in Old World monkeys. International Journal of Primatology, 4, 113–125.
Buzas, M., & Gibson, T. (1969). Species diversity: Benthonic Foraminifera in the western North Atlantic. Science, 163, 72–75.
Call, J., Aureli, F., & de Waal, F. B. M. (1999). Reconciliation patterns among stumptailed macaques: A multivariate approach. Animal Behavior, 58, 165–172.
Castles, D. L., Aureli, F., & de Waal, F. B. M. (1996). Variation in conciliatory tendency and relationship quality across groups of pigtail macaques. Animal Behavior, 52, 389–403.
Castles, D. L., & Whiten, A. (1998). Post-conflict behaviour of wild olive baboons. I. Reconciliation, redirection and consolation. Ethology, 104, 126–147.
Chikazawa, D., Gordon, T., Bean, C., & Bernstein, I. (1979). Mother-daughter dominance reversals in rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta). Primates, 20, 301–305.
Cooper, M. A., Aureli, F., & Singh, M. (2007). Sex differences in reconciliation and post-conflict anxiety in bonnet macaques. Ethology, 113, 26–38.
Cooper, M. A., & Bernstein, I. S. (2000). Social grooming in Assamese macaques (Macaca assamensis). American Journal of Primatology, 50, 77–85.
Cooper, M. A., & Bernstein, I. S. (2002). Counter aggression and reconciliation in assamese macaques (Macaca assamensis). American Journal of Primatology, 56, 215–230.
Datta, S., & Beauchamp, G. (1991). Effects of group demography on dominance relationships among female primates. I: Mother-daughter and sister-sister relations. American Naturalist, 138, 201–226.
de Waal, F. B. M. (1977). The organization of agonistic relations within two captive groups of Java monkeys (Macaca fascicularis). Zeitshrift für Tierpschychologie, 44, 225–282.
de Waal, F. B. M., & Luttrell, L. (1989). Toward a comparative socioecology of the genus Macaca: Different dominance styles in rhesus and stumptail monkeys. American Journal of Primatology, 19, 83–109.
de Waal, F. B. M., & Yoshihara, D. (1983). Reconciliation and redirected affection in rhesus monkeys. Behaviour, 85, 224–241.
Delson, E. (1980). Fossil macaques, phyletic relationships and a scenario of deployment. In D. Lindburg (Ed.) The Macaques: Studies in Ecology, Behavior and Evolution pp. 10–30. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold.
Flack, J. C., & de Waal, F. B. M. (2004). Dominance style, social power, and conflict management: a conceptual framework. In B. Thierry, M. Singh, & W. Kaumanns (Eds.) Macaque Societies: A Model for the Study of Social Organization (pp. 157–182). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Fooden, J. (1982). Taxonomy and evolution of the sinica group of macaques: 3. Species and subspecies accounts of Macaca assamensis. Fieldiana Zoologica, 10, 1–52.
Fooden, J. (1986). Taxonomy and evolution of the sinica group of macaques: 5. Overview of natural history. Fieldiana Zoologica, 29, 1–22.
Hemelrijk, C. K. (1999). An individual-oriented model of the emergence of despotic and egalitarian societies. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B—Biological Sciences, 266(1417), 361–369.
Hill, W., & Bernstein, I. S. (1969). On the morphology, behavior and systematic status of the Assam macaque (Macaca assamensis McClelland, 1939). Primates, 10, 1–17.
Hoelzer, G., & Melnick, D. (1996). Evolutionary relationships of the macaques. In J. Fa, & D. Lindburg (Eds.) Evolution and Ecology of Macaque Societies (pp. 3–19). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Isbell, L. A., & Young, T. P. (2002). Ecological models of female social relationships in primates: Similarities, disparities, and some directions for future clarity. Behaviour, 139, 177–202.
Kaufman, I., & Rosenblum, L. (1966). A behavioral taxonomy for Macaca nemestrina and Macaca radiata: Based on longitudinal observation of family groups in the laboratory. Primates, 7, 205–208.
Kawamura, S. (1965). Matriarchal social ranks in the Minoo-B group: A study of Japanese monkeys. In K. Imanishi, & S. Altmann (Eds.) Japanese Monkeys: A Collection of Translations (pp. 66–86). Atlanta: Emory University Press.
Koenig, A., Larney, E., Lu, A., & Borries, C. (2004). Agonistic behavior and dominance relationships in female Phayre’s leaf monkeys—preliminary results. American Journal of Primatology, 64, 351–357.
Kummer, H. (1971). Primate Societies: Group Techniques of Ecological Adaptation. Chicago: Aldine-Atherton.
Kummer, H., Goetz, W., & Angst, W. (1974). Triadic differentiation: An inhibitory process protecting pair bonds in baboons. Behaviour, 49, 62–87.
Kutsukake, N., & Castles, D. L. (2001). Reconciliation and variation in post-conflict stress in Japanese macaques (Macaca fuscata fuscata): Testing the integrated hypothesis. Animal Cognition, 4, 259–268.
Majolo, B., Ventura, R., & Koyama, N. (2005). Postconflict behavior among male Japanese macaques. International Journal of Primatology, 26, 321–336.
Matsumura, S. (1996). Postconflict affiliative contacts between former opponents among wild moor macaques (Macaca maurus). American Journal of Primatology, 38, 211–219.
Matsumura, S., & Kobayashi, T. (1998). A game model for dominance relations among group-living animals. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 42, 77–84.
Menard, N., & Vallet, D. (1996). Demography and ecology of Barbary macaques (Macaca sylvanus) in two different habitats. In J. Fa, & D. Lindburg (Eds.) Evolution and Ecology of Macaque Societies (pp. 106–131). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Nakamichi, M., Itoigawa, N., Imakawa, S., & Machida, S. (1995). Dominance relations among adult females in a free-ranging group of Japanese monkeys at Katsuyama. American Journal of Primatology, 37, 241–251.
Ogawa, H. (1995). Bridging behavior and other affiliative interactions among male Tibetan macaques (Macaca thibetana). International Journal of Primatology, 16, 707–729.
Petit, O., Abegg, C., & Thierry, B. (1997). A comparative study of aggression and conciliation in three cercopithecine monkeys (Macaca fuscata, Macaca nigra, Papio papio). Behaviour, 134, 415–432.
Petit, O., & Thierry, B. (1992). Affiliative function of the silent bared-teeth display in Moor macaques (Macaca maurus): Further evidence for the particular status of Sulawesi macaques. International Journal of Primatology, 13, 97–105.
Preuschoft, S. (2004). Power and communication. In B. Thierry, M. Singh, & W. Kaumanns (Eds.) Macaque Societies: A Model for the Study of Social Organization (pp. 56–60). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Preuschoft, S., & Paul, A. (2000). Dominance, egalitarianism, and stalemate: An experimental approach to male-male competition. In P. M. Kappeler (Ed.) Primate Males: Causes and Consequences of Variation in Group Composition (pp. 205–216). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Preuschoft, S., Paul, A., & Kuester, J. (1998). Dominance styles of female and male Barbary macaques (Macaca sylvanus). Behaviour, 135, 731–755.
Schino, G., Rosati, L., & Aureli, F. (1998). Intragroup variation in conciliatory tendencies in captive Japanese macaques. Behaviour, 135, 897–912.
Seyfarth, R. M., & Cheney, D. L. (1984). Grooming, alliances and reciprocal altruism in vervet monkeys. Nature, 308, 541–543.
Silk, J. B. (1994). Social relationships of male bonnet macaques: Male bonding in a matrilineal society. Behaviour, 130, 271–291.
Silk, J. B., & Samuels, A. (1984). Triadic interactions among Macaca radiata: Passports and buffers. American Journal of Primatology, 6, 373–376.
Singh, M., Akram, N., & Pirta, R. (1984). Evolution of demographic patterns in the bonnet monkey (Macaca radiata). In M. L. Roonwal, S. M. Mohnot, & N. S. Rathore (Eds.) Current Primate Researchers (pp. 7–16). Jodhpur, India: University of Jodhpur Press.
Singh, M., Singh, M., Sharma, A., & Krishna, B. (2003). Methodological considerations in measurement of dominance in primates. Current Science, 84, 709–713.
Sinha, A., Mukhopadhyay, K., Datta-Roy, A., & Ram, S. (2005). Ecology proposes, behavior disposes: Ecological variability in social organization and male behavioral strategies among wild bonnet macaques. Current Science, 89, 1166–1179.
Smith, R. J., & Jungers, W. L. (1997). Body mass in comparative primatology. Journal of Human Evolution, 32, 523–559.
Sterck, E., Watts, D. P., & van Schaik, C. P. (1997). The evolution of female social relationships in nonhuman primates. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 41, 291–309.
Taub, D. (1980). Testing the ‘agonistic buffering’ hypothesis I. The dynamics of participation in the triadic interaction. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 6, 187–197.
Thierry, B. (1985). Patterns of agonistic interactions in three species of macaque (Macaca mulatta, M. fascicularis, M. tonkeana). Aggressive Behavior, 11, 223–233.
Thierry, B. (1990). Feedback loop between kinship and dominance: The macaque model. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 145, 511–521.
Thierry, B. (2000). Covariation of conflict management patterns across macaque species. In F. Aureli, & F. B. M. de Waal (Eds.) Natural Conflict Resolution (pp. 106–128). Berkeley: University of California Press.
Thierry, B., Iwaniuk, A. N., & Pellis, S. M. (2000). The influence of phylogeny on the social behaviour of macaques (Primates: Cercopithecidae, genus Macaca). Ethology, 106, 713–728.
Thoren, S., Lindenfors, P., & Kappeler, P. M. (2006). Phylogenetic analyses of dimorphism in primates: Evidence for stronger selection on canine size than on body size. American Journal Physical Anthropology, 130, 50–59.
Veenema, H. C., Das, M., & Aureli, F. (1994). Methodological improvements for the study of reconciliation. Behavioural Processes, 31, 29–37.
Wilson, E. (1975). Sociobiology: The New Synthesis. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Wittig, R. M., & Boesch, C. (2003). The choice of post-conflict interactions in wild chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes). Behaviour, 140, 1527–1559.
Wittig, R. M., & Boesch, C. (2005). How to repair relationships—Reconciliation in wild chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes). Ethology, 111, 736–763.
Zhao, Q., & Deng, Z. (1988). Macaca thibetana at Mt. Emei, China: III. Group composition. American Journal of Primatology, 16, 269–273.
Acknowledgments
A grant from the National Geographic Society (grant 5862–97) funded the research, which we conducted in cooperation with the Indo-US Primate Project, principal investigators S. M. Mohnot and Charles Southwick. We thank Arun Srivastava and Prabal Sarkar for logistical support in the field, and Mohibul Haque for help in data collection. The University of Georgia Animal Care and Use Committee approved all procedures, and the study complied with Indian law.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Cooper, M.A., Bernstein, I.S. Evaluating Dominance Styles in Assamese and Rhesus Macaques. Int J Primatol 29, 225–243 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10764-008-9236-y
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10764-008-9236-y