Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Exploring Business Models for MOOCs in Higher Education

  • Published:
Innovative Higher Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs) potentially challenge the traditional dominance of brick and mortar institutions as providers of quality higher education. The benefits for students include reduced education costs and global access to exclusive institution courses and instructors. However, the benefits for institutions are less clear as there is a financial overhead required to develop and deliver content that is suitable for mass student consumption. In this article we examine the opportunities that MOOCs provide and identify several different business model challenges for offering MOOCs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. In North American usage, this term is to be understood as “graduate.”

References

  • Asterhan, C. S. C. (2011). Assessing e-moderation behavior from synchronous discussion protocols with a multi-dimensional methodology. Computers in Human Behavior, 27, 449–458.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Attis, D., Koproske, C., & Miller, C. (2012). Understanding the MOOC trend: The adoption and impact of massive open online courses. Washington, DC: The Education Advisory Board. Retrieved from http://www.eab.com

  • Belanger, Y., & Thornton, J. (2013). Bioelectricity: A quantitative approach. Duke University’s first MOOC. Durham, NC: Duke University. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/10161/6216

  • Blatter, M., Muehlemann, S., & Schenker, S. (2012). The costs of hiring skilled workers. European Economic Review, 56, 20–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bruff, D. (2013, February 19). Online learning ecosystems: What to make of MOOC dropout rates? [Blog message]. Retrieved from http://derekbruff.org

  • Carey, K. (2013, February 13). Obama, Rubio agree on one thing: Technology could fix the Higher Ed mess. Slate. Retrieved from http://www.slate.com

  • Colman, D. (2013, April 2). The big problem for MOOCs visualized. Open Culture. Retrieved from http://www.openculture.com

  • Davidson, C. (2013, November 6). Clearing up some myths about MOOCs [Blog message]. Retrieved from Humanities, Arts, Science and Technology Alliance and Collaboratory (HASTAC) website http://www.hastac.org

  • EDUCAUSE (2012, December 20). What campus leaders need to know about MOOCs: an EDUCAUSE executive briefing. Louisville, CO: EDUCAUSE Publications. Retrieved from http://www.educause.edu

  • Edwards, C. (2012, August). MOOC’s: An analysis for BCIT. British Columbia, Canada: British Columbia Institute of Technology. Retrieved from http://landing.athabascau.ca

  • EvoLLLution NewsWire (2013). Finally, a business model for MOOCs. EvoLLLution. Retrieved from http://www.evolllution.com

  • Firmin, R., Schiorring, E., Whitmer, J., Willett, T., & Sujitparapitaya, S. (2013, September). Preliminary Summary: SJSU + Augmented Online Learning Environment: Pilot Project. San Jose, CA: Research and Planning Group for California Community Colleges. Retrieved from http://www.sjsu.edu

  • Gallagher, S., & Garrett, G. (2013, July 31). Disruptive education: Technology Enabled Universities. Sydney, Australia: United States Studies Centre, University of Sydney. Retrieved from http://ussc.edu.au

  • Haggard, S. (2013). The maturing of the MOOC (BIS Research paper number 130). London, England: Department for Business, Innovation and Skills. Retrieved from http://www.gov.uk

  • Higher Education Price Index (2013). Retrieved from the Commonfund Institute website: http://www.commonfund.org

  • Hyman, P. (2013, October 22). MOOCs evolve; Version 2.0 aims to retain more students. Communications of the ACM. Retrieved from http://cacm.acm.org

  • Jordan, K. (n.d.). MOOC Completion Rates: The Data [Table]. Retrieved from http://www.katyjordan.com

  • Kedem, K., & Puchalla, J. E. (2012). Shifting ground: Technology begins to alter centuries-old business model for universities. (Report Number 144483), New York, NY: Moody’s Investors Service. Retrieved from http://www.moodys.com

  • Kolowich, S. (2012a, June 11). How will MOOCs make money? Inside Higher Ed. Retrieved from http://www.insidehighered.com

  • Kolowich, S. (2012b, September 12). The MOOC Survivors. Inside Higher Ed. Retrieved from http://www.insidehighered.com/

  • Kolowich, S., (2013a, February 21). How EdX plans to earn, and share, revenue from its free online courses. The Chronicle of Higher Education, Retrieved from http://www.chronicle.com

  • Kolowich, S., (2013b, March 24). The Professors Who Make the MOOCs. The Chronicle of Higher Education. Retrieved from http://www.chronicle.com

  • Leckart, S., (2012, March 20). The Stanford education experiment could change higher learning forever. Wired. Retrieved from http://www.wired.com

  • Lewin, T., (2013, January 6). Students rush to web classes, but profits may be much later. The New York Times. Retrieved from http://www.nytimes.com

  • Loukis, E., Pazalos, K., & Salagara, A. (2012). Transforming e-services evaluation data into business analytics using value models. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 11, 129–141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morris, L. V. (2013). MOOCs, emerging technologies, and quality. Innovative Higher Education, 38, 251–252.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rivard, R., (2013a, March 22). Coursera’s contractual elitism. Inside Higher Ed. Retrieved from http://www.insidehighered.com

  • Rivard, R. (2013b, July 18). Udacity project on “pause”. Inside Higher Ed. Retrieved from http://www.insidehighered.com

  • Sandeen, C. (2013, July 18). From hype to nuanced promise: American higher education and the MOOC 3.0 era. The Huffington Post. Retrieved from http://www.huffingtonpost.com

  • Sitzmann, T. (2012). A theoretical model and analysis of the effect of self-regulation on attrition from voluntary online training. Learning and Individual Differences, 22, 46–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Young, J. R. (2012a, July 19). Inside the Coursera contract: How an upstart company might profit from free courses. The Chronicle of Higher Education. Retrieved from http://www.chronicle.com

  • Young, J. R., (2012b, July 19). The U. of Michigan's contract with Coursera. The Chronicle of Higher Education. Retrieved from http://www.chronicle.com

  • Young, J. R. (2013, February 21). Revenue-sharing models between edX and university partners. The Chronicle of Higher Education. Retrieved from http://www.chronicle.com

  • Yuan, L., & Powell, S. (2013). MOOCs and open education: Implications for higher education (2013:WP01). Bolton, UK: JISC Centre for Educational Technology & Interoperability Standards. Retrieved from http://www.cetis.ac.uk

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shamus P. Smith.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Burd, E.L., Smith, S.P. & Reisman, S. Exploring Business Models for MOOCs in Higher Education. Innov High Educ 40, 37–49 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10755-014-9297-0

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10755-014-9297-0

Keywords

Navigation