Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Dispersal and colonisation of plants in lowland streams: success rates and bottlenecks

  • Primary Research Paper
  • Published:
Hydrobiologia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Plant dispersal and colonisation, including rates of dispersal, retention, colonisation and survival of dispersed propagules (shoots and seeds), were studied in a 300-m stream reach in a macrophyte-rich lowland stream during one growing season. Relationships between colonisation processes and simple flow parameters were tested. Each fortnight during a growing season, the number of dispersed plant propagules and the number of new and lost plant colonisations since the last sampling day were recorded. The retention of dispersing shoots was tested on two occasions during the growing season by releasing plant shoots and subsequently re-collecting the retained shoots in the study reach. The main bottleneck for plant colonisation in macrophyte-rich lowland streams is the primary colonisation (development of attached roots in the sediment from vegetative propagules or seedlings) of retained shoots and seeds, due in part to low retention success (1% of the dispersed shoots per 100-m reach) and to unsuccessful colonisation of retained shoots (3.4% of retained shoots colonised). The number of drifting shoots and seeds per day during the growing season were 650–6,950 and 2,970–62,780, respectively, and caused no constraint to colonisation. The survival rate of primary colonists was high with 80% surviving during the first growing season and about 50% surviving the first winter. There was no relationship between number of drifting shoots and flow, but the number of drifting seeds increased with flow. The number of colonisations between two consecutive sampling days correlated to the extent of low flow in the period. The loss rate of colonisations correlated to high flow events, but was low overall. My study strongly indicates that the number of propagules is not a constraint to colonisation in macrophyte-rich lowland streams. Rather, I conclude that primary colonisation is the main constraint to regaining vegetation in lowland streams in general and in vegetation-free rehabilitated streams in particular. Therefore, if plant colonisation is a target for stream rehabilitation, it is important to enhance retention and colonisation of propagules by creating areas of low flow and by providing physical obstacles to work as retention agents in the stream.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Baattrup-Pedersen A. & T. Riis, 2004. Impacts of different weed cutting practices on macrophyte species diversity and composition in a Danish stream. River Research and Application 20: 103–114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baattrup-Pedersen, A., S. E. Larsen & T. Riis, 2003. Composition and richness of macrophyte communities in small Danish streams—influence of environmental factors and weed cutting. Hydrobiologia 495: 171–179.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bakker, J. P., T. Poschold, R. J. Strykstra, R. M. Bekker & K. Thompson, 1996. Seed banks and seed dispersal: important topics in restoration ecology. Acta Botanica Neerlandica 45: 461–469.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barrat-Segretain, M. H. & G. Bornette, 2000. Regeneration and colonization abilities of aquatic plant fragments: effect of disturbance seasonality. Hydrobiologia 421: 31–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barrat-Segretain, M. H., G. Bornette & A. Hering-Vilas-Boas, 1998. Comparative abilities of vegetative regeneration among aquatic plants growing in disturbed habitats. Aquatic Botany 60: 201–211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barrat-Segretain, M. H., C. P. Henry & G. Bornette, 1999. Regeneration and colonisation of aquatic plant fragments in relation to the disturbance frequency of their habitats. Archieve fur Hydrobiologie 45: 111–145.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boedeltje, G., J. P. Bakker, R. M. Bekker, J. M. Van Groendal & M. Soesberg, 2003. Plant dispersal in a lowland stream in relation to occurrence and three specific life-history traits of the species in the species pool. Journal of Ecology 91: 855–866.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boedeltje, G., J. P. Bakker, A. ten Brinke, J. M. Van Groendal & M. Soesberg, 2004. Dispersal phenology of hydrochorous plants in relation to discharge, seed release time and buoyancy of seeds: the flood pulse concept supported. Journal of Ecology 92: 786–796.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bullock, J. M., I. L. Moy, R. F. Pywell, S. J. Coulson, A. M. Nolan, & H. Caswell, 2002. Plant dispersal and colonization processes at local and landscape scale. In Bullock J. M., K. E. Kenward & R. S. Hails (eds), Dispersal Ecology. Blackwell Publication, Oxford, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dawson, F. H., E. Castellano, & M. Ladle, 1978. Concept of species succession in relation to river vegetation and management. Verhandlungen Internationale Vereinigung für Theoretische and Angewandte Limnologie 20: 1439–1444.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flint, N. A. & J. D. Madsen, 1995. The effect of temperature and daylength on the germination of Potamogeton nodosus tubers. Journal of Freshwater Ecology 10: 125–128.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johansson, M. E. & C. Nilsson, 1993. Hydrochory, population dynamics and distribution of the clonal aquatic plant Ranunculus lingua. Journal of Ecology 81: 81–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaenel, B. R., B. C. Matthaei & U. Uehlinger, 1998. Disturbance by aquatic plant management in streams: effects on benthic invertebrates. Regulated Rivers: research & management 14: 341–356.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Merritt, D. M. & E. E. Wohl, 2002. Processes governing hydrochory along rivers: hydraulics, hydrology, and dispersal phenology. Ecological Applications 12: 1071–1087.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moeslund, B., B. Løjtnant, H. Mathiessen, L. Mathiessen, A. Pedersen, N. Thyssen & J. C. Schou, 1990. Danske Vandplanter (in Danish). Environmental News No. 2. Danish Environmental Protection Agency, Copenhagen.

  • Pickett, S. T. A. & M. J. McDonell, 1989. Changing perspectives in community dynamics: a theory of successional forces. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 4: 241–245.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Riis T., K. Sand-Jensen & S. E. Larsen, 2001. Plant distribution and abundance in relation to physical conditions and location within Danish stream systems. Hydrobiologia 448: 217–228.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Riis, T. & B. J. F. Biggs, 2003. Hydrologic and hydraulic control of macrophytes in streams. Limnology and Oceanography 48: 1488–1497.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Riis, T. & K. Sand-Jensen, 2006. Dispersal of plant fragments in small streams. Freshwater Biology 51: 274–286.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sand-Jensen, K., 2003. Drag and reconfiguration of freshwater macrophytes. Freshwater Biology 48: 271–283.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sand-Jensen, K. & J. Mebus, 1996. Fine-scale patterns of water velocity within macrophyte patches in streams. Oikos 76: 69–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sand-Jensen, K., E. Jeppesen, K. Nielsen, L. van der Bijl, A.-L. Hjermind, L. W. Wiggers & T. M. Iversen, 1989. Growth of macrophytes and ecosystem consequences in a Danish lowland stream. Freshwater Biology 22: 15–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sand-Jensen, K., K. Andersen & T. Andersen, 1999. Dynamic properties of recruitment, expansion and mortality of macrophyte patches in streams. International Review of Hydrobiology 84: 497–508.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sculthorpe, C. D., 1967. The Biology of Aquatic Vascular Plants. Edward Arnold, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, D. H., J. D. Madsen, K. L. Dickson & T. L. Beitinger, 2002. Nutrient effect on autofragmentation of Myriophyllum spicatum. Aquatic Botany 74: 1–17.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Spencer, D. F. & G. G. Ksander, 1992. Influence of temperature and moisture on vegetative propagule germination of Potamogeton species—implications for aquatic plant management. Aquatic Botany 43: 351–364.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spencer, D. F., W. VanViessen, F. J. Ryan & G. G. Ksander, 1993. Influence of photoperiod and plant weight on tuber production by Potamogeton pectinatus L. Journal of Freshwater Ecology 8: 1–11.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • van Wijk, R. J. & J. A. J. Trompenaars, 1985. On germination of turions and life cycle of Potamogeton trichoides Cham. et Scheld. Aquatic Botany 22: 165–172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wiegleb, G., W. Herr & D. Todeskino, 1989. Ten years of vegetation dynamics in two rivulets in Lower Saxony (FRG). Vegetatio 82: 163–178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilcock, R. J., P. D. Champion, J. W. Nagels & G. F. Croker, 1999. The influence of aquatic macrophytes on the hydraulic and physico-chemical properties of a New Zealand lowland stream. Hydrobiologia 416: 203–214.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

I thank Ole Bennike, Geological Survey of Denmark and Greenland (GEUS) for helping with seed identification and Ole Zahrtmann for helping with field work. I also thank The Danish Natural Science Research Council for financial support.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Biological Sciences, Plant Biology, University of Aarhus, Ole Worms Allé, 8000, Aarhus C, Denmark

    Tenna Riis

Authors
  1. Tenna Riis
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tenna Riis.

Additional information

Handling editor: L. M. Bini

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Riis, T. Dispersal and colonisation of plants in lowland streams: success rates and bottlenecks. Hydrobiologia 596, 341–351 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10750-007-9107-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10750-007-9107-0

Keywords

Search

Navigation