Abstract
We present a new generic problem solving approach for over-constrained problems based on Max-SAT. We first define a Boolean clausal form formalism, called soft CNF formulas, that deals with blocks of clauses instead of individual clauses, and that allows one to declare each block either as hard (i.e., must be satisfied by any solution) or soft (i.e., can be violated by some solution). We then present two Max-SAT solvers that find a truth assignment that satisfies all the hard blocks of clauses and the maximum number of soft blocks of clauses. Our solvers are branch and bound algorithms equipped with original lazy data structures, powerful inference techniques, good quality lower bounds, and original variable selection heuristics. Finally, we report an experimental investigation on a representative sample of instances (random 2-SAT, Max-CSP, graph coloring, pigeon hole and quasigroup completion) which provides experimental evidence that our approach is very competitive compared with the state-of-the-art approaches developed in the CSP and SAT communities.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Alber, J., J. Gramm, and R. Niedermeier. (1998). “Faster Exact Algorithms for Hard Problems: A Parameterized Point of View.” In 25th Conf. on Current Trends in Theory and Practice of Informatics, LNCS, Springer-Verlag, pp. 168–185.
Alsinet, T., F. Manyà, and J. Planes. (2003). “Improved Branch and Bound Algorithms for Max-SAT.” In Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on the Theory and Applications of Satisfiability Testing.
Borchers, B. and J. Furman. (1999). “A Two-Phase Exact Algorithm for MAX-SAT and Weighted MAX-SAT Problems.” Journal of Combinatorial Optimization 2, 299–306.
Cha, B., K. Iwama, Y. Kambayashi, and S. Miyazaki. (1997). “Local Search Algorithms for Partial MAXSAT.” In Proceedings of the 14th National Conference on Artificial Intelligence, AAAI'97, Providence/RI, USA, AAAI Press, pp. 263–268.
Culberson, J. (1995). “Graph Coloring Page: The Flat Graph Generator.” See http://web.cs.ualberta.ca/˜joe/ Coloring/Generators/flat.html.
Davis, M., G. Logemann, and D. Loveland. (1962). “A Machine Program for Theorem-Proving.” Communications of the ACM 5, 394–397.
de Givry, S., J. Larrosa, P. Meseguer, and T. Schiex. (2003). “Solving Max-SAT as Weighted CSP.” In 9th International Conference on Principles and Practice of Constraint Programming, CP-2003, Kinsale, Ireland, Springer LNCS 2833, pp. 363–376.
Gent, I. P. (2002). “Arc Consistency in SAT.” In Proceedings of the 15th European Conference on Artificial Intelligence (ECAI), Lyon, France, pp. 121–125.
Gomes, C. P. and B. Selman. (1997). “Problem Structure in the Presence of Perturbations.” In Proceedings of the 14th National Conference on Artificial Intelligence, AAAI'97, Providence/RI, USA, AAAI Press, pp. 221–226.
Hwang, J. and D. G. Mitchell. (2005). “2-way vs. d-way Branching for CSP.” In Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Principles and Practice of Constraint Programming, CP-2005, Sitges, Spain, Springer LNCS 3709, pp. 343–357.
Jiang, Y., H. Kautz, and B. Selman. (1995). “Solving Problems with Hard and Soft Constraints Using a Stochastic Algorithm for Max-SAT.” In Proceedings of the 1st International Workshop on Artificial Intelligence and Operations Research.
Kasif, S. (1990). “On the Parallel Complexity of Discrete Relaxation in Constraint Satisfaction Networks.” Artificial Intelligence 45, 275–286.
Larrosa, J. and P. Meseguer. (1999). “Partition-based Lower Bound for Max-CSP.” In 5th International Conference on Principles and Practice of Constraint Programming, CP'99, Alexandria, USA, Springer LNCS 1713, pp. 303–315.
Larrosa, J. and T. Schiex. (2003). “In the Quest of the Best form of Local Consistency for Weighted CSP.” In Proceedings of the International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, IJCAI'03, Acapulco, México, pp. 239–244.
Li, C. M., F. Manyà, and J. Planes. (2005). “Exploiting Unit Propagation to Compute Lower Bounds in Branch and Bound Max-SAT Solvers.” In Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Principles and Practice of Constraint Programming, CP-2005, Sitges, Spain, Springer LNCS 3709, pp. 403–414.
Loveland, D. W. (1978). Automated Theorem Proving. A Logical Basis, volume 6 of Fundamental Studies in Computer Science. North-Holland.
Meseguer, P., N. Bouhmala, T. Bouzoubaa, M. Irgens, and M. Sánchez. (2003). “Current Approaches for Solving Over-Constrained Problems.” Constraints 8(1), 9–39.
Moskewicz, M., C. Madigan, Y. Zhao, L. Zhang, and S. Malik. (2001). “Chaff: Engineering an Efficient Sat Solver.” In 39th Design Automation Conference.
Selman, B., H. Levesque, and D. Mitchell. (1992). “A New Method for Solving Hard Satisfiability Problems.” In Proceedings of the 10th National Conference on Artificial Intelligence, AAAI'92, San Jose/CA, USA, AAAI Press, pp. 440–446.
Smith, B. and M. Dyer. (1996). “Locating the Phase Transition in Binary Constraint Satisfaction Problems.” Artificial Intelligence 81, 155–181.
Wallace, R. and E. Freuder. (1996). “Comparative Studies of Constraint Satisfaction and Davis-Putnam Algorithms for Maximum Satisfiability Problems.” In D. Johnson and M. Trick, editors, Cliques, Coloring and Satisfiability, volume 26, pp. 587–615.
Xing, Z. and W. Zhang. (2005). “MaxSolver: An Efficient Exact Algorithm for (Weighted) Maximum Satisfiability.” Artificial Intelligence 164(1-2), 47–80.
Zhang, H., H. Shen, and F. Manya. (2003). “Exact Algorithms for Max-SAT.” In 4th Int. Workshop on First order Theorem Proving, June.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Research partially supported by projects TIN2004-07933-C03-03 and TIC2003-00950 funded by the Ministerio de Educación y Ciencia. The second author is supported by a grant Ramón y Cajal.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Argelich, J., Manyà, F. Exact Max-SAT solvers for over-constrained problems. J Heuristics 12, 375–392 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10732-006-7234-9
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10732-006-7234-9