Abstract
Hamiltonian gravity, relying on arbitrary choices of ‘space,’ can obscure spacetime symmetries. We present an alternative, manifestly spacetime covariant formulation that nonetheless distinguishes between ‘spatial’ and ‘temporal’ variables. The key is viewing dynamical fields from the perspective of a field of observers—a unit timelike vector field that also transforms under local Lorentz transformations. On one hand, all fields are spacetime fields, covariant under spacetime symmeties. On the other, when the observer field is normal to a spatial foliation, the fields automatically fall into Hamiltonian form, recovering the Ashtekar formulation. We argue this provides a bridge between Ashtekar variables and covariant phase space methods. We also outline a framework where the ‘space of observers’ is fundamental, and spacetime geometry itself may be observer-dependent.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Arnowitt, R., Deser, S., Misner, C.W.: The dynamics of general relativity. In: Witten, L. (ed.) Gravitation: An Introduction to Current Research. Wiley, New York (1962)
Geroch, R.: Domain of dependence. J. Math. Phys. 11, 437–449 (1970)
Bernal, A.N., Sánchez, M.: On smooth cauchy hypersurfaces and Geroch’s splitting theorem. Commun. Math. Phys. 243, 461–470 (2003)
Gielen, S., Wise, D.K.: Spontaneously broken Lorentz symmetry for Hamiltonian gravity. Phys. Rev. D 85, 104013 (2012)
Ashtekar, A.: New variables for classical and quantum gravity. Phys. Rev. Lett. 57, 2244 (1986)
Barbero G., J.F.: Real Ashtekar variables for Lorentzian signature space times. Phys. Rev. D 51, 5507–5510(1995). arXiv:gr-qc/9410014
Wise, D.K.: The geometric role of symmetry breaking in gravity. J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 360, 012017 (2012)
Crnković, C., Witten, E.: Covariant description of canonical formalism in geometric theories. In: Hawking, S.W., Israel, W. (eds.) Three Hundred Years of Gravitation. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1987)
Gotay, M.J., Isenberg, J., Marsden, J.E., Montgomery, R.: Momentum maps and classical relativistic fields. Part I: Covariant field theory. arXiv:physics/9801019
Gielen, S., Wise, D.K.: Lifting general relativity to observer space, in preparation
Ambjorn, J., Jurkiewicz, J., Loll, R.: Reconstructing the universe. Phys. Rev. D 72, 064014 (2005)
Barbour, J.: Shape dynamics. An introduction. In: Finster, F., et al. (eds.) Quantum Field Theory and Gravity: Conceptual and Mathematical Advances in the Search for a Unified Framework, Birkhaeuser, Basel (2012)
Gomes, H., Gryb, S., Koslowski, T.: Einstein gravity as a 3D conformally invariant theory. Class. Quantum Grav. 28, 045005 (2011)
Hořava, P.: Quantum gravity at a Lifshitz point. Phys. Rev. D 79, 084008 (2009)
Amelino-Camelia, G., Freidel, L., Kowalski-Glikman, J., Smolin, L.: Relative locality: a deepening of the relativity principle, Second Prize in the 2011 Essay Competition of the Gravity Research Foundation. arXiv:1106.0313
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Essay written for the Gravity Research Foundation 2012 Awards for Essays on Gravitation.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Gielen, S., Wise, D.K. Linking covariant and canonical general relativity via local observers. Gen Relativ Gravit 44, 3103–3109 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10714-012-1443-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10714-012-1443-3