Skip to main content
Log in

Is VGI participation? From vernal pools to video games

  • Published:
GeoJournal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper examines the relationship between public participatory GIS (PPGIS) and volunteered geographic information (VGI). A brief review of the history of PPGIS reveals similarities between the two but also provides examples of how these two areas have developed in ways that cause the boundaries between them to be unclear at times. As evidence for advancing this conversation, 2 case studies are presented: volunteers mapping vernal pools and park design in Second Life. These case studies demonstrate both the intertwined nature of some aspects of VGI and PPGIS, while also showing some aspects of divergence.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aitken, S. (2002). Public participation, technological discourses and the scale of GIS. In W. Craig, T. Harris, & D. Weiner (Eds.), Community participation and geographic information systems (Chap. 27, pp. 357–366). London: Taylor and Francis.

  • Arnstein, S. (1969). A ladder of citizen participation. Journal of the American Institute of Planners, 35(4), 216–224.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chrisman, N. (1987). Design of geographic systems based on social and cultural goals. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Systems Association, 53, 1367–1370.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chrisman, N. (1999). What does ‘GIS’ mean? Transactions in GIS, 3(2), 175–186.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chrisman, N. (2005). Full circle: More than just social Implications of GIS. Cartographica, 40(4), 23–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Corbett, J. M., & Keller, C. P. (2005). An analytical framework to examine empowerment associated with participatory geographic information systems (PGIS). Cartographica, 40(4), 91–102.

    Google Scholar 

  • Craglia, M., & Onsrud, H. (2003). Workshop on access to geographic information and participatory approaches in using geographic information. URISA Journal, 15(APA I), 9–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Craig, W., Harris, T., & Weiner, D. (1998). Empowerment, marginalization and public participation GIS: Report of Varenius workshop. National Center for Geographic Information and Analysis, Santa Barabara, CA. http://www.ncgia.ucsb.edu/varenius/ppgis/PPGIS98_rpt.html.

  • Craig, W., Harris, T., & Weiner, D. (Eds.). (2002). Community participation and geographic information systems. London: Taylor and Francis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Curry, M. (1998). Digital places: Living with geographic information technologies. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dorcey, A. (1994). Public involvement in government decision making: Choosing the right model. Report of the British Columbia Round Table on the Environment and the Economy, British Columbia Round Table, Victoria, BC.

  • Dueker, K., & Kjerne, D. (1989). Multipurpose cadastre: Terms and definitions. Falls Church, VA: American Society for Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing and American Congress on Surveying and Mapping (ASPRS-ACSM).

    Google Scholar 

  • Flaherty, E. (2006). Public participation in a virtual world. Landscape Architecture, 96(10), 136–141.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, T., & Weiner, D. (1996). GIS and society: The social implications of how people, space, and environment are represented in GIS—scientific report for the initiative 19 specialist meeting, NCGIA Report 96-7. National Center for Geographic Information and Analysis, Santa Barbara, CA. http://www.ncgia.ucsb.edu/Publications/Tech_Reports/96/96-7.PDF.

  • Harris, T., & Weiner, D. (2002). Implementing a community-integrated GIS: Perspectives from South African fieldwork. In W. Craig, T. Harris, & D. Weiner (Eds.), Community participation and geographic information systems (Chap. 18, pp. 246–258). London: Taylor and Francis.

  • Hodgson, D. L., & Schroeder, R. A. (2002). Dilemmas of counter-mapping community resources in Tanzania. Development and Change, 33(1), 79–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Howe, J. (2006). The rise of crowdsourcing. Wired, 14(6), 176–183.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kyem, P. (2001). Public participation GIS applications and the community empowerment process: A review of concerns and challenges. Cartographica, 38(3/4), 5–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kyem, P. (2002). Promoting local community participation in forest management through a PPGIS application in Southern Ghana. In W. Craig, T. Harris, & D. Weiner (Eds.), Community participation and geographic information systems (Chap. 16, pp. 219–231). London: Taylor and Francis.

  • Laituri, M. (2002). Ensuring access to GIS for marginal societies. In W. Craig, T. Harris, & D. Weiner (Eds.), Community participation and geographic information systems (Chap. 20, pp. 270–282). London: Taylor and Francis.

  • Lathrop, R., Montesano, P., Tesauro, J., & Zarate, B. (2005). Statewide mapping and assessment of vernal pools: A New Jersey case study. Journal of Environmental Management, 76(3), 230–238.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maué, P. (2007). Reputation as tool to ensure validity of VGI. Position Paper for Specialist Meeting on VGI, Santa Barbara, CA. http://ncgia.ucsb.edu/projects/vgi/docs/position/Maue_paper.pdf.

  • McMaster, R., & Usery, L. (Eds.). (2005). A research agenda for geographic information science. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mummidi, L., & Krumm, J. (2008, this issue). Discovering points of interest from users’ map annotations. GeoJournal.

  • Pickles, J. (1995). Ground truth: The social implications of geographic information systems. New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, E. M. (1962). The diffusion of innovations. New York: Free Press of Glencoe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schlossberg, M. A., & Shuford, E. (2005). Delineating ‘public’ and ‘participation’ in PPGIS. Urban and Regional Information Systems Association (URISA) Journal, 16(2), 15–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sheppard, E., & Poiker, T. (Eds.). (1995). Special issue on GIS and society. Cartography and Geographic Information Systems (CAGIS), 22, 1.

  • Sieber, R. (2006). Public participation geographic information systems: A literature review and framework. Annals of the American Association of Geography, 96(3), 491–507.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tulloch, D. (2007). Many, many maps: Empowerment and online participatory mapping. First Monday, 12(2) (February). http://firstmonday.org/issues/issue12_2/tulloch/index.html.

  • Wiedemann, I., & Femers, S. (1993). Public participation in waste management decision making: Analysis and management of conflicts. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 33, 355–368.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zarate, B. (2008). Phone Interview with author. 13 March 2008.

Download references

Acknowledgments

This paper was written with partial support from the New Jersey Agricultural Experiment Station (Project No. 84102). Great appreciation is also owed to Marcus Knowlton for his generous technical assistance with the illustrations. The cases studies would not have been possible without additional information and insight from the individuals leading the projects—particularly Brian Zarate, Tom Lowenhaupt and Rick Lathrop—and the volunteers who participated in them.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to David L. Tulloch.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Tulloch, D.L. Is VGI participation? From vernal pools to video games. GeoJournal 72, 161–171 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10708-008-9185-1

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10708-008-9185-1

Keywords

Navigation