We discuss the nature of reality in the ontological context of Penrose’s math-matter-mind triangle. The triangle suggests the circularity of the widespread view that math arises from the mind, the mind arises out of matter, and that matter can be explained in terms of math. Non-physicists should be wary of any claim that modern physics leads us to any particular resolution of this circularity, since even the sample of three theoretical physicists writing this paper hold three divergent views. Some physicists believe that current physics has already found the basic framework for a complete description of reality, and only has to fill in the details. Others suspect that no single framework, from physics or other sources, will ever capture reality. Yet others guess that reality might be approached arbitrarily closely by some form of future physics, but probably based on completely different frameworks. We will designate these three approaches as the fundamentalist, secular and mystic views of the world, as seen by practicing physicists. We present and contrast each of these views, which arguably form broad categories capturing most if not all interpretations of physics. We argue that this diversity in the physics community is more useful than an ontological monoculture, since it motivates physicists to tackle unsolved problems with a wide variety of approaches.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Penrose R. (1994), Shadows of the Mind. Oxford University Press, New York, Sec. 8.7.
Penrose R. (1994), The Road to Reality. Knopf, New York, Sec. 1.4
Tegmark M. (1998). Ann. Phys. 270, 1, gr-qc/9704009
Wigner E.P. (1967). Symmetries and Reflections. MIT Press, Cambridge
Rucker R. (1982). Infinity and the Mind. Birkhauser, Boston
Barrow J.D. (1992). Pi in the Sky. Clarendon, Oxford
Nozick R. (1981). Philosophical Explanations. Harvard University Press, Cambridge
Lewis D. (1986). On the Plurality of Worlds. Blackwell, Oxford
Rudd A. (1998). “What it’s like, and what’s really wrong with physicalism: a Wittgensteinean perspective”. J. Conscious. Stud. 5(4): 454
W. V. Quine, ‘On What There Is’ and ‘Two Dogmas of Empiricism’, in From a Logical Point of View, 2nd edn., (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA, 1980); Success and Limits of Mathematization, in Theories and Things (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA, 1981).
H. Putnam, ‘What is Mathematical Truth’ and ‘Philosophy of Logic’, in Mathematics Matter and Method: Philosophical Papers Vol. 1, 2nd edn. (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1979).
Colyvan, Mark, “Indispensability Arguments in the Philosophy of Mathematics”, The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall 2004 edn.), Edward N. Zalta, ed. URL =〈http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2004/entries/ mathphil-indis/〉.
Barrow J.D. (1992). Pi in the Sky. Oxford University Press, New York
P. Hut, Life as a Lab, 2004, http://lab.kira.org/lab.
Hut P., Shepard R. (1996). J. Conscious. Stud. 3, 313–329
Hut P., van Fraassen B. (1997). J. Conscious. Stud. 4, 167
Napper E. (1989). Dependent-Arising and Emptiness. Wisdom Publications, Boston
J.-P. Changeaux and A. Connes, 1995 Conversations on Mind, Matter, and Mathematics (Princeton University Press, edited and translated by M. B. DeBevoise from the original Matière à Pensée, 1989), Chap. 7.
Tipler F.J. (1994), The Physics of Immortality. Doubleday, New York, p. 210
J. Schmidthuber, “Lecture Notes in Computer Science”, in Foundations of Computer Science: Potential – Theory – Cognition, C. Freksa, ed. (Springer, Berlin, 1987), p. 201 ftp://ftp.idsia.ch/pub/juergen/everything.ps.gz.
M. Tegmark, astro-ph/0302131, in Science and Ultimate Reality, J. D. Barrow, P. C. W. Davies and C. L. Harper, eds. (Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, 2004).
P. M. S. Hacker, Insight and Illusion, (Oxford University Press, 1972).
Cohen M. (2003) Master’s thesis. Dept. of Philosophy, Ben Gurion University of the Negev, Israel
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hut, P., Alford, M. & Tegmark, M. On Math, Matter and Mind. Found Phys 36, 765–794 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10701-006-9048-x
Received:
Revised:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10701-006-9048-x