Skip to main content
Log in

The philosophical significance of Mendeleev’s successful predictions of the properties of gallium and scandium

  • Published:
Foundations of Chemistry Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The philosophical significance of Dmitri Mendeleev’s successful predictions of the properties of gallium and scandium vis a vis the acceptance of the Periodic Table 1874–1886 has been debated recently. This author presents evidence that De Boisbaudran and Cleve both respectively predicted the possible existence of gallium and scandium, but on the basis of the old TRIAD methodology. This suggests that these successful Mendeleev predictions were therefore not independent corroboration of the concept of the Periodic System. Instead the significantly independent predictive successes for Mendeleev’s system were (a) the determination of the atomic weight of the known element uranium as 240 instead of the previously accepted 120 in 1874 and (b) the isolation of germanium by Winkler in 1886.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Cleve, P.T.: Sur deux nouveaux elements dans l’erbine. Comptes Rendus 89, 478–480 (1879a)

    Google Scholar 

  • Cleve, P.T.: Sur l’erbine. Comptes Rendus 89, 708–709 (1879b)

    Google Scholar 

  • Cleve, P.T.: Sur le thulium. Comptes Rendus 91, 328–329 (1880)

    Google Scholar 

  • Cleve, P.T., Hogelund, M.: Sur les combinaisons de l’yttrium et de l’erbium. Bulletin Societe Chimique Français 18, 287–297 (1872)

    Google Scholar 

  • Döbereiner, J.W.: An attempt to group elementary substances according to their analogies. Annalen der Physik und Chemie 15, 301–307 (1829)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lecoq de Boisbaudran, P.E.: Sur un nouveau metal, gallium. Annales de Chimie 10, 100–141 (1877)

    Google Scholar 

  • Mellor, J.W.: A Comprehensive Treatise on Inorganic and Theoretical Chemistry, vol. 5, p. 373. Longman, Green & Co., London (1924)

    Google Scholar 

  • Mendeleev, D.I.: Uber die Bezeihungen der Eigenschaften zu den Atomgewichten der Elemente. Zeitschrifte fur Chemie 12, 405 (1869)

    Google Scholar 

  • Mendeleev, D.I.: Die Periodische Gesetzmassigkeit der Chemischen Elements. Annalen Chemie und der Pharmacie Supplementband 8, 133–229 (1871)

    Google Scholar 

  • Newlands, J.A.R.: On the equivalent of indium (letter to the editor). Chemical News, November 12, p. 240 (1864)

  • Scerri, E.: The periodic table. University Press, Oxford (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  • Scerri, E., Worrall, J.: Prediction and the periodic table. Stud. Hist. Philos. Sci. 32A, 407–452 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spottiswoode, N.: Presidential address. Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. 29, 407–431 (1879)

  • Thorpe, T. E.: Cleve memorial lecture. Chemical Society Memorial Lectures 1901–1913, pp. 103–104 (1901)

  • Winkler, C.: Germanium, Ge, non-metallische elemente. Berichte der Deutschen Chemische Gesellschafte 19, 210–211 (1886a)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Winkler, C.: Uber Germanium. Journal fur praktische chemie 142, 177–229 (1886b)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michael Akeroyd.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Akeroyd, M. The philosophical significance of Mendeleev’s successful predictions of the properties of gallium and scandium. Found Chem 12, 117–122 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10698-010-9085-6

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10698-010-9085-6

Keywords

Navigation