Skip to main content
Log in

Assessment of Fire Dynamics Simulator for Heat Flux and Flame Heights Predictions from Fires in SBI Tests

  • Published:
Fire Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper presents an experimental and numerical study of heat flux and flame heights from fires generated in single burning item (SBI) tests. Thin steel plate probes were developed, as an inexpensive and reliable alternative to heat flux gauges, to measure the surface heat flux, whilst flame heights were determined by analyzing the instantaneous images extracted from the videos of the experiments by a CCD camera. Experimental results obtained at different heat release rates were subsequently used to assess the accuracy of the computational fluid dynamics (CFD) code, Fire dynamics simulator (FDS, V4.07). Simulation results indicated that though predicting reasonably flame heights FDS underpredicts significantly the surface heat flux at higher heat release rates. Consequently, a sensitivity study of the parameters used in the radiation and soot models in FDS was conducted.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6
Figure 7
Figure 8
Figure 9
Figure 10
Figure 11
Figure 12

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Hasemi Y, Tokunaga T (1984) Some experimental aspects of turbulent diffusion flames and buoyant plumes from fire sources against a wall out in a corner of walls. Combust Sci Technol 4:15–26

    Google Scholar 

  2. Kokkala MA (1993) Characteristics of a flame in an open corner of walls. In: Proceedings of Interflam, Interscience Communication Limited, London

  3. Heskestad G (1995) Fire plumes. In: DiNenno PJ (ed) SPFE handbook of fire protection engineering, 2nd edn., National Fire Protection Association, Quincy

  4. Cheng Q (1995) Turbulent flame spread on vertical corner walls. National Institute of Standards and Technology, NIST-GCR-95-669

  5. Dillon SE (1998) Analysis of the ISO 9705 room/corner test: simulations, correlations and heat flux measurements. National Institute of Standards and Technology, NIST-GCR-98-756

  6. Ohlemiller TJ (2000) Estimating Fire Growth on Composite Materials in a Corner Configuration. In: 45th International SAMPE symposium and exhibition, vol 45. Long Beach, CA, pp. 1229–1243

  7. Lattimer BY, Sorathia U (2003) Thermal characteristics of fires in a non-combustible corner. Fire Saf J 38:709–745. doi: 10.1016/S0379-7112(03)00065-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. BRITISH STANDARD BS EN 13823:(2002) Reaction to fire tests for building products—building products excluding floorings exposed to the thermal attack by a single burning item

  9. Lennon PF, Silcock GWH (2001) An investigation of the ability of a thin plate heat flux device to determine the incident heat fluxes during enclosure fires. Int J Eng Performance-Based Codes 3:1–15

    Google Scholar 

  10. Tofilo P (2006) Factors controlling the behaviour of glazing systems in enclosures. PhD dissertation, University of Ulster

  11. Audouin L, Kolb G, Torero JL, Most JM (1995) Average centreline temperatures of a buoyant pool fire obtained by image processing of video recordings Fire Saf J 24:167–187. doi:10.1016/0379-7112(95)00021-K

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. McGrattan K, Forney G (2005) Fire dynamics simulator (version 4) user’s guide. NIST Special Publication 1019, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg

  13. Zukoski EE, Kubota T, Cetegen BM (1981) Air entrainment in fire plumes. Fire Saf J 3:107–121. doi:10.1016/0379-7112(81)90037-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Floyd J, Lattimer BY (2003) Validation of FDS V4 boundary heat flux predictions for a corner fire. In: Proceedings of Interflam, Edinburgh

  15. Lautenberger CW, de Ris J, Dembsey NA, Barnett JR, Baum HR (2005) A simplified model for soot formation and oxidation in CFD simulation of non-premixed hydrocarbon flames. Fire Saf J 40:141–176. doi:10.1016/j.firesaf.2004.10.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Beji T, Zhang J, Delichatsios MA (2008) Determination of soot formation rate from laminar smoke point measurements. Combust Sci Technol 180:927–940. doi:10.1080/00102200801894398

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Delichatsios MA (1994) A Phenomenological Model for Smoke-Point and Soot Formation in Laminar Flames. Combust. Sci. Technol. 100:283–298. doi:10.1080/00102209408935457

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Smyth KC (1999) Diffusion flame measurements of species concentrations, soot concentrations, temperature, and velocity. Available online at http://www.fire.nist.gov/fire/flamedata/

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors acknowledge the EU for financially supporting the PREDFIRE-NANO project under Grant number 013998 in the sixth Framework Program. The authors thank Mr M. McKee and Mr W. Veighey for helping with the experiments.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jianping Zhang.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Zhang, J., Delichatsios, M. & Colobert, M. Assessment of Fire Dynamics Simulator for Heat Flux and Flame Heights Predictions from Fires in SBI Tests. Fire Technol 46, 291–306 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10694-008-0072-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10694-008-0072-6

Keywords

Navigation