Re G (Children) [2005] E.W.C.A. (Civ.) 462
Abstract
In Re G, the Court of Appeal awarded a joint residence order to the appellant, who was the lesbian ex-partner of the child’s full biological mother. The award also indirectly vested the appellant, a social parent, with parental responsibility and extended a body of case law to same-sex couples, which had until now only been applied to heterosexual couples. The initial purpose of this note is to outline the legal issues of the case in the context of the framework of parental responsibility set out in the Children Act 1989, putting forward a test of ‘parental fitness’ (which focuses on active ‘care’ as its central consideration) for social parents who must appeal to the court’s discretion to obtain parental responsibility. Secondly, the note offers at once a positive reading of Re G while highlighting a number of reservations centring upon continued legal preference for the ‘sexual family’. It is argued that while the legal recognition of ‘family diversity’ and parenthood remains modelled on this ‘sexual family’, the relaxation of family ‘boundaries’ (despite legal victories such as Re G) will remain limited.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bainham A., (1999) Parentage, Parenthood and Parental Responsibility: Subtle, Elusive Yet Important Distinctions. In: Bainham A., Day Sclater S., Richards M. (eds) What is a Parent: A Socio-Legal Analysis. Hart Publishing, Oxford, pp. 25–46
Bainham A., (2005). Children: The Modern Law. Family Law, Bristol
Barker N., (2004). For Better or For Worse? The Civil Partnership Bill [HL] 2004. Journal of Social Welfare and Family Law 26/3:313–324
Barton C., Douglas G., (1995). Law and Parenthood. Butterworths, London
Dolan, A., “Lesbian Wins Equal Parental Rights Over Ex-Lover’s Children”, The Daily Mail, 8 April 2005
Eekelaar J., (2001). Rethinking Parental Responsibility. Family Law Journal 31: 426–423
Equal Parenting Council, “Shared Parenting: the Right Starting Point” (2003), at http://www.equalparenting.org/Download/SHARED%20PARENTING%20100 903A.pdf
Fineman M., (1995). The Neutered Mother, The Sexual Family and Other Twentieth Century Tragedies. Routledge, New York
Miccio, K., “A Reasonable Battered Mother? Redefining, Reconstructing, and Recreating the Battered Mother in Child Protective Proceedings”, Harvard Women’s Law Journal 22 (1999), 89–122, as exerted in Lemon, N. K. D., Domestic Violence Law (St. Paul, MN: West Group, 2001), 393–400
Pilditch, D., “Lesbian Wins Equal Rights Over Children”, The Express, 8 April 2005
Probert R., (2005). Same-Sex Couples and the Marriage Model. Feminist Legal Studies 13/1:135–143
Sandland R., (2000). Not ‘Social Justice’: The Housing Association, the Judges, the Tenant and his Lover: Fitzpatrick v. Sterling Housing Association. Feminist Legal Studies 8/2: 227–239
Sheldon S., (2001). Unmarried Fathers and Parental Responsibility: A Case for Reform?. Feminist Legal Studies 9/2: 93–118
Acknowledgements
I would like to thank Marie Fox, Tony Hobbs, Matija Longar, Sally Sheldon and the Feminist Legal Studies case note editors for their helpful comments and advice on earlier drafts of this note.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
MCandless, J. Recognising Family Diversity: the ‘Boundaries’ of RE G . Feminist Legal Stud 13, 323–336 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10691-005-9006-6
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10691-005-9006-6