Skip to main content
Log in

Diverse reproductive barriers in hybridising crickets suggests extensive variation in the evolution and maintenance of isolation

Evolutionary Ecology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Reproductive barriers reduce gene flow between populations and maintain species identities. A diversity of barriers exist, acting before, during and after mating. To understand speciation and coexistence, these barriers need to be quantified and their potential interactions revealed. We use the hybridising field crickets Gryllus bimaculatus and G. campestris as a model to understand the full compliment and relative strength of reproductive barriers. We find that males of both species prefer conspecific females, but the effect is probably too weak to represent a barrier. In contrast, prezygotic barriers caused by females being more attracted to conspecific male song and preferentially mounting and mating with conspecifics are strong and asymmetric. Postzygotic barriers vary in direction; reductions in fecundity and egg viability create selection against hybridisation, but hybrids live longer than pure-bred individuals. Hybrid females show a strong preference for G. bimaculatus songs, which together with a complete lack of hybridisation by G. campestris females, suggests that asymmetric gene flow is likely. For comparison, we review reproductive barriers that have been identified between other Gryllids and conclude that multiple barriers are common. Different species pairs are separated by qualitatively different combinations of barriers, suggesting that reproductive isolation and even the process of speciation itself may vary widely even within closely related groups.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adamo SA, Hoy RR (1994) Mating-behavior of the field cricket Gryllus bimaculatus and its dependence on social and environmental cues. Anim Behav 47:857–868

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arnold ML (1992) Natural hybridization as an evolutionary process. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 23:237–261

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arnold ML, Hodges SA (1995) Are natural hybrids fit or unfit relative to their parents? Trends Ecol Evol 10:67–71

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Barlow GW, Siri P (1997) Does sexual selection account for the conspicuous head dimorphism in the Midas cichlid? Anim Behav 53:573–584

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Birge LM, Hughes AL, Marshall JL, Howard DJ (2010) Mating behavior differences and the cost of mating in Allonemobius fasciatus and A. socius. J Insect Behav 23:268–289

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boughman JW (2002) How sensory drive can promote speciation. Trends Ecol Evol 17:571–577

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bridle JR, Saldamando CI, Koning W, Butlin RK (2006) Assortative preferences and discrimination by females against hybrid male song in the grasshoppers Chorthippus brunneus and Chorthippus jacobsi (Orthoptera: Acridiae). J Evol Biol 19:1248–1256

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cade WH, Tyshenko MG (1990) Geographic variation in hybrid fertility in the field crickets Gryllus integer, G. rubens and Gryllus sp. Can J Zool 68:2697–2700

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cousin G (1933) Sur l’hybridation de deux espèces de Gryllidae. (Acheta campestris et bimaculata). Bull Soc Ent Fr 12:189–193

    Google Scholar 

  • Coyne JA, Orr HA (1989) Patterns of speciation in Drosophila. Evolution 43:362–381

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coyne JA, Orr HA (1997) Patterns of speciation in Drosophila revisited. Evolution 51:295–303

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coyne JA, Orr HA (2004) Speciation. Sinauer Associates Inc, Sunderland

    Google Scholar 

  • Crawley MJ (2007) The R book. Wiley, Chichester

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Desutter-Grandcolas L, Robillard T (2003) Phylogeny and the evolution of calling songs in Gryllus (Insecta, Orthoptera, Gryllidae). Zool Scr 32:173–183

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dobzhansky T (1937) Genetic nature of species differences. Am Nat 71:404–420

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doebeli M, Ispolatov I (2010) Complexity and diversity. Science 328:494–497

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Doherty JA (1991) Song recognition and localization in the phonotaxis behavior of the field cricket, Gryllus bimaculatus (Orthoptera, Gryllidae). J Comp Physiol A 168:213–222

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doherty JA, Storz MM (1992) Calling song and selective phonotaxis in the field crickets, Gryllus firmus and G. pennsylvanicus (Orthoptera, Gryllidae). J Insect Behav 5:555–569

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Endler JA (1992) Signals, signal conditions, and the direction of evolution. Am Nat 139:S125–S153

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fitzpatrick MJ, Gray DA (2001) Divergence between the courtship songs of the field crickets Gryllus texensis and Gryllus rubens (Orthoptera, Gryllidae). Ethology 107:1075–1085

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gerhardt HC (1991) Female mate choice in treefrogs: static and dynamic acoustic criteria. Anim Behav 42:615–635

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giraudoux P (2008) Pgirmess: data analysis in ecology. R package version 1.3.7. http://perso.orange.fr/giraudoux/SiteGiraudoux.html

  • Gorochov AV, Llorente V (2001) Estudio taxonómico preliminary de los grylloidea de España (Insecta, Orthoptera). Graellsia 57:95–139

    Google Scholar 

  • Gray DA (2005) Does courtship behavior contribute to species-level reproductive isolation in field crickets? Behav Ecol 16:201–206

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gray DA (2011) Speciation, divergence, and the origin of Gryllus rubens: behavior, morphology, and molecules. Insects 2:195–209

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gray DA, Cade WH (2000) Sexual selection and speciation in field crickets. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 97:14449–14454

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gregory PG, Howard DJ (1993) Laboratory hybridization studies of Allonemobius fasciatus and A. socius (Orthoptera, Gryllidae). Ann Entomol Soc Am 86:694–701

    Google Scholar 

  • Gregory PG, Howard DJ (1994) A postinsemination barrier to fertilization isolates 2 closely related ground crickets. Evolution 48:705–710

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hankison SJ, Morris MR (2002) Sexual selection and species recognition in the pygmy swordtail, Xiphophorus pygmaeus: conflicting preferences. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 51:140–145

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harrison RG (1983) Barriers to gene exchange between closely related cricket species. 1. Laboratory hybridization studies. Evolution 37:245–251

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harrison RG (1985) Barriers to gene exchange between closely related cricket species. 2. Life-cycle variation and temporal isolation. Evolution 39:244–259

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harrison RG, Arnold J (1982) A narrow hybrid zone between closely related cricket species. Evolution 36:535–552

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harrison RG, Bogdanowicz SM (1997) Patterns of variation and linkage disequilibrium in a field cricket hybrid zone. Evolution 51:493–505

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hedwig B, Poulet JEA (2005) Mechanisms underlying phonotactic steering in the cricket Gryllus bimaculatus revealed with a fast trackball system. J Exp Biol 208:915–927

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hennig RM, Weber T (1997) Filtering of temporal parameters of the calling song by cricket females of two closely related species: a behavioral analysis. J Comp Physiol A 180:621–630

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Higgie M, Blows MW (2007) Are traits that experience reinforcement also under sexual selection? Am Nat 170:409–420

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Higgie M, Blows MW (2008) The evolution of reproductive character displacement conflicts with how sexual selection operates within a species. Evolution 62:1192–1203

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hill KG, Loftus-Hills JJ, Gartside DF (1972) Premating isolation between the Australian field crickets Teleogryllus commodus and T. oceanicus (Orthoptera: Gryllidae). Aust J Zool 20:153–163

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hine E, Lachish S, Higgie M, Blows MW (2002) Positive genetic correlation between female preference and offspring fitness. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 269:2215–2219

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Honda-Sumi E (2005) Difference in calling song of three field crickets of the genus Teleogryllus: the role in premating isolation. Anim Behav 69:881–889

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Howard DJ (1986) A zone of overlap and hybridization between two ground cricket species. Evolution 40:34–43

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Howard DJ (1999) Conspecific sperm and pollen precedence and speciation. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 30:109–132

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Howard DJ, Gregory PG (1993) Post-insemination signaling systems and reinforcement. Philos Trans R Soc Lond Ser B Biol Sci 340:231–236

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Howard DJ, Waring GL (1991) Topographic diversity, zone width, and the strength of reproductive isolation in a zone of overlap and hybridization. Evolution 45:1120–1135

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Howard DJ, Waring GL, Tibbets CA, Gregory PG (1993) Survival of hybrids in a mosaic hybrid zone. Evolution 47:789–800

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Howard DJ, Gregory PG, Chu JM, Cain ML (1998) Conspecific sperm precedence is an effective barrier to hybridization between closely related species. Evolution 52:511–516

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoy RR, Paul RC (1973) Genetic-control of song specificity in crickets. Science 180:82–83

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hoy RR, Hahn J, Paul RC (1977) Hybrid cricket auditory behavior—evidence for genetic coupling in animal communication. Science 195:82–84

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Huang Y, Ortí G, Sutherlin M, Duhachek A, Zera A (2000) Phylogenetic relationships of the North American field crickets inferred from mitochondrial DNA data. Molec Phylog Evol 17:48–57

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Izzo AS, Gray DA (2004) Cricket song in sympatry: species specificity of song without reproductive character displacement in Gryllus rubens. Ann Entomol Soc Am 97:831–837

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Izzo AS, Gray DA (2011) Heterospecific courtship and sequential mate choice in sister species of field crickets. Anim Behav 81:259–264

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jang Y, Gerhardt HC (2006a) Divergence in female calling song discrimination between sympatric and allopatric populations of the southern wood cricket Gryllus fultoni (Orthoptera: Gryllidae). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 60:150–158

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jang Y, Gerhardt HC (2006b) Divergence in the calling songs between sympatric and allopatric populations of the southern wood cricket Gryllus fultoni (Orthoptera: Gryllidae). J Evol Biol 19:459–472

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jang Y, Gerhardt HC (2007) Temperature effects on the temporal properties of calling songs in the crickets Gryllus fultoni and G. vernalis: Implications for reproductive isolation in sympatric populations. J Insect Behav 20:33–52

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jang Y, Won YJ, Choe JC (2009) Convergent and divergent patterns of morphological differentiation provide more evidence for reproductive character displacement in a wood cricket Gryllus fultoni (Orthoptera: Gryllidae). BMC Evol Biol 9:11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaneshiro KY (1976) Ethological isolation and phylogeny in the Planitibia subgroup of Hawaiian Drosophila. Evolution 30:740–745

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Larson EL, Hume GL, Andrés JA, Harrison RG (2012) Post-mating prezygotic barriers to gene exchange between hybridizing field crickets. J Evol Biol 25:174–186

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lemmon EM (2009) Diversification of conspecific signals in sympatry: geographic overlap drives multidimensional reproductive character displacement in frogs. Evolution 63:1155–1170

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lemmon EM, Lemmon AR (2010) Reinforcement in chorus frogs: lifetime fitness estimates including intrinsic natural selection and sexual selection against hybrids. Evolution 64:1748–1761

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Leonard AS, Hedrick AV (2009) Single versus multiple cues in mate discrimination by males and females. Anim Behav 77:151–159

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lim H-C (1970) Further cytological studies of Antipodean Teleogryllus species and their hybrids (Orthoptera: Gryllidae). Can J Zool 48:523–527

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marie Curie SPECIATION Network (2012) What do we need to know about speciation? Trends Ecol Evol 27:27–39

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maroja LS, Andrés JA, Harrison RG (2009a) Genealogical discordance and patterns of introgression and selection across a cricket hybrid zone. Evolution 63:2999–3015

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Maroja LS, Andrés JA, Walters JR, Harrison RG (2009b) Multiple barriers to gene exchange in a field cricket hybrid zone. Biol J Linnean Soc 97:390–402

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marshall JL (2004) The Allonemobius-Wolbachia host-endosymbiont system: evidence for rapid speciation and against reproductive isolation driven by cytoplasmic incompatibility. Evolution 58:2409–2425

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Marshall JL (2007) Rapid evolution of spermathecal duct length in the Allonemobius socius complex of crickets: species, population and Wolbachia effects. PLoS ONE 2:1–7

    Google Scholar 

  • Mendelson TC, Shaw KL (2002) Genetic and behavioral components of the cryptic species boundary between Laupala cerasina and L. kohalensis (Orthoptera : Gryllidae). Genetica 116:301–310

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mendelson TC, Shaw KL (2005) Sexual behaviour: rapid speciation in an arthropod. Nature 433:375–376

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mendelson TC, Shaw KL (2012) The (mis)concept of species recognition. Trends Ecol Evol 27:241–427

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mullen SP, Mendelson TC, Schal C, Shaw KL (2007) Rapid evolution of cuticular hydrocarbons in a species radiation of acoustically diverse Hawaiian crickets (Gryllidae : Trigonidiinae : Laupala). Evolution 61:223–231

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Naisbit RE, Jiggins CD, Mallet J (2001) Disruptive sexual selection against hybrids contributes to speciation between Heliconius cydno and Heliconius melpomene. Proc R Soc B Biol Sci 268:1849–1854

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nosil P, Vines TH, Funk DJ (2005) Perspective: reproductive isolation caused by natural selection against immigrants from divergent habitats. Evolution 59:705–719

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ohmachi F, Masaki S (1964) Interspecific crossing and development of hybrids between the Japanese species of Teleogryllus (Orthoptera: Gryllidae). Evolution 18:405–416

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Orr HA (1995) The population genetics of speciation—the evolution of hybrid incompatibilities. Genetics 139:1805–1813

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pardo JE, Gómez R, del Cerro A (1993) Orthopteroidea de los sistemas montañosos de Castilla-La Mancha (España). II Ensifera. Zoologica Baetica 4:113–148

    Google Scholar 

  • Pfennig KS (2000) Female spadefoot toads compromise on mate quality to ensure conspecific matings. Behav Ecol 11:220–227

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pfenning KS (1998) The evolution of mate choice and the potential for conflict beween species recognition and mate-quality recognition. Proc R Soc B Biol Sci 265:1743–1748

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Phelps SM, Rand AS, Ryan MJ (2006) A cognitive framework for mate choice and species recognition. Am Nat 167:28–42

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pollack GS (1982) Sexual differences in cricket calling song recognition. J Comp Physiol A 146:217–221

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Popov AV, Shuvalov VF (1977) Phonotactic behavior of crickets. J Comp Physiol A 119:111–126

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Proulx SR, Servedio MR (2009) Dissecting selection on female mating preferences during secondary contact. Evolution 63:2031–2046

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pryke SR, Andersson S (2008) Female preferences for long tails constrained by species recognition in short-tailed red bishops. Behav Ecol 19:1116–1121

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • R Development Core Team (2011) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramsey J, Bradshaw HD, Schemske DW (2003) Components of reproductive isolation between the monkeyflowers Mimulus lewisii and M. cardinalis (Phrymaceae). Evolution 57:1520–1534

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ritchie MG (2007) Sexual selection and speciation. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 38:79–102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rodríguez-Muñoz R, Bretman A, Slate J, Walling CA, Tregenza T (2010) Natural and sexual selection in a wild insect population. Science 328:1269–1272

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rodríguez-Muñoz R, Bretman A, Tregenza T (2011) Guarding males protect females from predation in a wild insect. Curr Biol 21:1716–1719

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ross CL, Harrison RG (2002) A fine-scale spatial analysis of the mosaic hybrid zone between Gryllus firmus and Gryllus pennsylvanicus. Evolution 56:2296–2312

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ross CL, Benedix JH, Garcia C, Lambeth K, Perry R, Selwyn V, Howard DJ (2008) Scale-independent criteria and scale-dependent agents determining the structure of a ground cricket mosaic hybrid zone (Allonemobius sociusAllonemobius fasciatus). Biol J Linnean Soc 94:777–796

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ryan MJ, Rand AS (1993) Species recognition and sexual selection as a unitary problem in animal communication. Evolution 47:647–657

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sætre G-P, Sæther SA (2010) Ecology and genetics of speciation in Ficedula flycatchers. Mol Ecol 19:1091–1106

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sánchez-Guillén RA, Wullenreuther M, Rivera AC (2012) Strong asymmetry in the relative strengths of prezygotic and postzygotic barriers between two damselfly sister species. Evolution 66:690–707

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schluter D (2001) Ecology and the origin of species. Trends Ecol Evol 16:372–380

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Servedio MR (2004) The evolution of premating isolation: local adaptation and natural and sexual selection against hybrids. Evolution 58:913–924

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Servedio MR, Noor MAF (2003) The role of reinforcement in speciation: theory and data. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 34:339–364

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shaw KL (2000) Interspecific genetics of mate recognition: inheritance of female acoustic preference in Hawaiian crickets. Evolution 54:1303–1312

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Simmons LW (1986) Female choice in the field cricket, Gryllus bimaculatus (De Geer). Anim Behav 34:1463–1470

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simmons LW (1988a) The contribution of multiple mating and spermatophore consumption to the lifetime reproductive success of female field crickets (Gryllus bimaculatus). Ecol Entomol 13:57–69

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simmons LW (1988b) The calling song of the field cricket, Gryllus bimaculatus (De Geer): constraints on transmission and its role in intermale competition and female choice. Anim Behav 36:380–394

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith CJ, Cade WH (1987) Relative fertility in hybridization experiments using 3 song types of the field crickets Gryllus integer and Gryllus rubens. Can J Zool 65:2390–2394

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sullivan BK (2009) Mate recognition, species boundaries and the fallacy of “species recognition”. Open J Zool 2:86–90

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Svedin N, Wiley C, Veen T, Gustafsson L, Qvarnström A (2008) Natural and sexual selection against hybrid flycatchers. Proc R Soc B Biol Sci 275:735–744

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Svensson EI, Karlsson K, Friberg M, Eroukhmanoff F (2007) Gender differences in species recognition and the evolution of asymmetric sexual selection. Curr Biol 17:1–5

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Thorson J, Weber T, Huber F (1982) Auditory behavior of the cricket. II. Simplicity of calling-song recognition in Gryllus and anomalous phonotaxis at abnormal carrier frequencies. J Comp Physiol A 146:361–378

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Traylor T, Birand AC, Marshall JL, Howard DJ (2008) A zone of overlap and hybridization between Allonemobius socius and a new Allonemobius sp. Ann Entomol Soc Am 101:30–39

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tyler F, Harrison X, Bretman A, Veen T, Rodríguez-Muñoz R, Tregenza T (in press) Multiple post-mating barriers to hybridisation in field crickets. Mol Ecol

  • Vamosi SM, Schluter D (1999) Sexual selection against hybrids between sympatric stickleback species: evidence from a field experiment. Evolution 53:874–879

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van der Sluijs I, van Dooren TJM, Hofker KD, van Alphen JJM, Stelkens RB, Seehausen O (2008) Female mating preference functions predict sexual selection against hybrids between sibling species of cichlid fish. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 363:2871–2877

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Veech JA, Benedix JH, Howard DJ (1996) Lack of calling song displacement between two closely related ground crickets. Evolution 50:1982–1989

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Veen T, Borge T, Griffith SC, Sætre G-P, Bureš S, Gustafsson L, Sheldon BC (2001) Hybridization and adaptive mate choice in flycatchers. Nature 411:45–50

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Veen T, Faulks J, Rodríguez-Muñoz R, Tregenza T (2011) Premating reproductive barriers between hybridising cricket species differing in their degree of polyandry. PLoS ONE 6:1–7

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Veen T, Faulks J, Tyler F, Lloyd J, Tregenza T (2012) Data from: diverse reproductive barriers in hybridising crickets suggests extensive variation in the evolution and maintenance of isolation. Data deposited in the Dryad Repository. http://dx.doi.org/10.5061/dryad.sh53j

  • von Hörmann-Heck VS (1955) Untersuchungen über den Erbgang einiger verhaltensweisen bei Grillenbastarden (Gryllus campestris und Gryllus bimaculatus De Geer). Zeitschrift für Tierpsychologie 14:10–183

    Google Scholar 

  • Wagner WE (1998) Measuring female mating preferences. Anim Behav 55:1029–1042

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Weissing FJ, Edelaar P, van Doorn GS (2011) Adaptive speciation theory: a conceptual review. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 65:461–480

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wiley C, Qvarnström A, Andersson G, Borge T, Sætre G-P (2009) Postzygotic isolation over multiple generations of hybrid descendents in a natural hybrid zone: how well do single-generation estimates reflect reproductive isolation? Evolution 63:1731–1739

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wirtz P (1999) Mother species—father species: unidirectional hybridization in animals with female choice. Anim Behav 58:1–12

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank Gina Conte, Seth Rudman and Rolando Rodríguez-Muñoz for valuable advice and Rolando for cricket collecting. Four anonymous Peerage of Science reviewers gave very constructive advice for which we are very thankful. T. V. was supported by a Rubicon grant from the Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research and the NSERC-CREATE Training Program in Biodiversity Research from Canada. F.T. was supported by the European Social Fund. T. T. was supported by grants from the Natural Environment Research Council.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Thor Veen.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 165 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Veen, T., Faulks, J., Tyler, F. et al. Diverse reproductive barriers in hybridising crickets suggests extensive variation in the evolution and maintenance of isolation. Evol Ecol 27, 993–1015 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10682-012-9610-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10682-012-9610-2

Keywords

Navigation