Abstract
Phenotypic polymorphism is a consequence of developmental plasticity, in which the trajectories of developing organisms diverge under the influence of cues. Environmental and genetic phenotype determination are the two main categories of polymorphic development. Even though both may evolve as a response to varied environments, they are traditionally regarded as fundamentally distinct phenomena. They can however be joined into a single framework that emphasizes the parallel roles of environmental and genetic cues in phenotype determination. First, from the point of view of immediate causation, it is common that phenotypic variants can be induced either by environmental or by allelic variation, and this is referred to as gene-environment interchangeability. Second, from the point of view of adaptation, genetic cues in the form of allelic variation at polymorphic loci can play similar roles as environmental cues in providing information to the developmental system about coming selective conditions. Both types of cues can help a developing organism to fit its phenotype to selective circumstances. This perspective of information in environmental and genetic cues can produce testable hypotheses about phenotype determination, and can thus increase our understanding of the evolution of phenotypic polymorphism.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bagheri HC (2006) Unresolved boundaries of evolutionary theory and the question of how inheritance systems evolve: 75 years of debate on the evolution of dominance. J Exp Zool 306B:329–359
Braendle C, Davis GK, Brisson JA, Stern DL (2006) Wing dimorphism in aphids. Heredity 97:192–199
Caillaud MC, Boutin M, Braendle C, Simon JC (2002) A sex-linked locus controls wing polymorphism in males of the pea aphid, Acyrthosiphon pisum (Harris). Heredity 89:346–352
Cain AJ, Sheppard PM (1954) The theory of adaptive polymorphism. Am Nat 88:321–326
Conover DO, Schultz ET (1995) Phenotypic similarity and the evolutionary significance of countergradient variation. Trends Ecol Evol 10:248–252
Darwin C (1859) The origin of species. John Murray, London
de Jong G (1999) Unpredictable selection in a structured population leads to local genetic variation in evolved reaction norms. J Evol Biol 12:839–851
de Jong G (2005) Evolution of phenotypic plasticity: patterns of plasticity and the emergence of ecotypes. New Phytol 166:101–118
de Jong G, Behera N (2002) The influence of life-history differences on the evolution of reaction norms. Evol Ecol Res 4:1–25
Dobzhansky T (1951) Genetics and the origin of species, 3rd edn. Columbia University Press, New York
Ehrlén J, Käck S, Ågren J (2002) Pollen limitation, seed predation and scape length in Primula farinosa. Oikos 97:45–51
Evans JD, Wheeler DE (2001) Gene expression and the evolution of insect polyphenisms. Bioessays 23:62–68
Fisher RA (1958) Polymorphism and natural selection. J Ecol 46:289–293
Ford EB (1965) Genetic polymorphism. Faber & Faber, London
Ford EB (1971) Ecological genetics, 3rd edn. Chapman & Hall, London
Futuyma DJ, Moreno G (1988) The evolution of ecological specialization. Ann Rev Ecol Syst 19:207–233
Gray SM, McKinnon JS (2007) Linking color polymorphism maintenance and speciation. Trends Ecol Evol 22:71–79
Harvell CD (1998) Genetic variation and polymorphism in the inducible spines of a marine bryozoan. Evolution 52:80–86
Jaenike J (1990) Host specialization in phytophagous insects. Ann Rev Ecol Syst 21:243–273
Joron M, Iwasa Y (2005) The evolution of a Müllerian mimic in a spatially distributed community. J Theor Biol 237:87–103
Joron M, Wynne IR, Lamas G, Mallet J (1999) Variable selection and the coexistence of multiple mimetic forms of the butterfly Heliconius numata. Evol Ecol 13:721–754
Joron M, Papa R, Beltran M et al (2006) A conserved supergene locus controls colour pattern diversity in Heliconius butterflies. PLoS Biol 4:1831–1840
Leimar O (2005) The evolution of phenotypic polymorphism: randomized strategies versus evolutionary branching. Am Nat 165:669–681
Leimar O, Hammerstein P, Van Dooren TJM (2006) A new perspective on developmental plasticity and the principles of adaptive morph determination. Am Nat 167:367–376
Levins R (1968) Evolution in changing environments. Princeton University Press, Princeton
Lively CM, Hazel WM, Schellenberger MJ, Michelson KS (2000) Predator-induced defense: variation for inducibility in an intertidal barnacle. Ecology 81:1240–1247
Maynard Smith J (1982) Evolution and the theory of games. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Maynard Smith J (1988) Can a mixed strategy be stable in a finite population? J Theor Biol 130:247–251
Mayo O, Bürger R (1997) Evolution of dominance: a theory whose time has passed? Biol Rev 72:97–10
Messmer V, Jones GP, van Herwerden L, Munday PL (2005) Genetic and ecological characterisation of colour dimorphism in a coral reef fish. Environ Biol Fish 74:175–183
Munday PL, Eyre PJ, Jones GP (2003) Ecological mechanisms for the coexistence of colour polymorphism in a coral-reef fish: an experimental evaluation. Oecologia 137:519–526
Nijhout HF (1999) Control mechanisms of polyphenic development in insects. Bioscience 49:181–192
Nijhout HF (2003) Polymorphic mimicry in Papilio dardanus: mosaic dominance, big effects and origins. Evol Dev 5:579–592
Olendorf R, Rodd FH, Punzalan D et al (2006) Frequency-dependent survival in natural guppy populations. Nature 441:633–636
Otto SP, Bourguet D (1999) Balanced polymorphisms and the evolution of dominance. Am Nat 153:561–574
Relyea RA (2004) Fine-tuned phenotypes: tadpole plasticity under 16 combinations of predators and competitors. Ecology 85:172–179
Sasaki A, de Jong G (1999) Density dependence and unpredictable selection in a heterogeneous environment: compromise and polymorphism in the ESS reaction norm. Evolution 53:1329–1342
Scharloo W (1970a) Stabilizing and disruptive selection on a mutant character in Drosophila. II. Polymorphism caused by a genetical switch mechanism. Genetics 65:681–691
Scharloo W (1970b) Stabilizing and disruptive selection on a mutant character in Drosophila. III. Polymorphism caused by a developmental switch mechanism. Genetics 65:693–705
Scharloo W, Hoogmoed MS, ter Kuile A (1967) Stabilizing and disruptive selection on a mutant character in Drosophila. I. The phenotypic variance and its components. Genetics 56:709–726
Schlichting CD, Pigliucci M (1998) Phenotypic evolution: a reaction norm perspective. Sinauer, Sunderland
Schlichting CD, Smith H (2002) Phenotypic plasticity: linking molecular mechanisms with evolutionary outcomes. Evol Ecol 16:189–211
Seger J, Brockmann HJ (1987) What is bet-hedging? Oxf Surv Evol Biol 4:182–211
Shapiro AM (1976) Seasonal polyphenism. Evol Biol 9:259–333
Skelly DK (2004) Microgeographic countergradient variation in the wood frog, Rana sylvatica. Evolution 58:160–165
Sotka EE (2005) Local adaptation in host use among marine invertebrates. Ecol Lett 4:448–459
Sultan SE, Spencer HG (2002) Metapopulation structure favors plasticity over local adaptation. Am Nat 160:271–283
Teplitsky C, Plenet S, Joly P (2004) Hierarchical responses of tadpoles to multiple predators. Ecology 85:2888–2894
Toräng P, Ehrlén J, Ågren J (2006) Facilitation in an insect pollinated herb with a floral display dimorphism. Ecology 87:2113–2117
Trussell GC (2002) Evidence of countergradient variation in the growth of an intertidal snail in response to water velocity. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 243:123–131
Weinig C (2000) Limits to adaptive plasticity: temperature and photoperiod influence shade-avoidance responses. Am J Bot 87:1660–1668
West-Eberhard MJ (2003) Developmental plasticity and evolution. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Acknowledgments
I thank an anonymous reviewer for helpful comments. This work was supported by grants from the Swedish Research Council.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Leimar, O. Environmental and genetic cues in the evolution of phenotypic polymorphism. Evol Ecol 23, 125–135 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10682-007-9194-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10682-007-9194-4