Skip to main content
Log in

Relationship between grain yield and quality of durum wheats from different eras of breeding

  • Published:
Euphytica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

High protein content and a ‘strong’ gluten are required in durum wheat (Triticum turgidum L. var. durum) to process semolina into a suitable final pasta product. The variation in grain protein content and quality realized through breeding and the concomitant variation in biomass production and partitioning have been analyzed by comparing in a 2-year field trial, four groups of cultivars released in different eras and areas of breeding. Three groups of cultivars represented the evolution of the Italian germplasm from the first landraces and genealogical selections (Group 1) to the cultivars constituted by crossing Mediterranean types with Syriacum types (Group 2), and the modern dwarf and semi-dwarf cultivars (Group 3). Group 4 was an ICARDA collection of breeding lines bred for adaptation to high altitudes. The measured traits included both biomass production and its partitioning to the grain, and total nitrogen uptake and its partitioning to the grain. Grain protein percentage, gluten content and gluten index were utilized as quality traits. Breeding resulted in an increased earliness, reduced height without significant decreases in total biomass, and improved partitioning. The concomitant total nitrogen uptake did not change, whereas the changed biomass partitioning caused a parallel change in nitrogen partitioning, with an increase in nitrogen harvest index from 0.41 to 0.59. The lower protein percentage in the grains of modern cultivars was therefore not due to a reduced nitrogen uptake, nor to a lower NHI or to less milligram of nitrogen per grain, but to the dilution effect caused by the heavier grains of modern cultivars. A notable increase in gluten index was observed in the modern cultivars, reflecting an improvement in the pasta-making quality of grain proteins.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abdalla, O., J.A. Dieseth & R.P. Singh, 1992. Breeding durum wheat at CIMMYT. In: S. Rajaram, E.E. Saari& G.P. Hettel(Eds.), Durum Wheats: Challenges and Opportunities, pp. 1–13. CIMMYT, Ciudad Obregon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ali Dib, T., P. Monneveux & J.L. Araus, 1992. Adaptation à la sércheresse et notion d’ideotype chez le blé dur. II. Caractéres physiologiques d’adaptation. Agronomie 12: 381–393.

    Google Scholar 

  • Austin, R.B., M.A. Ford, J.A. Edrich & R.D. Blackwell, 1977. The nitrogen economy of winter wheat. J Agric Sci Camb 88: 159–167.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blum, A., G. Golan, J. Mayer, B. Sinmena, L. Shpiler & J. Burra, 1989. The drought response of landraces of wheat from the northern Negev Desert in Israel. Euphytica 43: 87–96.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blum, A., B. Sinmena, G. Golan & J. Mayer, 1987. The grain quality of landraces of wheat as compared with modern cultivars. Plant Breed 99: 226–233.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bozzini, A., D. Bagnara, C. Mosconi, L. Rossi & G.T. Scarascia-Mugnozza, 1973. Trends and results of durum wheat mutation at G.T.Scarascia-Mugnozza(Ed.), Proceedings, Symposium on ‘Genetics and Breeding of Durum Wheat’, Bari, Italy, pp. 339–347.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bozzini, A. & G.T. Scarascia-Mugnozza, 1967. A dominant short-straw mutation induced by thermal neutrons in durum wheat. Wheat Inform Serv 23–24: 5–6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, J., B. Marchylo, M. Kovacs, J. Noll & T. McCaig, 1996. Screening of durum wheats for pasta quality: The Canadian system. In: Proceedings of the 5th International Wheat Conference’, Ankara. Abstract, pp. 233–234.

  • Cubadda, R. & M. Carcea, 1994. Evaluation of gluten strength in durum wheat and semolina by rapid methods. Italian Food Beverage Technol IV: 15–20.

  • D’Egidio, M.G., B.M. Mariani, S. Nardi, P. Novaro & R. Cubadda, 1990. Chemical and technological variables and their relationships: A predictive equation for pasta cooking quality. Cereal Chem 67: 275–281.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Cillis, E., 1927. I grani d’Italia. Tipografia della Camera dei Deputati, Roma, p. 173.

  • Evans, L.T., 1993. Processes, genes and yield potential. In: D.R. Buxton, R. Shibles R.A. Forsberg B.L. Blad, K.H. Asay G.M. Paulsen & R.F. Wilson(Eds.), International Crop Science I, CSSA, pp. 687–696.

  • Feil, B., 1992. Breeding progress in small grain cereals. A comparison of old and modern cultivars. Plant Breed 108: 1–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gale, M.D. & S. Youssefian, 1985. Dwarfing genes in wheat. Plant Breed, 1–36.

  • Grignac, P., 1965. Contribution à l’étude de Triticum durum Desf. Thése doctorat, Toulouse, p. 151.

  • Kirby, E.J.M., 1988. Analysis of leaf, stem and ear growth in wheat from terminal spikelet stage to anthesis. Field Crops Res 18: 127–140.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koc, M., C. Barutcular & N. Zencirci, 2000. Grain protein and grain yield of durum wheats from south-eastern Anatolia, Turkey. Aust J Agric Res 51: 665–671.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kramer, T., 1979. Environmental and genetic variation for protein content in winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Euphytica 28: 209–218.

    Google Scholar 

  • McNeal, F.H., M.A. Berg, P.L. Brown & C.F. Maguire, 1971. Productivity and quality response of five spring wheat genotypes, T. aestivum L., to nitrogen fertilizer. Agron J 58: 605–608.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mi, G., L. Tang, F. Zhang & J. Zhang, 2000. Is nitrogen uptake after anthesis in wheat regulated by sink size? Field Crops Res 68: 183–190.

    Google Scholar 

  • Milach, S.C.K. & L.C. Federizzi, 2001. Dwarfing genes in plant improvement. Adv Agron 73: 35–63.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nachit, M.M., 1992. Durum breeding for Mediterranean drylands of north Africa and west Asia. In: S. Rajaram, E.E.Saari & G.P. Hettel(Eds.), Durum Wheats: Challenges and Opportunities, pp. 14–27, CIMMYT Mexico, Ciudad Obregon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quinn, G.P. & M.J. Keough, 2002. Experimental Design and Data Analysis for Biologists. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to R. Motzo.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Motzo, R., Fois, S. & Giunta, F. Relationship between grain yield and quality of durum wheats from different eras of breeding. Euphytica 140, 147–154 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10681-004-2034-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10681-004-2034-5

Key words

Navigation