Skip to main content
Log in

Seeing by Feeling: Virtues, Skills, and Moral Perception

  • Published:
Ethical Theory and Moral Practice Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Champions of virtue ethics frequently appeal to moral perception: the notion that virtuous people can “see” what to do. According to a traditional account of virtue, the cultivation of proper feeling through imitation and habituation issues in a sensitivity to reasons to act. Thus, we learn to see what to do by coming to feel the demands of courage, kindness, and the like. But virtue ethics also claims superiority over other theories that adopt a perceptual moral epistemology, such as intuitionism – which John McDowell criticizes for illicitly “borrow[ing] the epistemological credentials” of perception. In this paper, I suggest that the most promising way for virtue ethics to use perceptual metaphors innocuously is by adopting a skill model of virtue, on which the virtues are modeled on forms of practical know-how. Yet I contend that this model is double-edged for virtue ethics. The skill model belies some central ambitions and dogmas of the traditional view, especially its most idealized claims about virtue and the virtuous. While this may be a cost that its champions are unprepared to pay, I suggest that virtue ethics would do well to embrace a more realistic moral psychology and a correspondingly less sublime conception of virtue.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Annas, J., Virtue Ethics, in D. Copp (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Ethical Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press, forthcoming.

  • Doris, J., Lack of Character: Personality and Moral Behavior. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dreyfus, H.L. and Dreyfus, S.E., What is Morality? A Phenomenological Account of the Development of Ethical Expertise, in D. Rasmussen (ed.), Universalism vs. Communitarianism: Contemporary Debates in Ethics. Cambridge: MIT Press, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elster, J., Norms of Revenge.Ethics 100 (1990), pp. 862–885.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lincoln-Kieser, R., Death Enmity in Thull.American Ethologist 13 (1986), pp. 500–501.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hursthouse, R., On Virtue Ethics. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hursthouse, R., Virtue Ethics, in E.N. Zalta (ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall 2003 Edition). < http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2003/entries/ethics-virtue/>.

  • McDowell, J., Mind, Value, and Reality. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mill, J.S., Civilization, in Dissertations and Discussions. Honolulu, Hawaii: University Press of the Pacific, 2002, pp. 130–167.

  • Stratton-Lake, P. (ed.), Ethical Intuitionism. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Daniel Jacobson.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Jacobson, D. Seeing by Feeling: Virtues, Skills, and Moral Perception. Ethic Theory Moral Prac 8, 387–409 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10677-005-8837-1

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10677-005-8837-1

Keywords

Navigation