Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Corporate dynamic transparency: the new ICT-driven ethics?

  • Original paper
  • Published:
Ethics and Information Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The term “corporate transparency” is frequently used in scholarly discussions of business ethics and corporate social responsibility (CSR); however, it remains a volatile and imprecise term, often defined incompletely as “information disclosure” accomplished through standardized reporting. Based on the results of empirical studies of organizational behaviors, this paper identifies a new set of managerial practices based on the use of information and communication technologies (ICT) and particularly Internet-based tools. These practices are resulting in what can be termed “dynamic transparency.” ICT allows for an informational environment characterized by two-way exchange between corporations and their stakeholders, which fosters a more collaborative marketplace. It is proposed that such dynamic information sharing, conducted by means of ICT, drives organizations to display greater openness and accountability, and more transparent operations, which benefit both the corporations and their constituents. One of the most important outcomes that will accrue to consumers and other individuals is the “right to know,” especially about corporate strategies and activities that might directly affect their quality of life. This paper demonstrates that dynamic transparency is more desirable and more effective than the more common “static transparency” where firms’ information disclosure is one-way, usually in response to government regulation. We present three ethical arguments to justify the implementation by business firms of dynamic transparency and demonstrate that their doing so is related to CSR and to augment and complement stakeholder engagement and dialogue. The paper concludes with a summary of the possible limits to and the problems involved in the implementation of dynamic transparency for corporations, and suggests some strategies to counter them.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Akerlof, G. A. (1970). The market for ‹Lemons’: Quality uncertainty and the market mechanism. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 84(3), 488–500.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Audi, R. (2008). Some dimensions of trust in business practices: From financial and product representation to licensure and voting. Journal of Business Ethics, 80(1), 97–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bushman, R., Piotroski, J., & Smith, A. J. (2004). What determines corporate transparency? Journal of Accounting Research, 42(2), 207–252.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bushman, R., & Smith, A. J. (2003). Transparency, financial accounting information, and corporate governance. Economic Policy Review, 9(1), 65–87.

    Google Scholar 

  • Capurro, R. (2005). Privacy. An intercultural perspective. Ethics and Information Technology, 7(1), 37–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cramer, J. (2003). Learning about corporate social responsibility: The Dutch experience, national initiative for sustainable development (NIDO). Amsterdam: IOS Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crane, A., & Matten, D. (2008). Business ethics. USA: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crane, A., McWilliams, A., Matten, D., Moon, J., & Siegel, D. (2008). The Oxford handbook of corporate social responsibility. USA: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dando, N., & Swift, T. (2003). Transparency and assurance: Minding the credibility gap. Journal of Business Ethics, 44(2–3), 195–200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Darlin, D. (2006) The last stand of the “6-percenters?”, The New York Times, September 3, p. 15.

  • Dellarocas, C. (2006). Strategic manipulation of internet opinion forums: Implications for consumers and firms. Management Science, 52(10), 1577–1593.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DiPiazza, S. A., & Eccles, R. G. (2002). Building public trust: The future of corporate reporting. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eggert, A., & Helm, S. (2003). Exploring the impact of relationship transparency on business relationship- a cross sectional study among purchasing managers in Germany. Industrial Marketing Management, 32(2), 101–108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Espinosa-Pizke, M. (1999). Business ethics and accounting information. An analysis of the Spanish code of best practice. Journal of Business Ethics, 22(3), 249–259.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fleischmann, K. R., & Wallace, W. A. (2005). A covenant with transparency: Opening the black box of models. Communications of the ACM, 48(5), 93–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frederick, W. (2006). Corporation, be good! the story of corporate social responsibility. Dog Ear Publishing, Inc: Indianapolis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fung, A., Graham, M., Weil, D. (2003). The political economy of transparency: What makes disclosure policies sustainable. Ash Institute for democratic governance and innovation, Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University, OPS-02-03.

  • Fung, A., Graham, M., & Weil, D. (2007). Full disclosure: The perils and promise of transparency. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fung, A., Graham, M., Weil, D., Fagotto E. (2004a). Transparency policies: Two possible futures. Alfred Taubman center for state and local government, Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University. Taubman Policy Brief PB-2007-1.

  • Fung, A., Graham, M., Weil, D., Fagotto, E. (2004b). The political economy of transparency: What makes disclosure policies effective?. Ash Institute for democratic governance and innovation, Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University, OPS-03-04.

  • Gemmill, G. (1996). Transparency and liquidity: A study of block trades on the london stock exchange under different publication rules. Journal of Finance, 51(5), 1765–1790.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giles, J. (2005). Special report: Internet encyclopedias go head to head. Nature, 438, 900–901.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gray, R. (2001). Thirty years of social accounting, reporting and auditing: What (if anything) have we learnt? Business Ethics: A European Review, 10(1), 9–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guy, S., & Simon, M. (1996). Transforming urban infrastructure provision—The emerging logic of demand side management. Policy Studies, 17(2), 137–147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hartmann, P., & Ibáñez, V. A. (2007). Managing customer loyalty in liberalized residential energy markets: The impact of energy branding”. Energy Policy, 35, 2661–2672.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henriques, A. (2001). Civil society and social auditing. Business Ethics: A European Review, 10, 40–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hess, D. (2007). Social reporting and new governance regulation: The prospects of achieving corporate accountability through transparency. Business Ethics Quarterly, 17(3), 453–476.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, D., & Mulvey, J. M. (1995). Accountability and computer decision systems. Communications of the ACM, 38(12), 58–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jonker, B., & Ziekemeyer, M. (2005). Wake up call—human resource management (HRM): An orientation on company models anticipating ageing. International Congress Series, 1280, 371–376.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaptein, M. (2004). Business codes of multinational firms: What do they say? Journal of Business Ethics, 50(1), 13–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaptein, M., & Van Tulder, R. (2003). Toward effective stakeholder dialogue. Business and Society Review, 108(2), 203–224.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leet, E. H., & Wallace, W. A. (1994). Society’s role in the ethics of modeling”. In W. A. Wallace (Ed.), Ethics in modeling. Tarrytown, NY: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lennerfors, T. T. (2007). The transformation of transparency–on the act on public procurement and the right to appeal in the context of the war on corruption. Journal of Business Ethics, 73(4), 381–390.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Markard, J., & Holt, E. (2003). Disclosure of electricity products—lessons from consumer research as guidance for energy policy. Energy Policy, 31(14), 1459–1474.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maskus, K. E. (2000). Intellectual property rights in the global economy. Washington: Institute for International Economics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mathews, M. R. (1995). Social and environmental accounting: A practical demonstration of ethical concern? Journal of Business Ethics, 14(8), 663–671.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matten, D., & Moon, J. (2008). “Implicit” and “Explicit” CSR: A conceptual framework for a comparative understanding of corporate social responsibility. Academy of Management Review, 33(2), 404–424.

    Google Scholar 

  • New York Times (2007). Whole Foods Chief Apologizes for Posts. Last access, October 11, 2007, from http://www.nytimes.com/2007/07/18/business/18whole.html?partner=rssnyt&emc=rss.

  • Online Etymological Dictionary (2007). Last access December 18,␣2007, from http://www.etymonline.com/index.php?search=transparent&searchmode=none.

  • Owen, D. L., & Swift, T. (2001). Introduction: Social accounting, reporting and auditing: Beyond the rhetoric. Business Ethics: A European Review, 10, 4–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Owen, D. L., Swift, T., Humphrey, T. C., & Bowerman, M. (2000). The new social audits: Accountability, managerial capture or the agenda of social champions? European Accounting Review, 9(1), 81–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Owen, D. L., Swift, T., & Hunt, K. (2001). Questioning the role of stakeholder engagement in social and ethical accounting, auditing and reporting. Accounting Forum, 25(3), 264–282.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pagano, B. (2004). The transparency edge. New York: Mc Graw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quaak, L., Theo, A., & John, G. (2007). Transparency of corporate social responsibility in Dutch breweries. Journal of Business Ethics, 76(3), 293–308.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rawls, J. (1971). A Theory of Justice. Cambridge, MA: The Belknap press of Harvard university press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Redfin (2008). How We’re Different. Last access on January 6, 2008, from http://www.redfin.com/stingray/do/how_different.

  • Schwartz, J. (2007). Transparency lost in the fog, The New York Times. Last access July 27, 2007, available at the http://www.nytimes.com/2007/04/08/business/yourmoney/08fog.html?ex=1333684800&en=4bb6b8922af61b02&ei=5088&partner=rssnyt&emc=rss.

  • Sison, A. J. G. (2001). Infomediarios: Campo de acción y valor (Infomediaries: Field of Action and Value) Iniciativa emprendedora y empresa familiar (Barcelona: Ediciones Deusto, S.A.), 27 (March-April), 24–28.

  • Soh, C., Markus, M. L., & Huat Goh, K. (2006). Electronic marketplaces and price transparency: Strategy, information technology, and success. MIS quarterly, 30(2), 705–723.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tanimoto, K., & Suzuki, K. (2005). Corporate social responsibility in Japan: Analysing the participating companies in global reporting initiative. Working Paper No. 208 Stockholm School of Economics, Sweden.

  • Tapscott, D., & Ticoll, D. (2003). The naked corporation. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, C. (2007). The see through CEO. Wired, 15(04). Last visit July 28, 2007, available at the http://www.wired.com/wired/archive/15.04/wired40_ceo.html.

  • Turilli, M., & Floridi, L. (2008). The ethics of information transparency. In A. Vaccaro, P. Madsen, & H. Horta (Eds.), Transparency and information and communication technologies: Social responsibility and accountability in business and education. Charlottesville, VA: Philosophical Documentation Center.

    Google Scholar 

  • Unerman, J., & Bennett, M. (2004). Increased stakeholder dialogue and the internet: Towards greater corporate accountability or reinforcing capitalist hegemony? Accounting, Organizations and Society, 29(7), 685–707.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vaccaro, A. (2006). Privacy, security and transparency: ICT-related ethical perspectives and contrasts in contemporary firms. In D. Howcroft, E. Trauth, & J. DeGross (Eds.), Social inclusion: Societal and organizational implications for information systems. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vaccaro, A., & Madsen, P. (2006). Firms’ information transparency: Ethical questions in the information age. In J. Berleur (Ed.), Social informatics: An information society for all?. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vaccaro, A., & Madsen, P. (2007). ICT. Non governmental organizations and transparency: Ethical concerns and perspectives. Proceedings of CEPE, 2007, 410–417.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vaccaro, A. & Madsen, P. (2009). ICT and an NGO: Difficulties in attempting to be extremely transparent. Forthcoming in Ethics and Information Technology. doi 10.1007/s10676-009-9180-3 (online first).

  • Vaccaro, A., Madsen, P., & Horta, H. (2008). Transparency and information and communication technologies: Social responsibility and accountability in business and education. Charlottesville, VA: Philosophy Documentation Center.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Buren III, H. J. (2001). If fairness is the problem, is consent the solution? integrating ISCT and stakeholder theory. Business Ethics Quarterly, 11(3), 481–499.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waddock, S. (2004). Creating corporate accountability: Foundational principles to make corporate citizenship real. Journal of Business Ethics, 50(4), 313–327.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weil, D., Fung, A., Graham, M., & Fagotto, E. (2006). The effectiveness of regulatory disclosure policies. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 25(1), 155–181.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, C. C. (2005). Trust diffusion: The effect of interpersonal trust on structure, function, and organizational transparency. Business & Society, 44(3), 357–368.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Engineering and Public Policy, Carnegie Mellon University, Baker Hall 131, Pittsburgh, PA, 15213, USA

    Antonino Vaccaro

  2. Center for Ethics Business and Economics, Catholic University of Portugal, Lisbon, Portugal

    Antonino Vaccaro

  3. Carnegie Mellon University, Baker Hall 161F, Pittsburgh, PA, 15213, USA

    Peter Madsen

Authors
  1. Antonino Vaccaro
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Peter Madsen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Antonino Vaccaro.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Vaccaro, A., Madsen, P. Corporate dynamic transparency: the new ICT-driven ethics?. Ethics Inf Technol 11, 113–122 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10676-009-9190-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10676-009-9190-1

Keywords

Search

Navigation