Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Transport of NOX Emissions from Sugarcane Fertilisation into the Great Barrier Reef Lagoon

  • Published:
Environmental Modeling & Assessment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The Great Barrier Reef World Heritage Area contains highly sensitive ecosystems that are threatened by the effects of anthropogenic activity including eutrophication. The nearby sugarcane plantations of tropical north Queensland are fertilised annually and there has been ongoing concern about the magnitude of the loss of applied nitrogen to the environment. Previous studies have considered the potential of rainwater run-off to deposit reactive nitrogen species into rivers and ultimately into the Great Barrier Reef Lagoon, but have neglected the possibility of transport via the atmosphere. This paper reports the results of a modelling study commissioned by Australia’s National Heritage Trust aimed at assessing whether or not atmospheric deposition of reactive nitrogen from Queensland’s sugarcane plantations posed a potential threat to the Great Barrier Reef Lagoon. Atmospheric dispersion modelling was undertaken using The Air Pollution Model, developed by Australia’s Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation. Despite the predominance of onshore southeasterly winds, the dispersion model results indicate that 9% of the time during the sugarcane fertilization season (in the modeled years 2001–2006) the meteorological conditions resulted in emissions from the coastal regions of north Queensland being transported out over the ocean around the Great Barrier Reef. The results suggest that there may be a greater efficiency for transport out over the reef during October than for November and December. For the 2 months that exhibited the greatest potential for transport of coastal pollution to the Great Barrier Reef, the modeled deposition of nitrogen oxides (NOX) into the Great Barrier Reef lagoon was less than 1% of the total emissions from the sugarcane plantations, but was not zero. Our model has a simple chemical scheme that does not cover the full chemistry of all reactive nitrogen compounds and so the results are only indicative of the potential levels of deposition. Nevertheless, our study shows that small amounts of NOX that originate from sugarcane fertilization may be transported and dry deposited into the Great Barrier Reef lagoon. Other pathways not included in the modeling scheme may provide a more efficient transport mechanism. Whilst modern practices for the application of fertilizer to sugarcane plantations have drastically reduced emissions, the potential efficiency of transport of pollutants via the atmosphere may be of concern for other more highly polluting agricultural industries.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Brodie, J. E., Mitchell A. W., (2004). Nutrients in Australian tropical rivers: changes with agricultural development and implications for receiving environments, paper presented at Sustainable Futures for Australias Tropical Rivers Conference, Darwin, Australia, Feb 01–03.

  2. Cooper, T. F., Uthicke, S., Humphrey, C., et al. (2007). Gradients in water column nutrients, sediment parameters, irradiance and coral reef development in the Whitsunday Region, central Great Barrier Reef. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science, 74(3), 458–470.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Haynes, D., Brodie, J., Waterhouse, J., et al. (2007). Assessment of the water quality and ecosystem health of the Great Barrier Reef (Australia): Conceptual models. Environmental Management, 40(6), 993–1003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Luick, J. L., Mason, L., Hardy, T., et al. (2007). Circulation in the Great Barrier Reef Lagoon using numerical tracers and in situ data. Continental Shelf Research, 27(6), 757–778.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Smith, J., Douglas, G. B., Radke, L. C., et al. (2008). Fitzroy River Basin, Queensland, Australia. III. Identification of sediment sources in the coastal zone. Environmental Chemistry, 5(3), 231–242.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Wooldridge, S., Brodie, J., & Furnas, M. (2006). Exposure of inner-shelf reefs to nutrient enriched runoff entering the Great Barrier Reef Lagoon: Post-European changes and the design of water quality targets. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 52(11), 1467–1479.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Devlin, M. J., and J. Brodie (2004) Terrestrial discharge into the Great Barrier Reef Lagoon: nutrient behavior in coastal waters, paper presented at Conference for Reef Research, Townsville, Australia,

  8. Alongi, D. M., & McKinnon, A. D. (2005). The cycling and fate of terrestrially-derived sediments and nutrients in the coastal zone of the Great Barrier Reef Shelf. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 51, 239–252.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Freney, J. R., Denmead, O. T., Wood, A. W., et al. (1992). Factors controlling ammonia loss from trash covered sugarcane fields fertilized with urea. Fertilizer Research, 31(3), 341–349.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Prammanee, P., Saffigna, P. G., Wood, A. W., et al. (1989), Loss of nitrogen from urea and ammonium sulphate applied to sugar cane crop residues, Proceedings of the Australian Society of Sugar Cane Technologists, edited. pp. 76–84.

  11. Prasertsak, P., Freney, J. R., Denmead, O. T., et al. (2002). Effect of fertilizer placement on nitrogen loss from sugarcane in tropical Queensland. Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems, 62, 229–239.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Freney, J. R., Denmead, O. T., Wood, A. W., Saffigna, P. G. (1994). Ammonia loss following urea addition to sugar cane trash blankets. Paper presented at Proceedings of Australian Society of Sugar Cane Technologists.

  13. Denmead, O. T., Chen, D., Griffith, D. W. T., et al. (2008). Emissions of the indirect greenhouse gases NH3and NOx from Australian beef cattle feedlots. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture, 48(1–2), 213–218.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Asman, W. A. H., & van Jaarsveld, J. A. (1992). A variable resolution transport model applied for NHx in Europe. Atmospheric Environment, 26A, 445–464.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Dragosits, U., Theobald, M. R., Place, C. J., et al. (2002). Ammonia emission, deposition and impact assessment at the field scale: a case study of sub-grid spatial variability. Environmental Pollution, 117, 147–158.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Fowler, D., Pitcairn, C. E. R., Sutton, M. A., et al. (1998). The mass budget of atmospheric ammonia in woodland within 1 km of livestock buildings. Enviromental Pollution, 102(S1), 343–348.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Sutton, M. A., Burkhardt, J. K., Guerin, D., et al. (1998). Development of resistance models to describe measurements of bi-directional ammonia surface–atmosphere exchange. Atmospheric Environment, 32, 473–480.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Asman, W. A. H., Sutton, M. A., & Schoerring, J. K. (1998). Ammonia emission, atmospheric transport and deposition. The New Phytologist, 139, 27–48.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Loubet, B., Asman, W. A. H., Theobald, M., et al. (2006). Ammonia deposition near hot spots: Processes, models and monitoring methods. Background document, in Working Group 3: UNECE Expert Workshop on Ammonia, edited, Edinburgh, UK

  20. Galperin, M. V., & Sofiev, M. A. (1998). The long-range transport of ammonia and ammonium in the northern hemisphere. Atmospheric Environment, 32, 373–380.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Pearson, J., & Stewart, G. R. (1993). Tansley Review no. 56. The deposition of atmospheric ammonia and its effects on plants. The New Phytologist, 125, 283–305.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Wilson, S. R., Naylor, T., Denmead, O. T., et al. (2008). Volatilised nitrogen losses from crops and agricultural practices to reduce losses. Report Griffith-NHT-2A, Australian Greenhouse Office.

  23. Macdonald, B. C. T., Denmead, O. T., White, I., et al. (2009). The missing nitrogen gases: emissions of indirect greenhouse gases from sugarcane agriculture, paper presented at Australian Society of Sugarcane Technologists.

  24. Hurley, P. J., Physick, W. L., & Luhar, A. K. (2005). TAPM: a practical approach to prognostic meteorological and air pollution modelling. Environmental Modelling and Software, 20(6), 737–752.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Edwards, M., Hurley, P., & Physick, W. (2004). Verification of TAPM meteorological predictions using sodar data in the Kalgoorlie region. Australian Meteorological Magazine, 53(1), 29–37.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Hurley, P. (2000). Verification of TAPM meteorological predictions in the Melbourne region for a winter and summer month. Australian Meteorological Magazine, 49(2), 97–107.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Hurley, P., Manins, P., Lee, S., et al. (2003). Year-long, high-resolution, urban airshed modelling: verification of TAPM predictions of smog and particles in Melbourne, Australia. Atmospheric Environment, 37(14), 1899–1910.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Hurley, P. J., Blockley, A., & Rayner, K. (2001). Verification of a prognostic meteorological and air pollution model for year-long predictions in the Kwinana industrial region of Western Australia. Atmospheric Environment, 35(10), 1871–1880.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Luhar, A. K., & Hurley, P. J. (2003). Evaluation of TAPM, a prognostic meteorological and air pollution model, using urban and rural point-source data. Atmospheric Environment, 37(20), 2795–2810.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Luhar, A. K., & Hurley, P. J. (2004). Application of a prognostic model TAPM to sea-breeze flows, surface concentrations, and fumigating plumes. Environmental Modelling and Software, 19(6), 591–601.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Wesely, M. L. (1989). Parameterization of surface resistances to gaseous dry deposition in regional-scale numerical models. Atmospheric Environment, 23(6), 1293–1304.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Harley, R. A., Russell, A. G., McRae, G. J., et al. (1993). Photochemical modeling of the Southern California Air-Quality Study. Environmental Science & Technology, 27(2), 378–388.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Devlin, M. J., & Brodie, J. (2005). Terrestrial dischsrge into the Great Barrier Reef Lagoon: nutrient behaviour in coastal waters. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 51, 9–22.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Denmead, T., Macdonald, B. C. T., Bryant, G. W., et al. (2005). Gaseous nitrogen losses from acid sulfate soils producing sugarcane on the coastal lowlands, paper presented at 27th Conference of the Australian Society of Sugar Cane Technologists. Bundaberg, Qld: Australian Society of Sugar Cane Technologists.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Veldkamp, E., & Keller, M. (1997). Fertilizer-induced nitric oxide emissions from agricultural soils. Nutrient Cycling In Agroecosystems, 48(1–2), 69–77.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Warneck, P. (2000). Chemistry of the natural atmosphere (2nd ed.). San Diego: Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Poor, N., Pribble, R., & Greening, H. (2001). Direct wet and dry deposition of ammonia, nitric acid, ammonium and nitrate to the Tampa Bay Estuary, FL, USA. Atmospheric Environment, 35(23), 3947–3955.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Dr. Martin Cope and Dr. Peter Hurley of CSIRO for their kind and helpful advice on the use of the TAPM model and the National Heritage Trust and Australian Greenhouse Office for funding this work.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Clare Paton-Walsh.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Paton-Walsh, C., Wilson, S.R., Naylor, T. et al. Transport of NOX Emissions from Sugarcane Fertilisation into the Great Barrier Reef Lagoon. Environ Model Assess 16, 441–452 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10666-011-9260-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10666-011-9260-8

Keywords

Navigation