Abstract
This paper reports a numerical study on dam-break waves over movable beds. A one-dimensional (1-D) model is built upon the Saint-Venant equations for shallow water waves, the Exner equation of sediment mass conservation and a spatial lag equation for non-equilibrium sediment transport. The set of governing equations is solved using an explicit finite difference scheme. The model is tested in various idealized experimental cases, with fairly good agreement between the numerical predictions and measurements. Discrepancies are observed at the earlier stage of the dam-break wave and around the dam location due to no vertical velocity component being taken into account. Sensitivity tests confirm that the friction coefficient is an important parameter for the evaluation of sediment transport processes operating during a dam-break wave. The influence of the non-equilibrium adaptation length (or the lag distance) is negligible on the wavefront celerity and weak on the free surface and bed profiles, which indicates that one may ignore the spatial lag effect in dam-break wave studies. Finally, the simulation of the Lake Ha!Ha! dyke-break flood event shows that the model can provide relevant results if a convenient formula for computing the sediment transport capacity and an appropriate median grain diameter of riverbed material are selected.
Similar content being viewed by others
Abbreviations
- A :
-
Wetted area
- A b :
-
Cross-sectional area
- B :
-
Channel width at the free surface
- BSS :
-
Brier Skill Score (Eq. 19)
- C :
-
Conveyance (Eq. 4)
- C r :
-
Courant number
- c :
-
Celerity= \(\sqrt{gA/B}\)
- D char :
-
Lag distance
- D 50 :
-
Particle size for which 50% of the sediment is finer by weight).
- F :
-
Flux vector= \(\left[{\begin{array}{l} Q\\ \frac{Q^{2}}{A}+g I_1 \end{array}}\right]\)
- g :
-
Gravitational acceleration
- h :
-
Flow depth
- h0, hw,u, hs,u:
-
Water head, flow depth and initial bottom step in the upstream reach
- h w,d :
-
Flow depth in the downstream reach
- I 1 :
-
Hydrostatic pressure force (Eq. 3a)
- I 2 :
-
Pressure force due to longitudinal width variation (Eq. 3b)
- J :
-
Energy slope
- K :
-
Manning–Strickler coefficient for flow resistance calculations (Eq. 4)
- p :
-
Porosity of bed deposit
- Q :
-
Flow discharge
- Q s :
-
Volumetric sediment discharge
- \(Q_s^{cap}\) :
-
Volumetric sediment transport capacity discharge
- \(Q_s^{dep},\, Q_s^{ero},\, Q_s^{I_n},\, Q_s^{O_u} \cdot Q_s^{tra}\) :
-
Sediment fluxes (Eqs. 8 to 10)
- R h :
-
Hydraulic radius
- S :
-
Source term= \(\left[{\begin{array}{l} 0\\ -gA\frac{\partial z_b}{\partial x}-gA \frac{Q\left| Q \right|}{C^{2}} +g I_2 \end{array}}\right]\)
- t :
-
Time
- t 0 :
-
Characteristic time for dam-break wave propagation = \(\sqrt{h_0/g}\)
- U :
-
Conservative hydraulic variables= \(\left[{\begin{array}{l} A\\Q \end{array}}\right]\)
- V b :
-
Bedload velocity assumed equal to the mean flow velocity
- x :
-
Longitudinal distance
- z b :
-
Bed elevation
- ΔA b :
-
Change in the cross-sectional area due to deposition or scour
- Δt :
-
Time step
- Δx :
-
Space step
- \(\delta_i^n\) :
-
Slope of Q (or A) defined by Eq. 12
- \(\delta_{i(1)}^n,\, \delta_{i(2)}^n, \,\delta_{i(3)}^n\) :
-
Parameters in Eq. 12
- κ :
-
Parameter in Eq. 12
- ρ :
-
Density of water
- ρ s :
-
Density of the sediment
- τ :
-
Bottom shear stress = ρ gRJ
- τ 0 :
-
Shields number= \(\frac{\tau}{g({\rho_s -\rho})D_{50}}.\)
- τ 0,cr :
-
Critical Shields number
- χ :
-
Parameter in Eq. 12
References
Ackers P and White WR (1973). Sediment transport: new approach and analysis. J Hydr Div 99(11): 2041–2060
Armanini A and Silvio G (1988). A one-dimensional model for the transport of a sediment mixture in non-equilibrium conditions. J Hydr Res 26(3): 275–295
Balayn P (2001) Contribution à la modélisation numérique de l’évolution morphologique des cours d’eau aménagés lors de crues. Dissertation, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1
Bell RG, Sutherland AJ (1983) Non-equilibrium bed-load transport by steady flows. J Hydr Eng 109(3):351–367.20.
Belleudy P (2001). Numerical simulation of sediment mixture deposition part 2: a sensitivity analysis. J Hydr Res 39(1): 25–1
Bennet JP and Nordin CF (1977). Simulation of sediment transport and armouring. Hydrol Science Bull 112(4): 555–569
Brooks GR and Lawrence DE (1999). The drainage of the Lake Ha!Ha! reservoir and downstream geomorphic impacts along Ha!Ha! River, Saguenay area, Quebec, Canada. Geomorphology 28: 141–168
Cao Z and Carling PA (2001). Mathematical modelling of alluvial rivers: reality and myth. Part I: general review. Water and Marit Eng 154(3): 207–219
Cao Z, Day R and Egashira S (2002). Coupled and decoupled numerical modeling of flow and morphological evolution in alluvial rivers. J Hydr Eng 128(3): 306–321
Cao Z, Pender G, Wallis S and Carling PA (2004). Computational dam-break hydraulics over erodible sediment bed. J Hydr Eng 130(7): 689–703
Capart H and Young DL (1998). Formation of a jump by the dam-break wave over a granular bed. J Fluid Mech 372: 165–187
Capart H (2000) Dam-break induced geomorphic flows. Dissertation, Université Catholique de Louvain-La-Neuve
Capart H, Spinwine B, Young DL, Zech Y, Brooks GR, Leclerc M and Secretan Y (2007). The 1996 Lake Ha! Ha! breakout flood, Québec: test data for geomorphic flood routing methods. J Hydr Res 45(Extra Issue): 97–109
Chen YH and Simons DB (1979). An experimental study of hydraulic and geomorphic changes in an alluvial channel induced by failure of a dam. Water Resour Res 15: 1183–1188
Correia L, Krishnappan BG and Graf WH (1992). Fully coupled unsteady mobile boundary flow model (FCM). J Hydr Eng 118(3): 476–494
Costabile P, Macchione F (2006) One dimensional modeling of dam break flow over erodible sediment bed. In: Ferreira RML, Alves EC, Leal JGAB, Cardoso AM (eds) Proceedings of river flow 2006, Lisbon, 2006
Costabile P, Costanzo C, Macchione F (2007) Numerical simulation of 2D dam break wave on erodible sediment bed. In: Di Silvio G, Lanzoni S (eds) Proceedings of the 32nd IAHR congress, Venise, 2007
Davies AG, Van Rijn LC, Damgaard JS, Ribberink JS and Graaff J (2002). Intercomparison of research and practical sand transport models. Coastal Eng 46: 1–23
Daubert A, Lebreton JC (1967) Etude expérimentale sur modèle mathématique de quelques aspects des processus d’érosion des lits alluvionnaires, en régime permanent et non-permanent. Proceedings of the 12th IAHR congress, Fort Collins, 1967
El Kadi Abderrezzak K (2006) Evolution d’un lit de rivière en fonction des apports. Dissertation, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1
Ferreira RML, Leal JGAB (1998) 1D mathematical modelling of the instantaneous dam-break flood wave over mobile bed: application of TVD and flux-splitting schemes. Paper presented at the meeting of the European concerted action on dam-break modelling (CADAM), Universität der Bunderswehr München, 8–9 October 1998 Available via http://www.hrwallingford.co.uk/projects/CADAM/CADAM/index.html
Ferreira RML, Leal JGAB, Cardoso AH, Almeida, AB (2003) Sediment transport by dam-break flows. A conceptual framework Drawn from the theories for rapid granular flows. Paper presented at the 3rd IMPACT workshop, Université Catholique de Louvain-la-Neuve, Louvain-La-Neuve, 5–7 November 2003. Available via http://www.impact-project.net
Ferreira RML, Leal JGAB, Cardoso AH, Almeida, AB (2004) Lake Ha!Ha! case study: mathematical model and results. Oral presentation at the 4th IMPACT workshop, University of Zaragoza, Zaragoza, 3–5 November 2004 (CD-ROM)
Ferreira RML, Leal JGAB, Cardoso AH (2005) Mathematical modelling of the morphodynamic aspects of the 1996 flood in the Ha! Ha! River. In: Jun BH, Lee SI, Seo IW, Choi GW (eds) Proceedings of the 31st IAHR congress, Seoul, 2005
Fraccarollo L and Toro EF (1995). Experimental and numerical assessment of the shallow water model for two-dimensional dam-break type problems. J Hydr Res 33(6): 843–864
Fraccarollo L, Armanini A (1998) A semi-analytical solution for the dam-break problem over a movable bed. Paper presented at the Meeting of the European Concerted Action on Dam-Break Modelling (CADAM), Universität der Bunderswehr München, 8–9 October 1998. Available via http://www.hrwallingford.co.uk/projects/CADAM/CADAM/index.html
Fraccarollo L and Capart H (2002). Riemann wave descriptions of erosional dam-break flows. J Fluid Mech 461: 183–228
Fraccarollo L, Capart H and Zech Y (2003). A Godunov method for the computation of erosional shallow water transient. Inter J Num Meth in Fluids 41(9): 951–976
Fraccarollo L, Giuliani M, Rosatti G (2004) CUDAM Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering University of Trento. Oral presentation at the 4th IMPACT workshop, University of Zaragoza, Zaragoza, 3–5 November 2004 (CD-ROM)
Guo J and Jin Y (1999). Modeling sediment transport using depth-averaged and moment equations. J Hydr Eng 125(12): 1262–1269
Holly FM and Rahuel JL (1990). New numerical/physical framework for mobile-bed modelling. Part 1: numerical and physical principles. J Hydr Res 28(4): 401–415
IMPACT Project (2004) EC Contract EVG1-CT-2001-00037 Investigation of extreme flood Processes and Uncertainty. Available via http://www.impact-project.net
INRS-Eau (1997) Simulation hydrodynamique et bilan sédimentaire des rivières Chicoutimi et Ha!Ha! lors des crues exceptionnelles de juillet 1996. INRS-Eau, Quebec
Lapointe MF, Secretan Y, Driscoll SN, Bergeron N and Leclerc M (1998). Response of the Ha! Ha! River to the flood of July 1996 in the Saguenay Region of Quebec: Large-scale avulsion in a glaciated valley. Water Resour Res 34(9): 2383–2392
Leal JGAB, Ferreira RML, Cardoso AH, Almeida AB (2003) Overview of IST Group Results on the Sediment Benchmark. Paper presented at the 3rd IMPACT workshop, Université Catholique de Louvain-la-Neuve, Louvain-La-Neuve, 5–7 November 2003. Available via http://www.impact-project.net
Leal JGAB, Ferreira RML and Cardoso AH (2006). Dam-break wave-front celerity. J Hydr Eng 132(1): 69–76
Le Grelle N, Soares-Frazao S, Spinewine B, Zech Y (2003) Dam-break flow experiment : geomorphic changes in a valley with uniform sediment. Paper presented at the 3rd IMPACT workshop, Université Catholique de Louvain-la-Neuve, Louvain-La-Neuve, 5–7 November 2003. Available via http://www.impact-project.net
Lyn DA (1987). Unsteady sediment transport modelling. J Hydr Eng 113(1): 16–28
Mahdi T and Marche C (2003). Prévision par modélisation numérique de la zone de risque bordant un tronçon de rivière subissant une crue exceptionnelle. Canadian J Civil Eng 30(3): 568–579
Meyer-Peter E, Müller R (1948) Formulas for bed-load transport. Proceedings of the 2nd IAHR congress, Stockholm, 1948
Mingham CG and Causon DM (1998). High-resolution finite-volume method for shallow water flows. J Hydr Eng 124(6): 605–614
Muramoto Y (1987) Water and sediment outflow from a reservoir by dam collapse. In: White WR (ed) Proceedings of the 22nd IAHR congress, Lausanne, 1987
Phillips BC and Sutherland AJ (1989). Spatial lag effects in bed load sediment transport. J Hydr Res 27(1): 115–133
Rahuel JL, Holly FM, Chollet JP, Belleudy P and Yang G (1989). Modeling of riverbed evolution for bedload sediment mixtures. J Hydr Eng 115(11): 1521–1542
Rickenmann D (1994) An alternative equation for the mean velocity in gravel-bed rivers and mountain torrents. In: Cotroneo GV, Rumer RR (eds) Proceedings of the National Conference on Hydraulic Engineering, Buffalo N.Y, 1994
Roe PL (1981). Approximate Riemann solvers, parameter vectors and difference schemes. J Comp Phys 43: 357–372
Saiedi S (1997). Coupled modeling of alluvial flows. J Hydr Eng 123(5): 440–446
Spinewine B, Zech Y (2002) Dam-break waves over movable beds: a flat bed test case. Paper presented at the 2nd IMPACT workshop, Statkraft Grøner, Mo-i-Rana, 12–13 September 2002. Available via http://www.impact-project.net
Spinewine B, Zech Y (2003) Dam-break waves on a movable bed: A test case exploring different bed materials and an initial bed discontinuity. Paper presented at the 3rd IMPACT workshop, Université Catholique de Louvain-la-Neuve, Louvain-La-Neuve, 5–7 November 2003. Available via http://www.impact-project.net
Spinewine B (2005) Two-layer flow behaviour and the effects of granular dilatancy in dam-break induced sheet-flow. Dissertation, Université Catholique de Louvain-La-Neuve
Spinewine B and Zech Y (2007). Small-scale laboratory dam-break waves on movable beds. J Hydr Res 45(Extra Issue): 73–86
Sutherland J (2004) COSMOS modelling and the development of model performance statistics. Report, HRWallingford, United Kingdom
VanLeer B (1979). Towards the ultimate conservative difference scheme. V. A second-order sequel to Godunov’s method. J Comp Phys 32: 101–136
Van Rijn LC, Walstra DJR (2003) Morphology of pits, channels and trenches; Part I: literature review and study approach. Report, WL|Delft Hydraulics, Netherlands
Wu W and Wang SSY (2007). One-dimensional modeling of dam-break flow over movable beds. J Hydr Eng 133(1): 48–58
Yang CT, Greimann BP (1999) Dam-break unsteady flow and sediment transport. Paper presented at the meeting of the European concerted action on dam-break modelling (CADAM), University of Zaragoza, Zaragoza, 18–19 November 1999. Available via http://www.hrwallingford.co.uk/projects/CADAM/CADAM/index.html
Zech Y, Soares-Frazao S, Spinewine B, Le Grelle N, Armanini A, Fraccarrollo L, Larcher M, Fabrizi R, Guiliani M, Paquier A, El Kadi Abderrezzak K, Ferreira RML, Leal JGAB, Cardoso AH, Almeida AB (2004) Sediment movement model development. In: Association of state dam safety officials (ed) Proceedings of the dam safety 2004 conference, Phoenix, 2004
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
El Kadi Abderrezzak, K., Paquier, A. & Gay, B. One-dimensional numerical modelling of dam-break waves over movable beds: application to experimental and field cases. Environ Fluid Mech 8, 169–198 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10652-008-9056-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10652-008-9056-9