Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Exploring one student’s explanations at different ages: the case of Sharon

  • Published:
Educational Studies in Mathematics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study describes the types of explanations one student, Sharon, gives and prefers at different ages. Sharon is interviewed in the second grade regarding multiplication of one-digit numbers, in the fifth grade regarding even and odd numbers, and in the sixth grade regarding equivalent fractions. In the tenth grade, she revisits each of these concepts again. The study investigates the different forms Sharon’s explanations take at different ages as well as how she perceives the nature of mathematical explanations at different ages. Sharon’s explanations are also used to investigate her conceptualization of the number zero, a concept which runs across the curriculum at different ages. Finally, the study explores a method for investigating the long-term mathematical development of one student. Implications for future research are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Achinstein, P. (1983). The nature of explanation. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anthony, G., & Walshaw, M. (2004). Zero: A “none” number? Teaching Children Mathematics, 11(1), 38–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Balacheff, N. (2010). Bridging knowing and proving in mathematics: A didactical perspective. In G. Hanna, H. N. Jahnke, & H. Pulte (Eds.), Explanation and proof in mathematics: Philosophical and educational perspectives (pp. 115–136). New York: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Ball, D. (1990). Prospective elementary and secondary teachers’ understanding of division. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 21(2), 132–144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ball, D., & Bass, H. (2000). Making believe: The collective construction of public mathematical knowledge in the elementary classroom. In D. Phillips (Ed.), Yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education, constructivism in education (pp. 193–224). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Board of Studies NSW (2006). Mathematics K-6 syllabus. Retrieved February 5, 2010 from http://k6.boardofstudies.nsw.edu.au/files/maths/k6_maths_syl.pdf

  • De Villiers, M. (1990). The role and function of proof in mathematics. Pythagoras, 24, 17–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dreyfus, T. (1999). Why Johnny can’t prove. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 38(1–3), 85–109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eynde, P., De Corte, E., & Verschaffel, L. (2006). Epistemic dimensions of students’ mathematics-related belief system. International Journal of Educational Research, 45(1–2), 57–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fischbein, E. (1987). Intuition in science and mathematics. Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Reidel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freudenthal, H. (1991). Revisiting mathematics education. Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Kluwer Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanna, G. (1989). More than formal proof. For the Learning of Mathematics, 9(1), 20–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanna, G. (2000). Proof, explanation and exploration: An overview. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 44, 5–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Healy, L., & Hoyles, C. (2000). A study of proof conceptions in algebra. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 31(4), 396–428.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Israel National Mathematics Curriculum (2006). Retrieved December 10, 2009, from http://cms.education.gov.il

  • Krummheuer, G. (1995). The ethnography of argumentation. In P. Cobb & H. Bauersfeld (Eds.), The emergence of mathematical meaning: Interaction in classroom cultures (pp. 229–269). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krummheuer, G. (2000). Mathematics learning in narrative classroom cultures: Studies of argumentation in primary mathematics education. For the Learning of Mathematics, 20(1), 22–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lampert, M. (1990). When the problem is not the question and the solution is not the answer. American Educational Research Journal, 27(1), 29–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levenson, E. (2010). Fifth grade students’ use and preferences for mathematically and practically based explanations. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 73(2), 121–142.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levenson, E., Tirosh, D., & Tsamir, P. (2009). Students’ perceived sociomathematical norms: The missing paradigm. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 28, 83–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levenson, E., Tsamir, P., & Tirosh, D. (2007). First and second graders’ use of mathematically-based and practically-based explanations for multiplication with zero. Focus on Learning Problems in Mathematics, 29(2), 21–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Linchevsky, L., & Williams, J. (1999). Using intuition from everyday life in ‘filling’ the gap in children’s extension of their number concept to include the negative numbers. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 39, 131–147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maher, C., & Martino, A. (1996). The development of the idea of mathematical proof: A 5-year case study. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 27(2), 194–214.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mancosu, P. (2008). Explanation in mathematics. In E. Zalta (Ed.), The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy. Retrieved July 2, 2010 from http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2008/entries/mathematics-explanation/

  • Mueller, M. (2009). The co-construction of arguments by middle-school students. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 28, 138–149.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: NCTM.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nunokawa, K. (2010). Proof, mathematical problem-solving, and explanation in mathematics teaching. In G. Hanna, H. N. Jahnke, & H. Pulte (Eds.), Explanation and proof in mathematics: Philosophical and educational perspectives (pp. 223–236). New York: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Pogliani, L., Randic, M., & Trinajstic, N. (1998). Much ado about nothing—an introductive inquiry about zero. International Journal of Mathematics Education in Science and Technology, 29(5), 729–744.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seife, C. (2000). Zero: The biography of a dangerous idea. New York: Viking Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tall, D. (2004). Thinking through three worlds of mathematics. In M. Hoines & A. Fuglestad (Eds.), Proceedings of the 28th conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (Vol. 4, pp. 281–288). Bergen, Norway: PME.

  • Tsamir, P., Sheffer, R., & Tirosh, D. (2000). Intuitions and undefined operations: The case of division by zero. Focus on Learning Problems in Mathematics, 22(1), 1–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Fraassen, B. (1980). The scientific image. Oxford: Clarendon.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Vinner, S. (1991). The role of definitions in the teaching and learning of mathematics. In D. Tall (Ed.), Advanced mathematical thinking. Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watson, A., & Mason, J. (2005). Mathematics as a constructive activity: Learners generating examples. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, P. (2001). Zero: A special case. Mathematics Teaching in the Middle School, 6(5), 300–303, 308–309.

  • Yackel, E. (2001). Explanation, justification and argumentation in mathematics classrooms. In M. Van den Heuvel-Panhuizen (Ed.), Proceedings of the 25th conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education PME-25, (Vol. 1, pp. 1–9). Utrecht, the Netherlands: PME.

  • Yackel, E., & Cobb, P. (1996). Sociomathematical norms, argumentation, and autonomy in mathematics. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 22, 390–408.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yackel, E., Cobb, P., & Wood, T. (1998). The interactive constitution of mathematical meaning in one second grade classroom: An illustrative example. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 17, 469–488.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zazkis, R., & Chernoff, E. J. (2008). What makes a counterexample exemplary? Educational Studies in Mathematics, 68(3), 195–208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel

    Esther Levenson

Authors
  1. Esther Levenson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Esther Levenson.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Levenson, E. Exploring one student’s explanations at different ages: the case of Sharon. Educ Stud Math 83, 181–203 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-012-9447-1

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-012-9447-1

Keywords

Search

Navigation