Abstract
This paper investigates the role of tools in the formation of mathematical practices and the construction of mathematical meanings in the setting of a telecommunication organization through the actions undertaken by a group of technicians in their working activity. The theoretical and analytical framework is guided by the first-generation activity theory model and Leont’ev’s work on the three-tiered explanation of activity. Having conducted a 1-year ethnographic research study, we identified, classified, and correlated the tools that mediated the technicians’ activity, and we studied the mathematical meanings that emerged. A systemic network was generated, presenting the categories of tools such as mathematical (communicative, processes, and concepts) and non-mathematical (physical and written texts). This classification was grounded on data from three central actions of the technicians’ activity, while the constant interrelation and association of these tools during the working process addressed the mathematical practices and supported the construction of mathematical meanings that this group developed from the researchers’ perspective. Technicians’ emerging mathematical meanings referred to place value, spatial, and algebraic relations and were expressed through personal algorithms and metaphorical and metonymic reasoning. Finally, the educational implications of the findings are discussed.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bessot, A. (2000). Visibility of mathematical objects present in professional practice. In A. Bessot & J. Ridgway (Eds.), Education for mathematics in the workplace. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Bliss, J. M., Monk, M., & Ogborn, J. (1983). Qualitative data analysis for educational research. London: Croom Helm.
Carson, M., & Bloom, I. (2005). The cyclic nature of problem solving: An emergent multidimensional, problem-solving framework. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 58, 45–75.
Daniels, H. (2001). Vygotsky and pedagogy. London: Routledge Falmer.
Duval, R. (2006). A cognitive analysis of problems of comprehension in a learning of mathematics. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 61(1/2), 103–131. Semiotic Perspectives in Mathematics Education: A PME Special Issue (2006).
Eisenhart, M. (1988). The ethnographic research tradition and mathematics education research. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 19(2), 99–114.
Evans, J. (1999). Building bridges: Reflections on the problem of transfer of learning in mathematics. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 39, 23–44.
Gray, E., & Tall, D. (1994). Duality, ambiguity, and flexibility: A “proceptual” view of simple arithmetic. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 25(2), 116–140.
Hoyles, C., Noss, R., & Pozzi, S. (2001). Proportional reasoning in nursing practice. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 32(1), 4–27.
Jaworski, B., & Potari, D. (2009). Bridging the micro- and the macro-divide: Using an activity theory model to capture sociocultural complexity in mathematics teaching and its development. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 72(2), 219–236.
Jurdak, M. (2006). Contrasting perspectives and performance of high school students on problem solving in real world, situated, and school contexts. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 63(3), 283–301.
Jurdak, M., & Shahin, I. (2001). Problem solving activity in the workplace and the school: The case of constructing solids. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 47(3), 297–315.
Leont’ev, A. N. (1978). Activity, consciousness, and personality. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.
Magajna, Z., & Monaghan, J. (2003). Advanced mathematical thinking in a technological workplace. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 52(2), 101–122.
Masingila, J. O., Davidenko, S., & Prus-Wisniowska, E. (1996). Mathematics learning in and out of school: A framework for connecting these experiences. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 31, 175–200.
Mayring, P. (2000). Qualitative content analysis [28 paragraphs]. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung/Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 1(2), Art. 20. http://nbnresolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0114-fqs0002204.
Mellin-Olsen, S. (1987). The politics of mathematics education. Dordrecht: Reidel.
Millroy, W. (1992). An ethnographic study of the mathematics ideas of a group of carpenters. In C. Brown et al. (Eds.), Journal for research in mathematics education (monograph no. 5). Reston: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
Noss, R. (2002). Mathematical epistemologies at work. For the Learning of Mathematics, 22(2), 2–13.
Noss, R., & Hoyles, C. (1996). The visibility of meanings: Modelling the mathematics of banking. International Journal of Computers for Mathematical Learning, 1, 3–31.
Noss, R., Pozzi, S., & Hoyles, C. (1999). Touching epistemologies: Meanings of average and variation in nursing practice. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 40(1), 25–51.
Noss, R., Hoyles, C., & Pozzi, S. (2000). Working knowledge: Mathematics in use. In A. Bessot & J. Ridgway (Eds.), Education for mathematics in the workplace. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Noss, R., Hoyles, C., & Pozzi, S. (2002). Abstraction in expertise: A study of nurses. Conceptions of concentration. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 33(3), 204–229.
Nunes, T., Schliemann, A., & Carraher, D. (1993). Street mathematics and school mathematics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Pozzi, S., Noss, R., & Hoyles, C. (1998). Tools in practice, mathematics in use. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 36(2), 105–122.
Presmeg, N. C. (1992). Prototypes, metaphors, metonymies and imaginative rationality in high school mathematics. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 23(6), 595–610.
Roth, W. M. (2005). Mathematical inscriptions and the reflexive elaboration of understanding: An ethnography of graphing and numeracy in a fish hatchery. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 7(2), 75–110.
Sfard, A. (2001). There is more to discourse than meets the ears: Looking at thinking as communicating to learn more about mathematical learning. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 46, 13–57.
Simon, M. A. (1996). Beyond inductive and deductive reasoning: The search for a sense of knowing. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 30(2), 197–210.
Straesser, R. (2000). Mathematical means and models from vocational contexts—a German perspective. In A. Bessot & J. Ridgway (Eds.), Education for mathematics in the workplace. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Triantafillou, C., & Potari, D. (2006). Mathematical activity in a technological workplace: Results from an ethnographic study. In H. Novotna, M. Kratka, & N. Stehlikova (Eds.), Proceedings of the 30th conference of the international group for the psychology of mathematics education, vol. 3 (pp. 297–304). Prague: Charles University.
Triantafillou, C., & Potari, D. (2008). Students’ interpretations of authentic representations of a function in the workplace. In Figueras, O. Cortina, J. Alatorre, S. Rojano & T. Sepulveda, A. (Eds.), Proceedings of the 32nd Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (vol. 4, pp. 329–336). Morelia.
Van Oers, B. (2001). Educational forms of initiation in mathematical culture. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 46, 59–85.
Vygotsky, L. (1981). The development of higher forms of attention. In J. Wertsch & M. E. Sharpe (Eds.), The concept of activity in soviet psychology (pp. 189–240). New York: Armonk.
Wedege, T. (2000). Mathematics knowledge as a vocational qualification. In A. Bessot & J. Ridgway (Eds.), Education for mathematics in the workplace. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Wedege, T. (2002). Numeracy as a basic qualification in semi-skilled jobs. For the Learning of Mathematics, 22(3), 23–28.
Williams, J. S., & Wake, G. D. (2007a). Black boxes in workplace mathematics. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 64(3), 317–343.
Williams, J. S., & Wake, G. D. (2007b). Metaphors and models in translation between college and workplace mathematics. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 64(3), 345–371.
Zevenbergen, R. (2000). Research methods for mathematics at work. In A. Bessot & J. Ridgway (Eds.), Education for mathematics in the workplace. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Acknowledgments
This manuscript is based on the first author’s dissertation research in the Education Department at the University of Patras. The authors wish to thank Jeff Evans for his insights and suggestions and all the anonymous reviewers for making positive and useful comments on earlier versions of this manuscript. Finally, we are grateful to all the technicians in the Greek Telecommunication Organization for giving us the chance to carry out this research.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Triantafillou, C., Potari, D. Mathematical practices in a technological workplace: the role of tools. Educ Stud Math 74, 275–294 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-010-9237-6
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-010-9237-6