Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Private returns to education in urban China

  • Published:
Economic Change and Restructuring Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The paper examines the marginal returns of education in China for 4 years covering the period 1989–2000. We find, in common, with others that such returns were small in 1989 and 1993, but have increased steadily since 1993. We also find that the returns for women exceed those for men and go some way to reducing the gender earnings gap. Crucially, however, the returns to education decline with the length of time since the individual left school which is consistent with the hypothesis that education enhances ability and skills which in turn enhances earnings, but that the value of such skills deteriorates over time. Finally we find evidence for gravity effects by which earnings decline with distance from Beijing, and more noticeably, Shanghai.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Some studies also include occupations in the wage function. It seems likely that occupations and wages are jointly determined, in other words, simultaneity may exist between them. Moreover, a high degree of multicollinearity exists between schooling and occupation (Li 2003). Psacharopoulos and Patrinos (2004) also argued that the inclusion of occupation in the Mincer’s earnings function leads to stealing part of the effect of education on earnings that comes from occupational mobility.

  2. There exists the possibility that education both augments and signals individual productivity based on weak screening hypothesis (see e.g., Brown and Sessions 1998). Thus our hypothesis (1) indicates the primary role of education is to augment marginal productivity.

  3. Here we incorporate the assumption by Riley (1979) and Farber and Gibbons (1996) that the return to an educational signal is constant over time. They argued that a basic condition for a signalling equilibrium is that employers find out that their predictions based on the education signals are correct on average, thus the return to an educational signal is constant over time.

  4. The estimated change in earnings Y i for individual i is calculated by (\( {\text{e}}^{{\beta_{1i} }} - 1 \)).

  5. This shows that returns are usually higher for females, in other countries; see Psacharopoulos and Patrinos (2004) and Dougherty (2005).

  6. However, the two variables are jointly significant at the 1% level. In addition, when the regression was re-estimated with squared experience omitted, experience per se was positively significant.

  7. This may partially reflect a declining impact of seniority and an increasing role for market forces, but it may also reflect changes in the system of subsidies, e.g. the appearance of the accommodation or housing subsidy subsidy. This cash subsidy replaced in kind housing subsidies and were meant to facilitate urban residents’ abilities to meet their housing needs in the open market (Lee and Zhu 2006).

  8. Breusch-Pagan Lagrangian multiplier.

  9. This is different to the argument that experience becomes relatively more important in later working life and schooling relatively less important, This is reflected in the significance of experience in the regressions. But we argue that in addition to this, skills learnt in formal education become less useful over time in a technically changing environment.

References

  • Becker GS (1964) Human capital, 2nd edn. National Bureau of Economic Research, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Borolotti B, Fantini M, Sinisalco D (2004) Privatisation around the world: evidence from panel data. J Public Econ 88:305–322

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brooks R, Tao R (2003) China’s labour market performance and challenges. IMF Working Paper No. 03/210, Asia and Pacific Department, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown S, Sessions JG (1998) Education, employment status and earnings: a comparative test of the strong screening hypothesis. Scot J Polit Econ 45(5):586–591

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buch CM, Kleinert M, Toubal F (2004) The distance puzzle: on the interpretation of the distance coefficient in gravity equations. Econ Lett 83:293–298

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Byron R, Manaloto E (1990) Returns to education in China. Econ Dev Cult Change 38(4):783–796

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campos NF, Jolliffe D (2003) After, before, and during: returns to education in Hungary (1986–1998). Econ Syst 27(4):377–390

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Card DE (1999) The causal effect of education on earnings. Handbook of labour economics 3(A): 1801–1863. In: Ashenfelter OC, Card DE (eds) Amsterdam, North-Holland

  • Chase RS (1998) Markets for communist human capital: returns to education and experience in the Czech Republic and Slovakia. Ind Labor Relat Rev 51(3):401–423

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cheidvasser S, Benitez-Silva H (2007) The educated Russian’s curse: returns to education in the Russian federation during the 1990s. Labour 21(1):1–41

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • China Labour Market Year Book (2002) China Labour Market Information Centre

  • Deolalikar AB (1993) Gender differences in the returns to schooling and in school enrollment rates in Indonesia. J Human Res 28(4):899–932

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dougherty C (2005) Why are the returns to schooling higher for women than for men? J Human Res 40(4):969–988

    Google Scholar 

  • Duraisamy P (2002) Changes in returns to education in India, 1983–94: by gender, age-cohort and location. Econ Educ Rev 21(6):609–622

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farber HS, Gibbons R (1996) Learning and wage dynamics. Quart J Econ 111(4):1007–1047

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fersterer J, Winter-Ebmer R (2003) Smoking, discount rates, and returns to education. Econ Educ Rev 22(6):561–566

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Filer RK, Daniel SH, Albert ER (1996) The economics of work and pay, 6th edition edn. HarperCollins College Publishers, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Flabbi L, Paternostro S, Tiongson E (2008) Returns to education in the economic transition: a systematic assessment using comparable data. Econ Educ Rev 27(6):613–742

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang J-T, Kuo C-C, Kao A-P (2003) The inequality of regional economics development in China between 1991 and 2001. J Chin Econ Bus Stud 1(3):273–285

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knight J, Song L (2003) Increasing wage inequality in China: extent, elements and evaluation. Econ Transit 11(4):597–619

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee J, Zhu Y-p (2006) Urban governance, neoliberalism and housing reform in China. Pac Rev 19(1):39–61

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li H (2003) Economic reform and returns to education in China. Econ Educ Rev 22:317–328

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li H, Luo Y (2004) Reporting errors, ability heterogeneity, and returns to schooling in China. Pac Econ Rev 9(3):191–207

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lin J, Fang C, Zhou L (2003) The lessons of China’s transition to a market economy. CATO J 16(2):201–231

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu Z (1998) Earnings, education and economic reforms in urban China. Econ Dev Cult Change 46(4):697–725

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maurer-Fazio M (1999) Earnings and education in China’s transition to a market economy survey evidence from 1989 and 1992. China Econ Rev 10(1):17–40

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mincer J (1974) Schooling, experience and earnings. National Bureau of Economic Research, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Moock PR, Patrinos HA, Venkataraman M (2003) Education and earnings in a transition economy: the case of Vietnam. Econ Educ Rev 22(5):503–510

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Psacharopoulos G (1994) Returns to investment in education: a global update. World Dev 22(9):1325–1343

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Psacharopoulos G, Patrinos HA (2004) Returns to investment in education: a further update. Educ Econ 12(2):111–134

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Qian X, Smyth R (2008) Private returns to investment in education: an empirical study of urban China. Post-Commun Econ 20(4):483–501

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Redding S, Venables AJ (2004) Economic geography and international inequality. J Int Econ 62:53–82

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rice P, Venables AJ (2003) Equilibrium regional disparities: theory and British evidence. Reg Stud 37:675–686

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Riley J (1979) Testing the educational screening hypothesis. J Polit Econ 87(5):S227–S252 (Part 2)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roy JR, Thill JC (2004) Spatial interaction modelling. Pap Reg Sci 83:339–361

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schultz TW (1961) Investment in human capital. Am Econ Rev 51(1):1–17

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu X, Xie Y (2003) Does the market pay off? Earning inequality and returns to education in urban China. Am Sociol Rev 68(3):425–442

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang DT (2005) Determinants of schooling returns during transition: evidence from Chinese cities. J Comp Econ 33(2):244–264

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yu X, Hannum E (1996) Regional variation in earnings inequality in reform-era urban China. Am J Sociol 101(4):950–992

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang J, Zhao YH, Park A, Song X (2005) Economic returns to schooling in urban China, 1988–2001. J Comp Econ 33(4):730–752

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to John Hudson.

Additional information

We would like to acknowledge the helpful comments of an anonymous referee.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Qiu, T., Hudson, J. Private returns to education in urban China. Econ Change Restruct 43, 131–150 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10644-009-9081-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10644-009-9081-9

Keywords

JEL Classification

Navigation