Abstract
The paper examines the marginal returns of education in China for 4 years covering the period 1989–2000. We find, in common, with others that such returns were small in 1989 and 1993, but have increased steadily since 1993. We also find that the returns for women exceed those for men and go some way to reducing the gender earnings gap. Crucially, however, the returns to education decline with the length of time since the individual left school which is consistent with the hypothesis that education enhances ability and skills which in turn enhances earnings, but that the value of such skills deteriorates over time. Finally we find evidence for gravity effects by which earnings decline with distance from Beijing, and more noticeably, Shanghai.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
Some studies also include occupations in the wage function. It seems likely that occupations and wages are jointly determined, in other words, simultaneity may exist between them. Moreover, a high degree of multicollinearity exists between schooling and occupation (Li 2003). Psacharopoulos and Patrinos (2004) also argued that the inclusion of occupation in the Mincer’s earnings function leads to stealing part of the effect of education on earnings that comes from occupational mobility.
There exists the possibility that education both augments and signals individual productivity based on weak screening hypothesis (see e.g., Brown and Sessions 1998). Thus our hypothesis (1) indicates the primary role of education is to augment marginal productivity.
Here we incorporate the assumption by Riley (1979) and Farber and Gibbons (1996) that the return to an educational signal is constant over time. They argued that a basic condition for a signalling equilibrium is that employers find out that their predictions based on the education signals are correct on average, thus the return to an educational signal is constant over time.
The estimated change in earnings Y i for individual i is calculated by (\( {\text{e}}^{{\beta_{1i} }} - 1 \)).
However, the two variables are jointly significant at the 1% level. In addition, when the regression was re-estimated with squared experience omitted, experience per se was positively significant.
This may partially reflect a declining impact of seniority and an increasing role for market forces, but it may also reflect changes in the system of subsidies, e.g. the appearance of the accommodation or housing subsidy subsidy. This cash subsidy replaced in kind housing subsidies and were meant to facilitate urban residents’ abilities to meet their housing needs in the open market (Lee and Zhu 2006).
Breusch-Pagan Lagrangian multiplier.
This is different to the argument that experience becomes relatively more important in later working life and schooling relatively less important, This is reflected in the significance of experience in the regressions. But we argue that in addition to this, skills learnt in formal education become less useful over time in a technically changing environment.
References
Becker GS (1964) Human capital, 2nd edn. National Bureau of Economic Research, New York
Borolotti B, Fantini M, Sinisalco D (2004) Privatisation around the world: evidence from panel data. J Public Econ 88:305–322
Brooks R, Tao R (2003) China’s labour market performance and challenges. IMF Working Paper No. 03/210, Asia and Pacific Department, USA
Brown S, Sessions JG (1998) Education, employment status and earnings: a comparative test of the strong screening hypothesis. Scot J Polit Econ 45(5):586–591
Buch CM, Kleinert M, Toubal F (2004) The distance puzzle: on the interpretation of the distance coefficient in gravity equations. Econ Lett 83:293–298
Byron R, Manaloto E (1990) Returns to education in China. Econ Dev Cult Change 38(4):783–796
Campos NF, Jolliffe D (2003) After, before, and during: returns to education in Hungary (1986–1998). Econ Syst 27(4):377–390
Card DE (1999) The causal effect of education on earnings. Handbook of labour economics 3(A): 1801–1863. In: Ashenfelter OC, Card DE (eds) Amsterdam, North-Holland
Chase RS (1998) Markets for communist human capital: returns to education and experience in the Czech Republic and Slovakia. Ind Labor Relat Rev 51(3):401–423
Cheidvasser S, Benitez-Silva H (2007) The educated Russian’s curse: returns to education in the Russian federation during the 1990s. Labour 21(1):1–41
China Labour Market Year Book (2002) China Labour Market Information Centre
Deolalikar AB (1993) Gender differences in the returns to schooling and in school enrollment rates in Indonesia. J Human Res 28(4):899–932
Dougherty C (2005) Why are the returns to schooling higher for women than for men? J Human Res 40(4):969–988
Duraisamy P (2002) Changes in returns to education in India, 1983–94: by gender, age-cohort and location. Econ Educ Rev 21(6):609–622
Farber HS, Gibbons R (1996) Learning and wage dynamics. Quart J Econ 111(4):1007–1047
Fersterer J, Winter-Ebmer R (2003) Smoking, discount rates, and returns to education. Econ Educ Rev 22(6):561–566
Filer RK, Daniel SH, Albert ER (1996) The economics of work and pay, 6th edition edn. HarperCollins College Publishers, New York
Flabbi L, Paternostro S, Tiongson E (2008) Returns to education in the economic transition: a systematic assessment using comparable data. Econ Educ Rev 27(6):613–742
Huang J-T, Kuo C-C, Kao A-P (2003) The inequality of regional economics development in China between 1991 and 2001. J Chin Econ Bus Stud 1(3):273–285
Knight J, Song L (2003) Increasing wage inequality in China: extent, elements and evaluation. Econ Transit 11(4):597–619
Lee J, Zhu Y-p (2006) Urban governance, neoliberalism and housing reform in China. Pac Rev 19(1):39–61
Li H (2003) Economic reform and returns to education in China. Econ Educ Rev 22:317–328
Li H, Luo Y (2004) Reporting errors, ability heterogeneity, and returns to schooling in China. Pac Econ Rev 9(3):191–207
Lin J, Fang C, Zhou L (2003) The lessons of China’s transition to a market economy. CATO J 16(2):201–231
Liu Z (1998) Earnings, education and economic reforms in urban China. Econ Dev Cult Change 46(4):697–725
Maurer-Fazio M (1999) Earnings and education in China’s transition to a market economy survey evidence from 1989 and 1992. China Econ Rev 10(1):17–40
Mincer J (1974) Schooling, experience and earnings. National Bureau of Economic Research, New York
Moock PR, Patrinos HA, Venkataraman M (2003) Education and earnings in a transition economy: the case of Vietnam. Econ Educ Rev 22(5):503–510
Psacharopoulos G (1994) Returns to investment in education: a global update. World Dev 22(9):1325–1343
Psacharopoulos G, Patrinos HA (2004) Returns to investment in education: a further update. Educ Econ 12(2):111–134
Qian X, Smyth R (2008) Private returns to investment in education: an empirical study of urban China. Post-Commun Econ 20(4):483–501
Redding S, Venables AJ (2004) Economic geography and international inequality. J Int Econ 62:53–82
Rice P, Venables AJ (2003) Equilibrium regional disparities: theory and British evidence. Reg Stud 37:675–686
Riley J (1979) Testing the educational screening hypothesis. J Polit Econ 87(5):S227–S252 (Part 2)
Roy JR, Thill JC (2004) Spatial interaction modelling. Pap Reg Sci 83:339–361
Schultz TW (1961) Investment in human capital. Am Econ Rev 51(1):1–17
Wu X, Xie Y (2003) Does the market pay off? Earning inequality and returns to education in urban China. Am Sociol Rev 68(3):425–442
Yang DT (2005) Determinants of schooling returns during transition: evidence from Chinese cities. J Comp Econ 33(2):244–264
Yu X, Hannum E (1996) Regional variation in earnings inequality in reform-era urban China. Am J Sociol 101(4):950–992
Zhang J, Zhao YH, Park A, Song X (2005) Economic returns to schooling in urban China, 1988–2001. J Comp Econ 33(4):730–752
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
We would like to acknowledge the helpful comments of an anonymous referee.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Qiu, T., Hudson, J. Private returns to education in urban China. Econ Change Restruct 43, 131–150 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10644-009-9081-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10644-009-9081-9