Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Ecosystem Service Value and Agricultural Conversion in the Amazon: Implications for Policy Intervention

  • Published:
Environmental and Resource Economics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We explore the welfare implications of agricultural expansion in the Brazilian Amazon by comparing spatially explicit estimates of soybean rents and the value of ecosystem services. Although these estimates are generated from different datasets, models, and estimation techniques, the values are comparable, such that the value of ecosystem services is greater than soybean rents for about 61% of the total area and 24% of the area where soybean rents are positive if protected areas are well enforced. Based on the balance between the benefits and costs of conversion, failure to value ecosystem services reduces total social welfare by 7.13 billion dollars annually relative to an optimum. Policy instruments that internalize the value of ecosystem services via protected lands, land conversion taxes, conservation subsidies, or excise taxes can avoid much of this loss. Regardless of intervention regime, policy makers should be cognizant of the diminishing net benefits of converting natural ecosystems to agriculture. Realizing the final 3.8% requires the conversion of an additional 15% natural ecosystems to soybean production.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anderson L, Granger C, Reis E, Wunder S, Weinhold D (2002) The dynamics of deforestation and economic growth in the Brazilian Amazon. Cambridge Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Barbier E, Burgess J (1997) The economics of tropical forest land use options. Land Econ 73(2): 174–195

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bockstael NE, Freeman A et al (2000) On measuring economic values for nature. Environ Sci Technol 34(8): 1384–1389

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bowman M, Soares-Filho B et al Persistence of cattle ranching in the Brazilian Amazon: a spatial analysis of theh rationale for beef production. Land Use Policy (Under Review)

  • Braziliense C (2011) Aldo Rebelo, the Forestry Code and 65 suggestions—Aldo Rebelo, o Código Florestal e 65 sugestões. Cerreio Braziliense 2010 Available via http://www.correiobraziliense.com.br/app/noticia/brasil/2010/06/28/interna_brasil,199730/index.shtml. Cited 10 Mar 2011

  • Chagnon F (2005) Contemporary climate change in the Amazon. Geophys Res Lett 32(13): L13703

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cole D (2002) Pollution and property: comparing ownership institutions for environmental protection. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • CRS (2006) Brazil’s agricultural production and exports: selected data. In: Hanrahan CE (ed) CRS report for congress. Congressional Research Service, Washington

  • Dirzo R, Raven P (2003) Global state of biodiversity and loss. Annu Rev Environ Resour 28: 137–167

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eltahir E, Bras R (1996) Precipitation recycling in the Amazon basin. Q J R Meteorol Soc 120(518): 861–880

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fearnside P (1989) Extractive reserves in Brazilian Amazonia. BioScience 39(6): 387–393

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fearnside P (2005) Deforestation in Brazilian Amazonia: history, rates, and consequences. Conserv Biol 19(3): 680–688

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fisher B, Turner R, Morling P (2009) Defining and classifying ecosystem services for decision-making. Ecol Econ 68: 643–653

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foley J, Asner G et al (2007) Amazonia revealed: forest degradation and loss of ecosystem goods and services in the Amazon Basin. Front Ecol Environ 5(1): 25–32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Friedl M, McIver D et al (2002) Global land cover from MODIS: algorithms and early results. Remote Sens Environ 83: 135–148

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malhi Y, Roberts T et al (2008) Climate change, deforestation, and the fate of the Amazon. Science 319(196): 169–172

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mann M, Kaufmann R et al (2010) The economics of cropland conversion in Amazonia: the importance of agricultural rent. Ecol Econ 69: 1503–1509

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mann M, Kaufmann R et al Pasture conversion and competitive land rents in the Amazon (in preparation)

  • MEA (2005) Millennium ecosystem assessment synthesis report. In: Reid W (ed) Island Press, Washington

  • MFFR (2008) Tax system and administration in Brazil. In: Maciel E, Ferreira Verdi M, Rodrigues J, Wasilewski LF (eds) General-coordination of tax polixy. Ministry of finance federal revenue, Brazilia

  • Moreira H, Assuncao J (2001) Towards a truthful land taxation mechanism in Brazil. LACEA, Montevideo

    Google Scholar 

  • Pfaff A (1999) What drives deforestation in the Brazilian Amazon. J Environ Econ Manag 37: 26–43

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pfaff A, Robalino J, Walker R (2007) Road investments, spatial spillovers, and deforestation in the Brazilian Amazon. J Reg Sci 47(1): 109–123

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richmond A, Kaufmann R, Myneni R (2007) Valuing ecosystem services: a shadow price for net primary production. Ecol Econ 64(2): 454–462

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ricketts T, Soares-Filho B, da Fonseca G et al (2010) Indigenous lands, protected areas, and slowing climate change. PLoS Biol 8(3): e1000331

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rodrigues A, Ewers R, Parry L et al (2009) Boom-and-Bust development patterns across the Amazon deforestation frontier. Science 324(5933): 1435–1437

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Santhanna S (2011) Fellowship of Mato Grosso goes to Brasilia to defend the ’New Forest Code’—Comitiva de Mato Grosso vai à Brasília em defesa do ‘Novo Código Florestal’. Available via http://www.expressomt.com.br/noticiaBusca.asp?cod=123170&codDep=3. Cited 11 Mar 2011

  • Soares Filho B, Dietzsch L, Moutinho P et al (2008) Reduction of carbon emissions associated with deforestation in Brazil: the role of the Amazon Region Protected Areas Program (ARPA). World Wide Fund for Nature (WWF), Brasilia

  • Suyker A, Verma S, Burba G et al (2005) Gross primary production and ecosystem respiration of irrigated maize and irrigated soybean during a growing season. Agr For Meteorol 131(3–4): 180–190

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vera-Diaz M, Kaufmann R, Nepstad D et al (2008) An interdisciplinary model of soybean yield in the Amazon basin: the climatic, edaphic, and economic determinants. Ecol Econ 65(2): 420–431

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walker R, Oyama Homma A (1996) Land use and land cover dynamics in the Brazilian Amazon: an overview. Ecol Econ 18(1): 67–80

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walker R, Browder J, Arima E, Simmons C et al (2009) Ranching and the new global range: Amazônia in the 21st century. Geoforum 40(5): 732–745

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • WHRC (2007) Three essential strategies for reducing deforestation. In: Developed by Alianca da Terra, Amigos da Terra, Instituto Centro de Vida, IMAZON, IPAM, ISA. Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso, and Wood Hole Research Center. Woods Hole

  • WWF (2011) New threat to Amazon as Brazilian legislators lay siege to forest law. World Wildlife Foundation 2010 Available via http://wwf.panda.org/?194008/New-threat-to-Amazon-as-Brazilian-legislators-lay-siege-to-forest-law. 1 Mar 2011

  • Zhao M, Heinsch F, Nemani R et al (2005) Improvements of the MODIS terrestrial gross and net primary production global data set. Remote Sens Environ 95: 164–176

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michael L. Mann.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mann, M.L., Kaufmann, R.K., Bauer, D.M. et al. Ecosystem Service Value and Agricultural Conversion in the Amazon: Implications for Policy Intervention. Environ Resource Econ 53, 279–295 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-012-9562-6

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-012-9562-6

Keywords

Navigation